Report creation date: 14.10.2008 - 10:24
Countr(y/ies): Finland
Chapter(s):
1,2,21,22,23,24,241,242,243,244,245,246,3,31,32,33,4,41,42,421,422,423,424,425,426,427,428,429,4210,43,5,51,511,512,513,514,515,516,517,518,519,52,53,531,532,533,534,535,536,537,538,539,5310,6,61,62,63,64,7,71,72,73,8,81,811,812,813,82,821,822,83,831,832,84,841,842,9,91,92
Finland/ 1. Historical perspective:
cultural policies and instruments
The formation of Finnish national
cultural policies from the mid-19th century to the late 20th century can be
roughly divided into three stages:
Historically four forces have shaped
these developments:
The foundations for Finnish national
culture were laid and affirmed under the Russian Czarist regime (1809-1917)
which, alongside the Senate of the autonomous Finnish Grand Duchy, was the
patron of the evolving bilingual (Swedish and Finnish) artistic and cultural
life. After independence, the new nation state took over the role of patron and
continued to build a national identity and national unity. This identity was
based on the cultural heritage stemming from the period of Russian rule and
partly from the period of earlier Swedish rule, which had lasted seven
centuries. During the first four decades of independence, which saw a civil war
and two wars with the Soviet Union, national unity and national identity became
even more prioritised objectives of the state and, subsequently, also central
principles in national cultural and arts policies. Other objectives, such as
the promotion of creativity and enhancing participation and cultural democracy,
started to gain ground in the 1960s and became integrated with other economic
and social goals when the ideology of the social welfare state was more
comprehensively adopted and implemented in the 1970s.
Public support for the arts and
culture had expanded even before the advent of the social welfare state. The
municipalities had gradually taken over the task of maintaining institutions of
adult education and public libraries from the civic associations and the
central government started to subsidise them on a regular basis. The role of
the state in supporting these institutions was cemented by legislation in the
1920s. The joint financial responsibility of the state and the municipalities
became one of the pillars of modern Finnish cultural policy.
The broader financial basis for
public support of the arts, cultural institutions and cultural services was
confirmed by legislation in the 1960s and 1970s. The system of artists' grants
traces its legislative basis to the late 1960s and state support for municipal
non-institutional cultural activities was set in legislation at the beginning
of the 1980s.
Although some national institutions
(especially the National Opera and the National Theatre) maintained their
private legal status, the process of "étatisation" of Finnish
cultural and art institutions accelerated in the 1970s and continued well into
the 1990s. The institutions of higher education in the arts and the National
Art Gallery became part of the state budgetary system and the former were granted
the status of state universities. In parallel, local museums, theatres and
orchestras also came under the budgetary control of the municipalities and, at
the end of the 1980s and the beginning of the 1990s, their grants were
organised as a subsystem within the new statutory state transfer (subsidy)
system to municipalities. In addition to the new Financing Law, this
also led to Laws on Museums, Theatres and Orchestras. Only a few
professional cultural and arts institutions (including the National Theatre and
the National Opera) were left to be financed on an annual discretionary basis.
The above overview suggests that
historically the main instruments of Finnish cultural policy have been:
The late 1990s and the first years
of the 21st century have seen a gradual alteration in Finnish society and in
its commitment to the basic principles of the welfare state. The changes were
precipitated by the severe economic recession in 1991-1993. The changes from
the mid-1990s onwards have created, within the legal and administrative
frameworks of the European Union, a new system of governance with distinct
touches of market orientation in the public sector. Although public cultural
administration has been rather slow in reacting to the requirements of new
public management, many other factors have shaped the conditions of artistic
activities, cultural service systems and culture industries. Such factors are
e.g. the enlarging of the European Union, new ways of coupling the arts and
artists to the networked information society, and the need to enhance the
export of art and cultural goods and services.
The changes that have taken place in
the late 1990s and at the beginning of the new millennium have somewhat decreased
the role of the state and municipalities in the governance of culture and as
direct financiers of creativity, cultural services, voluntary organisations and
cultural production. At the same time, the role of public authorities in
providing capital investment for cultural buildings and facilities and for
professional education in the arts and culture has become increasingly
prominent. In other words, public authorities invest in infrastructure and
highly trained manpower, but expect that cultural and art organisations and
institutions finance an increasing share of the current costs. EU policies,
especially the programmes financed within the context of the Structural Funds,
have linked public cultural policies more closely to urban and regional development
and social cohesion policies. It should be added that Finland has observed
strictly the criteria of the budgetary discipline of the EU Stability and
Growth Pact, which has curtailed public spending, including in the arts and
culture (for the effects of this, see chapter
4.1,
chapter
4.2 and chapter
6).
Finland/ 2. Competence,
decision-making and administration
2.1 Organisational structure
(organigram)
The following organigram gives a
detailed overview of Finnish cultural policy decision-making and
administration. The solid line arrows and vertical overlapping boxes indicate
authority relations; the dotted line and horizontal overlapping boxes indicate
relations of influence and co-operation. The titles indicate the status and the
role of advisory and planning organisations.
On the state level, the chart
includes central government administration of education and science to pinpoint
interrelated and joint activities with the cultural policy administration. The
responsibility for general and professional education in the arts and culture
are under the Department for Education and Science Policy, not under the Department
for Cultural, Sports and Youth Policy.
Finland/ 2. Competence,
decision-making and administration
2.2 Overall description of the
system
As in other Nordic countries, the
Finnish political system and public administration creates, simultaneously,
both a highly decentralised and highly centralised country. This is due to the
fact that the local government system is strong and autonomous in principle,
because of the constitutional and legislative provisions and income taxation
right of the municipalities. On the other hand, with the advent of the social
welfare state, the main burden of implementing modern public service systems
was shouldered by municipalities; the state set the legislative framework and
committed legislatively to compensate a statutory share of expenditure. In the
late 1980s and in the 1990s, this system, which had earlier covered public
libraries and adult education, was expanded to include museums, theatres,
orchestras and basic arts education. As a result of this development, the state
is mainly responsible for the arts support systems, national cultural and art
institutions, international cultural co-operation and university level cultural
and arts education; and it shares with the municipalities the financial
responsibility of maintaining the nation-wide system of performing arts
institutions and cultural services (among the most important are public
libraries).
The municipalities are responsible
for regional and local performing arts and cultural service provision, for
which they provide two thirds of the funding. They also maintain the
infrastructure as well as financing and supporting local cultural and arts
activities, and receive central government subsidies for both of these
purposes. Thus the state and the municipal sector are formally on an equal
footing in relation to cultural policy competence; yet the state has a much
stronger hold of the steering wheel. There is no autonomous regional
administration, although EU-membership strengthened the role of the regional
councils, which actually are federations of municipalities (for the legal basis
and the role of the third sector see chapter
5.3).
The final legislative and budgetary
powers rest with Parliament; the overall and co-ordinating executive powers of
policy initiation, planning and implementation lie with the government (Council
of State), and sector policy initiation, planning and implementation powers are
the responsibility of ministers and ministries. The counterbalance to these
central government powers can be found at the bottom of the graph in the strong
system of local (municipal) self-governance. The regional level is administered
on the one hand by the regional authorities of central government (province
offices, sector district offices, sector development centres), and on the other
hand by the co-operative bodies of the municipalities. Of the latter, the
regional councils bear the main responsibility for overall co-ordination of
physical planning and regional development.
In Parliament, the main work in the
final preparation of bills and budget proposals is carried out in parliamentary
committees, which play a major role in this process. The Parliamentary
Committee of Education and Culture deals with cultural policy issues, but the
powerful Committee of Finance checks and proposes the financial limits for all
budget allocations. After Finland's accession to the European Union, the Grand
Committee became an increasingly important body that monitors the relations
between national and Union legislation and policies. For that purpose it hears
the ministers before and after the Union Council meetings. This means that the
ministers, among them the Minister of Culture, are in a new and more direct
manner responsible to Parliament.
After its appointment, a new
government is obliged by the constitution to submit its action programme as a
formal communication to Parliament for discussion. The programme sets the
agenda for the government and it is accompanied by proposals of general and
sectoral development programmes and projects. Culture, youth work and sports,
which are considered a joint administrative sector, usually receive short
development plans in the programme. In recent years, the government's plans and
programmes concerning the overall state support for the municipal sector and
third sector institutions are more salient for the arts and culture than the
specific chapters dedicated to them. Art and culture, and youth work and
sports, although supported by the same types of state statutory transfer
(subsidy) system as other public services, are, however, segregated from other
services by their special source of financing. They are financed prominently
from profits of the state lottery, soccer pool and sports betting company
(Veikkaus). These profits and their use do not follow the same pattern as the
overall financial policy of the central government, because overall economic
fluctuations and gambling interests do not often coincide and, also, the state
budget proposal for a given year is made before the actual annual amount of
profits is known. Although there are strict legislative rules limiting the use
of Veikkaus profits to the arts, youth work, sports and scientific research,
the Ministry of Finance and the ruling government have often, irrespectively,
tried and succeeded in using them as compensatory resources to fill other
budget gaps (see also chapter
5.1.3 and chapter
6).
The government does not have any
permanent committees or other expert bodies responsible for cultural policy
purposes. It can set up special working groups to monitor and prepare decisions
in important policy sectors.
On the sector level, the main
planning and executive responsibility lies with the Ministry of Education and
Culture. In the Ministry, there are two ministers: the Minister of Education
and Science and the Minister of Culture, Youth and Sports. The latter presides
over the Department for Cultural, Sports and Youth Policy, which is divided
into six divisions, i.e. those of Art and Heritage, Media and Culture, Cultural
Export, Cultural Legislation and Finance, Sports and Youth Policy.
