Report creation date: 14.10.2008 - 10:31
Countr(y/ies): Georgia
Chapter(s): 1,2,21,22,23,24,241,242,243,244,245,246,3,31,32,33,4,41,42,421,422,423,424,425,426,427,428,429,4210,43,5,51,511,512,513,514,515,516,517,518,519,52,53,531,532,533,534,535,536,537,538,539,5310,6,61,62,63,64,7,71,72,73,8,81,811,812,813,82,821,822,83,831,832,84,841,842,9,91,92
Georgia/ 1. Historical perspective:
cultural policies and instruments
After the October Socialist
Revolution of 1917, Georgia became an independent democratic state - the
Republic of Georgia - for a short period from 1918-1921. While short, it was a
very significant one from a cultural point of view. During this time the
foundation was laid for the development of a cultural policy whose main aims
were the introduction of democratic processes and the preservation of national
identity. A key milestone achievement of this period was the opening of the
State University (1918) as a centre of scientific and cultural life in the
country.
The period of Soviet influence was
as dramatic in Georgia as in other Republics of the Soviet Union. The period
between the 1930s-1940s, was an important time for creative freethinking
intellectuals, during which "ideology" was predominant and
"social realism" was developed. Stalin's period of power (1929-1953)
was characterised by unconditional and implicit power over the official culture
and ideology.
L. I. Brezhnev's time in office (1964-1981)
was a period of stagnation for culture. Alongside the relative loosening of
control from Stalin's totalitarian system and some freedom at the periphery of
the USSR, Georgian culture experienced a conflict between the
bureaucratic-communistic and Georgian national cultures that finally led to the
end of the Soviet socialistic culture. Since the late 1980s, i.e. the period of
"perestroika", this conflict had been intensified and manifested, for
example, in officious and informal activity; communistic bureaucracy and the
national liberation movement; and Soviet culture and Georgian national culture
based on non-ideologised arts.
During this period, two events had a
dramatic effect on the development and establishment of contemporary Georgian
mentality and, therefore, on culture in general. In 1978, in connection with
the adoption of the revised Constitution of the USSR in Tbilisi, mass marches
were held and called for the protection of the Georgian language and for it to
maintain its official status. These marches led to the formation of the
national liberation movement which was behind the 9 April 1989 anti-Soviet
demonstration which was quashed by the Soviet army and led to several tragic
deaths. This event signaled the beginning of the disintegration of the USSR.
The paternalistic cultural policy
pursued by the Soviet Union had some positive influences on Georgia. It created
an extensive network and well-functioning infrastructure of public cultural
institutions; a well-shaped and widely accessible academic system of education
supporting the arts and science; "high" culture, which was understood
as a neutral link in state building; and a growth in mass culture consumption.
Like any other area of activity in
Georgia, culture was administered in a centralised manner through the relevant
channels. The formula of Soviet official culture adopted in Georgia was "nationalist
in its shape and socialist in its content". There were important
creative achievements in Georgian theatre, cinema, art and music, created by
outstanding artists and cultural workers, notwithstanding the ideological
influences. These achievements assisted in developing a national understanding
of culture as a system of values which determines and forms national identity
and, as a result, unites the nation.
The post-Soviet period in the
history and culture of Georgia is complicated and contradictory. Elections were
held in 1990 and on 9 April 1991 the Parliament of Georgia unanimously adopted
the Declaration of Independence (under the first Georgian president Zviad
Gamsakhurdia) and led to the establishment of the Republic of Georgia as a new
independent state.
This post-Soviet period (from
1990-1992) saw the creation of a differential cultural policy and an
aggravation of international problems, particularly those provoked by outside
influences. As a result, control was lost over the region of Inner Kartli,
formerly the South-Ossetian Autonomous Territory. Furthermore, during the
1991-1992 period, the "Tbilisi War" broke out and the government of
Gamsakhurdia was overthrown. Edward Shevardnadze came to power (March 1992) and
the political situation stabilised. Peace was established in Georgia and there
was an increased drive towards building a new state. This did not last long,
however. Supporters of former president Gamsakhurdia engaged in successful
military operations in Abkhazia. On 27th September 1993, Georgian authorities
lost control over almost all of the territory of the Abkhazian Autonomous
Republic.
During the period 1993-2003, Georgia
faced financial restrictions and a political overhaul aimed at balancing
national and liberal-democratic ideas. The cultural infrastructure that
remained from the Soviet period required reform. Cultural policy in Georgia had
no clear strategic focus, even though it was declared as one of the state's
priorities. Support for the arts was the extent of the reach of the state's
policies.
The so called Rose Revolution took
place on 23rd November 2003, after which President Shevardnadze retired. Since
2004, the country has being undergoing continuous reforms, including those of a
constitutional nature.
During the period 1990-2004, Georgia
had 6 different Ministers of Culture. Since 2004, cultural affairs, sports and
youth affairs have been combined in one Ministry. Currently there are ongoing
structural changes.
Georgia has experienced many
political and socio-cultural changes during the 20th century. Those which
occurred over the past 15 years were the result of revolution. Given this fact,
it has been extremely difficult to install a sustainable system of policy
development. In the field of culture, it has indeed prevented the
creation and implementation of a long-term cultural strategy.
The November 2007 crisis in Georgia
(the rally carried out by the united opposition forces demanding the
restoration of the previous constitutional terms for parliamentary elections
established before the amendments made in the Constitution of Georgia as of
2006, the attack pressed by the government against the people on hunger-strike,
dispersal of demonstrators and closing of two independent TV companies
"Imedi" and "Caucasia" and radio-broadcasting station
"Imedi", implementation of the state of emergency all over the
territory of Georgia from November 7-16, 2007) has revealed the post-revolution
period problems. Calling pre-term presidential elections and plebiscite on
restoration of constitutional terms of the parliamentary elections is the only
constitutional way out of this crisis.
Georgia/ 2. Competence,
decision-making and administration
2.1 Organisational structure
(organigram)
Ministry
of Culture, Monuments Protection and Sport
Georgia/ 2. Competence,
decision-making and administration
2.2 Overall description of the
system
Georgia is a democratic republic
divided into 9 regions, 65 territories, 2 autonomous republics - Abkhazia and
Ajaria, and 5 cities. The official language is Georgian, except in the
territory of Abkhazia where both Georgian and Abkhazian languages are official.
The capital city of Georgia is Tbilisi with a population of
1 253 000.
The system of administration
includes the following branches of authority:
Parliament - holding
legislative powers; the parliamentary committee for education, science, culture
and sports is responsible for legislation and supervision of the executive
power (the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport of Georgia).
President of Georgia - the head of the state; holds the central place in the
hierarchy of the executive power. The President's Administration includes the
Internal Policy Service. The Service for Culture, Science and Youth Affairs
which existed at the State Chancellery before the Rose Revolution has been
dismantled; only one unit in the newly formed Internal Policy Service
represents Culture, Science, Social and Religious Affairs.
On the 5th September 2006, the
Council for Culture and the Fund for Culture were established by the President
of Georgia. The goal of the Council for Culture is to determine the cultural
policy and the Presidential initiatives in this sphere; the purpose of the Fund
for Culture is to finance cultural activities and international and local
festivals country-wide.
Nevertheless, as of November 2007
these structures still remain superficial and do not influence the national
cultural policy (for this reason the Board for Culture is not reflected in the
organigram (see chapter
2.1).
Cabinet of Ministers and its head -
the Prime Minister - forms the executive power. In
line with the amendments made to the Constitution since 2004, the role of the
Prime Minister and the Cabinet of Ministers has been strengthened.
The institutional division of
authority among various levels of power in culture is as follows:
National government: The Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport of
Georgia is the central authority that forms and pursues cultural policy. The
ministry is also the main governmental body that provides financial support to
the cultural sector.
There are Reserve Funds of the
President of Georgia and Government of Georgia that finance emergency
programmes, including those in the cultural sphere (see chapter
5.1.2). Such programmes are implemented together with the Ministry of
Culture, Monument Protection and Sport and promote more centralisation of the
state policy for culture (see chapter
2.4.2).
National institutions and organisations
of culture are subordinate to the Agency for Administration at the Ministry of
Economic Development. The Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport of
Georgia is responsible for the development of cultural policy.
Advisory bodies or councils: In the Georgian system of cultural administration there is
no institute or independent arts council. Advisory bodies - branch committees -
were established at the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport.
These committees are composed of freelance experts. Small grants are made
available to ensure public participation in the implementation of cultural
policy. In 2007, the branch commissions were unfortunately inactive.
In Georgia, there are no new
authorities such as special councils, committees or working groups which should
facilitate the representation and participation of the national and cultural
minorities or groups of immigrants in the cultural processes. The only
authority which indirectly addresses these issues (in the context of the
protection of the general rights of minorities) is the Centre for Tolerance at
the Office of the Ombudsman of Georgia.
Local authorities: In line with Georgian legislation, the governments of
Abkhazia and Ajaria Autonomous Republics have their own Ministries of Culture
which are responsible for programmes within their respective administrative
borders.
The local authorities of
administration (municipalities) and self-government (sakrebulo - city or
village councils) bear responsibility for cultural activity in the regions.
The structural units of local
authorities are the departments of culture, cultural heritage and protection of
monuments at the local governmental level.
Most of the institutions of culture
(theatres, clubs, museums, libraries, centers and house of culture, art and
music schools) responsible to the local bodies of administration and
self-government have no legal status although they receive state-municipal
financing.
Presidential power in the regions is
realised through the institute of presidential "rtsmunebuli" (the
governor / president's attorney). There are 10 rtsmunebulis throughout Georgia.
The Governor's Office includes the committee for culture (institutions and
programmes of regional importance. The Rtsmunebuli Office is financed from the
central budget (however, the structure of rtsmunebuli (President's attorney in
each region) is not defined in the Constitution of Georgia).
In many respects, the President's
institutes -"rtsmunebuli"- duplicate the functions of the bodies of
local administration and self-government and due to a trend of centralisation
in recent years the powers of the rtsmunebuli have been further reinforced.
In some cases there are conflicting
priorities and approaches taken by the national cultural policy and by the
policies of local self-government which can result in the lack of a coherent
system for cultural support.
One example of these inconsistencies
is in relation to the autonomous republics. Until 2004, the Ajaria Autonomous
Republic was not accountable to the central government. The territory of the
Abkhazia Autonomous Republic is controlled by a separatist government, which
for 12 years has been in conflict with the official Georgian authorities and
has pursued a policy directed against the indigenous Georgian culture. The
Tskhinvali Region, also known as South Ossetia, is a similar case in point.
Due to the political and economic
interests of the central authorities listed above, as well as demands from both
local authorities and the public, the problems of delimitation of powers and
reinforcement of centralisation have become very acute.
Georgia/ 2. Competence,
decision-making and administration
2.3 Inter-ministerial or
intergovernmental co-operation
Cooperation between the Ministry of
Culture, Monument Protection and Sport of Georgia and other ministries is
determined by their participation in public cultural development. There are no
special inter-ministerial agreements; co-operation is regulated under the Law
on Structure and Procedures of Executive Power.
The ministries responsible for some
aspects of regulation / management of culture are:
The Ministry of Education and
Science is responsible for the
implementation of reforms in higher, vocational and secondary education,
including legislative reform, and accordingly is responsible for education
policies. The ministry also implements the state policy on the official
Georgian language and undertakes to provide equal access to learning Georgian,
especially in the regions with a high density of ethnic minorities.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is responsible for the development and implementation of a
single foreign policy, including the foreign cultural policy. The Ministry
provides coordination with foreign countries and international organisations.
The National Committee of UNESCO at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Georgia
coordinates the ministries, institutions and agencies engaged in the sphere of
culture. The Secretariat of the Committee is also established under this
Ministry.
The Centre for the Protection of
Georgian Cultural Heritage Abroad, which was established under the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs in 2004, was abolished in 2006. It was replaced by a new
Department for Foreign Economic and Humanitarian Relations, under the Ministry
of Foreign Affairs. This department took over the responsibilities of the
Centre for the Protection of Georgian Cultural Heritage Abroad and the
Department for Foreign Economic Relations. It also includes a section
responsible for Cultural Heritage and Relations with Diasporas.
The Ministry of Economic Development
(Departments for Tourism, Construction and Privatisation) is responsible for the strategy on privatisation and
attraction of subsidies (including for the cultural sector); for tourism
development (including cultural tourism), creation of a favourable investment
environment for cultural industries and provision of the official system for
the preservation of cultural heritage in the areas of construction, spatial
planning and cultural landscaping.
The Ministry of Finance, like the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport
is responsible for execution of the budget and for regulation of the United
Fund of the National Lottery.
The President's Administration cooperates with the Ministry of
Culture, Monument Protection and Sport in the planning, financing and
arrangement of all major public cultural events inside and outside Georgia.
On the regional level, the Ministry
of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport cooperates with the local
authorities, the office of rtsmunebuli / governor / President's attorney and
municipal authorities in the form of methodological consultations, concrete
projects or in the context of collaboration in respect of a budget-funded
institution or monument of culture. Until 2003, the Ministry of Culture had
coordinators in the regions through which it provided supervision on its
cultural policies and supported its powers with budgetary funds.
The Ministries of Culture of
Abkhazia and Ajaria Autonomous Republics are under dual subordination - they
are accountable to local governments and to the central authority. However, in
view of the war and the 12-year conflict, the de-facto Abkhazian authorities
independently control the cultural policy in the territory of Abkhazia.
Similarly, the Ministry of Culture of the Ajaria Autonomous Republic pursues
the cultural policy, in the context of the decentralisation policy, declared by
the Georgian government within its administrative borders.
At present, there are no special
interdepartmental or interstate systems in place for addressing intercultural
dialogue in Georgia (see chapter
2.4.5 (interstate) and chapter
4.2.3 (intra-state).
Georgia/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.1 Overview of main structures
and trends
Georgia has signed various
agreements, in the sphere of culture, with the EU countries, CIS countries
(Commonwealth of Independent States), USA, China, Israel etc. These agreements
are divided into:
The first group of agreements
include those between Georgia and the UK (1992), Azerbaijan (1993), Armenia
(1993), Germany (1993), Spain (1993), Kazakhstan (1993), Poland (1993),
Turkmenistan (1993), Russia (1994), Turkey (1992), Bulgaria (1995), Uzbekistan
(1995), Romania, Greece (1997), Italy, France (1997), Kyrgyzstan (1997), Ukraine
(2002), and Estonia (2004).
The second group of agreements
includes intergovernmental programmes on cultural exchange with Russia (1997)
and intergovernmental cooperation programmes on culture, education and science
with Israel, Spain, and Greece for the 2004-2006 period.
The third group of agreements
includes those between the Ministry of Culture of Georgia and the Ministry of
Culture, Sports and Youth Affairs of Armenia (1999) and between the Ministry of
Culture of Georgia and the Georgian Cultural, Tourist and Trade Centre in Japan
(2000) and so on.
Recently, Georgia has intensified
its contacts with the Baltic countries and GUAM countries (The GUAM
Organisation for Democracy and Economic Development is a regional organisation
of four CIS states: Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, and Moldova). The contacts
with Ukraine have become especially close and many-sided.
The Ministry of Culture, Monument
Protection and Sport of Georgia, newly established in 2004, seeks cooperation
with bodies operating international cultural funds.
Georgia/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.2 Public actors and cultural
diplomacy
The Department of International
Relations at the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport is
responsible for international cultural cooperation. The issues of cultural
heritage, in the context of international cultural cooperation, are mainly
addressed by the Department of Cultural Heritage and, in the context of UNESCO
programmes, within the remit of the National Committee of UNESCO.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs also
has a responsibility for international cultural cooperation which is
administered by its Department for Foreign Economic and Humanitarian Relations.
This Department is responsible for some aspects of cultural policy and the
protection of Georgian cultural heritage abroad.
Within the Participation Programme
framework for 2007-2008, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Georgia financed 7
projects in the total amount of 120 000 USD. In addition, two large
projects are in the process of implementation under the aegis of UNESCO:
The President's Administration also
participates in the planning of international cultural activities, e.g. the
launch of Georgia's Year in the Ukraine (2005), Tbilisi Culture Days in
Istanbul (2006).
On the municipal level, there are
examples of international agreements between cities and regions, e.g. between
the Culture Service of Tbilisi Municipality and respective services of Moscow
(2000), Kiev (2001), Didim (2001), Yerevan (2003), Rome (2004) and Florence
(2004).
International public cultural agencies,
institutes and funds also operate in Georgia.
Significant financing and support
for international cultural cooperation has been implemented through
international funds and institutions, such as the Open Society Georgia
Foundation (Soros Foundation), South Caucasus Regional Office of the
Heinrich-Boll-Foundation, the British Council Georgia Office, and the
Alexander Dumas Centre of French Culture. As there are minimal funds allocated
by the state for international cultural relations, the role of the above listed
universally recognised cultural agencies and institutes are very important.
Each of the listed funds contributes to the development of public participation
and cultural diplomacy according to their priorities.
Examples of projects in the fields of
education and culture are:
The main instruments in
international cultural relations are:
As yet, there are few examples of
trans-national cooperation in cultural education and training. For some years,
such cooperation has been initiated by international organisations or by
governmental programmes of countries that have a close relationship with
Georgia e.g. Italy.
Each year, Ministry of Culture,
Monument Protection and Sport provides travel grants for young artists to attend
international competitions or training etc. It also co-finances a grant for a
competition with the Government of Italy - the Rome Award. Within the framework
of the project STAGE, a group of librarians attended training courses in
Frankfurt in 2005, and 9 young musicians were sent to Frankfurt in 2005 (and 3
in 2006).
Traditionally, the state did not
provide a great deal of input into the organisation of international projects.
However, the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport succeeded to
arrange some large-scale international activities, such as:
The President's Administration also
participates actively in the planning and co-financing of international
cultural activities, including an allocation of GEL 150 182 towards the
opening of Georgia's Year in Ukraine in 2005.
In 2005, with the co-financing of
the Presidential and Government's Reserve Funds of Georgia, the following
activities were organised:
The total amount of funds allocated
for such international events was 2 482 370 GEL, including
120 000 GEL of the estimated budget of the State Programme for the Support
of Foreign Cultural Relations of the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection
and Sport of Georgia.
The government is planning to create
a National Lottery Fund and is currently consulting with British experts. A
working group has already been established.