The Ministry and its departments and
divisions focus on strategic planning and govern and guide through information
provision and performance contracts. Consequently, actual policy implementation
in cultural and arts administration has been increasingly delegated to the
arm's length bodies, special agencies and quasi-governmental organisations. In
cultural policy implementation the following organisations are of prime
importance:
Furthermore, more specific expert
and national policy implementation functions are carried out by bodies such as
the National Art Gallery, Finnish Film Archive, Board of Film Classification,
the Library for the Visually Impaired, and the Administration of the Fortress
of Suomenlinna (a UNESCO World Heritage Site).
International cultural co-operation
is managed for the whole ministry by the Secretariat of International
Relations. The Department for Cultural, Sports and Youth Policy does not have
any units or special plans for intercultural dialogue, partly because the
national legislation and administration focuses primarily on the economic and
social conditions of minority groups, partly because all educational policies,
including education in the arts and culture, come under the jurisdiction of the
Ministry's Department of Education and Science (see below and chapter
2.3).
The following other ministries have
an important say in the formation and implementation of cultural policies:
Finland has an extensive system of
local self-government, in which the municipalities have the right of taxation,
that is, right to determine the rate of municipal income tax for individuals
and enterprises. The state (central government) addresses inequalities in
public services and their infrastructural development through financial
transfers, at present mainly through the statutory subsidy system. This system
is also used for transferring most central government financial support for
maintaining more equal regional and local supply of art production and culture
services.
Cultural policy decision-making at
the municipal level is in the hands of the Municipal Council (elected
assembly), the Executive Board (reflecting the party divisions and
coalitions in the Council), sector municipal committees and the executive
staff, headed by the municipal manager / mayor. Regarding the sector committees
and administration, the trend in the 1980s was to integrate all cultural
matters (theatre, music, amateur arts, etc.) under one municipal committee for
culture. In the 1990s the trend was reversed and cultural matters have been
increasingly distributed to trans-sector committees with broader
responsibilities (e.g. committees on leisure, tourism, etc.).
There is no autonomous regional
administration with elected bodies. The Provincial Offices are extensions of
the central government, carrying out the general task of monitoring regional
development in general and the development of public service systems in
particular. Their number was decreased in 1997 from eleven to five and many
specific functions have been transferred to more specialised regional agencies
of the central government. At the same time, nineteen regional councils
(federations of municipalities) have gained a greater role in regional
development and planning. This is partly due to their responsibilities in
planning and monitoring programmes financed within the framework of the EU
programmes. This development has been counter-balanced by the organising of the
regional state administration as regional development centres for such
important sectors as the economy and employment, forestry, transportation and
the environment.
The Regional Art Councils are an extension of the system of the Arts Council of
Finland to the regional level. However, they are under the direct jurisdiction
of the Ministry of Education and Culture and they are located administratively
in the Provincial Offices. Basically, the arts councils have the same functions
at regional level (grants and other support to artistic work, project grants)
as the Arts Council of Finland and its art form councils have nationally. At
present (2007), there is a legislative bill pending, which, if passed, will
transfer regional arts councils within the administrative framework of the
"national" system of Arts Councils (Arts Council of Finland).
The basic architecture of the core
cultural policy decision-making and administration, as it is depicted in the
organigram (
chapter
2.1), has not changed much during the last fifteen years. The various
sections of the Department of Cultural, Sports and Youth Policy have been
altered and names changed; most recently a new Division for Cultural Export was
created. Some delegation of decision-making from the Department to the quangos,
especially to the system of arts councils, has also taken place. On the other
hand, crucial changes in jurisdiction and decision-making powers have happened
in such culturally salient fields as state-municipality relations, guidance and
control of the media and the culture industries, and the administration of
refugee and immigrant policies.
Finland/ 2. Competence,
decision-making and administration
2.3 Inter-ministerial or
intergovernmental co-operation
In the Finnish political system, the
plenary sessions of the government (Council of State) and its standing
committees and working groups have a strong role in controlling and guiding
individual ministries and in co-ordinating their work. Inter-sectoral
co-ordination has been perceived as an important issue, but few institutional
mechanisms to maintain it have been introduced.
Finnish EU-membership has also
brought forth a need for inter-ministerial co-ordination. There is a special
Committee of Ministers for the co-ordination of EU-affairs and, on the top
civil servant level, an Inter-Ministerial Committee of EU-Affairs, with a
number of sub-committees, among them a sub-committee for culture and
audio-visual affairs.
In any case, the co-ordination of
cultural policy planning and decision-making rests with the Ministry of
Education and Culture, but important roles are also played by: the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs (the co-ordination of "cultural diplomacy"), the
Ministry of Transportation and Communications (concerning co-ordination of
media, communications and information technologies), the Ministry of Justice
(preparing freedom of expression legislation, court processes in immaterial
rights issues) and the Ministry of the Interior (immigrant issues). From the
cultural policy point of view, the Ministry of Trade and Industry has had a
central role in respect to R&D, SMEs and competition issues in the media
and culture industries. As the Ministry of Labour will be merged (from 1
January 2008) with the Ministry of Trade and Industry (re-named the
Ministry of Labour and Industry), the new "super-ministry" will also
have a strong say in such culturally salient areas as public works,
construction projects, employment policies (including relations with the ILO)
and gender issues. In the same overall administrative reform, the regional
development issues were transferred from the Ministry of the Interior to this
new "super-ministry", and the financial monitoring and planning power
of the other "super-ministry", the Ministry of Finance, was expanded
by including, in its jurisdiction, economic, administrative and information
technology issues concerning municipal and regional governance.
It is impossible to say how this
administrative re-organising will influence the inter-ministerial co-operation
in cultural policy issues. Directly, they concerned the cultural policy
implementation only in one domain - the administration of copyright policies
belonged in the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Education and Culture and it
was proposed that they should also be transferred to the new
"super-ministry", which already was responsible for industrial
rights. As the copyright stakeholders, especially artists' organisations,
protested against this transfer, the copyright issues remained within the
jurisdiction of the Ministry of Education and Culture (see chapter
4.1 and chapter
5.1.7).
There are no inter-governmental
bodies in cultural policy-decision making and administration. As to public
cultural services, the Association of the Finnish Regional and Local
Authorities is an important intermediary between the central government and the
municipalities. To a certain extent the regional arts councils also function as
intermediaries between the central government and regions. The financing from
the EU Structural Funds has created a whole host of new planning and
supervisory organisations, which also co-ordinate regional cultural policies to
a certain extent.
The present and the previous
government have wished to enhance inter-sectorality in state policy-making and
administration. The previous Centre-Socialist government introduced, in its
programme ("action plan") for the years 2003-2007, the idea of programme-based
management and outlined four inter-sectoral policy programmes for employment,
entrepreneurship, the information society and civil society, but did not
propose any specific instruments for coordinating their implementation. The
present Centre-Conservative-Green government proposed only three such policy
programmes:
Culture was not explicitly included
in any of these programmes. The previous government promised, in its programme,
to draft and implement a national strategy for the promotion of creativity.
This was done, although only a few actions have been implemented. The present
government underlines, in its programme, the renovation of the systems of basic
public services and the need to reorganise the basic institutional structure of
municipal administration and the state subsidy systems. Both carrot and stick
are used to merge very small communities; minimum population limits and productivity
requirements are set for local and regional public service systems. Because
Finnish municipalities are also the main providers of cultural services, these
new policy guidelines may have, in the longer run, considerable effects on the
performing arts, museums and public libraries.
In 2003-2004, a planning process was
carried out to draft a policy strategy for the promotion of export of Finnish
cultural goods and services. This planning work was co-ordinated by the
Ministry of Education and Culture, but the Ministry of Trade and Industry and
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs participated on an equal footing and
participants and experts came from different administrative sectors and walks
of life. The final report "Staying power to Finnish cultural exports!"
was published in 2004, and the Ministry of Education and Culture initiated its
implementation by establishing in 2005 a special Division of Cultural Exports.
After the recent overall
administrative reform the minority, ethnic, refugee and immigration affairs are
concentrated in two ministries, the Ministry of Interior and the new
"super-ministry", the Ministry of Labour and Industry (see this
chapter, third paragraph). There is a sectoral division in these issues also
within the Ministry of Education and Culture. The Department of Cultural,
Sports and Youth Policy defines its objectives e.g. in the Immigration Policy
Outlines, in rather general terms, as "... the cultural needs of
minorities will be enhanced by increasing the grants to correspond the
escalation of immigration.; and these needs will be taken better into account
in the decisions and activities of the main cultural policy support systems and
cultural and art institutions". More recently, in the preamble of the 2007
State Budget, the Department promises to enhance equal access and
conditions for equal participation especially in respect to ethnic groups and
disabled people. In addition to the "traditional" concern with
bilingualism and the status of the Sami (see chapter
4.2.2), the policy actions so far have been limited to the distribution of
grants (totalling 252 000 euros annually) to immigrant and minority
organisations and artists and to projects and programmes carrying out
anti-discrimination campaigns.
The other main department of the
Ministry, the Department of Education and Science, has had closer links to
other ministries, especially to the Ministry of Labour, in promoting equal
opportunities of minorities, ethic groups and immigrants. As the Ministry of
Labour has been merged with the Ministry of Trade and Industry, it is difficult
to say, what will happen to these links in the near future. As to the education
policies of the immigrants and minorities, the main responsibility for the
research and development activities, experiments and planning of courses and
educational material with the Ministry of Education's main educational expert
body, the National Board of Education. Yet, the focus of educational policy
efforts has not been longer term promotion of multiculturalism but opening up
opportunities for immigrants and refugees to become integrated into the Finnish
educational system and subsequently also into Finnish labour markets.