According to the data of the
Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport of Georgia, the sum
allocated for foreign cultural cooperation in 2006 was 327 000 GEL, or
0.6% of the Ministry's budget (51 177 100 GEL). This figure decreased
7.5 times in comparison with 2005 (2 482 370 GEL). Some financing of
international cultural cooperation was provided by national private companies
and funds (no exact data is available).
Promotion of Georgian culture
worldwide and forging ties with leading international scholarly institutions
are among the top priorities of the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection
and Sport in the sphere of cultural heritage. A Memorandum of Understanding was
signed in 2007 between the Ministry and the Max Plank Institute of Florence,
which is one of the most respected institutions of this kind, to enhance
cooperation in restoration and conservation matters.
Within the framework of the
Memorandum, an international seminar dedicated to Georgian art was held between
September 30 and October 7 with the participation of the representatives of the
Max Plank Institute (M. Angar, M. Bacci, B. Fricke, A. Forman, W. Kemp, E.
Maayan-Fanar, D. Maayan, K. Müller, B. Schellewald and G. Wolf) and the Giorgi
Chubinashvili National Research Centre of Georgian Art History and Monument
Preservation.
In 2007, support for international
cultural cooperation by the state, namely by means of the reserve funds of the
President and Government of Georgia, co-financed the programme "Georgian
Seasons" under the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport of
Georgia:
International project support was
also offered by the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport of
Georgia under its programme "International Cultural Cooperation Support
Activities", totalling 379 277 GEL (158 032 euro) in 2007.
Georgia/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.3 European / international
actors and programmes
There are agreements in place
between Georgia and international organisations such as UNESCO, ICROM
(International Center for Renovation and Maintenance (of Cultural Heritage
Sites: affiliate of UNESCO), ICOM (International Council of Museums) and ICOMOS
(International Council on Monuments and Sites).
Georgia is included in HEREIN
(European Heritage Network), and the Participation Programme (UNESCO). Georgia
is also a member of the BSEC (Black Sea Economic Cooperation) working group on
culture and European Heritage Days (since 1999).
Since 2001, Georgia has cooperated
with the project STAGE (EC Cultural Policy and Action Department, Directorate
General IV - Education, Culture and Heritage, Youth and Sport (DGIV/CULT/STAGE
(2003) 11)) (since 2005-2006, this project has been transformed into the Kyiv Initiative
(Regional Programme: Black Sea and South Caucasus -The Kyiv Initiative is a
regional and transversal programme of cultural co-operation between five
countries: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Ukraine and Moldova).
In recent years, Georgia took part in
the following activities:
Georgia participates in the EU
neighbourhood policy, which has a plan of actions with the following
objectives:
Regarding the transnational
organisations which unite large geographical regions, Georgia has executed
cultural agreements with the CIS (The creation of the Commonwealth of
Independent States signaled the dissolution of the Soviet Union and, according
to leaders of Russia, its purpose was to "allow a civilised divorce"
between the Soviet Republics), GUAM and BSEC countries. The responsibility for
the provision and monitoring of the UNESCO Convention on the Protection and
Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, to which Georgia has
acceded, is carried out by the National Committee of UNESCO, under the Ministry
of Foreign Affairs.
Georgia/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.4 Direct professional
co-operation
In Georgia, transnational
cooperation involving institutes of fine arts and cultural heritage and local
authorities for culture and trade unions are frequent. Most of the interesting
and successful projects are initiated by individuals and NGOs or through the
bilateral relations of various public and private organisations which have been
initiated by personal contacts rather than as a matter of state policy.
One example: The Georgian Arts &
Culture Centre (GACC) actively co-operates with the Concervazione Beni
Culturali (Rome, Italy) in cultural heritage projects (European Union Prize for
Cultural Heritage / Europa Nostra Awards, 2007). This cooperation includes
consultancies, seminars, training in the international practice of
conservation, modern conservation materials, microbiological and other related issues.
The symposium "Georgian Culture: Past and Present"
(24.04.2007) was organised by the Georgian Arts and Culture Center and
supported by the Harriman Institute at Columbia University, Tbilisi State
Academy of Arts, and the Fulbright Scholar Programme.
In addition to the work carried out
by the Georgian Arts & Culture Centre, there are a number of interesting
projects carried out by NGOs include: Georgian Crafts Development Project; New
Art Union Project "providing assistance to the development of contemporary
art and to the formation of an art market in South Caucasus"; the
Arts Interdisciplinary Research Laboratory AIRL project; the "Tbilisi
Urban Development and Heritage Protection Public Monitoring Council" and
the interdisciplinary newspaper "Iliazd" etc.
"Tbilisi-Basel-Freiburg"
is a non-government international artist exchange programme which provides
funds to Georgian contemporary artists to work and travel in Europe for 6
months. It started in 1998 and is supported by foreign partners: the Christoph
Merian Stiftung IAAB program (Artists' International Exchange Program), Basel;
Department of Culture of Freiburg municipality and the Arts Interdisciplinary
Research Laboratory (AIRL).
Other significant examples of
cultural transnational cooperation:
Georgia/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.5 Cross-border intercultural
dialogue and co-operation
A project to set up a Caucasian
network of Cultural Policies in Tbilisi (Georgia), Baku (Azerbaijan) and
Yerevan (Armenia) was started in 2004. It aims at analysing the main problems
and determinants for cultural policy in the region and at developing joint
approaches in the development of cultural policies. Round tables on the
exchange of experience in the development of strategic plans took place and
possible functions of cultural observatories at Tbilisi, Baku and Yerevan are
under discussion.
The project "Caucasian Network
of Cultural Observatories" has revealed the problems of a regional scale
connected with the consolidation of the non-governmental sector and municipal
structures for development of the open civil society in the Caucasus; problems
related to supporting the coexistence of various cultures in the Caucasian
states (these problems are typical in Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia to a
variable extent).
Partners from Georgia, Azerbaijan,
Armenia, Russian Federation, Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan work together
in the field of cultural industries, with special emphasis on the museum sector
and traditional crafts. Round table meetings took place, and the participant
co-operate in the production of case studies in the countries involved. (http://www.gaccgeorgia.org/FrCultIndustries.htm).
Two cross-border seminars in
Contemporary Art took place in 2000 and 2001: "DifferAnce 1"
and "DifferAnce 2". The main purpose of the
seminars was to discuss the situation of contemporary art in post-Soviet
society. Experts from various arts institutions in the West and from local
organisations were involved in the discussions of contemporary art in the west
and possible lessons to be learned for post-soviet art in Georgia.
The contemporary art project
"OUTLAW" took place in Tbilisi in 2005 and was organised by the Arts
Interdisciplinary Research Laboratory (http://www.airl.ge) (2005). The project was supported by
IFA Stuttgart, Germany and included a workshop and exhibition. Participating
artists came from Georgia, Scotland, Germany, Switzerland, and Holland).
A long-term international project in
contemporary art started in 2004 and curated by Daniel Bauman from Switzerland.
Exhibitions included "Tuesday is Gone" (2004), Tbilisi2;
"Wednesday Calls the Future" (2005); "Let us live till Monday"
Tbilisi3 (2006); and Tbilisi4 (2007) (exhibition, talks, films) (http://www.tbilisi2.com).
For more information, see our Intercultural Dialogue section.
Georgia/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.6 Other relevant issues
The policy of support for the
Georgian Diaspora is still vague and assistance from the state is very small.
Organisational support for the Diaspora is the responsibility of the Ministry
of Foreign Affairs through its Department for Cultural Heritage and Relations
with the Diaspora.
The Georgian Center for Relations
with Compatriots Residing Abroad was financed, in the amount of 102 200
GEL from the 2006 budget. The establishment of the spiritual-cultural center
for Phereidan Georgians (residing in Iran) was assigned 219 600 GEL.
Contacts with the Diaspora of "Georgian Hebrews" in Israel and Muslim
Georgians in Turkey are under progress (see chapter
2.4.2). The cultural activity of representatives of Diasporas is also
supported by the Foundation of His Holiness and Beatitude, Archbishop of Mtskheta-Tbilisi
and Catholicos-Patriarch of All Georgia Ilya II - "Chveneburebi".
Georgia/ 3. General objectives and
principles of cultural policy
3.1 Main elements of the current
cultural policy model
The development of cultural policy
in Georgia over the past 15 years (1990-2005) can be characterised by 3
distinct stages (even though they are unequal in duration and character):
The first stage (1990-1992), was a
period of rebuilding an independent Georgian state and was characterised by
contradictions and dramatic events. Changes were initiated in the framework of
the persisting Soviet style system. The model of cultural policy chosen by the
first national government was aimed at creating a separate Georgian policy for
culture.
The second stage (1993-2003), can be
even further divided into: a) a period of war and devastation (1992-1994) when
the entire state policy was aimed at struggling against centrifugal trends and
therefore could not pursue a purposeful cultural policy; b) a period of
formation of state structures in territories controlled by the state (1995-99)
with a neutrally homogenous policy; c) a period (2000-2003) anticipating the
foundation of a decentralisation policy. On the one hand, in 2001 amendments
were made to the Law on Local Administration and Self-government (1997)
which reinforced decentralisation, and on the other hand the presidential
vertical power was still upheld by the "rtsmunebuli" institute. In
view of these two conflicting approaches, the cultural policy model which
evolved at this time was of a contradictory nature. The extension of
independence for municipalities was declared theoretically. Although the state
adopted the Law on Local Administration and Self-government, further
laws evolving the practicalities of decentralisation were not passed, i.e. Bills
on Local and Municipal Property and Budgets. Without these practical laws,
the bodies of local administration and self-government found themselves without
the appropriate power instruments. Institutional reform in the sphere of
culture was not implemented during this period.
The third "revolutionary and
post-revolutionary" phase (2003-2005) saw the recentralisation of cultural
policy development supported by legislative / constitutional changes and in the
extension and unification of infrastructure. This period was characterised by
the need for the central government to restore the jurisdiction of the Georgian
state over the entire territory of Georgia. The idea that art and culture could
assist in economic growth, expansion of exports and employment and reinforce
positive factors in the building of the state had not yet become popular. More
recently, an entrepreneurial approach has been taken cultural policy (see chapter
4.2.9). This does not mean that operators are to rely solely on private
sources of support but rather attempts to apply some market logic to the cultural
sector. There are concerns that the privatisation of culture could produce very
negative results in the hands of potential unfair investors.
Georgia/ 3. General objectives and
principles of cultural policy
3.2 National definition of culture
There is no special definition of
culture in contemporary Georgian legislation.
The present Georgian legislation
does not provide a special definition of "culture", but there are
related terms such as "cultural activity", "sphere of
culture", "cultural heritage", and "cultural values".
The Law on Culture (see chapter
5) defines "cultural work" as:
The law also defines the
"sphere of culture" as the territories and objects of history and
culture, buildings, movable and immovable monuments of culture, folklore, art
souvenirs, crafts, art education, professional creative work and literature,
education, research and development, technologies, popularisation of the
cultural and creative process via mass media, cultural-entertainment programmes
and showbiz. "Cultural heritage" and "cultural values" are
described as products of cultural and creative work, aesthetic, artistic,
scientific and technical values.
The Overview of the Georgian
Cultural Policy: National Report 2001 provides the following understanding of
the concept of culture: "The originality of culture is the determining
factor for development of the state in the past and in the future."
The historical and confessional
diversity of the Georgian state has also contributed to the concept of Georgian
national culture based on diversity and tolerance.
Culture is also inseparably
associated with the culture of human relations as seen through classic Georgian
literature and folklore.
It may be concluded that in Georgia,
the national concept of culture is understood as a system of values determining
and composing the national identity, and hence, the national integrity.
Georgia/ 3. General objectives and
principles of cultural policy
3.3 Cultural policy objectives
In 2004, strategic goals for
cultural policy were developed by the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection
and Sport for a period of 5 years. These are:
In 2007, the Strategic Goals for the
Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport for the Years 2007-2010 were
amended as follows:
The elaboration of these specific
goals represents an important step forward in comparison to the more general
ones published by the Ministry of Culture in the National Report of 2001.
Reforms and programmes of both a general institutional nature and directly in
the support of cultural heritage have also advanced.
However, within the context of
priorities of the Council of Europe the ideas of promotion of identity and
diversity declared by the government have no real material and economic basis
but rather a political one, especially in some regions.
Georgia/ 4. Current issues in
cultural policy development and debate
4.1 Main cultural policy issues and
priorities
During recent years cultural policy
in Georgia has been influenced by the availability of financial and
administrative resources. The main objective of cultural policy (before 2004)
was the maintenance and support of a centralised system. The creation of a
decentralised model and the redistribution of powers were supported only on a
declarative level.
A systematic change in cultural
policy can be seen at the end of 2003. Government priorities shifted and were
focused on institutional reform, protection of cultural heritage and
rehabilitation of infrastructure in the sphere of culture. Plans to optimise
the public cultural network resulted in restructuring and down-sizing, and a
reorganisation of public institutions of culture into other forms of ownership.
The Ministry of Culture, Monument
Protection and Sport of Georgia has specified four priority programmes of
reform for 2004-2009:
For 2007-2010, the Ministry of
Culture, Monument Protection and Sport of Georgia highlighted the following
strategic directions:
It is interesting to note that the
allocation of funds from the central budget (the total budgets of the Ministry
of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport and State Broadcasting Company and
the funds allocated from the Presidential Reserve) indicated that the national
priority for cultural policy is mass media-broadcasting. The other priorities
indicated, in order of funds allocated, are performing arts, cultural heritage
and arts education.
In practical terms, the current
institutional reform has led to changes in legislation (see chapter
5) which resulted in a strengthening of the centralised system, extension
of structures and their unification, instead of diversification. The policy of
state control has been reinforced, however, the problem of distinct
delimitation of the authorities, typical for Georgia in the last 15 years, has
not been solved yet (there are some facts of unlawful parallelism of functions
of executive authority at the national and local levels). This is a result of
the inexplicit functions of these structures or from the contradictions between
the performance of the legislative and executive powers.
Georgia/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.1 Cultural minorities, groups
and communities
Georgia is a multinational country.
On 1 January 2002, the total population was 4 371 535, of which 16.2%
were minorities.
Table 1: Distribution
of national and ethnic minorities, 2002
Nationalities |
Number |
%
to total population |
Total population |
4 371 535 |
100.0 |
Total national and ethnic
minorities |
710 362 |
16.2 |
Abkhazians |
3 527 |
0.1 |
Ossetians |
38 028 |
0.9 |
Armenians |
248 929 |
5.7 |
Russians |
67 671 |
1.5 |
Azerbaijanis |
284 761 |
6.5 |
Greeks |
15 166 |
0.3 |
Jews |
3 772 |
0.1 |
Ukrainians |
7 039 |
0.2 |
Kurds |
2 514 |
0.1 |
Others |
38 955 |
0.9 |
Source:
State Department for Statistics
Many groups of ethnic minorities
have been formed historically - Abkhazians, Ossetians, Greeks, Jews, Armenians,
Azeri, Kurds, Russians, and Ukrainians. One of the oldest Diasporas - the
Jewish Diaspora - has had 26 centuries of peaceful existence, whereas the
comparatively young Diasporas - Russians and Ukrainians - have no less than 200
years.
During the past 15 years, as a
result of conflicts with the separatist authorities of the Abkhazian Autonomous
Republic and former South-Ossetian Autonomous District (the Inner Kartli), a
new group has been formed in the population - IDP (internally displaced
persons). Currently, there are 286 643 IDPs officially registered, of
which 275 096 (95.97%) are from Abkhazia and 11 546 (4.0%) from the
former South Ossetian Autonomous District (the Inner Kartli).
Information about the newly formed
groups of immigrants is not available, as the country still faces major
emigration waves of its population.
Out of the above listed groups, the
indigenous groups are Georgians and Abkhazians. Others moved to Georgia in
later periods.
Various ethnic groups are
geographically concentrated throughout Georgia. There are also specific
settlements of Azeri, Armenians, Ossetians, Assyrians, Greeks and Russians. The
Dukhobors live in Samtskhe-Javakheti, the Old Believers live on the Black Sea
coast.
The Constitution of Georgia provides
for the equality of all citizens regardless of their national, ethnic,
religious or language background. Freedom for citizens to use their native
language and to practice their culture is safeguarded. In addition to the
Constitution, the rights of minorities are specified in the Laws on General
Education, on Culture, and on Broadcasting. However, no special law
on minorities exists.
To assist minorities to exercise
their constitutional rights the state supports:
Georgia acceded to the Vienna
Convention on the Protection of Ethnic Minorities and signed the European
Framework Convention on National Minorities.
Some state authorities such as: the
Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport, the Ministry of Education
and Science, the public TV and radio-broadcasting companies, the municipal
culture services - have responsibilities related to minorities, though none of
them have a special structure for minorities in particular.
In Georgia, there are public primary
and secondary schools for minorities (Azeri, Armenian, Russian), where the
Georgian language is taught as the official language (see chapter
4.2.2). The publication of textbooks for minorities is provided by state
procurement.
Under the Law on Broadcasting
(Article 16, paragraph l), public broadcasting shall "place
programmes in the languages of minorities, about minorities and prepared by
minorities in accordance with their share in the total population".
Accordingly, Georgian radio and TV have special news programmes in some
languages (Abkhaz, Azeri, Armenian, Russian and Ossetian). These programmes
occupy 4% of air time on public television and 2% of air time on public radio.
In addition, there is special public broadcasting in Abkhaz and Ossetian
languages, which covers a part of Abkhazia and the total region of "South
Ossetia". Local community broadcasting companies also provide coverage of
various spheres within their broadcasting, including the cultural life of
minorities.
In the context of recent conflicts
in Abkhazia and Samachablo (South Ossetia) the problem of territorial integrity
is very acute, though the constitutional rights of minorities in the territory
under the control of Georgian authorities are fully protected.
Besides Abkhazia and Samachablo, the
areas with a high density of ethnic minorities are Samthkhe-Javakheti and Lower
Kartli. One of the main concerns for minorities is their lack of knowledge of
the Georgian language, which hinders their integration into the common national
processes. Within the reform of teaching the official language, intensively
implemented by the Ministry of Education and Science, the Ministry of Culture,
Monument Protection and Sport developed and realised a special programme for
the cultural development of ethnic minorities. This programme was allocated
190 000 GEL by the state budget in 2005.
The budget of the State Programme
for Cultural Development of Ethnical Minorities increases year by year, e.g.