Immigrants' native tongue is seen important in the initial integration stage
and municipalities can provide teaching in immigrants' native languages if they
so wish and have resources. It is symptomatic that immigrants are not at all in
the quadrennial Education and Research Development Plans of the Ministry of
Education and Culture.
Yet, educational policies provide
the closest link of the Ministry of Education and Culture to the overall
national system of policy-making and administration in the minority, ethnicity
and immigration issues. In this system, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs shapes
these issues from the point of view of national security and the Ministry of Interior,
through its border guards, police authorities, Department of Immigration and
the Directorate of Immigration, has the first say in entry / asylum issues,
residence permits and naturalisation. After the recent overall re-organisation
of the Finnish ministries, most other refugee and anti-discrimination issues
are located within the jurisdiction of the Ministry of the Interior.
Two important legal instances, the
Ombudsman for Minorities and the National Discrimination Tribunal are also
located in the Ministry of Interior. These organisations are, however,
independent of the Ministry in their decision-making processes. The former is
the main authority in issues concerning the legal protection and the promotion
of the status of ethnic minorities and foreigners and in maintaining equality
and non-discrimination practices in ethnic relations. The activities of the
latter are defined in the Equality Act i.e. preventing and combating
ethnic discrimination in working life and service provisions. Another auxiliary
organisation, the Board of Ethnic Relations, which plans and
co-ordinates activities in all issues concerning refugees, migrants and ethnic
relations, is also located in the Ministry of Interior. This Board and the
National Discrimination Tribunal have a representation of immigrant groups and
traditional national minorities among their members. No doubt these three
organisations also co-ordinate the activities of different ministries, but
their main purpose is to operate as bodies where experts and different
stakeholders seek solutions for practical social, economic and human rights
problems. Consequently municipal (city-) administration and voluntary
associations have shouldered the responsibilities for the immigrants and
minorities in the fields of arts and culture - and also in respect to
multiculturalism and intercultural dialogue. For their role, see chapter
4.2.1 and chapter
4.2.3 for cases illustrating Finnish approaches to intercultural dialogue.
Finland/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.1 Overview of main structures
and trends
According to the law defining the
structure and functioning of the Finnish central government (the Council of
State / ministries), all the ministries are responsible for international
co-operation within their policy domains. However, the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs is responsible for international affairs in many areas, which makes it
a joint - and even often the main -actor in the international policy domains of
other ministries including significant international treaties and commitments
to new international responsibilities. The new tasks of the Ministry cover also
such inter-ministerial policy areas as international trade and investments,
development co-operation and development aid, humanitarian aid, co-operation
with neighbouring regions, and Nordic co-operation. Among the tasks of the
Ministry are also relations with international media and cultural relations in
respect to the Ministry's own activities and initiatives to make Finland
better-known internationally. In other words, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
has its say in practically all of the main forms of international cultural
co-operation. In the case of the Ministry of Education and Culture, this means
first that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs shares with it the responsibility for
cultural agreements and bilateral treaties. Secondly, the post-1989
geopolitical changes and the membership in the EU have increased the role of
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in transnational regional co-operation with
neighbouring countries. It is responsible for co-operation with the Baltic Sea
and Barents Sea regions and the activities within the policy initiative and
framework of the Northern dimension. On the other hand, although the Ministry
of Foreign Affairs finances some of these activities, the substantive issues,
like which projects are initiated and financed and how they are managed, are
left to other ministries. Finnish experts, international lawyers as well as
professional diplomats have often had a significant role in the search for
solutions to ethnic conflicts and human rights issues.
Within the jurisdiction of the
Ministry of Education and Culture, the management of international cultural
co-operation is assigned to a special unit, the Secretariat for International
Cultural Relations. Its main function is monitoring, planning and co-ordinating
international bilateral and multilateral relations jointly with the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs. The former are based on bilateral cultural agreements,
cultural exchange programmes / memorandums of understanding and bilateral funds
(with 45 countries); the multilateral relations include ratification of all
pertinent international conventions and agreements and Finnish membership in
international organisations such as UNESCO, the Council of Europe, ITU and
WIPO. Since the 1970s, Finland has been especially active in UNESCO's and the
Council of Europe's main programmes and projects. Most recently, Finnish
experts have had an important role e.g. in WIPO's efforts in the renovation of
the international copyright agreements and in the effecting of UNESCO's new
Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural
Expressions.
The EU Desk of the Ministry is also
located at the Secretariat for International Cultural relations. Most of the
budget allocations of the Ministry of Education and Culture for international
cultural co-operation are channelled to these bilateral and multilateral
activities. The import and export of cultural products and services has, in
recent years, become a major policy issue and in 2005 the Ministry established
a new division for monitoring, planning and co-ordinating cultural export
efforts (Cultural Export Division).
Nordic co-operation has a special
position in Finnish international co-operation policies. Finland is represented
in the cultural and educational committees, working groups and steering groups
responsible to the Nordic Council of Ministers, and participates in the Nordic
Cultural Fund (1996), which is administered by the Secretariat of the Nordic
Council of Ministers in Copenhagen. Finland has bilateral Cultural Funds with
all the other Nordic countries: Iceland (1974), Norway (1979), Sweden (1960)
and Denmark (1981). These cultural funds are administered by the
Swedish-Finnish Cultural Centre at Hanasaari (Helsinki). The Ministry of
Education and Culture allocates funds for Nordic co-operation.
Finnish art and culture is made
better known by promotion centres in Finland and by cultural institutions
abroad (see chapter
2.4.2).
The membership of the EU and the
globalisation processes have decentralised administration and increased the
independence of expert bodies, regional organisations and municipalities in
international cultural co-operation. Thus, the EU Media Desk is located in the
Finnish Film Foundation, the National Board of Antiquities is responsible for
international co-operation in the cultural heritage sector, and CIMO, the
Centre for International Mobility, is responsible for student exchange
programmes and functions as an EU Contact Point for the Culture 2000 programme.
The art universities, research centres and the main cultural and art
institutions have their own cultural co-operation relations and are well linked
to their respective European and wider international networks (European Theatre
Convention, European Theatre Union, ITI, IMC, ICOM, ICOMOS, ELIA, ENCATC etc).
The municipalities have their own town twinning programmes and the main cities
belong to network organisations such as the Union of Baltic Cities and
Eurocities. Associations of artists and cultural centres are well linked to
European networks (IETM, International PEN, European Jazz Network, TransEurope
Halles, etc.).
Finland/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.2 Public actors and cultural
diplomacy
The main ministries responsible for
international cultural co-operation are the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the
Ministry of Education and Culture. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs controls and
guides the overall "diplomacy aspects" of cultural co-operation, the
Ministry of Education and Culture and more particularly, its Department of
Cultural, Sports and Youth Policy is responsible for the substantive
"exchange of the arts and culture"-activities. Cultural and art
institutes, institutes of art education and many expert bodies ("quangos"
like the Finnish Film Foundation) maintain, in addition to "content
co-operation and exchange", professional co-operation in managerial and
technological aspects in their fields of work. The relative role of the two
ministries and the internal structure and actors in the Ministry of Education
and Culture and the domains of its cultural co-operation activities are
described in chapter
2.4.1.
The EU desks and contact points are
listed in chapter
2.4.1. The promotion centres located in Finland are involved in the
presentation of Finnish arts and culture to the rest of the world e.g. the
Finnish Literature Information Centre (FILI), the Finnish Music Information
Centre (IFIMIC), the Foundation for the Promotion of Finnish Music (LUSES), the
Finnish Dance Information Centre, The Finnish Theatre Information Centre and
the Design Forum Finland. The promotion work is also carried out by the Finnish
Film Foundation and the Promotion Centre for Audiovisual Culture, whose main
functions are, however, financing film production and related development of
Finnish Cinema and promotion of film and audiovisual culture. Also, the Finnish
Fund for Art Exchange (FRAME), in addition to making the visual arts
better-known, "exports" Finnish work via exhibitions and co-operation
with foreign galleries and art museums.
Finnish embassies and consulates all
over the world have, of course, an important role not only in implementing
"official cultural diplomacy", but also as nodal points in the
information networks of actors in international cultural co-operation. Finland
has also a network of sixteen cultural and scientific institutes abroad. Four
scientific institutes are located in Rome, Athens, the Middle East and Tokyo;
the twelve cultural institutes are situated in St. Petersburg, Tallinn, Berlin,
Budapest, Oslo, Stockholm, Copenhagen, Antwerp, Paris, London, Madrid and New
York. All these institutes are operated by foundations; although the state
supports them. They do not have any joint mandate, but are independent and have
varying missions and profiles which alter when the directors and board members
of the foundations change. The most common activities are events, lectures,
discussions and exhibitions organised in co-operation with local partners
(institutes of art, science, education and technology, business and cultural
associations). The institutes do not have a common programme, planning or
co-ordinating bodies, although the Ministry of Education and Culture as their
main financer monitors their activities and results.
The roles of the other ministries
with regard to minority, refugee and immigration policies and in the
implementation of pertinent international conventions and agreements see chapter
2.2 and chapter
2.3; they are examined in greater detail in chapter
4.2.2, chapter
4.2.3 and chapter
4.2.4.
Finnish municipalities have become
increasingly active in establishing and maintaining ties of their own in
international cultural co-operation. They have town twinning programmes and the
main cities belong to such international organisations and networks as the
Union of Baltic Cities and the Eurocities. On the municipal and regional
umbrella level, the Finnish Association of the Local and Regional Authorities
is a member of the International Union of Local Authorities (IULA), European
Section CEMR of the IULA and the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities in
Europe (CLRAE). Finnish regional councils participate in the activities of the
Association of European regions. All these organisations maintain cultural
co-operation programmes and carry out research and development activities in
the administration and management of the arts and culture. The Finnish
Broadcasting Company is an active member of the EBU.
The EU membership has opened new
avenues for international cultural co-operation e.g. through the training and
entrepreneurial programmes of the MEDIA programmes and the co-production
funding by Eurimages. Before the current new cultural export strategy, the
direct public input of the Ministry of Education and Culture in the culture
industries have been incidental. The new strategy will be implemented by a
network co-ordinated by the Ministry's new Division of Cultural Exports. In
this network the public partners will be the national promotion centres, the
Finnish Film Institute, the Finnish embassies and cultural institutes abroad,
the Finnish system of arts councils, and TEKES, the Finnish Funding Agency for
Technology, the R&D centre within the Ministry of Labour and Industry.
TEKES has offices of its own in Brussels, Tokyo, Shanghai, Beijing, Silicon
Valley and Washington DC.
In the field of professional art
education and in other cultural education and training the educational
institutes, especially the art universities and the cultural and art programmes
of the polytechnics, are the main actors and have the right to plan and
implement their own policies for international exchange of students and
teachers and other forms of international co-operation. The overall educational
policies do not have integrated national programmes for international
education; it is provided as special pedagogical or campaign type courses and
educational materials.
Direct financing of international
cultural cooperation is limited. In 2006, the financing channelled, through the
budget of the Ministry of Education and Culture, to international cultural
co-operation was 6-7 million euros, half of which was allocated to the Finnish
cultural institutes abroad and about 900 000 euros to the exchange
programmes and other activities within the framework of bilateral cultural
agreements. The joint co-operative cultural programme with the Russian
Federation received 180 000 euros. The budget proposal for the year 2008
promises to increase, considerably, the state financing of the arts and culture
and an appropriation of some 3.5 million euros is proposed for cultural
co-operation in general and for cultural export efforts in particular.
Finland/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.3 European / international
actors and programmes
Finland has been active in most of
the main cultural programmes of UNESCO, the Council of Europe and the EU (see
also chapter
2.4.1 and chapter
2.4.2). Of particular importance is the participation in the UNESCO ASPnet
(Associated Schools Project Network / international education) activities, the
cultural policy monitoring and development programmes of the Council of Europe,
and the EU Kolarctic Neighbourhood activities (INTERREG North). In general,
much of the international / transborder cultural projects have been financed
within the framework of the EU Structural Funds. The Ministry of Education and
Culture underlined in its recent strategic plan for the years 2006-2010 the
need to allocate funds especially to cohesion-increasing transborder projects
in the new 2007-2013 period of Structural Funds.
On 12 June 2006, the Parliament of
Finland approved Finland's adherence to the UNESCO Convention on the
Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions and the
President of Finland confirmed this adherence by signing the Law on 29 June
2006. Finland's adherence to the convention was ratified after all the
Member States of the European Community and the Community itself had deposited
their Instruments of Ratification, Accession or Acceptance to the Director
General of UNESCO. So far, there are no decisions that organisation(s) of the
Finnish cultural administrative system will take the responsibility for
implementing the information and monitoring functions stipulated in Article 9
of the Convention.
Finland/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.4 Direct professional
co-operation
Professional cultural co-operation
has at least four different levels: 1) government-mediated, 2) national
associations-mediated 3) cultural and art institutions-mediated, and 4)
informal individual networking.
The "indirect"
government-mediated, and often also government financed co-operation, is
described in chapters
2.4.1 to 2.4.3. The membership of the municipalities to European
associations and the links of the main cities to European city networks were
also indicated in chapter
2.4.2. Also of interest here is the extensive cross-country project
activities carried out by regional councils, municipalities and voluntary
associations within the framework of the EU INTERREG-Programmes. For example
the Vyborg-centre project was financed within the framework of INTERREG III A,
South-East Finland-Russia Programme. The organisation responsible for the
project was Karjalanliitto (Karelia Association), which aims at reviving the
relations with the part of Finland acceded to the Soviet Union in the Paris
Peace Treaty. Together with the City of Vyborg (Finnish: Viipuri), the Karelia
Association has established an information, cultural and development centre in
Vyborg to serve heritage / history maintenance and cultural tourists from
Finland and other EU countries.
All Finnish national cultural and
art associations have their own "cultural diplomacy", that is,
co-operative relations either bi-laterally with other national associations or
international umbrella organisations. Thus, the Finnish library associations
(the Finnish Library Association, the Finnish Research Library Association and
the Finnish-Swedish Library Association) have close professional co-operation
with the library associations in the Nordic Countries and the other countries
of the Baltic Sea Region and all are also members of IFLA, the International
Library Federation. Another example is the Finnish Arts Council, with similar
transnational neighbourhood relations and membership of IFFACA, the
International Federation of Arts Councils and Cultural Agencies and Ars
Baltica-network. Some further examples are listed in chapter
2.4.1.
All Finnish national cultural and
art institutions have well-established transnational relations with
corresponding institutions abroad. New relations are continuously generated and
institutionalised. One example is the participation of the Finnish National
Opera in the CWM, the Creative Ways to Mozart Project. The project involves
collaboration between opera houses and youth culture organisations to engage
young people creatively with Mozart and his operas. Working with artists,
teachers and young people from across the continent, the partner organisations
will exchange, compare, brainstorm, document and, above all, produce ways to
bring Mozart alive for young people 250 years after his birth. The project has
received funding from EU Culture 2000 Programme and it is co-ordinated by
RESEO, the European network of education departments in opera houses.
Informal networks of international
relations are important for the careers of artists and cultural professionals.
They can, however, also be based around "schools", generations or
movements, which extent across national borders. One example is the Finnish
"Korvat auki"-("Open Ears"-) generation, whose members were
students at the Sibelius-Academy and have, since 1977, revived Finnish music
and established an extensive international network. Well-known members of this
generation are Esa-Pekka Salonen, Kaija Saariaho and Magnus Lindberg.
Finland/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.5 Cross-border intercultural
dialogue and co-operation
There are no general programmes,
strategies or debate forums aimed at enhancing intercultural dialogue. Ethnic
cultural relations and the establishment and maintenance of intercultural
dialogue have been left, by and large, to cities, educational planners and
schools. The Finnish case studies illustrate how Helsinki has enhanced
multicultural dialogue. The importance of the EU Structural Funds and INTERREG
programmes are mentioned in chapter
2.4.4. The following cases provide further evidence of their importance in
developing cross-border intercultural dialogue.
The Afbare project (Arctic Documentary Films at Risk in Barents Region:
Surveying, Protecting and Screening, 2002-2006) aimed at promoting cultural
cooperation across borders, increasing public awareness, and protecting
audiovisual heritage in Europe by surveying, protecting and screening of arctic
documentary films at risk in the Barents Sea region. Priority was given to
films dealing with arctic indigenous people, arctic nature, society, and
explorations. The Afbare project began on 1 July 2002 and was completed by 30
June 2006. It was co-ordinated by the Artic Centre of the University of Lapland
and funded by Interreg IIIA, the North Kolarctic Programme, the State
Provincial Office of Lapland, the Finnish Cultural Foundation, and Finnish and
Russian participating institutions.
The following example demonstrates
the efforts to enhance intercultural dialogue in the Calotte region:
The Calotte Academy is a travelling
symposium, with a series of sessions and panels to be held in Finland, Norway
and Russia. The Academy has been organised annually, since 1991 (except the
years of 2000 and 2001), in research and development centres of the North
Calotte Region. In 2007, the sessions of the Academy took place in June in
Inari, Finland, Svanhovd, Norway and in Murmansk, Russia. The main theme was a
"New Northern Dimension". The theme is politically salient and
academically interesting because of the recent (November 2006) agreement by the
leaders of the EU, Russia, Norway and Iceland to launch a new Northern
Dimension policy evident in the new framework document for the Northern
Dimension. In addition to the economic and social developmental issues and
problems of cross-border co-operation, the sub-themes of the sessions included
such ICD-related topics as "Stability and Security", "the State
of Human Development in Lapland" and a "New Northern Dimension:
Industry, Research and Education". The sessions were co-organised by the
Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Lapland, Thule Institute at the
University of Oulu, the Municipality of Inari and The Sami Education Centre in
Inari (all in Finland); by the Barents Institute in
Kirkenes / Svanhovd Environmental Centre (in Norway) and by the
Murmansk Humanities Institute and the Institute of Economic Studies at the Kola
Science Centre in Apatity (Russia). They were financed by the North Calotte
Council, the Regional Council of Lapland and the Norwegian Barents Secretariat.
Educational measures also feature
prominently in programmes aimed at increasing and intensifying the involvement
of young people and youth groups in internationalism and intercultural
dialogue. Youth organisations are also active in offering opportunities to
their members and youth in general to get involved in international activities.
Their umbrella organisation "Allianssi" works in co-operation with
the Youth Division of the Ministry of Education and Culture to activate young
people in general and enhance their international interests in particular. The
initiation of the international programme AVARTTI -Youth in Action programme -
is a good example. The programme is internationally known as The International
Award for Young People. The programme was first launched in Great Britain in
1956 and is now in operation in 122 countries. The international license was
obtained by the Youth Division, but the programme is managed by the Avartti
Office, operated by Allianssi. The idea of AVARTTI is that young people can
select for themselves an activity programme consisting of components from three
activity domains: service, skills, sports and expedition, and earn a medal on
three levels (bronze, silver and gold). Although most activities are carried
out in Finland, the Finnish AVARTTI is a member of the International Award
Association and its activity planning and many of its meetings are international.