271 500 GEL in 2006, 281 000 GEL in 2007.
In accordance with Strategy 4 -
Development of Culture of National Minorities (see chapter
4.1) - the purposes of this programme are:
Main programmes / activities under
the strategy are:
One example of under this programme
is the identification and protection of samples of Polish cultural heritage
kept in Georgia (see chapter
2.4.2).
The majority of issues related to
minorities are dealt with on the municipal level. Tbilisi is historically a
multiethnic city which is remarkable in the Caucasus for its ethnic, religious
and cultural tolerance. The Tbilisi Municipality supports cultural centres
(Russian, Azeri and the Caucasus House), sponsors and finances the Petros
Adamyan Tbilisi State Armenian Theatre, Tbilisi State Azeri Drama Theatre and
A. S. Griboedov Academic Russian Drama Theatre, which is the oldest Georgian
theatre (opened in 1845) and which has promoted Georgian and Russian stage
classics.
Together with the local authorities,
the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport carries out different
cultural events, festivals, conferences and days of culture (Armenian, Azeri,
Lithuanian, Israel etc.). One important cultural event in Georgia was the
exhibition dedicated to the 26 centuries old history of the establishment of
Jewry in Georgia (held in 1998), which covered the history of the peaceful
coexistence of Georgians and Jews. (For more information on languages in
Georgia see chapter
4.2.2).
The following NGOs respresenting
cultural minorities are registered in Georgia: the Latvians Association
in Georgia "Ave Sol"; "Public Movement Multinational
Georgia"; Union of the Russian Women "Yaroslavna"; "Armenians
Union in Georgia"; "Ossetins Association in Georgia";
"Kurds Union in Georgia"; "Armenian Youth Union in
Georgia"; "Yezid Youth Association in Georgia"; "The
Independent League of the Kurd-yezid Women in Georgia"; "The National
Congress of the Kurd-yezids in Georgia"; "Einung" - German
Association in Georgia; "Union of the Azerbaijani Women in Georgia";
"Hilel-Tbilisi" - Jewish Youth Foundation; "The National
Congress of Assyrians in Georgia"; "The Ukrainians Association in
Georgia"; "The Georgian Federation of the Greek Associations";
and the Polish Community.
Georgia/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.2 Language issues and policies
The official language of Georgia is
Georgian. In the territory of Abkhazia there are two official languages -
Georgian and Abkhazian.
Language has been the most sensitive
problem historically for Georgia since the period of the Russian Empire and
then the USSR, which pursued the policy of Russification.
The Georgian language has been one
of the main uniting factors in the formation of the Georgian state. The
significant factor in the Georgian national identity is also the fact that the
Georgian original written language is one of the oldest written languages
worldwide (it was created no later than III-IV centuries A.D. and was used in
the literary monuments dating back to V c. which have reached up to us. The
Georgian alphabet is used in all dialects of the Georgian language. Only in
Abkhazia has the modified Cyrillic alphabet been used since the establishment
of the Soviet regime.
Two autonomous republics were
formed- Abkhazia and Ajaria - which have their own language issues. Abkhazia is
populated by two indigenous groups - Georgians and Abkhazs - whose linguistic
difference is confirmed by the Constitution. Ajaria is populated by ethnic
Georgian-Moslems, whose dialect is much closer to the literary Georgian
language than the dialect of other regions and territories of Georgia, such as
Mingrelia and Svanetia.
In Georgia, national minorities
constitute 16.2% of the population, with the largest linguistic minorities
being Azerbaijanis with 6.5% and Armenians with 5.7%. Until recently the most
widespread language after Georgian was Russian.
The Constitution of Georgia obliges
all departments, municipal services and users to use the Georgian language and
all official versions of legislative texts must be published in Georgian. In
order to promote integration of minorities and their participation in the state
administration, the Ministry of Education and Science arranges intensive
teaching of the official language.
The Official Language Programme
implemented by the Ministry of Education and Sciences was financed in the
amount of 1 531 700 GEL in 2005, 895 000 GEL in 2006, and
460 000 GEL in 2007. The programme of teaching the official language in
non-Georgian speaking schools was financed in the amount of 244 100 GEL in
2005, 250 000 GEL in 2006, and 250 000 GEL in 2007.
Unfortunately, in the territories
beyond the control of the government of Georgia, the teaching of the official
language has been stopped and the system of education operating in Abkhazia is
based on Abkhazian and Russian and in the Tskhinvali Region the education
system is based on the Ossetian and Russian languages.
Although linguistic pluralism was at
one time the subject of public discussion, the Official Language Law has
not been adopted and the legislative activities have been considered
impractical.
The issues of protection and
development of language are within the terms of reference of the Ministry of
Education and Science and the State Chamber for the Georgian Language. The
latter has ceased to be an independent body since 2004 and now represents a
part of the Ministry of Education and Science. The support and development of
the literary language and language diversity as a cultural phenomenon are also
the responsibility of the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport.
Since 2006, the R&D institutes
under the Academy of Sciences of Georgia have been subordinated to the Ministry
of Education and Science. Among those institutes are significant scientific and
cultural centers for research and development of Georgian culture, language and
literature such as the Arnold Chikobava Institute of Linguistics (in 2006 -
116 600 GEL, in 2007 - 265 800 GEL), Shota Rustaveli Institute of
Georgian Literature (144 100 GEL in 2006, 265 800 GEL in 2007), and
the Korneli Kekelidze Institute of Manuscripts (88 600 GEL in 2006,
201 800 GEL in 2007).
The Georgian language is the native
language for a large number of ethnic Georgians who reside outside the country
(about 5 million live in Azerbaijan, Turkey, Russia, Iran, Europe and the USA).
Support and development of the Georgian language abroad is the responsibility
of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs via its Section for Cultural Relations and
Relations with Diasporas. However, the funds assigned by the government for
promotion of the language abroad are not adequate and this infrastructure
requires further systematic development.
To solve this problem, the Ministry
of Education and Science has implemented the Programme of Assistance for
Georgian Schools Abroad (in 2006 - 45 000 GEL, and in 2007 - 45 000
GEL).
For promotion of the Georgian
language within the process of globalisation and new communication networks,
there is a need to create and distribute a Georgian version of software
products (MS Windows and applications of Microsoft Office). This software issue
will be resolved with the Microsoft Corporation by means of a working group
which has prepared the Georgian version of the computer terminology (subject to
further improvement). These communication issues are the responsibility of the
Department for Information Development of Georgia and the State Chamber for the
Georgian Language.
Georgia/ 4.3 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.3 Intercultural dialogue:
actors, strategies, programmes
The Ministry of Education and
Science regards the issue of intercultural dialogue as important for
educational policy in Georgia. However, at the present stage, intercultural
dialogue in Georgia is not considered as a priority of state cultural policy.
National Goals for Education were
adopted in Georgia in October 2004, stating the development of intercultural
skills for graduates of secondary education as one of its priorities.
One of the third sector unions
engaged in the introduction and promotion of intercultural dialogue in Georgia
is the Public Movement "Multinational Georgia".
The Centre for Cultural Relations of
Georgia - Caucasian House - is a cultural, educational and peacekeeping
institution (it receives state financial support). One of the priorities of the
Caucasian House is to protect human rights and establish religious and
ethnic tolerance, promote peaceful co-existence of different cultures, support
cultural integration of and collaboration with the Caucasian people. In 1999,
the Caucasian House, together with other NGOs, created - the Union -
Caucasian House, which is situated in the same building and is made up of
the following Departments:
There is a wealth of project
supported by foundations to foster intercultural dialogue. Below is an overview
of their recent activities:
Current projects supported by the Heinrich
Boll Foundation:
Current projects supported by the
European Foundation HORIZON:
The Democratic Commission of Small
Grants of the USA Embassy provides support for the Georgian - Abkhazian public
and political newspaper "Kavkazski Akcent".
The British non-governmental
organisation "Conciliation Resources" provides support for the Russian
language edition of the "Kavkazski Akcent" newspaper, The Life
Histories publication which includes stories about the war narrated by
Abkhazians and Georgians.
For more information, see:
Database of Good Practice on Intercultural Dialogue and our
Intercultural Dialogue section.
Georgia/ 4.3 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.4 Social cohesion and cultural
policies
The current public opinion polls
studying values and social cohesion do not include any culture related
information. However, there are many works regarding the problems facing
internally displaced persons (IDP).
The state assistance to IDPs is
minimal, which causes social discontent of both IDPs and other residents. The
majority of IDPs (300 000) residing in Georgia are ethnical Georgians who
were forced to leave their homes in Abkhazia after the ethnical cleansing
executed by separatists. Since integration of IDPs in other regions has been
difficult due to unemployment and inflation, the idea of the social integrity
is unsteady. However, all groups of the population and, especially, the
government are proclaiming the adherence of national interests to the idea of
national integrity.
We may only assume (as there are no
special researches or debates thereof) that the culture is not used as the
instrument for reinforcement of social cohesion. At the same time the concept
of national integrity has ever been supported with the national culture and the
national culture has been the basic parameter of the national identity.
Georgia/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.5 Media pluralism and content
diversity
Adoption of the Laws on
Broadcasting and on Telecommunications has initiated a new stage of
development of mass media and relations within Georgia.
The Law on Broadcasting, adopted
in 2004, was developed in association with the EU and Georgia acceded to the EU
Directive "TV without Frontiers". It specifies three kinds of radio
and TV companies:
The estimated share of domestic
television programmes produced in Georgia vs. imported products is 70 to 30.
(Out of 30% imported product, the major part is manufactured in the USA,
followed by Brazil, Argentina and Columbia (serials); some product is from the
Russian Federation. Almost all products are dubbed by TV companies in Georgian
(no exact statistical data is available, the information is given in general).
In compliance with the Laws on
Telecommunications (adopted in 2004), on Broadcasting (2004) and on
Independent Regulatory Commissions (2005), the Georgian National
Communications Commission (GNCC) - the independent regulatory authority -
issued 92 licenses for TV and radio-broadcasting, as well as 67 licenses for
cable TV and radio broadcasting by the end of 2004. None of these stations
specialises in culture.
The Ministry of Culture, Monument
Protection and Sports promoted intercultural programmes through subsidies
allocated to the TV company "MIR" (107 500 GEL in 2005). However,
in 2006, the project was completed, appropriation of "MIR" was
stopped and it was closed.
According to polls organised by the
Georgian National Communications Commission (GNCC - independent regulatory
authority), 46% of respondents declared a desire for the creation of a
specialised cultural channel.
During the period 2000-2004 Georgia
underwent market liberalisation, new competitors arrived on the market, and
unauthorised channels were closed.
In the telecommunications sphere in
Georgia, there are 150 operators, including 8 owned by the state. The growth of
revenues in the sector and advertising income is stable.
Plans to create a special TV channel
"CULTURE", using the public television Channel 2, were discussed
before reorganising the State TV and Radio Committee of Georgia into a public
service broadcaster (The Public Service Broadcaster is a legal entity of
public law, independent of the state and accountable to the public, established
under Georgian legislation, on the basis of public financing, for television or
radio broadcasting. The Public Service Broadcaster does not subordinate to any
state authority), however, it did not come to fruition.
The Public Service Broadcaster is
funded at 0.15% of GDP from the state budget. Parliament, when planning the
state budget, relies on the approved GDP from the previous year, not on the
projected GDP for the following year. For example, the state obligation to the
Public Broadcaster in the 2007 budget was calculated according to the GDP of
2005. Because of this, the Public Broadcaster is not fully benefiting from the
GDP growth, which initially was the main idea behind this scheme. The
difference in this case amounts to GEL 1.5 million. The Public Broadcaster's
budget in 2006 was GEL 16.5 million, with income from economic activities
nearly GEL 2 million. Economic activities include income from limited
advertising, rent, and sale of property. (http://www.irex.org/programs/MSI_EUR/2006/georgia.asp)
In 2004-2005, public initiatives in
the area of mass media also omitted the issues of culture and the need for
analytical programmes related to cultural issues. In this period there was a
decrease in the already small area of culture oriented programmes; in some
cases this decline was caused by closing TV companies which had special culture
programmes, in other cases the culture programmes were replaced with more
profitable entertainment programmes, e.g. reality shows. In general, only some
channels have short programmes in art and culture.
In 2007, the TV company
"Iveria" was started, under the Patriarchy of the Georgian Apostolic
Orthodox Church, which is oriented to religious and cultural development.
Development of Internet projects
combining the spheres of culture is mainly prevented due to data processing
problems.
According to data from the State
Department for Statistics, at the end of 2003 there were 500 000 copies of
registered and 24 900 000 copies of unregistered newspapers
sold in Georgia during that year (No detailed information for 2006 and 2007
is available).
The majority of national and local
periodicals are privately owned.
Table 2:
Edition of books, magazines and newspapers in Georgia, 2003-2005
|
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
Circulation of books and
brochures, in million copies |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
Annual circulation of magazines
and other printed editions, in million copies |
0.5 |
0.7 |
1.1 |
Number of published newspapers |
149 |
122 |
88 |
Individual circulation of
newspapers, in million copies |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.4 |
Annual circulation of newspapers,
in million copies |
24.9 |
35.4 |
17.9 |
Source:
Ilya Chavchavadze National Library under the Parliament of Georgia, Department
of National Bibliography.
Notwithstanding the development of
the media, and the high prestige attached to the field of journalism, there are
no special training programmes for journalists in Georgia aimed at increasing
their sensitivity to the culture-related issues and conflicts. Consequently,
professionalism is an issue among those journalists who are engaged in cultural
issues.
There are no special antitrust
measures and legal bases for preventing media concentration in Georgia. This
promotes the trend of monopolisation of mass media by the central authorities
and ideologising of previously independent TV companies which has developed in
2006-2007. As a result of transfer and distribution of shares they felt in
hands of the pro-governmental forces.
In early 2006, Rustavi 2
broadcasting company bought shares of Tbilisi-based TV station Mze (Sun).
Currently, Georgian Industrial Group (GIG) owns 22% of shares in Rustavi 2 TV;
22% in Mze TV and 65% in Pirveli Stereo. All three TV stations are part of a
holding, wherein majority stakes are owned by lawmaker Davit Bezhuashvili's
Georgian Industrial Group (GIG). Davit Bezhuashvili is a brother of foreign
minister Gela Bezhuashvili. (http://www.geotimes.ge/index.php?m=home&newsid=7372)
David Bezhuashvili, who has long been known as Saakashvili's sponsor, has
always preferred to remain in the shadows and has never displayed any overt
political ambitions. Zaza Tananashvili, Director General of Mze, confirmed the
purchase of Rustavi-2 shares by Bezhuashvili. The amount of shares reportedly
varies from 22% up to 50%, giving Bezhuashvili the opportunity to serve as
Saakashvili's eye in the new media holding.)
Henceforth, Mze is expected to
broadcast exclusively entertainment programmes, which, according to analyst Ia
Antadze, will completely support the authorities' plans to "lull the
public vigilance" before this autumn's local elections. This theory is
partially supported by the fact that Rustavi-2 still owes the state
approximately USD 5 million, and therefore has limited financial
maneuverability to assume control of Mze. (http://www.jamestown.org/edm/article.php?article_id=2370675).
It should be mentioned that Mze TV
has a weekly Sunday analytical-informational programme "Culture".
The political crisis of November
2007 exposed most sharply the problems related to the independent mass media.
The regular researches of mass media showed that the most highly rated and
balanced TV Company was TV "Imedi" the main competitor of the
pro-governmental TVs. Noteworthy is that TV Company "Imedi", a part
of Imedi Media Holding and its management, was transferred for one year to News
Corporation, owned by Rupert Murdock. This TV Company covered all burning
topics of the day and in November 2007 arranged the live debates with the
opposition representatives.
However, on November 7, after the
attack on the rally of the opposition and before declaration of the
state of emergency, the state authorities occupied the TV Company building and
forcibly stopped it broadcasting without any substantiating documents. By the
same manner, the broadcasting of independent TV companies "Caucasia",
"25th Channel" (Batumi), Radio "Imedi" were also stopped.
Thereafter, the assets of the opposition TV company "Imedi", crushed
by the special forces, were taken over by court decision and the Georgian
National Communication Commission (GNCC) deprived the TV company of its
license. Such actions of the government caused indignation inside the country
and outside it. All democratically disposed people (regardless of political
belonging) are demanding the re-opening of TV Channel "Imedi". The
Ombudsman of Georgia appealed for the restoration of freedom of speech.
Though the state of emergency was
remitted in Georgia (on November 16, 2007) "media freedom is still the
matter of our concern", according to the defence and foreign ministers of
EU member states at a meeting held in Brussels on 19-20 November 2007. The EU
Board underlined the significance of creation of the conditions required for
the adequate democratic processes prior to the pre-term presidential elections
planned for 5 January 2008.
In this context, the cultural issues
are of minor importance for TV channels (nevertheless some well-known
representatives of Georgian culture have increased interest in various
political issues).
Georgia/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.6 Culture industries: policies
and programmes
In Georgia, the culture industries
are in the process of development and have not yet been formally established,
nor properly defined and analysed. Private companies offering cultural items
and services (publishing houses, periodicals, providers of audio cassettes and
CDs etc.), as a rule, are independent from state cultural policy and operate
without any government support. Nevertheless, there are some partnerships
between the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport of Georgia and
some companies engaged in the publishing business, concert activity etc. but,
in general, the relations of central and local authorities with public agencies
may be described as sporadic. The contacts between them are limited to
non-permanent cultural events and projects.
Some state programmes are open to
the private sector on a competition basis, for example with regard to the
publication of books, where competition is open to all publishing houses
regardless of their ownership. However, the selection of a winner is not
effective in all cases as the criteria for selection is not adequately
specified and this affects the decision-making process. Often selection in
these competitions is not transparent.
The Tax Code of Georgia
specifies some preferences for the importation of scientific, creative editions
and fiction, books and periodicals where the authors are citizens of Georgia as
well as for the importation of Georgian classics published abroad. Guidelines
are also set for the distribution, import, sale and printing of periodicals and
fiction. The state supports publishing activities through governmental
programmes (e.g. the programme for promoting fiction and the publishing sector
had a budget of 400 600 GEL in 2005). The publishing sector is developed
more effectively than the cinema and showbiz sector which require a more
powerful and stable economy and larger market than is available in Georgia.
Until now the attempts to introduce an industrial model of development for the
folk art and handicrafts sector in the context of the development of cultural
tourism have not been successful.