In addition to Allianssi, there is
another NGO, the Service Centre for Development Cooperation KEPA. This
centre is a service base for Finnish NGOs interested in development work and
global issues and over 250 such organisations work under its umbrella. It acts
as a trustee and representative of its member organisations and assists them in
enhancing their activities through training and expert advice. In the field of
cultural co-operation, it organises annually the "World Village
Festival" in Helsinki. The Festival is at the same time a cultural
event and a meeting point for different areas of development work.
For more information, see our Intercultural Dialogue section.
Finland/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.6 Other relevant issues
The EU programmes and projects,
especially those financed and carried out under the frameworks of the
Structural Funds and INTERREG, have substantiated the assumptions that culture
is an important factor in development - in overall national development, for
equal regional development and development of transnational co-operation -for
examples, see chapter
2.4.4 and chapter
2.4.5.
Finland has special international
relations to / through "diaspora Finns" and "kinship
people". The diaspora Finns live mainly in three geopolitical areas:
North America (the USA and Canada), the Russian Federation
(Ingria) and Sweden. The "kinship relations" are maintained
with people speaking Finno-Ugric languages.
Intercultural ties through the
diaspora relations have now a lesser role than they had in the post-World War
II era. The Finnish diaspora in the USA and Canada resulted from the mass
emigration in the late 19th century and the early 20th century and the
individuals and organisations of this diaspora provided important material aid
to Finland after the wars. The second mass emigration, due to unemployment,
took place in the late 1960s and early 1970s to Sweden. Although a considerable
share of these emigrants returned to Finland, the present diaspora of the first
and second generation immigrants is estimated to be about 450 000 persons.
The third mass migration took place during and after the Finno-Soviet wars as
most of the Ingrians, belonging to a historical Finnish minority population
living close to St. Petersburg / Leningrad, were first moved directly, or via
Germany, to Finland and then after the truce conceded back to the Soviet Union.
The Ingrians were given a promise, by the Finnish President in 1990, to be
treated as returning migrants to Finland, and after this promise materialised in
legislation and practice, some 30 000 Ingrains have moved to Finland.
When the smaller Finnish Diasporas,
and Finnish citizens working abroad, are added to second and third generation
Finns living in the North-American and Swedish Diasporas, there are close to
1.6 million Diaspora Finns living outside Finland. Their role as international
extensions of Finnish culture, and mediators of intercultural dialogue with
their country of origin, displays a great diversity. The North American
immigrant communities have had the same kinds of cultural links to their
country of origin as any other small immigrant settlements in the U.S and
Canada. As the flow of emigration has been steadily waning since the 1940s,
cultural communication has also decreased in terms of volume, although it is
still fairly active. Although the original Finnish minority in Sweden has
decreased, they form, together with their descendents, one of main minority
groups in Sweden. On the other hand, because of the close geographic location,
cultural communication with the Sweden-based immigrants to Finland takes place
to a great extent on the individual level of family and kinship relations and
holidays.
The maintaining of links with
diaspora Finns has been delegated to an umbrella NGO, the Finland Society,
which maintains media and other links and organises meetings and events and
allocates grants to diaspora associations and diaspora media. In order to
enhance the participation of the diaspora Finns in the organisational
activities, the Finland Society established, in 1997, a forum for all
expatriate Finns. The forum is called the Finnish Expatriate Parliament (FEP),
which enables the diaspora Finns and expatriate Finns to "...come together
and decide collectively on issues that they deem important to them". The
Parliament, which has sub-forums in eight continental regions, meets every two
or three years, its Secretariat is the Finland Society and its Speaker the
chairman of the Finland Society.
Cultural communication with other
major Finno-Ugric people, Estonians and Hungarians, is carried out using the
same institutional and organisational channels as in the case of other
bilateral international communication. Communication with other "kin
people" living in Northern parts of the Russian Federation is carried out
on a more ad hoc basis. As an example of the means of maintaining this
dialogue, one can mention the Kindred Nation programme funded by the
Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture. The "kindred people" of
the programme belong to the Uralic language groups in the Russian Federation,
and the programme, managed by the M.A. Castren Association, enhances cultural
exchanges, supports collaboration in ethnological research, in education, and
in museum and library science, and promotes the preservation of cultural
traditions.
The NGOs in Finland organise
annually - and mostly in summer time - numerous cultural festivals and events.
In 2006, the Ministry of Education and Culture and the Finnish Film Foundation
provided grants to 161 festivals and events. The three most popular events
attracted the following audiences:
For events with a more definite
focus on intercultural dialogue, see chapter
2.4.4 and chapter
2.4.5.
The Ministry of Education and
Culture / the Division of Arts and Heritage has planned the Finnish
contribution for the EU Year of Intercultural Dialogue (2008). The coordinator
of the activities will be the National Art Gallery. The activities will be
organised around two main themes:
The activities around the first
theme will include the launching of a series of projects providing children
with inspiring creative intercultural activities (painting, singing, writing,
learning by doing etc.), in which the children will come into direct contact
with other children sharing the same space (e.g. schools, nursery schools,
pre-schools, art education centres, cultural centres, sport clubs). Activities
involving young people will include e.g. cooperation projects between schools
and cultural institutions and other cultural operators. Experiences will be
shared and disseminated in schools, in youth and sports organisations, Internet
communities, events etc. In cooperation with artists and the media, the young
people will be able to participate in developing e.g. an interactive game and
take part in intercultural dialogue.
Under the second theme, the
activities of the year aim at reaching wider audiences. These activities will
include public debates (through various media channels), seminars, articles,
nationwide competitions etc. focusing on such strategic problems as those of
"Fair Culture". The dialogue in the events will take, as a starting
point, the intercultural reality and underline the importance of transparent
dialogical processes open to everyone, but its implementation will probably be
left to the National Board of Education, schools and voluntary associations.
Finland/ 3. General objectives and
principles of cultural policy
3.1 Main elements of the current
cultural policy model
The Finnish cultural policy
"model" is first and foremost a model of horizontal and vertical
decentralisation and arm's length implementation. On the level of
the central government, a number of expert bodies and agencies advise the
Ministry of Education and Culture and also implement agreed policies. These
bodies also have some independent decision making power. The horizontal
decentralisation is often corporatist in nature: associations of professional
artists and cultural workers play an important role in the formulation and
implementation of policies concerning artists, as well as in determining grants
and project funding. This model is also reflected in the central role of the
representative associations of artists and producers in copyright affairs and
in the management of copyright organisations.
Vertical decentralisation revolves
around the axis of the central government (the state) and the local
self-government (municipalities). The state is responsible for the
national art and cultural institutions, but it also promotes wider and more
equal access to the arts and culture by providing financing for regional and
local cultural institutions. Previously this work was supported by
grants-in-aid that were specifically targeted by the Ministry of Education and
Culture. Since 1993, these grants-in-aid have been integrated in the overall
system of statutory state transfers to municipalities. These automatic
transfers, calculated on the basis of preset cost-compensation and equity
criteria, now cover public libraries, institutions of adult education,
non-institutional municipal cultural activities, basic arts education, museums,
theatres and orchestras. Some municipal institutions were also designated to have
special regional functions or were considered to have "regional
significance" and receive, consequently, additional central government
funding. After the 1991-1993 economic recession, the statutory transfer system
did not function for a period of ten years, according to its original
principles. The central government did not compensate fully, in its transfers,
for the rate of inflation and the rise of labour costs; nor was the total
funding increased, although the number of subsidised organisations increased.
In recent years, the central government has compensated for the financial
losses of the previous years and reformed the system to make it more just and
equitable. Consequently, the transfers to municipalities and institutions from
the 2008 state budget proposal have already amounted to almost 50% of the total
appropriations to the arts and culture.
In the case of vertical
decentralisation the "third sector" also plays an important role. The
role of professional cultural and art organisations as lobbyists was already
indicated. Yet, the "third sector" has two other roles. Firstly, the
voluntary organisations are important in enhancing cultural participation and
amateur arts. Secondly, although dependant on public support the majority of
cultural and art institutions (especially museums, theatres, but also some
orchestras) are operated as non-public organisations (voluntary associations,
foundations, non-profit joint stock companies). The problem at present is how
to adjust all these functions to diminishing public support and to the new
conditions of the information society and media developments.
The Finnish model has three further
unique features, which are, however, at present under pressure to change. The
first feature is the reliance on public ownership and public budgets and,
especially, on legislation, which has been used to guarantee the
stability (statutory status) of public funding for the arts and cultural
services. The statutory status implies that the criteria used for funding can
only be changed through an act of legislation passed by Parliament. In recent
years, general "desetatisation" processes have started to undermine
this strict legislative order. The budget allocations are subject to
"performance contracts", their effects assessed by criteria set for
efficiency and effectiveness, and the overall policies for outsourcing services
in central government and municipal administration are also applying to
cultural policy implementation.