There is a significant need to
develop Georgian film production and distribution. The leading force in
Georgian cinema is the film studio "Gruzia-Film", where 90% of the
production capacities and cinematography staff are concentrated, and where most
national films are produced. Some years ago the film studio was privatised and
today it holds a special status in that two-thirds of the shares are held by
the state. Today it is recognised by those working in the film industry that
the privatisation process was managed incorrectly, as it has brought no
investment and the studio is in a more difficult situation than previously.
In 2001, in order to rescue the
cinema industry, the Ministry of Culture established the National
Cinematography Centre which, to some extent, drove the reforms in the film
sphere. The Fund for the Development of Georgian Cinema was also established
with the aim of joining together cinematography forces in the country. However,
the state still fails to meet the needs of film production. The budget of the
Cinema Centre is only 870 000 GEL (2005) although, in 2007, its budget increased
to 1 477 073 GEL, it is a very small portion (1.9%) of the budget of
the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport.
The situation in the film
distribution network is poor as well. Only 4-5 cinema theatres in Georgia meet
modern standards. One of the main problems in the operation of cinemas is the
piracy operating in private TV companies (which show dozens of unauthorised
films each day), despite the active work of the Georgian National
Communications Committee. Another issue of concern is the dominance of American
films which must be addressed by developing and propagating Georgian national
and European cinema with the help of public television companies.
Until now, attempts to introduce an
industrial sector development model into the folklore and crafts sector (in
order to further develop cultural tourism) were in vain.
However, there are single cases of
the positive practice:
However, the lack of appropriate
integration into the industrial process (due to the current crisis in the
Georgian economy and inadequate development of the cultural industries) and
inadequate practical studies in these sectors minimise the chances for
postgraduate employment. The situation is aggravated with the total
disintegration of the vocational training system the new Law on Vocational
Education (2007) has not been put fully into effect yet (see section 5, chapter
8.3).
Georgia/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.7 Employment policies for the
cultural sector
Statistical data on employment in
the cultural sector is not available.
In light of the annual growth in
unemployment (exact data is not available) and a lack of regulation of social
protection for workers, employment issues in the culture sphere are not a
current issue of importance for the state.
In Georgia, the reorganisation of
the social infrastructure, including the cultural sphere, is a continuing
process; in 2004 alone, the municipal service for culture was reorganised three
times. The institutions subordinate to the Ministry of Culture, Monument
Protection and Sport are also in the process of reorganisation (see chapter
4.1) which has reduced the number of staff employed in the cultural sector.
The highest unemployment rate is
evident in the intellectual, cultural sphere. The wages of cultural workers are
the lowest in the public sector (84 GEL monthly); the average wage amounts to
150 GEL (Doctors and teachers earn 100 GEL per month, street cleaners earn 200
GEL and judges earn 1 700 GEL).
Table 3:
Number of employees and remuneration in Georgia, in GEL, 2004
Number
of employees in 2004 |
|||
|
Women |
Men |
Total |
Culture, entertainment, recreation |
20 700 |
22 000 |
42 700 |
|
Urban |
Rural |
Total |
Culture, entertainment, recreation |
34 400 |
8 300 |
42 700 |
Remuneration
in 2004 |
|||
|
Women |
Men |
Total |
Culture, entertainment, recreation |
69.8 |
110.4 |
84.8 |
Source:
State Department for Statistics
In 2007, employment in the sphere of
culture has steadily declined, but no statistical research on this issue has
been conducted yet.
Georgia/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.8 New technologies and cultural
policies
The general state of ICTD in Georgia
may be described as "spontaneous computerisation", without any single
strategy for development of the sector. The information space in Georgia,
though experiencing some progress, is at a transitional stage towards democracy
and requires reforms for free access and distribution, reliability of
information etc.
Table 4 compares the state of
development of communications in Georgia with developed countries according to
the following parameters:
Table 4:
Development of communication in Georgia
|
Developed
countries |
Georgia |
Density of fixed telephones |
60% |
12% |
Density of mobile communications |
30% |
6.5% |
Density of PC |
40% |
3.5% |
Density of DSL |
40% |
0.6% |
Source:
National Communications Committee
Despite the figures outlined in
Table 4, internet service is one of the fastest growing services and revenues
and constitutes 4% of the total telecommunications market in Georgia.
Adoption of the Law on Telecommunications
(2005) and Law on Independent Regulatory Committees (2005)
initiated favourable circumstances for the development of new media.
The Ministry of Culture, Monument
Protection and Sport of Georgia intends to use modern technologies for the creation
of a full national database of cultural heritage, although this is a project
for the future. A similar programme of upgrading museums is under development,
although not many museums have websites. In the library sphere the situation is
more than critical. The university system also suffers from a lack of
development in the ICT sector. Most of the traditional cultural institutions
still cannot meet the requirements of the information society.
Development of new technologies in
the cultural sphere is slow due to limited financial resources and any
developments are implemented with assistance from non-governmental
organisations. No detailed data for 2006 and 2007 years are available.
Georgia/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.9 Heritage issues and policies
Cultural heritage has always been of
great importance and pride in Georgia.
The main body responsible for the
protection of cultural heritage is the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection
and Sport, in particular the Department of Cultural Heritage and the Committee
for Protection of Cultural Heritage. Some responsibilities are also allocated
to the National Committee of UNESCO under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the
Georgian Academy of Sciences and the State Department of Archives under the Ministry
of Justice. Natural heritage is the responsibility of the Ministry of Natural
Resources and the Environment.
Within the last fifteen years,
cultural heritage in Georgia has suffered greatly as a result of the local
conflicts in Abkhazia and in the Tskhinvali Region, where monuments were
destroyed and plundered. During that period there were natural disasters such
as, powerful earthquakes, landslides and floods which had radical affects on
cultural monuments (e.g. Old Tbilisi).
Nevertheless, the major threat for
Georgian cultural heritage was the grave economic situation and the inadequacy
of the law which operated until 2007. Georgia faced the parallelism of
functions of state authorities and scientific institutions, for example,
between the systems of permission and registration; the procedure of granting
monument status was very complicated and long and, hence, many objects remain
unprotected; the inadequacy of the legislation prevented the system and
institutional reform required in the cultural heritage sphere. The applicable
legislation also created problems for the exhibition of the museum collections
abroad. A new Law on Cultural Heritage, introduced in 2007, is intended
to address all of the problems in this field (see below).
The museum system of Georgia
consists of 255 museums of various profiles, which are subordinated to and
financed from different levels of authority. Following the adoption of the Law
on Legal Persons under the Public Law of 1999 (see also chapter
2.2) museums should obtain a new legal status. However, this process has
been delayed for a number of reasons including: testing for discrepancies in
the legislation, bureaucratic slowness, a lack of political will (in some cases
it was disowned by local authorities / municipalities) and uncertainty
regarding the ownership after adoption of the Concordat.
Some progress has been made. In
2005, three museums were registered: the National Museum of Georgia, Niko
Pirosmani Museum in Mirzaani and the Historical and Architectural Museum at
Dadianis' Palace in Zugdidi. In 2006, the number of registered museums
increased to 15, in 2007 to 17. The process of registration of other museums is
in progress.
Since the Rose Revolution, museum
reform has been a priority; in particular, improvements in museum
administration have been stipulated. A first step was the creation of the
National Museum of Georgia (30.12.2004) which includes 11 public museums and
branches.
There is currently no full database
of cultural heritage available in Georgia. Training and involvement of young
people, as well as the introduction of new technologies to improve the
protection of cultural heritage, are major issues faced by the state requiring
serious investments.
The Department of Cultural Heritage
has developed a policy for the preservation of cultural heritage in Georgia and
its long-term strategy to create a heritage management system with the
following aims:
In 2005, 1 million GEL was allocated
from the state budget for the program of rehabilitation of unique monuments.
For the first time since the 1980s, the government has made effective steps to
improve the diagnostics, design, rehabilitation and restoration of about 60
monuments.
In 2006, the budget of the programme
for the Support of Cultural Heritage Institutes was 4 298 500 GEL, a
significant increase from the figure of 2005, which was 1 784 200
GEL. In 2007, the budget amounted to 7 792 079 GEL.
This enabled the development,
promotion and implementation of the policy to preserve the cultural heritage
elaborated by the Department of Cultural Heritage. Consequently, in 2006 and in
2007, because of the increased financing, the intense work of registration and certification
of monuments of cultural heritage was being performed. The range of
archeological studies was also extended.
In 2006, the National Committee of
ICOM was established.
In 2007, the new Law on Cultural
Heritage was adopted (see chapter
5.3.3) and the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport of
Georgia developed new strategic directions (see chapter
3.3 and chapter
4.1) and the state programme for the protection of cultural heritage.
Main programmes / activities under
the strategy:
1. Programme for the Preservation of
Historic Cities and Towns:
Activities under the programme
include the rapid inventory of the historic core of Tbilisi, Tbilisi Safeguard
Plan, Batumi Safeguard Plan.
2. Inventory of sites of cultural
heritage interest throughout Georgia and programme for establishing protecting
zones:
Activities under this
programme include: The Ministry held a tender for Establishment of Cultural
Heritage Protection Zones. The tender was announced for the following services:
Cities
Archaeological zones
Historical Areas
Inventory of Cultural Heritage
Monuments
The Cultural Heritage Department
regularly updates the list of cultural heritage monuments. The recording of
monuments with the aim of their listing on a Public Register is an important
mechanism that allows these properties to be legally protected.
In parallel with the inventory of
immoveable monuments of cultural heritage, the Ministry of Culture, Monument
Protection and Sport proceeded with the study and classification of moveable
monuments, an assessment of the state of the collections and recording of the
respective items. This will eventually allow determination of the artistic
value, as well as the market price of each sample, and thus promote the
formation of a legal art market. Intensive work was conducted to identify those
items of cultural heritage interest which are in urgent need of conservation
and rehabilitation.
The Division of Museums and Moveable
Monuments and a committee of art historians specialising in modern Georgian art
has been engaged in recording decorative paintings / drawings
(sketches) with the aim of their being listed on a state register.
3. Programme for Rescuing Cultural
Heritage Objects of Outstanding Value:
The Ministry of Culture, Monument
Protection and Sport has established strategic partnership with the Fund for
the Protection and Rescuing of Georgia's Historic Monuments in the realm of
cultural heritage preservation. The Ministry and the Fund jointly plan
schedules for the rehabilitation / restoration of cultural heritage monuments.
An additional one-million lari
allocation was made from the state budget in 2005 for the safeguarding of
Georgia's cultural heritage and the restoration / conservation of heritage
sites. The amount was used to support design, exploration, archaeological and
restoration work. The following phase, which entailed actual rehabilitation /
restoration of sites badly in need of repair, was implemented in 2006.
4. Programme for Cultural Heritage
Monitoring Throughout Georgia:
The collecting of information on the
state of preservation of cultural heritage sites in Tbilisi and Batumi, the
exercise of state control over the projects agreed upon with the Ministry of
Culture, Monument Protection and Sport, the processing of applications
addressed to the Ministry and the arranging of working meetings with
representatives of the self-governing bodies are the main monitoring tasks.
In 2006, the Division of Monitoring
and Preventive Conservation conducted permanent monitoring in Tbilisi, as well
as in various regions of Georgia. Photos of monuments were taken and their
state of preservation was assessed on site (56 monuments).
5. Programme for the Establishment
of Analytical and Information Network on Cultural Heritage:
Activities include:
1. Innovative Reorganisation of the
integrated information system of Georgia's cultural heritage and adoption of
contemporary tools of cultural heritage management: The project was selected
through a competition announced by the Development and Reform Fund at the
office of the President of Georgia within the framework of the UN Governance
Reform Programme, which was aimed at capacity building of ministries and other
public institutions. The project was started in 2006 with the financial support
(USD 97 780) of the Development and Reform Fund. The goal of the project
is to set up a renewable, easy-to-use database of cultural heritage properties
integrated with GIS software.
Database of cultural heritage
related archives: It is envisaged to create a model database filled with the
sample data with a view to its future linking to GIS and upon conducting
respective training, to make it accessible for external networks, such as those
of the Patriarchate, the Tourism Department, the Customs Department, museums
and local self-government bodies.
The archives of the Cultural
Heritage Department of the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport
are of immense heritage value. Since the destruction by fire of the building of
the former Chubinashvili Institute of the History of Georgian Art during the
civil war of 1992 in Tbilisi, it has been the only depository keeping together
research papers related to Georgian architecture, wall paintings, samples of
other forms of fine arts, and photographic negatives dating from the 19th
century onwards and more recent documents: several thousand pieces in all. The
materials comprising the archives are essential for the proper restoration /
conservation of any architectural monument.
The goal of creating the database is
to digitalise the existing information, including graphical, textual and photo
materials, on cultural heritage sites and allow for its regular update. It is
intended to establish a proper software that will be easy to use and will
facilitate the access to information.
2. Creation of Digital Topographic
Maps in Georgia; participation in the joint project signed by the Georgian and
Japanese governments on 21 December 2004 (from 2005 onwards).
One of the goals of the project is
to facilitate cultural heritage tourism. To this end, the Cultural Heritage
Department traced and processed materials on monuments in various districts of
Georgia). A sample GIS model for monuments in Borjomi district was produced by
JICA / PASCO experts on the basis of the mentioned data.
6. Programme for the Promotion of
Georgia's Cultural Heritage:
The following publications were
prepared through cooperation between the Ministry of Culture, Monument
Protection and Sport and the Giorgi Chubinashvili National Research Centre of
Georgian Art History and Monument Preservation within the framework of the
State Programme for Cultural Heritage Preservation 2006, under the aegis of the
Promotion of Georgia's Cultural Heritage.
7. Programme for Museum Reform:
Georgia has more than two hundred
museums of various profiles. With a view to promoting museum activities, the
Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport, through its museum
programme, supported a number of projects in and outside Tbilisi. Several
publications containing methodological guidance on museum management were
financed to facilitate reforms in the museum sector in order to achieve
international standards.
The progress in recent years reached
a climax in 2007 when with the completion of the restoration of the historic
part of Signakhi (financed by Cartu Group) and the Signakhi Museum was
established. This is the first museum of international standards.
8. Programme for the Promotion of
Cultural Heritage Research Institutions
The data obtained will be used for
developing a conservation plan for the monastery, the implementation of which
will be ensured by the Cyprian side. By the initiative of the government of the
Republic of Cyprus, this old Georgian monastery will be included in major
tourist itineraries.
Cooperation
with International Organisations
Cooperation with UNESCO and ICCROM: In 2006, protection zones of the Georgian sites on the
World Heritage List were identified under the projects on cultural heritage
protection zones for the historic cities of Mtskheta and Kutaisi (historic
monuments of Mtskheta, Bagrat's Cathedral and Gelati Monastery). The
determination of the boundaries will facilitate the further preservation of
these sites. A full inventory of monuments in Mtskheta was conducted. For the
first time in recent years, Georgia prepared a report on the state of
conservation of monuments inscribed on the World Heritage List.
The preliminary national list of
monuments proposed for inscription on the World Heritage List was updated which
resulted in the number of monuments being increased from six to twelve. In
2006, work was continued for the preparation of phase 2 of the international
project for stone conservation for Mtskheta Jvari (Holy Cross) Church. The
project is implemented in cooperation with ICCROM, the advisory body of the
International Centre of Restoration and Conservation.
Cooperation with the Council of
Europe: In 2006, the Ministry of Culture,
Monument Protection and Sport continued its cooperation with the Council of
Europe within the framework of the South Caucasian regional programme -
Management and Institutional Streamlining of Historic Cities and Towns,
directly related to the rehabilitation of the historic core of Tbilisi. Within
the same project, on the initiative of the Council of Europe, a working meeting
was held in France in November 2006, with the participation of representatives
of the bodies engaged in the work for the rehabilitation of the historic parts
of Tbilisi and Batumi, such as the Tbilisi City Municipality, the Ministry of
Culture, Monument Protection and Sport, the Ministry of Finance and Economy of
the Autonоmous Republic of Adjara and experts from the Council of Europe.
Within the framework of the South
Caucasian Regional Programme - Management and Institutional Streamlining of
Historic Cities and Towns, the outcome of the cooperation in 2006 was reflected
in the official recommendations prepared by the experts of the Council of
Europe, which will be the basis of the planning of the next stage of
cooperation between Georgia and the Council of Europe in the area of cultural
heritage.
In 2006, the implementation of a new
culture and heritage programme with a duration of four years was begun on the
basis of the Kiev Declaration signed in 2005 by the Minister of Culture of
Georgia, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Ukraine and Moldova. Within the framework of the
programme entitled the Kiev Initiative, Supporting Democracy Through Culture,
which unites the five mentioned states, a large number of important projects in
the next four years will be supported.
Traditional
Georgia: Projects include an inventory of
Immoveable Monuments and Sites with Monument Features in the Village of Atskuri
in Akhaltsikhe District and the creation of a database.
The project involved the village of
Atskuri, in the Akhaltsikhe district, including students of the Georgian
University of Social Sciences during their summer internship. An icon was
discovered with the Crucifixion scene carved on a jasper stone set in a cloisonné
enamel frame, presumably dating from the 10th-11th century. The icon was found
in the grave of the Bishop of Matskveri, in the interior of the Church of the
Virgin at Atskuri. This is an open search system which can be updated with
information on the moveable and immoveable monuments in Georgia and abroad.
The non-governmental sector
implements projects aimed at preservation and popularisation of the
multinational cultural heritage. Among these are: the Project Arts
Interdisciplinary Research Laboratory "Tbilisi Modernist Artistic Cafes
and Their Murals - the Space of International Communication". It involves
the research and conservation planning (research, analysis, documentation) of
the murals of unique artistic cafes - "Argonaut's Boat" (1918) and
"Khimerioni" (1919), which were the meeting places of modern artists,
poets and writers. These cafes significantly expose the multinational character
of Georgian Modernism. Along with the high artistic / aesthetic
quality of the paintings, the conservation of these cafes is also important, as
they are the only painted artistic spaces / cafes surviving from early period
of modernism. The project is supported by the "Open Society Georgia"
Foundation.
There are funds and non-governmental
organisations in Georgia which are engaged in, and make a significant
contribution to, the development of cultural heritage; these include: the Fund
for the Preservation of the Cultural Heritage of Georgia, ICOM, ICOMOS
(International Council on Monuments and Sites) Georgia, Museum Association of
Georgia, Heritage & Modernity Association, E. Privalova Painting Technical
Studies Centre "Betania", Georgian Cultural Heritage Information
Centre (GCHIC), and the Fund for Science "Udabno".
Private funding and sponsors: The fact that there is no special
legislation for charities in the field of culture frequently hampers private
charity initiatives. In spite of this, some Georgian companies periodically
provide subsidies, in the form of charity, for conservation-restoration works
to be conducted on an individual monument. For instance, the "Cartu
Group" provided 6 million US dollars for the rehabilitation of the
important architectural monument - the Rustaveli State Academic Theatre
building.
In recent years, the private sector
has allocated approximately 28 million GEL, for the restoration and
rehabilitation of the buildings of public theatres: Shota Rustaveli Tbilisi
State Academic Drama Theatre, Kote Marjanishvili Tbilisi State Academic
Theatre, Nodar Dumbadze Theatre for Young Spectators, Michael Tumanishvili
Theatre of Film Actors, Vaso Godziashvili Theatre of Musical Comedy and Drama,
and the Jansug Kakhidze Musical Centre.
In Georgia, there is only one
network in the field of cultural heritage - "European Heritage Days
National Office", which unites the competent institutions of this field,
non-governmental organisations, diplomatic missions and cultural institutions
of several countries.
Against the comparatively favorable
background of development in the sphere of cultural heritage, the situation for
libraries and archives is completely inadequate. The existing system has
2 089 libraries and their number is decreasing day by day (in comparison,
in the Soviet period, the number of operating libraries was about 8 000).
Currently libraries, with their obsolete material and technical base and
methodology, do not meet the requirements of contemporary readers, whose
numbers have been also decreasing. (In 2004, the number of readers decreased by
100 000, as compared with 2003, and made up 971 422).
Table 5:
Public and universal libraries in Georgia, 2001-2006
|
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006* |
Public and universal libraries (in
units) |
2 170 |
2 160 |
2 123 |
2 090 |
2 056 |
1 726 |
Quantity of readers |
2 311.3 |
1 625.9 |
1 421.3 |
1 528.9 |
1 556.1 |
732.1 |
Average quantity of readers (per
library) |
1 065.1 |
752.7 |
669.5 |
731.5 |
761.7 |
424.2 |
Quantity of copies (in million) |
30.8 |
30.6 |
29.6 |
28.5 |
28.3 |
20.7 |
Quantity of workers (persons) |
4 278 |
4 044 |
3 819 |
3 730 |
3 727 |
3 408 |
Source:
Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sports, State Department for
Statistics of Georgia
Note:
Not including the data on Ajara Autonomous Republic.
Most of the libraries in Georgia are
responsible to the local authorities, but their supervision, especially the
central libraries, falls within the competence of the Ministry of Culture,
Monument Protection and Sport of Georgia. School libraries (2 100 units)
are responsible to the Ministry of Education and Science. The financing of the
library sphere is the weakest and the librarian's salary is one of the lowest
nationwide. This has resulted in the outflow of personnel and complicates the
inflow of new high-skilled workers.
The preservation of archival
cultural heritage is vested in the National Book Chamber, which holds more than
1 600 000 titles. The Chamber's role is to prepare the national
bibliography and to store, in the archives, all editions dedicated to the
culture, history and achievements of Georgia.
The National Archive Fund, which was
established for the extended use and improvement of the centralised register of
documents created by the state authorities, is also engaged in the protection
of the cultural heritage.
For more information, see
European Heritage Network: Country profile Georgia
Georgia/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.10 Gender equality and cultural
policies
In 1996, Georgia acceded to the
International Convention on Equal Remuneration for Men and Women Workers for
Work of Equal Value adopted on 29 June 1951 by the General Conference of the
International Labour Organisation, arranged by the Administrative Council of
the International Labour Bureau. However, according to the available
statistical data, the average remuneration of women engaged in the sphere of
culture, entertainment and recreation is only 63% of the remuneration of men
engaged in the same sphere. Among the Ministry staff, the number of women
decreases in positions of responsibility: in 2004, out of 118 employees of the
Ministry, 70 were women (59%); in 2005, out of 151 employees, only 81 are women
(54%). The current Minister is male and only one of his deputies (20%) is a
woman; from heads of 10 departments, 5 are women (50%). Since 2006 all deputy
ministers are male.
In the 45 theatres responsible to
the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport of Georgia, four of the
art directors are women and there are only seven women managers (24 % of the
top positions). A great number of women are employed as librarians (99%). Out
of total 3 325 employees of libraries 3 305 are women.
There is no more precise statistical
data relating to the employment of women in the sphere of culture, nor have
gender issues been examined in the context of culture.
The total unemployment rate in
Georgia in 2005 was 13.8%. No detailed data for 2005, 2006, and 2007 is
available.
Georgia/ 4. Current issues in
cultural policy development and debate
4.3 Other relevant issues and
debates
Some cultural issues in Georgia have
been systematically discussed during the post-revolutionary period, including:
how to introduce political decisions in the sphere of culture which are not
supported with professional research and recommendations and have not included
members of the public in decision-making processes. Such issues are especially
acute within the reorganisation of public spaces in the large urban areas and
in connection with support for monumental objects of doubtful artistic quality.
Privatisation in the cultural
sphere, especially with respect to cultural heritage, is ambiguous. Within the
previous period the institutions of culture were privatised under the sole Decrees
of the President (e.g. privatisation of a part of film studio
"Gruzia-Film"). However, since the Revolution of 2003, privatisation
policy has covered the monuments of culture that were illegally deprived of
their monument status bypassing the applicable laws: Law on Culture
(1997), Law on Protection of Cultural Heritage (1999) and Law on
Privatisation of State-owned Property (1997). Intensification of this
process is stimulated not by prestige and effectiveness of development and
adaptation of cultural heritage, but by the investor's interest in the
permanent growth of real estate prices, and in particular, of land.
The state has made some attempts to
extend public participation in cultural life through mass cultural activities,
concerts and so on, which have become more frequent following the Rose
Revolution of November 2003. However, these activities have received some
public criticism due to the huge cost, doubtful artistic quality and propaganda
nature employed.
Finally, the Law on Public
Theatres (see chapter
5.3.2), which has demonstrated a state policy oriented towards
centralisation and aversion to public and professional opinion, casts doubt on
the efficiency and positive nature of current reforms in culture.
Debates on cultural issues are
usually held post-factum and are not taken into consideration by the
government. This excludes a wide rage of professionals in decision-making.
Another issue is the "personnel" problem. Prior to the Revolution (in
the unanimous opinion of experts) the system was geared towards gerontocracy,
while since the Revolution, the situation has reversed (e.g. the constitutional
amendment which lowers the entrance age for a judge of the Constitutional Court
to 28 years; and the Law on Higher Education which deprives those over
65 years of the right to hold an academic position). There is also a deficit of
professional personnel in the cultural sector.
The political crisis of November
2007 has exposed most sharply the problems related to the independent mass
media (see chapter
4.2.5).
Georgia/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.1 Constitution
Under the Constitution of
Georgia, which came into force in 1995, Georgia is a democratic republic
where the rights and freedoms of individuals are of the highest value.
The Constitution of Georgia is a
superior law and all other laws and acts of legislation shall comply with it.
The following Articles of the Constitution refer to cultural issues:
According to Article 23,
the Constitution of Georgia shall ensure the inviolability of intellectual
property and creative freedom. Interference in creative activity or censorship
in the creative sphere is not permissible. Placing a prohibition on the product
of a creative work or on its distribution shall not be permissible, unless it
violates the legal rights of others.
According to Article 34,
"The state shall maintain the development of culture, unrestricted
participation of citizens in cultural life, expression and enrichment of
cultural origins, recognition of national and generic values and a deepening of
international cultural relations. Each citizen of Georgia shall be obliged to
protect and preserve the cultural heritage. The state shall protect cultural
heritage by law. "
According to Article 38,
citizens of Georgia are equal in social, economic, cultural and political
life regardless of national, ethnic, religious or linguistic origin. The
freedom of citizens to use freely their native language and to develop their
culture is safeguarded.
Georgia/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.2 Division of jurisdiction
Division of jurisdiction on cultural
issues between national / federal and various regional / provincial, local /
municipal levels of government is referred to in various laws and is regulated
by the following laws to a different extent:
In addition to the laws above, the
legal / juridical subsidiarity on culture is enforced by means of
regulatory acts issued by the President and government (decrees, resolutions,
and orders).
Georgia/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.3 Allocation of public funds
Under Georgian legislation (The
Law on Culture, Article 29) financing of the cultural sector shall be
determined by the state budget:
Under the Law on the State Budget
of Georgia for 2005, a total amount of 32 554 400 GEL was allocated
to the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport, with culture
receiving 23 492 500 GEL of this fund. These funds are dispensed
among the subordinate organisations, legal entities under public law and
specific state programmes for culture, cultural heritage, sports and youth
affairs.
Specific programmes are designed for
the various spheres of culture. In 2005, local authorities allocated
41 323 200 GEL for culture. Archives (273 900 GEL from the
budget of the Ministry of Justice); National Libraries (1 021 800 GEL
from the budget of the Parliament of Georgia); Chamber of Books (223 900
GEL direct financing from the state budget); TV and Radio (16 500 000
GEL direct financing from the state budget). In total the state spent
82 835 300 GEL on culture in 2005 (see chapter
6.4); 23 492 500 GEL for the Ministry of Culture, Monument
Protection and Sport.
Under the Law on the State Budget
of Georgia for 2007, 77 113 691 GEL was allocated to the Ministry
of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport, with culture receiving
41 157 246 GEL (53.37%) of this fund.
Specific programmes are designed for
the various spheres of culture. In 2007, local authorities allocated
35 388 800 GEL (31.5%) for culture. Archives (1 501 000 GEL
from the budget of the Ministry of Justice); National Libraries
(3 908 300 GEL from the budget of the Parliament of Georgia); TV and
Radio (17 400 000 GEL direct financing from the state budget). In
total, the state spent 99 355 346 GEL on culture in 2007 (see chapter
6.4), including 41 157 246 GEL for the Ministry of Culture,
Monument Protection and Sport.
In addition to these programmes, the
state budget contains reserve funds for the Georgian President and Parliament.
The funds from these reserves are held for emergencies, such as disasters or
for payment of unforeseen state liabilities. The reserve funds are dispensed
via the relevant ministries. In rare cases, funds from the reserves are
allocated to culture (see chapter
2.4).
In compliance with Article 14
of the Tax Code, similar reserve funds are created in the local budgets of
the autonomous republics.
Under the Law on Culture the
state supports donations and sponsorship of private individuals and legal
entities in the sphere of culture using tax incentives and other privileges
established by Georgian legislation. However, Article 14 is not
supported by adequate definitions in the Tax Code or other acts of
legislation.
No specified data for 2006 are
available.
Georgia/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.4 Social security frameworks
In Georgia, there is no definite
legislation which regulates social security provision for the cultural sector,
although various kinds of security are provided under other legislation.
Under the Law on Art Workers and
Art Unions, Article 8, paragraph 2, social security and pension
provision for artists shall be implemented under the relevant acts of
legislation.
The Law on Social Security for
Researchers / Scientists regulates the creation of safeguards and
conditions for the work of scientists. While culture is not mentioned
specifically in the legislation, it is applicable to some cultural workers.
General unemployment in Georgia is a
major issue for the government to tackle and therefore the cultural sector has
not yet been singled out for specific development.
For more information, see our Status
of Artists section.
Georgia/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.5 Tax laws
There are no legal incentives for
investment in culture in Georgia. This sphere is regulated by general
legislation. The Tax Code determines some tax privileges, such as
exempting the following areas from tax payments: the sale and printing of
tickets for theatre and circus performances, classical music concerts and
museums; the import of scientific and creative books and fiction, books and
magazines written by citizens of Georgia, as well as the import of Georgian
classics published abroad; and services relating to the sale of, import,
distribution, delivery and printing of periodicals and fiction.
There are no special tax rules or
exemptions for creative individuals.
Construction of temples and churches
as charities are tax exempt in compliance with Article 172 of the Tax
Code. This category of buildings benefits more from the legislation than
the restoration of cultural heritage for which the law was intended.
Under the Tax Code of Georgia,
restoration and reconstruction work on monuments included in the UNESCO world
heritage list is exempted from VAT (18%).
In spite of long debates and drafted
bills, the Law on Donations and Sponsorship has not been adopted.
Georgia/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.6 Labour laws
There is no definite legislation
which regulates labour relations in the sphere of culture.
The new Labour Code of
Georgia was adopted on 25 May 2006. It abolished the Law on Collective
Agreements and Engagements, which was used sometimes in labour relations
with creative workers.
The new Labour Code of Georgia
supports the protection of fundamental human rights, fair remuneration, and
labour safety standards.
In addition to this Code, labour
issues are regulated by the Law on Public Service (see chapter
5.1.2), which regulates the labour relations of public servants (including
in the sphere of culture).
Under the Law on Art Workers and
Art Unions, Article 8, paragraph 1, an art worker may work in a
freelance capacity, be directly employed or work under another type of
contract. However, today this law is idle.
In Georgia, there is a trade union
for workers in the cultural sector but there is no trend of negotiations on
agreements and contracts between employers and trade unions on working
conditions.
The average monthly salary of art
workers is extremely poor and is equal to 84.8 GEL, on average. This sum is
15.6 % less than the salary of teachers and doctors (100 GEL on average) and is
95 % less than the salary of judges (equivalent to 1 000 USD in the
national currency).
Table 6:
Monthly salary of artists in Georgia, by gender, 2004
Salary
in GEL |
|||
|
Women |
Men |
Average
wage |
Culture, entertainment, recreation |
69.8 |
110.4 |
84.8 |
Source:
State Department for Statistics
Further statistical data on the
cultural sector is not available.
After the November crisis of 2007
and substitution of the Prime Minister, the government promised to raise the
salary of museum workers and teachers (it should be noted that the monthly
salary of custodians of regional museums is very small - 20 GEL (equivalent to
10 euro).
For more information, see our Status
of Artists section.
Georgia/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.7 Copyright provisions
Georgia is a party to the
international agreements on the protection of intellectual property - the Paris
and Berne Conventions.
In Georgian legislation, relations
on copyright in the sphere of intellectual property and moral rights relating
to the creation of a scientific, literary and art work are regulated by the Law
on Copyright and Related Rights (1999). Copyright - the integral /
essential right of work / art is the homogenous right - which includes the
moral rights, economic rights and related rights - of the author. This
law regulates the relations allied to the copyright of performers, phonogram
and videogram makers, broadcasting and database makers. State policy in the
protection of copyright and related rights is implemented and safeguarded by
the National Centre for Intellectual Property, SAKPATENTI.
Copyright accrued within the
creation of scientific, literary and art works is safeguarded under the law. In
relation to royalties, the state has established the following guidelines:
reproduction of creative products is allowed where they have been legally
published or are regarded as common property due to public distribution /
awareness; the sum of royalties and terms of payment shall be established under
the law, on the one side, and under the contract between the parties, on the
other side. In circumstances where the royalty rights are unclear, either party
can request a decision from SAKPATENTI (This decision may be appealed within 2
months).
The legislation determines copyright
relating to on-air broadcasting.
The Law on Limiting Measures in
Connection with Intellectual Property adopted on 23 June 1999 does not
mention "the owners and objects of related rights", although audio
and videocassettes and CDs are the objects of related rights. Therefore, this
law loses its significance and is inefficient.
The legislative base in the sphere
of copyright in Georgia is not well developed and there are often infringements
of the existing laws. A number of reasons exist for violations of the
legislation including: inadequate and weak infrastructure, mechanisms of
protection and legislative base; a lack of culture managers and copyright
specialists; and a low level of awareness of the legislation among the
community and target groups.
Recently in Georgia the debates on
moral rights have become more intensive as the concept of moral rights is often
not understood by the authorities in relation to sculptors and architects in
circumstances where their work is moved, remade or demolished within the
context of reconstruction and renovation of public spaces related to the new
investment policy (see chapter
7.1).
Georgia/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.8 Data protection laws
The provisions on data protection in
Georgia are available within the Law on Copyright and Related Rights
(see chapter
5.1.7). The law establishes the rights of authors and owners of software
and databases, enables the authorised users of original databases or their copies
to make necessary changes for the normal operation of the customers' hardware
without the consent of the author or a person who owns the copyright on the
software and databases.
The Law on Telecommunications
(2005) establishes the legal and economic principles for the operation of
the electronic communication networks and resources all over Georgia. The law
establishes the principles of creation and regulation of a competitive
environment in this sphere. The National Communications Commission of Georgia
is the regulatory authority in relation to the Law on Telecommunications
(2005), Law on Broadcasting (2004), and Law on Independent National Regulatory
Authorities (09.13.2002). The terms of reference of the Commission covers
the drafting and adoption of relevant statutory acts.
However, data protection is
recognised as a major issue in Georgia. Some efforts to resolve problems in
this area were made by the State Department on Information Provision which has
drafted the Bill on E-documents, E-signatures, E-agreements and E-commerce. This
bill is intended to regulate the mechanisms for the production activity of
electronic facilities.
Georgia/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.9 Language laws
There is no special language
legislation in Georgia (see chapter
4.2.2).
Georgia/ 5.2 Legislation on culture
The legislative structure of the
cultural sector in Georgia includes the following:
The legislation on culture is
continually reorganised, revised and refreshed, which requires a great number
of new changes to the laws and instructions.
Many laws are of a declarative
nature, are ineffective and regularly violated. Some laws within the cultural
sphere conflict with the fundamental laws in other socio-economic sectors. The
established norms and conditions are not often observed because there is no
clear responsibility and distribution of powers at different levels of
authority (including inter-ministerially). In some fields of the cultural
sector, especially in the culture industries, no juridical / legal base exists.
The laws determining the structures
of cultural policy or declaration of principles
In order to guarantee the
constitutional principles, the following laws in the cultural sector have been
adopted:
The Law on Culture (1997) is guided by the Constitution and considers the
centuries-old cultural tradition and world experience in the cultural sphere.
The law is the legislative base for development of culture and
protection and maintenance of cultural values in Georgia. Cultural heritage is
defined as the main state priority in the Law on Culture.