The second feature has been the
central role of special "earmarked funds", that is, the
profits from Veikkaus Ltd., the state owned company of lottery, lotto and
sports betting, in financing the arts and culture - including sports, youth and
science. As an aftermath of the economic recession in the early 1990s these
funds, originally planned for discretional use only, were started to be used to
finance more regular statutory state subsidies e.g. to public libraries,
theatres, orchestras and basic arts education. Consequently, there was less
central government money for new projects and initiatives. The reliance of the
central government funding of Veikkaus profits also increased and reached in
2001 the highest level, about 70 per cent of the funds allocated in the budget
of the Ministry of Education and Culture to the arts and cultural services. The
new acts on the lottery and betting, and on the use of the Veikkaus profits,
have started to increase the amount of tax-based appropriations and lowered the
share of Veikkaus profits down to the level of 44.6% (budget proposal, 2008).
The third unique feature of the
Finnish model has been the lack of autonomous regional level governance -
neither in general nor in the arts and culture in particular. The Arts Council
system was extended, at the very beginning, to the regional level by creating
the system of eleven provincial arts councils. The name of the councils was
changed to that of regional arts councils and their number was raised to
thirteen when the central government provincial office administration was reformed.
The regional arts councils have been administered jointly by the Ministry of
Education and Culture (policy guidance) and the Provincial Offices of the
Ministry of the Interior (organisational management). From 2008, the regional
arts councils will be brought under the administrative umbrella of the system
of national arts councils (Arts Council of Finland).
Already in the old subsidy system
some of the art and cultural institutions financed jointly by the state and the
municipalities received the status of regional institutions (regional
historical and art museums, regional theatres) and were granted additional
subsidies for their regional functions. Within the present financing system the
Ministry of Education and Culture can furthermore designate some institutions
as regionally significant and allocate them additional funding. These funding
arrangements do not actually make the institutions really regional, as to their
ownership and management, intellectual resources or programming. On the
administrative level the nineteen regional councils (that were originally
associations of adjacent municipalities for physical planning) were reorganised
for and invigorated by the EU membership and have taken over a variety of
regional planning and development functions, some even in the field of culture.
Yet they are still associations of municipalities, not independent regional
bodies and their role in enhancing cultural development in the regions is still
rather marginal.
There was a definite drift in the
1980s and 1990s towards decentralisation and desétatisation in Finnish cultural
policy. This was reflected in the reforms of state subsidy system to
municipalities and cultural institutions; in the performance contracts and in
the introduction of net budgeting within the state budget framework. Under the
present stringent financial policies, these policy instruments have also
provided effective means to centralised cost control. If we look at the issue
of centralisation from the point of view of enhanced local and regional
autonomy, a more unambiguous decentralisation trend is linked to the Finnish
membership in the EU and the funding of regional and local projects from the
Structural Funds. Financing within the framework of the Structural Funds has
involved regional councils in cultural policy processes and released cultural
energy at the local and regional levels in the form of cultural projects and
new initiatives. The external EU programmes (Phare, Tacis), together with the
national programme for co-operation with the adjacent transborder regions also
created in 1995-1999 a leeway for autonomous regional and local initiatives
across the border with adjacent regions and localities, e.g. in Leningrad
oblast, in the Baltic Sea countries and in the Barents Sea region. The
"Northern Dimension", the EU programme line launched by Finland, has
also helped to enhance autonomy of regional and municipal authorities in
international cultural co-operation.
The EU funding and the
"consensual" management of the regional and local development
projects by the Ministry of Interior, other ministries, regional councils and
municipalities has created loose co-operation networks also for planning and
implementing regional and local cultural policies. The recent re-organisation
of state central government has concentrated the administration of regional
development planning and policies to the two "super-ministries", the
Ministry of Finance and the new Ministry of Labour and Trade.
Finland/ 3. General objectives and
principles of cultural policy
3.2 National definition of culture
There is no official national
definition of culture in the Finnish cultural policy. However, as regards
official cultural statistics, culture is defined both in a wider and a narrower
sense.
In the narrower sense, the term
"culture" covers first the arts, which means creative and performing
arts, the work of individual artists and related branches of the culture
industries (fiction publishing, feature film production, classical music
recordings, and record industry, broadcasting, video and multimedia production)
with sufficiently high level of cultural contents. Secondly this narrower
definition covers the main domains of cultural services (public libraries and
cultural programmes of adult education institutions) and cultural heritage
(historical monuments and buildings, cultural sites, historical and art
museums) and international cultural co-operation. General arts education (for
children, youth) is usually included, professional arts education is usually
excluded for administrative reasons (they belong to the jurisdiction of higher
education and science, as do the National Library and scientific and research
libraries, historical and archives and related information services).
The wider definition includes all
culture industries irrespective of contents, professional education in the arts
and culture and all museums, scientific libraries and archives.
It should be noted that the recently
developed EUROSTAT frame for cultural statistics is based by and large on that broader
conception of culture. This frame is also used in the presentation of the
sectoral statistics on Finnish public expenditure on culture found in chapter
6.4. The framework omits crafts, public broadcasting that is financed by
licence (audience) fees, advertising and cultural tourism, which also could be
included in the wider definition. The even wider definition would include these
domains and so-called tax expenditure, the monetary estimates of tax relief to
the arts and culture.
There are attempts submit arts and
culture under broader categories of creative industries, creative economy or
knowledge intensive industries. For instance, the national project drafting a
national Creativity Plan does not assign any particular role for the arts in
its final report. There have also been studies that have tried to prove that
professional artistic activities are in the transformation process of becoming
"KIBSes", that is, knowledge-intensive business services.
Finland/ 3. General objectives and
principles of cultural policy
3.3 Cultural policy objectives
The affirmation of national identity
was originally the main corner stone of the Finnish cultural policy. Promotion
of artistic creativity has been the second prime objective of Finnish cultural
policy. This has traditionally been reflected in the endeavour of the state to
take care of its artists and to improve their economic position through systems
of state arts grants and pensions. In recent years, following the international
examples, the Finnish government has, however, started to emphasise creativity
and innovations and their contribution to economic growth. This is reflected in
the 2004 creativity strategy, drafted by three task forces representing a wide
spectre of civil servants from different ministries (notably, education and
culture, trade and industry, and labour), universities and art schools, artists
and representatives of the business sector.
Thirdly, the shared responsibility
of the state and the municipalities in providing, financing and maintaining a
regionally comprehensive system of cultural services clearly shows an effort to
expand participation in cultural life. The adoption of the arm's length
approach in art policies and in the use of expertise and the very fact that the
municipalities have the prime role in providing these services are an indication
of decentralisation - both horizontal and vertical.
Protection of minorities
including the Swedish-speaking Finns, the Sami and the Roma can be seen as an
aspiration for cultural diversity. The decisions granting the resident
aliens (immigrants and refugees) basically the same social, economic and
political rights in local politics as Finnish citizens reflect both equality
policies and the will to increase cultural diversity. The more abstract
principles, promotion of human rights and cultural rights, reflected in
the new spirit of the Finnish constitution and the ratification of all relevant
international conventions and agreements can be seen as the moral basis of
these more practical legal endeavours.
The above list of objectives
correspond well to those used as test criteria in the Council of Europe's
review programme of national cultural policies. On the other hand, the ideas
that the arts and culture should serve economic growth, increase exports and
employment and function as a positive factor in regional development and social
cohesion have become increasingly popular in Finland. The combining of the
traditional objectives with these new economically oriented objectives is
reflected in the recent 2015 strategy of the Ministry of Education and Culture
where the following strategic "key functions" were listed:
Another document by the Ministry of
Education and Culture ("Review of the Future", July 2006) listed the
following set of more concrete objectives and also proposed the annual need for
budget increases for their implementation:
Table 1:
Planned annual budget increase, in million euros, 2009-2011
Budget outlay for: |
Annual
average |
Participation in the EU-programme
of the European cultural city 2011 |
1.0 |
Enhancing active participation and
welfare through culture |
5.0 |
Expanding the activities of the
National Film Archive to cover radio and TV programmes |
2.0 |
Promotion of creative industries
and cultural exports |
9.0 |
out of which, from the Ministry's
own budget |
3.5 |
Government grants to subsidise
municipal cultural services within the statutory support system |
6.0 |
Pilot project for abolishing
entrance fees to museums |
3.0 |
National programme for
digitalisation of cultural heritage |
5.0 |
Other activities for strengthening
national cultural resources |
9.0 |
Source:
Ministry of Education and Culture, "Review of the Future", July 2006.
These increases are proposed
irrespective of the expenditure frame (maximum) which the government has set
for the same years. The central government budget proposal for the year 2008
indicates that despite the change of the government coalition in 2007
practically all the target areas have already had some priority funding, although
to a considerably lesser degree than proposed for the following years.
Cultural identity and diversity have
been priority objectives of Finnish cultural policies, although they have been
seen traditionally in terms of bilingualism of Finnish culture and the cultural
rights of national minorities (see chapter
4.2.2 and chapter
4.2.3 below). The fast growth in the number of immigrants and the issues in
refugee policies have broadened the approach to diversity policies, enlivened
debates and led to new legislation and projects for the integration of
"the new Finns" (immigrants, refugees). In the preamble of the 2007
State Budget Proposal, "taking ethnic relations into account" is
defined as a financing priority for the arts and cultural services.
Finland/ 4. Current issues in
cultural policy development and debate
4.1 Main cultural policy issues and
priorities
In Finland - like everywhere else -
new cultural policy issues are partly exogenous, partly endogenous; that is,
they may be initiated by more general national or international development
objectives or reflect more uniquely policy interests and problems ensuing
within different domains of the arts and culture.