The aim of the Law on Culture
is to protect the rights of citizens in the sphere of culture; to determine
legislative norms and principles for the use of cultural values and results of
creative work; to determine the responsibility of individuals and legal
entities for the maintenance and protection of cultural values; to ensure
non-interference of the state in the creative process and free cultural
activity of Georgian citizens; to promote involvement of Georgian culture into
the universal system of cultural processes and to carry out international
obligations undertaken by the state.
According to the Constitution, this
law reinforces the right of an individual to carry out cultural activities and
this is the integral and inviolable right of all citizens. All citizens of
Georgia are entitled to carry out free creative and cultural work according to
his / her interests and abilities.
The legislation determines a
creative worker as an author, reproducer or interpreter of cultural values in
the development of intellectual and creative process (see chapter
4.2.6).
The laws determining the domain,
operation, management structure and financing of culture institutions are:
The public laws that determine the
legal status, rules of activity and terms of reference of the state
institutions of various levels:
Legislation on financing:
Georgia/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.1 Visual and applied arts
Information is currently not
available.
Georgia/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.2 Performing arts and music
The Law on Public Theatres
(adopted in the first reading at the Parliamentary Committee in 2005) was
approved and signed by the President on June 9, 2006.
The purpose of the law is to support
the activity of theatres and theatre organisations, to promote national
dramatic art, to protect the literary language by means of the art of theatre,
to revive and develop traditions, to propagate universal human ideals and to
integrate Georgian theatre art into the world cultural space. The law regulates
the legal, social, economic and financial relations regarding the creation,
operation and re-organisation-liquidation of professional and amateur
organisations engaged in theatre activity and determines the rights and
obligations of natural and legal entities engaged in this sphere.
The law provides a new mechanism for
setting up a public theatre and defines its organisational and legal status.
All theatres financed from central and local budgets shall be founded as legal
entities under public law by the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and
Sport under its own initiative or on the recommendation of local governments.
In the Abkhazia and Ajaria autonomous republics, the respective governmental
institutions can recommend new theatres under their own initiative and / or on
the recommendation of bodies of local administration in the territories.
The right to establish a municipal
theatre under the initiative of bodies of local administration and
self-government will be provided in a new law, to comply with the Law on
Legal Entities under the Public Law.
The state is not permitted to
interfere in or control the creative process in theatres. However, the Law
on Public Theatres provides for the centralisation of the management of
theatre structures through concentration of responsibilities in a theatre
director (supervisor / administrator). The theatre directors are solely
accountable to the state authority for the general control of theatres, including
administrative, economic, routine and financial control. The position of
"art director" has lost its responsibilities as the legislation lacks
the levers supporting and ensuring decision-making in the creative sphere. This
provision has produced a discrepancy in the distribution of responsibilities
between the director and art director and infringes the rights of the latter.
The Law on Public Theatres
does not provide a clear definition of a theatre which allows the state to
avoid responsibility for supporting non-public theatres in Georgia.
The new Law on Public Theatres
does not extend to any private theatres such as those which are limited
companies, non-governmental theatres (NGOs), theatres of mixed type and amateur
theatres, which can be founded in compliance with the Civil Code of Georgia
and the Law on Entrepreneurs.
Georgia/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.3 Cultural heritage
Cultural heritage in Georgia is
regulated by the Cultural Heritage Law which was adopted on 27 June
2007, the Museums Law and the Law on Export-Import of Cultural
Objects in Georgia. The old Law on Protection of Cultural Heritage
adopted on 25 June 1999 has been invalidated.
The purpose of this new law is to
protect the cultural heritage of Georgia and regulation of legal relations
arising in this sphere. Georgia is also keen to protect Georgian cultural
heritage abroad.
The procedure of taking the cultural
heritage and cultural values from Georgia and their bringing in Georgia (that
means the export and import of cultural items as well as taking of cultural
heritage abroad for exhibitions) and regulation of professional activity in the
cultural heritage sphere is specified by the certain legislative act.
Consequently, amendments were made
to the following laws in order to protect Georgian cultural heritage.
The Cultural Heritage Law
(2007) provides the ground for protection of the richest cultural heritage of
Georgia; it defines the terms and general mechanisms that will protect the
cultural heritage against any encroachment.
Protection is provided to all
immovable monuments, movable parts of immovable monuments, movable monuments as
well as to the objects with monument signs and immovable monument protection
zones in the whole territory of Georgia, irrespective of the form of ownership.
As compared with the old Law on
the Protection of Cultural Heritage (1999), the Cultural Heritage Law
covers wider activities, is more specific in determination of the rights and
obligations related to the cultural heritage, and is more rigorous in the
formulation of principles for establishment of monument status.
On 2 September 2005, the government
of Georgia passed the Resolution on the Rules of the Issue of Permits for
Execution of Works on Monuments of History and Culture and Archeological Digs.
Work carried out on monuments of history and culture is regulated at state
level. The new revision of this Law is aimed at the perfection of the
applicable legislation.
The control of permits /
requirements is provided through the Law on State Control of Architecture
and Construction Activity. State supervision of compliance with the terms
of permits / requirements in the heritage field is undertaken by the Ministry
of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport.
As these heritage protection acts
have not long been in place, it is difficult to assess their success, although
the acts of legislation and regulatory norms on the issue were available before
the Rose Revolution of November 2003. New statutory acts reinforced and
strengthened delimitation of responsibilities regarding protection and control
of the monuments of history and culture.
The Law on Museums was passed
on 22 June 2001 and takes guidance from the Law on Culture and the Law
on the Protection of Cultural Heritage (25.06.1999); the aims and purposes
of the law are to determine the basic principles of museum activity and use of
museums; to provide state guarantees for museum activity; and to develop
administration and financing principles for the system of museums. The law
determines categories of museums, regulates non-state involvement in museum activity
and determines the rights and obligations of legal and natural persons in the
sphere of museum activities. In line with this law, the Ministry of Culture has
developed Instructions on Accounting and Protection of Museum Objects in
Georgia. This document is not a statutory act, but a manual for protection and
accounting and restoration of museum objects.
The Law on Import-export of
Cultural Objects was adopted on 22 June 2001, to determine the universal
rules for importing and exporting cultural objects.
One of the most disputable issues in
the protection of cultural heritage is the relationship between the state and
the Georgian Orthodox Church within the context of the concordat signed in 2000
(see chapter
5.3.10).
Although the process of forming a
legislative base in the sphere of cultural heritage is almost completed, in
reality the laws will be brought into line with international and European
standards. The laws are of a declarative nature; there are some discrepancies
both in the legislation regulating the sphere of cultural heritage and as
compared with the general laws, e.g. contravention to the Law on Legal
Person under the Public Law which in turn contradicts the Law on Local
Administration and Self-government (see chapter
2.2).
After the adoption of the Concordat
(with the church), the legislation regulating the heritage sector has suffered
a legal vacuum as no laws and acts of legislation interpreting the principles
determined in the Concordat and delimiting the rights on the property of the
state and the church have been passed (see chapter
5.3.10).
The Law on the National Backlog
regulates the activity of the National Archives.
Georgia/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.4 Literature and libraries
The Law on Library Management
regulates the general issues of library organisations. It defines libraries as
cultural-educational, scientific-informational institutions, whose main social
function is to effectively and fully apply its funds and other library
resources to benefit the users.
The universal library network
includes public and non-public, local and departmental library networks. The
library system covers the National Library, training libraries, public
libraries, children's libraries, school libraries and special library networks.
The main library of the public
network is the National Library of the Parliament of Georgia, and special
libraries also operate in the republics of Abkhazia and Ajaria.
The public library network is
established according to the territorial and departmental principles.
The lack of tax exemptions in the
law prevents the development of private libraries. Instead, there are efforts
to own the premises where the libraries are placed and thereby to stop their
operation.
Georgia/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.5 Architecture and environment
Georgia is a country with rich
architectural traditions which requires a well balanced and stable legal base
to support and develop this sector. The following laws are applicable:
The Law on Architectural Activity was passed on 14 April 1998 to create and develop an
adequate, eco-friendly, aesthetic environment and to promote architectural art
in Georgia.
Under the law, the following areas
are subject to state assessment: architectural designs financed by central or
local budgets, or budgets of autonomous republics and other territorial units; by
the state reserve or special state funds; and by the state or by construction
credit allocated under state guarantee.
The environmental assessment of
architectural design is carried out in compliance with the Law on State
Environmental Assessment.
Together with the Architecture and
Construction Inspection Agency, state supervision of the monuments of culture
is undertaken by the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport. The
law also allows participation in architecture and construction activity by
foreign legal and natural persons equated to resident legal and natural
persons.
The significant Law on Spatial
Management and Urban Planning Principles, passed on 2 June 2005, regulates
the process of spatial management and urban planning in Georgia. As well as
being responsible for private development, this law regulates the process of
accommodation, development of settlements and infrastructure in compliance with
the requirements of protecting the cultural heritage and environment, and
establishes in this sphere the rights and responsibility of governmental
institutions and natural and legal persons.
In the cultural sector,
environmental protection is regulated by the general legislation regardless of
the field - by the Law on Environment Protection and the Law on State
Control of Environmental Protection.
In spite of the state supervision
which has been implemented in this sphere there are some violations of the law.
The main reasons for the violations are:
Georgia/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.6 Film, video and photography
The Law on State Support for
National Cinematography was passed on 5 December 2000. As well as
determining the legal mechanisms for state support to national cinematography,
the law establishes the status of a national film, the legislative base for
financing its production and distribution, the legal status of a respective
institution / organisation operating in the film sphere and outlines the basic
principles of state support for film-making. These basic principles are
expressed in creation of guarantees for creative activity and creative freedom,
in protection of copyright and concerning integration of Georgian cinematography
in the world film process etc. The law takes into consideration the Laws on
Culture and on Protection of Copyright and Related Rights.
Georgia/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.7 Culture industries
See chapter
4.2.6.
Georgia/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.8 Mass media
The Law on Press and Other Mass
Media was passed on 10 August 1991 which declared freedom for the mass
media. By this law, the constitutional principles were reinforced through the
concrete relationship of the press and other mass media with the public.
The Law of Georgia on
Broadcasting was passed on 23 December 2004, which was drafted with the
expert support of the EU. This law determines the obligations of public
broadcasting to protect the public interest in the sphere of news, public and
political, educational, cultural and sport programmes. Public broadcasters are
also obliged by the law to create some programmes that reflect the ethnic,
cultural, language, religious, age and gender diversity of the population.
Provisions on protection of data are
also available within the applicable Law on Copyright and Related Rights (see
chapter
5.1.7).
The Georgian National Communication
Commission (GNCC) operates under the Law on Telecommunications (2005), Broadcasting
(2004), Independent National Regulatory Authorities (2002), and on
Independent Regulatory Commission (2005).
In compliance with the Law on
Telecommunications, the GNCC allocates licenses to companies engaged in
telecommunications.
When the Laws on
Telecommunications and on Broadcasting came into effect, the legal
status of broadcasting companies radically changed.
Under the Law on Broadcasting
three types of companies were recognised - public, community and private. The
State Broadcasting Company was reorganised into a public television company and
its status, content obligations, programme priorities and other issues were to
be regulated by the Law on Broadcasting (see chapter
3).
The GNCC performs the function of
monitoring the execution of the Law on Protection of Minors from Detrimental
Effect. The State Department for Youth Affairs is entitled to determine the
criteria of the films released and the GNCC monitors the protection of minors'
rights. The Commission also monitors compliance with the Law on Protection
of Copyright and Related Rights in the broadcasting sector.
Georgia/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.9 Legislation for self-employed
artists
Information is currently not
available.
For more information, see our Status
of Artists section.
Georgia/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.10 Other areas of relevant
legislation
Concordat
Subject to the Constitution of
Georgia, the state recognises the historical role and independence from the
state of the Georgian Apostolic Autocephalic Orthodox Church.
The Georgian Apostolic Autocephalic
Orthodox Church had obtained the status of independence, the Autocephaly, since
488 and was deprived of it within the period when Georgia was within the
Russian Empire (the independent status of the Georgian Orthodox Church was
abrogates in 1811). It restored the Autocephaly on March 12, 1917. The complete
rehabilitation of its rights took place in 1990 - in the Diptych of the World
Orthodox Churches the Georgian Apostolic Orthodox Church holds the 6th place.
The relationship between the state
and the church is specified in the constitutional agreement - the Concordat
adopted on 14 October 2002.
Under this Concordat, the state
recognises all Orthodox temples, monasteries (both open and closed), their
sites and land where they are located, as the property of the Church.
The state also recognises, as the
property of the Church, the ecclesiastic cultural objects kept in the National
Museums, stocks and depositories, except for the objects which are kept in
private collections. However, this principle does not comply with Article 8,
paragraph 2 of the Concordat which recognises the joint ownership of
the state and the church to the ecclesiastic objects as part of a single
national heritage. In spite of the legal discrepancy regarding this clause the
state preserves a level of regulation and supervision over the ecclesiastic
objects.
The Concordat outlines the
obligations of the state and the church in respect of the joint trusteeship,
protection and defence of the ecclesiastic cultural objects. Under the
agreement with the church, the state shall establish the legal conditions of
ecclesiastic objects kept in the museums and depositories, as well as the terms
and conditions of the projects of restoration, conservation and maintenance of
temples of cultural and historic importance.
The state also assigns the funds
from the central budget for the needs of the Georgian Apostolic Autonomous
Orthodox Church (1 290 100 GEL in 2005, 2 114 600 GEL in
2006, 3 395 000 GEL in 2007).
Georgia/ 6. Financing of culture
6.1 Short overview
Culture in Georgia is financed by
both the state and local budgets.
In 2004, the Ministry of Culture was
merged with the Departments for Sports and Youth Affairs. Along with a sharp
growth in the state budget, the budget of the Ministry of Culture, Monument
Protection and Sport of Georgia and regional expenditures for these spheres was
also increased.
In 2005 the total budget of the
Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport was 32 554 400
GEL, which amounted to 1.74% of the state budget (282 407 300 GEL).
In comparison with the budget of the Ministry for 2004 which totaled
28 906 700 GEL, or 3.02 % of the overall state budget
(151 321 720 GEL), the total for 2005 represents a decrease of 1.28%
in respect of the state budget.
It should be mentioned that the
draft budget of the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport for 2005
amounted to 32 554 400 GEL, unlike the actual budget which amounted
to 34 433 200 GEL. There is also the difference between the draft
budget and actual budget for 2007: the draft budget for 2007 amounts to
65 380 000 GEL and the actual amount is 77 113 691 GEL.
According to the Ministry of Finance
data, from January-June 2007, as compared with the same period of the previous
year, the actual gross domestic product increased by 12.5% and exceeded 7.5
billion GEL in nominal terms. The significant share in the growth of GDP
belongs to the industry, trade and transport. These three branches provided the
growth of GDP by 5.5%, or 44% of the total rise in GDP.
In June 2007, as compared with
December 2006, the general rate of customer prices increased by 4.1%. During
the twelve-month period (from June 2006 to June 2007) the inflation rate was
7.3%.
In 2006, the adjusted assignment for
the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport amounted to
53 984 400 GEL, or 1.4% of the payments to the state budget, and the
expenses - 53 757 300 GEL. In the first six months of 2007, the
adjusted assignment amounted to 43 485 300 GEL, or 2% of the payments
to the state budget, and the expenses - 39 224 400 GEL.
In the operational context, the
estimated expenses to be spent from the state budget for the culture, sport and
religion sphere in 2006, and the first six months of 2007, was determined as
follows - 72 779 900 GEL and 52 428 800 GEL accordingly.
The actual expenses for the same periods amounted to 71 935 500 GEL
and 48 060 600 GEL accordingly. The estimated expenses to be spent in
this sphere from the local budget in 2006 and the first six months of 2007
amounted to 69 940 200 GEL and 35 388 800 GEL and the
actual expenses for the same periods - 67 421 900 GEL and
28 824 500 GEL accordingly.
In 2006-2007, the state expenditures
in the sphere of culture per inhabitant amounted to 15.6 GEL and 20.5 GEL
accordingly, that is 0.5% of GDP per inhabitant. (Source: Ministry of Finance,
Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sports).
According to data for 2003 from the
State Department for Statistics, recreation and culture represented 1.8% of the
total personal consumption in households, which is half of the 2002 figure of
3.9%.
Georgia/ 6. Financing of culture
6.2 Public cultural expenditure per
capita
Table 7:
Public cultural expenditure per capita in Georgia, in GEL, 2000-2007
Year |
State |
GDP |
%
of GDP |
Population |
Expenditure
per capita |
2000 |
29 482 900 |
6 015 500 000 |
0.50 |
4 435 200 |
6.64 |
2001 |
29 435 600 |
6 647 100 000 |
0.44 |
4 401 400 |
6.68 |
2002 |
39 815 500 |
7 459 400 000 |
0.52 |
4 371 535 |
9.10 |
2003 |
41 453 500 |
8 564 700 000 |
0.46 |
4 342 600 |
9.54 |
2004 |
69 067 900 |
9 969 800 000 |
0.69 |
4 315 200 |
16.00 |
2005 |
73 877 600 |
11 600 900 000 |
0.63 |
4 289 100 |
17.22 |
2006 |
123 888 600 |
65 625 000 000 |
0.5 |
4 401 300 |
15.6 |
2007 |
112 502 500 |
75 000 000 000 |
0.5 |
4 401 300 |
20.5 |
Source:
Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sports.
*
The data for 2000-2003 has been calculated for culture only, since 2004-2007 -
for culture, sports and youth affairs.
In comparison to other European countries,
public culture expenditure per capita in Georgia is very low: GEL 17.22 (or 7.8
euros) in 2005 against GEL 16 in 2004, and corresponded, respectively, to 0.63
% of the GDP in 2005 and to 0.69 % in 2004. An increase in per capita spending
is related to the general growth of GDP in 2005.
Table 8:
Public cultural expenditure per capita in Georgia: Ministry of Culture,
in GEL, 2000-2007
Year |
Expenditure
|
GDP |
%
of GDP |
Population |
Expenditure
per capita |
2000 |
7 527 000 |
6 015 500 000 |
0.13 |
4 435 200 |
1.70 |
2001 |
7 882 700 |
6 647 100 000 |
0.12 |
4 401 400 |
1.79 |
2002 |
11 483 400 |
7 459 400 000 |
0.15 |
4 371 535 |
2.63 |
2003 |
9 732 300 |
8 564 700 000 |
0.11 |
4 342 600 |
2.24 |
2004 |
28 906 700 |
9 969 800 000 |
0.29 |
4 315 200 |
6.70 |
2005 |
32 554 400 |
11 600 900 000 |
0.28 |
4 289 100 |
7.59 |
2006 |
53 948 400 |
65 625 000 000 |
0.5 |
4 401 300 |
15.6 |
2007 |
77 113 700 |
75 000 000 000 |
0.5 |
4 401 300 |
20.5 |
Source:
Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sports.
*
In 2000-2003 - Ministry of Culture. Since 2004 - Ministry of Culture, Monument
Protection and Sports.
Table 9:
Public cultural expenditure per capita in Georgia: Local authorities,
in GEL, 2000-2007
Year |
Culture
expenditure |
Share
of total |
2000 |
21 955 900 |
6.8 |
2001 |
21 552 900 |
5.3 |
2002 |
28 332 100 |
6.3 |
2003 |
31 721 200 |
6.3 |
2004 |
40 161 200 |
5.9 |
2005 |
41 323 200 |
5.4 |
2006 |
69 940 200 |
0.5 |
2007 |
35 388 800 |
0.5 |
Source:
Ministry of Finance
Georgia/ 6. Financing of culture
6.3 Public cultural expenditure
broken down by level of government
Table 10: Public
cultural expenditure: by level of government, in GEL, 2007
Level of government |
Total
expenditure |
%
share of total |
State (federal) |
77 113 700 |
68.5% |
Regional (provincial, Länder) |
- |
- |
Local (municipal) |
35 388 800 |
31.5% |
TOTAL |
112 502 500 |
100.0% |
Source:
Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sports.
Georgia/ 6. Financing of culture
6.4 Sector breakdown
Table 11: State cultural
expenditure in Georgia: by sector, in GEL, 2007*
Field
/ Domain / Sub-domain |
Direct
|
Presidential |
Total |
%
of |
Cultural Goods |
|
|
|
|
Cultural Heritage |
9 880 900 |
- |
9 880 900 |
12.81 |
Historical
Monuments |
1 978 821 |
- |
1 978 821 |
2.56 |
Museums |
7 792 079 |
- |
7 792 079 |
10.1 |
Archives** |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Libraries and literature*** |
110 000 |
- |
110 000 |
0.14 |
Arts |
13 388 611 |
3 386 513 |
16 775 124 |
21.75 |
Visual Arts (including design) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Performing Arts |
|
|
16 775 124 |
21.75 |
Music
(including folk) |
4 756 732 |
1 746 513 |
6 503 245 |
8.43 |
Theatre
and Musical Theatre |
8 631 879 |
|
8 631 879 |
11.19 |
Ballet
art |
- |
1 640 000 |
1 640 000 |
2.13 |
Media |
1 477 073 |
- |
1 477 073 |
1.91 |
Books and Press |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Books**** |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Press |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Audio, Audiovisual and Multimedia |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Cinema |
1 477 073 |
- |
1 477 073 |
1.91 |
Radio***** |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Television***** |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Other |
10 345 859 |
2 678 291 |
13 024 149 |
16.9 |
Interdisciplinary |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Socio-cultural |
1 495 200 |
- |
1 495 200 |
1.93 |
Cultural
Relations Abroad |
379 277 |
2 678 291 |
3 057 568 |
3.96 |
Administration |
1 947 500 |
- |
1 947 500 |
2.52 |
Educational
Activities |
6 523 881 |
- |
6 523 881 |
8.46 |
Not allocable by domain |
|
|
35 956 445 |
46.63 |
|
|
|
77 113 691 |
100.00 |
Source:
State Budget of Georgia, the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and
Sports.
*
The data for sectors is only available for the national budget; the data for
municipalities is not available.
**
Archives - 2005- 273 900 GEL; 2006: 899 000 GEL; 2007:
1 501 000 GEL (within the budget of the Ministry of Justice).
*** Libraries
(National) -2005: 1 021 800 GEL; 2006: 3 908 300 GEL; 2007:
3 908 300 GEL (within the budget of the Parliament of Georgia).
**** Chamber of Books - 2005-
223 900 GEL (direct financing from state budget) No data for 2006-2007.
***** TV and Radio - 2005:
16 500 000 GEL; 2006: 16 500 000 GEL; 2007: 17 400 000
GEL (direct financing from state budget).
Georgia/ 7. Cultural institutions
and new partnerships
7.1 Re-allocation of public
responsibilities
According to Georgian legislation,
cultural organisations (as for other organisations) may have three types of
legal status - state, private profit making legal entities and non-profit
making (non-state) organisations.
Division of financial liabilities
between the state and municipalities is still an on-going issue; this is a good
example of an unstable process in the current grave economic conditions. There
has been a systematic transfer of various organisations from the control of
central government to municipal control and vice versa. There have been many
such shuttle movements in 2004-2005 for the following reasons: the imbalance of
the legislative base requiring permanent and radical changes (new Law on
Public Theatres, ongoing amendments to the Laws on Local
Administration and Self-government etc.) and the system of delimitation of
references in the making.
For many years the funds of
municipal budgets were regular while the allocations from the central budget
were less regular. This regularity of municipal allocations would indicate that
perhaps municipalities should support the organisations of national importance
in their own territories. Tbilisi Municipality would be particularly suitable
in this regard in that it operates under its own legislative regime - The Law
on the Capital City of Georgia - Tbilisi.
However, the situation is different
in the Autonomous Republics. After the establishment of separatist power in
Abkhazia and the forcible expatriation of 300 000 people (1993), cultural
life is ideologically influenced and does not conform to the cultural policy
pursued by the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport of Georgia.
From 1990-2004 in Ajaria Autonomous
Republic there was a political and socio-economic situation which influenced
the development of culture. Ajaria did not participate in the wars of the 1990s
and therefore preserved the cultural infrastructure of the Soviet period. The
Republic had full autonomy of executive power over its own budget, which meant
that it did not have to pay taxes to the central budget of Georgia. In light of
this healthy budget and in virtue of the political problems, the Ajarian
government also avoided the ideological control of the central authorities.
Instead, Ajaria developed its own centralised and ideological cultural policy,
using strict censorship over the mass media. From 1990-2004 the Batumi
Institute of Arts and Batumi State Conservatory were established. The local
authorities were most favourable to the development of opera. Performances of
the local Theatre of Opera and Ballet involved famous Georgian performers from
Tbilisi and from abroad.
However, cultural activities were
irregular and were concentrated on the performing arts. No cultural events
reached the poor, agrarian regions of Ajaria, as attendance at cultural events
were unaffordable for this section of the population whose living standards
were extremely low, even compared with standards in Georgia.
In May 2004 after the Rose
Revolution, the governing system in Ajaria Autonomous Republic changed.
Constitutional reforms were carried out and central Georgian control was
enforced in the region. As a result of this central control, the cultural
policy of Ajaria started to conform more to the policy pursued by the Ministry
of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport of Georgia.
No independent councils of culture
exist in Georgia.
The comparatively poorly developed
private and non-governmental cultural sector (including art galleries,
theatres, publishing houses) acts more or less independently from the
governmental cultural policy because they are financed either by donors (mainly
via international grants) or depend on the market, which is also poorly
developed.
As for the mass media, the role of
the state was very clear in the period 1990-2004. Prior to the Rose Revolution
in November 2003, the government channels were tightly controlled, but private
companies operated freely. The post revolutionary period is characterised by a
decrease in the mass media market, especially in the regions. Along with the
creation of public broadcasting there was a reduced polarisation of the mass
media - all companies, with rare exceptions, maintain a policy of political
correctness.
In 2007 the situation in mass media
was revealed and aggravated in kind of the opposition between independent TV
companies "Imedi" and "Caucasia" and pro-governmental TV
companies "Rustavi-2", "Alania", "Public
Broadcasting", "Mze" ended with the closing of TV company
"Imedi" on November 7, 2007 (see chapter
4.2.5).
Since 2005, the Georgian state has
supported private investments in the cultural sector. However, there are some
issues in relation to the investment climate for culture, especially in respect
of cultural monuments; the majority of investors are not interested in and do
not want to protect and defend the national values advocated by the state.
Under the Law on Culture, the Law on Cultural Heritage (2007) and
the Law on the Privatisation of State-owned Property, the cultural heritage
of Georgia, as well as other cultural values specified by the law, are excluded
from privatisation.
Some cultural values may be
"privatised" in accordance with the law and with the consent of the
relevant ministry, provided that the cultural activity will be preserved for a
specific term: for example, the co-owner-entrepreneur intends to build a cinema-city
on a part of the territory by restoring the film studio in the centre of
Tbilisi.
Recently, there has been a tendency
to allow the long-term lease of a part of public spaces and the sale of objects
regarded as cultural monuments. Until now, because of the inadequacy of
legislation on the protection of cultural heritage, the state has not had the
regulating levers to guarantee an investor's liabilities and protection of the
cultural heritage. This issue has attracted healthy public protest. The Cultural
Heritage Law adopted in 2007 is intended to create such levers and
guarantees (see chapter
5.3.3).
These "infringements" have
resulted in protests from the public.
Georgia/ 7. Cultural institutions
and new partnerships
7.2 Status/role and development of
major cultural institutions
Since 1999, in compliance with the Law
on Legal Entities under the Public Law, the main institutions of culture
have been re-registered and established as legal entities. However, this law
has failed to fully regulate all those legal relations which determine the
status of organisations under the control of the local bodies of administration
and self-government (see chapter
2.2).
Most institutions under the control
of the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport of Georgia were
established as legal entities under public law, including:
The funds of state status do not
exist in Georgia. Though it is the urgent need in the state funds which will
accumulate the assets for development and support of culture, no adequate
legislative activities have been held in spite of the permanent debates on this
issue. All private donations pass the funds with the status of
non-governmental, non-profit organisations.
All private donations for the public
organisations and institutions - legal persons under the public law
subordinated to the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport of
Georgia pass through the funds with the status of non-governmental non-profit
organisations.
Georgia/ 7. Cultural institutions
and new partnerships
7.3 Emerging partnerships or
collaborations
The long-term cooperation between
public institutions of culture and private sponsors is somewhat irregular and
unofficial. One of the few sponsors regularly cooperating with key
organisations of national importance is the Georgian fund "Cartu",
which has financed large projects such as the restoration and repair of Shota
Rustaveli Tbilisi State Academic Drama Theatre, Kote Marjanishvili Tbilisi
State Academic Theatre, M. Tumanishvili Municipal Film Actors' Theatre-Studio
etc.
Other important examples of
cooperation between the state (the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and
Sport s and international funds are the Soros Foundation and the British
Council in Georgia etc. These initiatives often encourage participation of NGOs
and cultural societies to cooperate in projects with central or local
authorities as a third partner (e.g. sometimes as the contractor in a joint
project, e.g. with the Soros Foundation. In 2006, the Programme for Culture and
Art in the Georgian branch of the Soros Fund - The Open Society Georgia
Foundation - was closed.
Two examples of public-private partnerships
or collaborations (involving state, municipalities and NGOs) which have been
very successful are the traditional international film festival
"Prometheus" and Tbilisi Jazz Festival, which attract many visitors
and sponsors.
Georgia/ 8. Support to creativity
and participation
8.1 Direct and indirect support to
artists
Until 2004, the state supported
artists through art unions. Unlike during the Soviet period, indirect support
to artists is not currently available in the form of distribution of space for
studios and low rent for shops, distribution of tools and materials etc. At the
state level, the cultural creative potential is indirectly supported as
follows:
The state programmes of development
and support for 2007 are:
The division of fund for the
Presidential National Programme is as follows:
There are no special programmes to
provide pensions or health contributions for freelance artists.
Georgia/ 8.1 Direct and indirect
support to artists
8.1.1 Special artists funds
Information is currently not
available.
Georgia/ 8.1 Direct and indirect
support to artists
8.1.2 Grants, awards, scholarships
A special programme of state awards
in literature, art and architecture (2 878 800 GEL in 2005), as well
as a programme for the support of gifted children and teenagers, now operates
in Georgia.
Art workers awards are as follows:
These awards are given for exclusive
achievements in various fields of culture and art. The candidates are nominated
by the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport. Decisions on
awards are made by the State Committee for Honor Awards at the President's
Administration.
The following awards are given by
the Committee for State Awards in literature, art and architecture:
Ministry of Culture, Monument
Protection and Sport gives the following awards in drama and music - for vocal
ensembles, opera and Estrada singers and folklorists.
In addition to the State Awards,
there are awards given by the Union of Theatre Workers - K. Marjanishvili Award
and S. Akhmeteli Award (every 2 years); by the Artists' Union - the award for
the best piece of the year, the prize for the best gallery of the year; by the
music society - Z. Paliashvili award (every 4 years) and the S. Tsintsadze
award for the best music ensemble (every 4 years).
Georgia/ 8.1 Direct and indirect
support to artists
8.1.3 Support to professional
artists associations or unions
The Law on Art Workers and Art
Unions regulates relations between artists' unions and the government,
provides governmental subsidies for support of those organisations as legal
entities under public law and guarantees their participation in the development
of cultural programmes and decision-making. However, it was only until 2000
(prior to the Rose Revolution) that the state budget of Georgia assigned governmental
funding to the main cultural unions of national significance - the Artists'
Union, Writers' Union, Composers' Union, Theatre Workers' Unions. From 2001
until 2003, governmental funding was assigned to the Writers Union only and,
since 2004, state subsidies to arts unions have been stopped.
However, the state and
municipalities support associations and organisations indirectly by financing
events, festivals and exhibitions which are arranged by the unions.
Georgian art unions are:
After the Rose Revolution the art
unions, which represented a rather powerful authority in the Soviet period,
found themselves almost on the level of newly established NGOs, though they
still obtain some capital and human resources to maintain and rehabilitate
their function of support to artists. Legislative amendments have enabled this
once powerful ideological structure to change in order to meet the needs of the
contemporary free community. However, these unions need some indirect but
effective measures for state support and, through the unions, for support of
artists.
Under Georgian law, art unions are
trade associations, with the status of a legal entity under the public law,
which unite at least 5 art workers in literature or art.
The entrepreneurship aimed at
profit-gaining in concrete cases specified by the law (Law on Non-profit
Organisations) may be of subsidiary character for support of the activity
of non-profit organisations. However, this provision is idle and creative
unions suffer the financial crisis.
The legislation in this sphere is adequate
however there are some problems in the execution of the acts of legislation and
their administration. The Tax Code provides no benefits for art unions.
Recently, Georgian real estate has
become the object of active interest from investors. This interest has led the
state to sell the assets of some creative unions. In spite of their protests
and attempts to restitute their property through the court, the unions are not
winning. One example is sale, by the Ministry of Economic Development of Georgia,
of the holiday home for composers located in the resort-city Borjomi (reported
by news agency Reuters), with a starting price of 4.5 million USD.
Georgia/ 8.2 Cultural consumption
and participation
8.2.1 Trends and figures
For the past 15 years (1990-2005)
systematic research and polls in the sphere of culture have not been held in
Georgia due to the extremely dramatic and dynamic political life aggravated
with the socio-economic crisis. The exception was the sociological research
carried out on focus groups for the Conception of Development of Culture and
Tourism in Tbilisi, held by the Fund for Culture Salvation under the order of
the Service of Culture and Sports of Tbilisi Municipality in 2004.
As the research was targeted only at
the detection of specific urban trends, nationwide data on participation of
various social groups, distinctive by gender, age or educational level, in
cultural activity, is not available.
Data on culture from the State
Department for Statistics is not useful either as in the majority of cases
cultural information was compiled with education or recreation, entertainment
or even religion. The differential indicators in the sphere of culture cannot
be separated.
Unfortunately, in 2004-2005 the
amount of statistical data on culture has further decreased.
In November 2007, the newly
designated Prime Minister of Georgia announced the need to separate the State
Department of Statistics from the Ministry of Economic Development, and on
granting sovereignty to this Department, because in the majority of cases the
data submitted by the Department was embroidered to conform with the ministry's
policy. As development of culture is not among the priorities of the policy
implemented by the Ministry of Economic Development, the statistical data on
culture for 2006-2007 "dissolved" in the data on education or the
data on the social sphere.
However, the general trends of
participation are as follows: the trends of cultural participation, which had
been constantly growing since 1995, reached a peak in 2003. In 2004-2005
participation figures have stopped growing and have decreased in some spheres.
In general, the trend of participation is much lower than in the 1980s.
There are many reasons for the low
figures: living standards are lower; comparatively lower range of cultural
services, in some cases obsolete (as in museums and libraries) and some have
disappeared (e.g. cinemas which don't operate and there has been almost a total
stoppage of film production). In 2007, state assistance in the cinema sphere is
still insignificant - 1 477 073 GEL (1.9% of the budget of the
Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport); there is no real film
production in Georgia.
During the past ten years the number
of public libraries in Georgia reduced from 8 000 in 1990 to 2 160 in
2004. This decrease is most notable in the regions. However, for the last five
years, the situation has stabilised to some extent.
Due to serious financial problems
museums, archives and libraries are not able to maintain their infrastructure,
to purchase new displays, publications, equipment etc. At the same time, for
the past ten years the number of professional theatres has increased, although
this increase took place at the expense of small theatres such as "Sardapi"
or mobile troupes based on enterprise principles.
A decrease in visitor numbers was
caused by the closing for repair of the largest academic theatres, on the one
side, as well as the radically reduced average family income - only 1.8% of
family incomes have been spent on culture, education and recreation jointly,
with culture receiving 0.6%.
Table 12: Data on
cultural participation in Georgia, 2000-2006
Number |
2000 |
2001 |
2003 |
2005 |
2006 |
Public and universal libraries |
2 208 |
2 170 |
2 123 |
2 056 |
1 726 |
Book fund (in million copies) |
31.1 |
30.8 |
29.6 |
28.3 |
20.7 |
Museums (quantity in units) |
101 |
105 |
112 |
111 |
137 |
Visitors of museums (in thousand) |
376.6 |
319.7 |
412.5 |
301.0 |
472.6 |
Theaters (quantity in units) |
37 000 |
40 000 |
40 000 |
41 000 |
46 000 |
Spectators of theatres (in
thousand) |
508.2 |
367.3 |
266.1 |
256.0 |
343 |
Source:
State Department for Statistics of Georgia.