The main source of exogenous
cultural policy issues and debates are economic policies. Although the economic
importance of the arts and culture is generally recognised and even underlined
in economic policy documents, negative opinions are often expressed about the
subjugation of the arts and culture to economic interests and economic
policy-makers are criticised for not taking sufficiently into account the
unique nature of artistic creation and cultural production and distribution
processes. Especially, the stringent financial policy practices, proctored
strictly by the Ministry of Finance, have led to protests by artists and
cultural professionals. The most recent debates have had three special foci:
The new policy lines, emphasising
the role of art and culture as creative sources for overall development and
boosting national exports, were earlier criticised as subjugation to economic
interests. However, they are now generally accepted as overall objectives for
cultural policy. The recent administrative reform gave rise to an intense
debate on whether the copyright issues should remain in the Ministry of
Education and Culture or be transferred to the Ministry of Labour and Industry.
The protests were effective: the copyright issues were not transferred from the
Ministry of Education and Culture to the new Ministry of Labour and Industry.
At the beginning of the century the
main endogenous issues debated were the promotion of artistic creativity, the
rights and wrongs in the new copyright legislation and the clarification of the
role of national and regional arts councils. In the forefront of the more
recent endogenous debates, there have been problems concerning the provision of
welfare services to the artists: the organisation of the artists' unemployment
insurance and pension funding and the artists' right to receive unemployment
benefits. So far, few potential solutions have been found and the debates
continue. Another issue has been the professional and academic education of
artists and other cultural labour force. It has been argued that too many students
are recruited by the arts universities and cultural, media and humanities
programmes of the professional schools and Polytechnics and this has resulted
in under- and unemployment. Consequently the Ministry plans to reduce the
number of students practically in all professional and academic programmes of
the arts and culture
Finland/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.1 Cultural minorities, groups
and communities
Constitutionally protected and
historical minorities in Finland consist of the following categories:
Constitutionally protected
minorities and indigenous people
(see chapter
5.1.1):
·
of this: speakers of the Sámi
languages
1 700 persons
Historical minorities:
These figures indicate that Finland
has been a relatively homogeneous country; especially as Swedish-speaking Finns
are not constitutionally considered a minority but a second national culture,
parallel to that of the Finnish-speaking population. Constitutional and
legislative responses to the claims of the "old" minorities have
concentrated, by and large, on two groups: Swedish-speaking Finns and the Sámi.
Due to their special historical position, they have a high degree of cultural
autonomy with cultural institutions of their own, special linguistic and
educational rights and special budget considerations in the state and local
government budgets. The Roma people have been the target of special
educational, cultural and social welfare measures, while the three other small
ethnic minority groups have their own small communities and institutions
(associations, churches, kindergartens). Some 23 per cent of Swedish speaking
Finns live in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area; the Sámi-people live mainly in
Finnish Lapland (although there is also a City-Sámi Association). The
"old" Russians, Tatars and Jews are concentrated mainly in the
Helsinki Metropolitan Area.
Formation of immigrant communities
From the international comparative
perspective, the recent inflow of foreign citizens, immigrants and refugees
into Finland started late, in the first half of the 1990s. The acceleration of
inflow was due to two factors: firstly to the increase in the number of
refugees allowed to enter Finland, especially so-called "quota
refugees" from Somalia; and secondly, to the "repatriation" policies
which allowed Ingrians of Finnish origin from the former Soviet Union to enter
as "returning nationals". The first "official" refugees
from Chile and Vietnam were accepted at the request of the UN High Commissioner
for Refugees in the 1970s and 1980s; the system of "quota refugees"
was adopted in 1988, and the first wave of Somali refugees arrived in Finland
in 1992. This was followed by an influx of "quota refugees" from
Southeast Europe, Iraq and Turkey, and migrants from Asia, e.g. from China and
Thailand. The Ingrians were officially recognised as "returning
nationals" by President Maunu Koivisto in 1990, and they contributed to
about one-third of the close to 62 000 immigrants entering Finland in the
1990s. This wave was paralleled by a steady escalation of individual
immigration from the Russian Federation and Estonia.
The following tables provide
information about the immigration flows into Finland.
Table 2:
Foreign citizens in Finland in 1990, 1995-2005
Country of citizen-ship |
1990 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
Russia |
.
|
9 720 |
11 810 |
14 316 |
16 861 |
18 575 |
20 552 |
22 724 |
24 336 |
24 998 |
24 626 |
24 621 |
Estonia |
.
|
8 446 |
9 038 |
9 689 |
10 340 |
10 652 |
10 839 |
11 662 |
12 428 |
13 397 |
13 978 |
15 459 |
Sweden |
6 051 |
7 014 |
7 291 |
7 507 |
7 756 |
7 809 |
7 887 |
7 999 |
8 037 |
8 124 |
8 209 |
8 196 |
Somalia |
44 |
4 044 |
4 555 |
5 238 |
5 371 |
4 410 |
4 190 |
4 355 |
4 537 |
4 642 |
4 689 |
4 704 |
Serbia* |
75 |
2 407 |
2 624 |
2 755 |
2 935 |
3 392 |
3 575 |
4 240 |
4 224 |
4 243 |
4 090 |
3 954 |
Iraq |
107 |
1 341 |
1 855 |
2 435 |
2 670 |
2 960 |
3 102 |
3 222 |
3 420 |
3 485 |
3 392 |
3 267 |
China, PR |
312 |
1 412 |
1 471 |
1 610 |
1 650 |
1 677 |
1 668 |
1 929 |
2 086 |
2 372 |
2 613 |
2 981 |
Germany |
1 568 |
1 748 |
1 836 |
1 961 |
2 072 |
2 162 |
2 201 |
2 327 |
2 461 |
2 565 |
2 626 |
2 792 |
United Kingdom |
1 365 |
1 865 |
1 803 |
1 907 |
2 058 |
2 170 |
2 207 |
2 352 |
2 535 |
2 651 |
2 655 |
2 762 |
Turkey |
310 |
1 335 |
1 479 |
1 668 |
1 737 |
1 737 |
1 784 |
1 981 |
2 146 |
2 287 |
2 359 |
2 621 |
Thailand |
239 |
763 |
864 |
964 |
1 084 |
1 194 |
1 306 |
1 540 |
1 784 |
2 055 |
2 289 |
2 605 |
Iran |
336 |
1 275 |
1 397 |
1 681 |
1 706 |
1 868 |
1 941 |
2 166 |
2 363 |
2 531 |
2 555 |
2 562 |
USA |
1 475 |
1 844 |
1 833 |
1 905 |
2 001 |
2 063 |
2 010 |
2 110 |
2 146 |
2 149 |
2 040 |
2 086 |
Afghanistan |
.
|
.
|
55 |
60 |
71 |
138 |
386 |
719 |
1 061 |
1 312 |
1 588 |
1 833 |
Vietnam |
292 |
2 084 |
2 143 |
2 171 |
1 965 |
1 840 |
1 814 |
1 778 |
1 713 |
1 661 |
1 538 |
1 657 |
India |
270 |
454 |
485 |
528 |
566 |
647 |
756 |
892 |
1 012 |
1 169 |
1 343 |
1 619 |
Bosnia / Herze-govina |
.
|
928 |
1 342 |
1 420 |
1 496 |
1 581 |
1 627 |
1 668 |
1 701 |
1 694 |
1 641 |
1 584 |
Other |
13 811 |
21 886 |
21 873 |
22 785 |
22 721 |
22 805 |
23 229 |
24 913 |
25 692 |
25 668 |
26 115 |
28 549 |
TOTAL |
26 255 |
68 566 |
73 754 |
80 600 |
85 060 |
87 680 |
91 074 |
98 577 |
103 682 |
107 003 |
108 346 |
113 852 |
Source:
Statistics Finland, Migration, http://www.stat.fi/til/muutl/index.html
*
Including former Yugoslavia.
Table 3:
Total Finnish population by home language and the number of foreign citizens in
1996-2005
Year |
Total
|
Finnish |
Swedish |
All
Sami |
Other |
Foreign
citizens |
1996 |
5 132 320 |
4 765 434 |
294 233 |
1 712 |
70 941 |
73 754 |
1997 |
5 147 349 |
4 773 576 |
293 691 |
1 716 |
78 366 |
80 600 |
1998 |
5 159 645 |
4 778 604 |
293 269 |
1 688 |
86 085 |
85 060 |
1999 |
5 171 302 |
4 783 224 |
292 439 |
1 690 |
93 949 |
87 680 |
2000 |
5 181 115 |
4 778 497 |
291 657 |
1 734 |
99 227 |
91 074 |
2001 |
5 194 901 |
4 793 199 |
290 771 |
1 734 |
109 197 |
98 577 |
2002 |
5 206 295 |
4 797 311 |
290 251 |
1 720 |
117 013 |
103 682 |
2003 |
5 219 732 |
4 803 343 |
289 868 |
1 704 |
124 817 |
107 003 |
2004 |
5 236 611 |
4 811 945 |
289 751 |
1 732 |
133 183 |
108 346 |
2005 |
5 255 580 |
4 819 819 |
289 675 |
1 752 |
144 334 |
113 852 |
Source:
Statistics Finland. Migration, http://www.stat.fi/til/muutl/index.html
Despite the decentralisation efforts
in the case of refugees, some 44 per cent of the foreign population has settled
in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area, e.g. some 82 per cent of Somalis have
established their homes in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area, while Russians and
Estonians are spread more evenly around the country. This makes the Somalis a
visible and audible minority in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area, in the sense of
community spirit, religion, and habits, while the Russians and Estonians have
been characterised as "invisible" and "inaudible"
minorities.