There are some research studies and
opinions on the monitoring of the participation of representatives of national
minorities in the cultural life of the community, carried out by the Public
Movement "Multinational Georgia" (http://www.pmmg.info). One of the recent efforts is the
Alternative Report on Implementation of the Framework Convention of the Council
of Europe on the Protection of National Minorities, but this report has not
been published yet. No other information is currently available.
Georgia/ 8.2 Cultural consumption
and participation
8.2.2 Policies and programmes
There is no coordinated or
strategically developed governmental programme for the promotion of
participation in cultural life, no state policy for extended civil
participation, civic belonging, or development / solidarity in the civic
community.
However, there are some projects
financed from the Presidential Fund and arranged by the Youth Department of the
Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport of Georgia. These projects
are partially aimed at developing solidarity in the civic community, e.g. the
annual project PATRIOT (which was introduced for the first time in 2005)
involves the integration of youth from various regions in summer camps; it also
facilitates intercultural dialogue between representatives of different
nationalities residing in Georgia and with foreign student groups, namely from
the Ukraine.
There are also some initiatives to
promote the sale and distribution of season tickets by Zachariah Paliashvili
State Academic Theatre of Opera and Ballet and project "Dmanisi" of
the National Museum - which is a summer camp for children on archeology.
Some activities organised by the
state could be considered as promoting participation in cultural life e.g.:
These events form part of the
regular cultural policy framework as they are financed from the reserve funds
of the President and the government.
Georgia/ 8.3 Arts and cultural
education
8.3.1 Arts education
Arts education in general and in
particular higher vocational art education (as is the higher education system
as a whole) has always been prestigious in Georgia. The academic art education
system created in the Soviet period provided the stability and admissibility of
high-quality education, on the one hand, and guaranteed the strictly
centralised and ideology driven control on the other. From the 1960s,
ideological pressure slackened, especially in the art institutions of higher
education resulting in an abundance of courses supported by a large cultural
market.
When Georgia regained its
independence in 1991, the country had an extended network of public music
schools, children's art schools and folklore ensembles with access to studios
and amateur arts groups. Tbilisi had a high concentration of the specialised
institutions of higher education - Tbilisi State Academy of Fine Arts, Tbilisi
State Conservatory and the State Institute (now University) of Theatre and
Cinema. In the early 1990s the trend of a high number of arts students
continued and new institutes of higher education were established - Batumi
State Conservatory, Batumi State Institute of Arts and the Tbilisi State
Institute of Culture and Arts. New departments majoring in art specialties were
opened in traditional institutes.
The period of economic crisis and
civil wars has drastically influenced the general state of art education both
from the material, technical and professional human aspects. This period is
characterised by the outflow of gifted young professionals, especially in the
performing arts - music, ballet, opera singers and artists. The issue of ageing
educational specialists became very acute.
The arts education field suffered
also due to the lack of a system of social insurance, extremely low wages in
education and scarce budgetary funds in the institutions of cultural education.
Reforms were required from both institutional and curriculum aspects. In 2003
the status of teachers of the secondary art schools was equated to the status
of teachers of general secondary schools whereby their wages have been
increased and the outflow of professionals has stopped.
The art education system (similar to
the general education system) consists of three main stages:
Stage I: primary education, including art schools (music, fine arts,
dance etc.) According to data from 2005, there are 258 of these schools in
Georgia.
Stage II: secondary vocational education, including art colleges (of
art, music, dance, cultural education). In 2006 there are 26 of these secondary
colleges in Georgia.
The Ministry of Education and
Science drafts the Law on Vocational Education in Georgia based on the
concept of vocational education in Georgia approved under Resolution N150 of 31
August 2005. The amendments to be made to the applicable law provide separation
of the comprehensive component from secondary vocational education, whereby
establishment, reorganisation and liquidation, state control etc. of a
vocational art college will come under the responsibility of the Ministry of
Culture, Monument Protection and Sport.
Stage III: higher education in culture is regulated by the Law on
Higher Education which provides for specifics on art education in some
issues. Today there are 9 institutions of higher education in Georgia.
Within the annual state programme of
art education of Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport funding is
assigned for the following activities:
In 2004, after a long debate, the Law
on Higher Education was drafted by the reformed Ministry of Education and
Science. Following this law, the first Universal National Exams were held in
2005. Difficulties have been created for art institutions, however, in that the
unified system of assessment cannot cater for the specifics of practical art
specialties. Consequently, discussions have been held between the Ministry of
Education and Sciences and the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and
Sport to resolve the issues in arts education.
At present the Ministry of Education
and Science has no clear concept of educational reform in the sphere of culture
or any policy on cultural issues. Delimitation of responsibilities of the two
ministries is specified in the Law on Higher Education (Chapter III,
Article 2, paragraph 2). Under the Law on Higher Education,
Chapter 8, the Ministry of Culture, Monument Protection and Sport of
Georgia is the central body for the formation and implementation of policies in
education, art and cultural heritage.
However, the institutional and
curriculum accreditation of an art institute of higher education shall remain
within the competence of the Ministry of Education and Science.
In May 2005, Georgia acceded to the
Bologna process. The new Law of Georgia on Higher Education binds the
institutes of higher education of Georgia to pursue the main priorities of the
Bologna process, such as transferring to the three-step system of higher
education, quality assurance and accreditation, European Credits Transfers and
Storage (ECTS) system, mobility, involvement of students in the decision-making
process, compatibility of curricula with the European system etc.
Since 2005, a new model entitled
"Money Follows a Student" has been in operation. Two phases of
institutional accreditation have also been carried out under the Universal
National Examination system, which has secured assessment of entrants by the
unified methods and elimination of corruption in this sphere. The cooperation
of the Ministry of Education and Sciences with the civil community is in
progress.
Under Order N 407 of the Minister of
Education and Sciences of Georgia of May 3, 2006 was established the national
team for support of the Bologna process. The goal of this team is to set the
concrete objectives for the effective implementation of the reforms under the
Bologna process in Georgia and to promote the activities determined within the
Bologna process. Two members of this team are representatives of the
institution of higher art education.
On April 3-5, 2006 under the support
and financing of the Ministry of Education and Sciences of Georgia at Shota
Rustaveli State University of Theatre and Film was carried out ELIA regional
conference - The Higher Art Education and Bologna. The conference was attended
by the representatives of various institutes of higher art education. This
conference was a significant contribution in making the significant changes in
the institutes of higher art education in the light of the Bologna process.
In the autumn semester of 2006,
several higher education institutions in Georgia introduced performance based
indicators / targets, according to the Bologna process. As the new Law
on Higher Education is not fully operational till 2007, there will be some
universities adopting the quality management systems at a later date.
Among the institutes of higher art
education Tbilisi Vano Sarajishvili State Conservatory and Tbilisi State
Academy of Fine Arts have been transferred to the three-step system of
education. In 2005-2006 was introduced the ECTS system as well. At Tbilisi Vano
Sarajishvili State Conservatory 23 curricula are built on the credit system and
at Tbilisi State Academy of Arts - 24 curricula. In 2006 in both institutes a
new form of the Transcript to Diploma was issued to the graduates. This form
was approved under Order N 149-e of the Minister of Education and Sciences
of Georgia (05.04.05) On Approval of the Form for Transcript of the Higher
Education State Certificate - Diploma.
Shota Rustaveli State University of
Theater and Film has also been transferred to the tree-step system of higher
education. For the University students of the first and second years has been
introduced the ECTS system, 114 curricula is built on the credit system.
Consequently, at this University the transcripts of diploma will be issued in
2006-2007.
The full reform of education is an
urgent and necessary process. However, the ongoing reform of education
initiated by the Ministry of Education and Science cannot be defined as
adequate. The methodology of transition from the Soviet academic system of education
to a new system is underdeveloped; the proposed educational system for culture
is inadequate and eclectic; and there is a manifest lack of co-ordination of
the respective ministries. In spite of the general declaration of priorities of
the Bologna process, the system of reorganisation of art institutions is
inclined towards unification, but not diversification.
In 2007, the Law on Higher
Vocational Education was adopted which creates the conditions for
development of the higher educational system in line of specialties attributed
to the practical qualifications. The higher vocational education in Georgia is
divided into artisan and artist education, where the artisan education covers
the applied specialties and artist education - the art specialties.
In accordance with the new law, the
Georgian higher schools announced admissions to various professional
specialties, including creative ones, for the 2007-2008 academic years.
In the same context is foreseen the
implementation of Strategy 5 declared by the Ministry of Culture, Monument
Protection and Sport of Georgia (see chapter
3.3 and chapter
4.1).
Main programmes / activities under
the strategy:
Expected Outcome:
Georgia/ 8.3 Arts and cultural
education
8.3.2 Intercultural education
The Ministry of Education and
Science, which is leading a reform of education in Georgia, is responsible for
promoting intercultural education. National goals for education have been
adopted in Georgia in October 2004, stating that the development of
intercultural skills for graduates of secondary level education is one of its
priorities. The Law on Secondary Education, which followed in April
2005, grants rights to all schools to teach in minority languages and to teach
the history of minorities without any discrimination regarding the content or
the financial support offered.
Intercultural education is a part of
the National Curriculum of Georgia and is integrated into teaching, mainly in
the subjects of the social sciences and of foreign languages.
The national goals of education
state that some of the other goals of education in Georgia are to educate a
tolerant citizen who knows how to effectively communicate with diverse
individuals and groups.
There are several topics included
into the teaching of the arts / music through the general school curriculum
covering the artistic experiences from different parts of the world and of the
minorities in Georgia.
One of the aims of the introduction
of the separate subject, "Civic Education in Georgia" was to increase
the student's sensitivity towards the knowledge of human rights, citizenship,
world religions and influences of various cultures on the society.
The public movement
"Multinational Georgia" has developed an alternative package of
recommendations and has introduced intercultural education as a part of the
general school curricula, within the civil education discipline.
For more information, see our Intercultural Dialogue section.
Georgia/ 8.4 Amateur arts, cultural
associations and community centres
8.4.1 Amateur arts
The amateur arts in Georgia are
divided into two groups: a) folklore and b) all other art-forms. There is a
strong affection among the population for folk songs and dances in which
Georgians hold great pride. Folk ensembles, in particular, of vocalists, are
plentiful throughout Georgia. The culture of preservation, study and
development of folklore in Georgia has been raised to the professional level.
Moreover, the Georgian vocal polyphony of folksongs and chorals is regarded as
important at the international level. Consequently, many villages and towns
have their own folk ensembles, which reflects the diversity of Georgian music
folklore and, on the other hand, supports continued interest in the training of
young people in this field. Large ensembles often have groups for young people
where the future generations of singers are encouraged. Folklore ensembles are
also popular among the national minorities.
The crafts sector is not as widely
developed. In comparison with the performing arts, the craft field requires
special programmes of support for preservation and maintenance. This is
especially important against the background of the critical socio-economic
situation in the countryside where ceramics, carpet weaving, embroidery etc.
are practiced.
All other types of amateur arts are
less popular than folklore and are mainly urban based (e.g. people's theatre
and fine arts). Recently groups for teenagers in large cities have become more
involved in modern genres of amateur art related to new technologies and social
development - multimedia, graffiti, e-music. This subculture has yet been
developed does not receive state support, though some municipal initiatives
related to mass culture are touching on this type of amateur art, although only
in the performing arts sector.
After the Rose Revolution, the
interest of the state in folklore has increased greatly, whereby many projects
in this sphere are organised and funded. The most significant are: the
International Folklore Festival "Chveneburi", ART GENE, and the
Presidential Programme "National Voice".
Georgia/ 8.4 Amateur arts, cultural
associations and community centres
8.4.2 Cultural houses and community
cultural clubs
Within the last 15 years the network
of former cultural houses and clubs of the Soviet period has been trimmed down.
In general, these centres of culture have been privatised and only a small
number have preserved their main profile. Unfortunately no statistical data is
available as these cultural houses and clubs were always under the control of
the regional or municipal authorities, which provide no detailed reports on
cultural data. Nevertheless, to some extent these cultural centres have been
replaced with new associations and unions.
Georgia/ 9. Sources and Links
9.1 Key documents on cultural policy
Bogouta, Gregor: Overview of
Georgian Book Policy, Recommendations. Project STAGE, 2002.
Cultural Policy and Action
Department, November 2003. Project
STAGE Directorate General IV - Education, Culture and Heritage, Youth and
Sport, 2003.
European Commission: Overview of
Georgian Cultural Policy. Brussels: European Commission, 2002.
Georgian National Communication
Commission: The 2004 Report. Tbilisi: Georgian National Communication
Commission, 2004.
Gunia-Kuznetsova, Nino: On Urgent
Measures for Implementation of Cultural Policy. Materials from Conference
"Cultural Policy - Priorities and Strategy". Tbilisi: YTA Union,
2001.
Gunia-Kuznetsova, Nino;
Shatirishvili, Zaza; Kipiani, Nana; Arabuli, Koba; Baliashvili, Marina;
Gegenava, Theona: Tbilisi Culture and Tourism Concept. Tbilisi 2004. Tbilisi
Municipality, Tbilisi City Municipality Service for Culture and Sport, Fund for
Saving Culture.
Laboratory for Interdisciplinary
Research and Art Development: Materials from conference Cultural Policy -
New Art - Exhibitions - Debates - Documentation - Interactive. Tbilisi,
2003.
Landry, Charles: Tbilisi City
Cultural Strategy: The Next Steps.
Ministry of Culture of Georgia:
National Report 2001. Tbilisi: Ministry of Culture of Georgia,
2001.
Ministry of Culture, Monument
Protection and Sport of Georgia: State Programmes. Tbilisi: Ministry of
Culture, Protection of Monuments and Sports of Georgia, 2004.
National Report on Cultural Heritage
Policies. 2003.
Periodic Report on the Application
of the World Heritage Convention.
2004.
Project Strategic direction of
management plan for historical part of Tbilisi. Tbilisi: National Committee of ICOMOS, 2003.
Georgia/ 9. Sources and Links
9.2 Key organisations and portals
Cultural policy making bodies
Parliament of Georgia / Committee
for Education, Sciences, Culture and Sports
http://www.parliament.ge/
Ministry of Culture, Monument
Protection and Sport of Georgia
http://www.mc.gov.ge/
President's Administration of
Georgia
http://www.president.gov.ge
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
http://www.mfa.gov.ge
Ministry of Education and Sciences
of Georgia
http://www.mes.gov.ge/
Professional associations
Union of Architects of Georgia
http://arcunion.iatp.org.ge
Young Theatrical Artists Union (YTA
UNION)
http://www.itic.org.ge/ytaunion
Grant-giving bodies
Cartu Group-Cartu Bank
http://www.cartubank.ge
Georgian Fund of Protection of
Monuments of History and Culture
http://www.monument.ge/
Open Society Georgia Foundation
(Soros Foundation)
http://www.osgf.ge
Goethe Institute
http://www.iiz-dvv.ge
Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung
Representative Office in Georgia
http://www.fes.ge
South Caucasus Regional Office of
the Heinrich-Boll-Foundation
http://www.boell.ge
British Council Georgia Office
http://www.britishcouncil.org/ge
Eurasia Foundation Georgia Office
http://www.eurasia.org.ge/
SOCO Foundation
http://soco.ge
Cultural research and statistics
State Department for Statistics of
Georgia
http://www.statistics.ge/index.php?plang=1
Georgian Academy of Sciences
G.Chubinashvili Institute of History Georgian Art
http://www.acnet.ge/arthistory.htm
National Committee of UNESCO at the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Georgia
http://www.mfa.gov.ge/index.php?sec_id=86&lang_id=GEO
ICOMOS Georgian national Committee
(International Council on Monuments and Sites)
http://www.international.icomos.org/risk/2001/geor2001.htm
Fund for the Preservation of the
Cultural Heritage of Georgia
http://www.culturalheritage.ge
Restoration Centre of Architectural
Heritage of Georgia
http://www.itic.org.ge/heritage
Centre for Archaeological Research,
TransCaucasus Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
http://members.tripod.com/centerarch
Heritage & Modernity Association
http://heritage.gol.ge
Georgian Cultural Heritage
Information Centre (GCHIC)
http://www.heritage.ge
Fund of Science "Udabno"
http://www.itic.org.ge/udabno/home.htm
Stichting Caucasus Foundation (SCF)
http://www.caucasusfoundation.ge
Fund for Saving Culture
http://www.netcreative.it/observatory/documenti/conceptiongeo.doc
Arts Interdisciplinary Research
Laboratory
http://www.airl.ge
Georgian Arts & Culture Center
http://www.gaccgeorgia.org
Caucasian House- Center for Cultural
Relations of Georgia
http://www.ccrgchouse.ge/
Intercultural Relations Centre (IRC)
Georgia Office
http://www.irc.org.ge
Public Movement Multinational
Georgia
http://www.pmmg.info
Culture / arts portals
Georgian National Museum
http://www.museum.ge
National Gallery of Georgia
http://www.sanet.ge/art
National Center of Cinematography
http://www.filmcenter.ge
Tbilisi State Academy of Arts
http://art.edu.ge
Tbilisi V. Sarajishvili State
Conservatoire
http://www.conservatoir.edu.ge
Center for Traditional Polyphony of
Tbilisi V. Sarajishvili State Conservatoire
http://www.polyphony.ge
Shota Rustaveli Georgian State
University of Theater and Cinema
http://www.tafu.edu.ge
Zachariah Paliashvili State Academic
Theater of Opera and Ballet
http://www.opera.ge
Folklore State Centre of Georgia
http://www.folk.ge
Iliko Sukhishvili and Nino
Ramishvili State Academy Troupe of Georgian National Ballet
http://www.gnb-sukhishvili.ge
Georgian Voices
http://www.georgian-voices.ge
Arts and Culture Centre
http://www.gaccgeorgia.org
New Art Union
http://www.newart.org.ge/
ART CAUCASUS
http://www.artcaucasus.org
Internet Academy
http://gesj.internet-academy.org.ge
Georgian International Festival of
Arts in honour of Michael Tumanishvili - "Gift"
http://www.giftfestival.ge/
Tbilisi International Film Festival
http://www.tbilisifilmfestival.ge
Eastern Promotion
http://www.easternpromotion.com
Tbilisi State Concert Hall
http://www.tbilisiconcerthall.com/
League of Professionals
http://www.league.gol.ge
Georgian House
http://www.georgianhouse.ge
The
Council of Europe/ERICarts "Compendium of Cultural Policies and Trends in
Europe, 9th edition", 2008