In the mid-1990s the human rights
stipulations of the constitution were reformed to expand rights covering all
persons living in the country and these reforms were enshrined into the new
codified constitution of 1999. Promotion of diversity has been reflected mainly
in continuous reforms to improve the position of national minorities (the Sami,
the Roma). Enhancing the rights of immigrants and refugees has been on the
agenda of the government during the last five years, but most progress has been
made in measures that help to integrate these groups economically and socially
into Finnish society. Control of the refugees' entry into the country however
has been made more restrictive and cultural rights of immigrants, though
included in the new legislation, have been implemented only by a few direct
measures. The Ministry of Education and Culture has in its budget a small
appropriation for supporting minority and immigrant cultures, fighting racism,
for multi-cultural events and projects and for supporting immigrant artists. As
for cultural services, a public multilingual library (books in 60 languages)
has been maintained since 1995 as an annex of the Helsinki City Library.
Although direct arts and cultural
policy measures for the protection and promotion of "new" minority
cultures are few and limited in scope, the responsibility for the minority and
immigrant cultures has been shouldered by the educational authorities,
municipalities and cultural and art institutions.
Finland/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.2 Language issues and policies
It is customary to speak about the
Swedish-speaking Finns as a minority, although the basic ideology of nation
building was that Finland has two parallel Finnish cultures, one based on the
Finnish-language and the other on Swedish. The rights of the Swedish-speaking
population are guaranteed in the newly (1999) re-codified Finnish
Constitution and further enacted by a special Language Act, which,
together with some special laws, provides for equality in the official
(administrative, court) use of the native language and access to education and
public careers. A special issue has been the "compulsory" teaching of
Swedish as a second native language in primary and secondary education. The Language
Act, as well as the Sami Language Act - providing for the right to
use Sami as an official language in the Sami homeland area, were revised in
2003 and enacted in 2004. Sami is the only recognised indigenous culture in
Finland.
Besides the Sami, the Constitution
gives a special position also to the Roma people and to the users of sign
language, and guarantees all three groups the right "...to maintain and
develop a language and culture of their own". The rights of
these minority groups are also enshrined by the international conventions,
especially by the European Framework Convention for the Protection of
National Minorities and the European Charter for the Protection of
Regional or Minority Languages.
Finland/ 4.3 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.3 Intercultural dialogue:
actors, strategies, programmes
The demographic, legal and
administrative conditions for intra-country intercultural dialogue are outlined
in chapter
3.3, chapter
4.2.1, chapter
5.1.1, and chapter
5.1.9.
Among the traditional minorities, the
Swedish-speaking Finns and the Sami have a special position which is
reflected in their interaction and dialogue with the dominant Finnish-speaking
culture. This dialogue concerns mainly the maintenance and fortification of
their constitutional positions, which, in the case of the Swedish-speaking
population, is the "second national culture" and, in the case of the
Sami, their position as a constitutionally recognised indigenous people. These
positions have been, every now and then, challenged by some groups and
political factions of the Finnish speaking population, which have considered
the minority rights unjust from the point of view of the Finnish speaking population.
This type of intercultural dialogue is reflected in two recent issues.
In the case of the Swedish speaking
culture, the main issue for some has been the special position of the Swedish
language in the school curricula. As a second native language, Swedish has been
a compulsory language both in primary education and at second level. This has
been seen by some groups as a limitation to free choice in language learning
and as a hindrance for broadening the language skills of the Finns. The
long-drawn debate led finally to new legislation in 2004, which removed Swedish
from the position of a compulsory subject in the high school final
matriculation exam.
The issue concerning the position of
the Sami people had broader ramifications. The logging in the old forests of
reindeer herding regions has been seen by the reindeer herders to endanger the
growth of both ground and tree-growing lichen, which are the winter fodder of
reindeers. The three additional - and in some sense actually main - parties
have been the environmental NGOs (WWF Finland and FANC, the Finnish Association
for Nature Conservation) and the forest company Metsähallitus, and the main
wood processing Finnish enterprises. The main respondent in the debate was
Metsähallitus, which has legislative right to governing the use - i.e. logging
- of the state-owned forests (12 million hectares of state land and water
areas) and planning of their protection. The conflict led to a field
confrontation in Lapland where Green Peace was the organizer of active
resistance to logging. The conflict was solved to the - at least temporary -
satisfaction of the parties involved. It, however, revived the concerns
relating to safeguarding the material basis of the Sami livelihood and culture
and also threw light on another even bigger issue, the Sami land-ownership,
which is still without final legislative solution in Finland.
From among other traditional
minorities the monitoring and protection of their rights the Roma and Finnish
sign language users have been carried out mainly within the framework of
international human rights agreements and conventions. As in most of the host
countries in Europe, improving the educational and labour market position and
the social equality of the Roma people has been an "eternal issue",
although the intensity of discrimination has been waning. The European Roma and
Travellers Forum was established by the Council of Europe with the support of
the Finnish President, Mrs. Tarja Halonen.
Intercultural dialogue concerning
"newcomers'", their cultural rights and initiatives to support their
projects and cultural activities has been carried out within the context of
local and regional authorities, NGOs and cultural institutions and the media,
but recently also national cultural institutions have initiated interesting
programmes and projects to increase intercultural dialogue. In 2005, The
Finnish National Art Gallery nominated a cultural diversity coordinator for the
museum for a period of two years to improve intercultural dialogue between the
Finns and immigrants living in Finland.
The Finnish updating of the
compendium content contains four cases of good practice by a municipality (City
of Helsinki / Caisa), by the Finnish Broadcasting Company (the programme
"Bazaar") and by two private initiatives (Cassandra; EU-MAN). Central
government educational and anti-discrimination efforts are presented in chapter
2.4.2 and chapter
8.3.2. Details of the formation of minority policies and organisations for
inter-cultural dialogue in the city of Helsinki are included below; the same
model has been followed by some other cities.
The City of Helsinki started to plan
systematically its immigrant policy in 1991 (like many other big cities such as
Tampere, Turku etc); and, even to start with, this was not carried out only in
order to solve potential social, political and economic problems, but also as
part and parcel of urban development policies. This approach was expressed for
the first time in 1991 in the report of the committee that made proposals for
the basis of the city's future immigration policy:
"The objective of the Helsinki
City immigrant policy is to enable the transformation of the city into an
international multicultural capital, where foreigners have equal rights to
municipal services and can maintain their own language and culture, while
having an opportunity to become integrated in the city life."
The report led first to the
establishment of an immigrant service unit and a council for immigration
affairs. The latter drafted an immigration policy programme that was enacted in
1995. The programme listed ten strategic policy areas that, by and large,
followed the outlines of the national integration legislation. They, however,
also emphasised the need to increase immigrants' social participation and
multiculturalism. Establishing meeting-points, and forums where different
ethnic groups and Helsinki denizens could meet was proposed as the main means
to these ends.
Enhanced interaction through meeting
points was to be organised on two levels: on the level of city districts and
the city as a whole. On the district level, the responsibility to activate
immigrants was to be shouldered jointly by the denizens' district associations
and city officials. On the city level, establishment of a new international
"foyer" was proposed.
The latter proposal led to the
decision to establish Caisa, which started its activities in March 1996. It
objectives, to start with, were defined as:
Or, more specifically: "Cultural
activities of ethic groups will be supported so that they have an opportunity
to maintain their ethnic identity" and "New items will be
included in the supply of cultural services and services will be brought closer
to immigrants, to schools and joint meeting places, so as to provide foreigners
with a channel to bring forth the artistic expressions of their own."
Recently, an extensive evaluation of
Caisa's activities was carried out and published. It found that Caisa had
managed well, by and large, in achieving its main goals:
"It appeared that Caisa has
successfully reached both the immigrant groups and representatives of the
dominant culture and those contacts had taken place in practice. The centre has
been a meeting place and a channel for making other cultures better known to
the majority. .... It has managed to create a more favourable public image of
immigrants, and thereby possibly contributed to reducing prejudices and
discrimination." But, on the other hand: "Our study also showed that
immigrants' associations, although they play an important role for the
immigrants' integration, cannot manage without the support of the city. They do
not have the economic resources needed for activities targeted to the (Finnish)
majority, e.g. for cultural gatherings.... Their resources are not always even
enough to organise the activities needed for keeping their associations
together."
For more information, see:
Database of Good Practice on Intercultural Dialogue and our
Intercultural Dialogue section.
For more information on the
government's National Strategy for the European Year of Intercultural Dialogue
please see: http://ec.europa.eu/culture/eac/dialogue/strategies_en.html
Finland/ 4.3 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.4 Social cohesion and cultural
policies
Although the flows of immigrants and
refugees accelerated in the 1990s, Finland is culturally and linguistically a
very homogeneous country. The share of the Finnish- and Swedish-speaking Finns
is still somewhat above 97% and the share of foreign language speakers thus
below three per cent. Even the share of Swedish-speakers is only around
5.5-5.7%, and the number of people belonging to other traditional minorities is
small: the total number of the speakers of Sami languages, Roma people, Tatars
and Jews add up to some 22 000-24 000 people. A similar homogeneity
prevails as to the religion: 84.6% of Finns belong to the Lutheran State
church, 13.1% have no religious affiliation, and the share of the
"second" state sponsored church, which is Greek-Orthodox, is 1.2% and
the other religious communities share the remaining 1.1%.
As the descriptions in the previous
chapter bear witness to, the dispute and conflicts concerning minorities have
been and still are engendered by the defence of the material interests or legal
position and related special rights of minority groups. Certainly there have
been and still appear cases of racial and religious discrimination and
violence, but they have been and still are local individual outburst, not
broader cleavages in social cohesion of the nation. The high level of national
cohesion can also be explained by historical facts, especially by the joint
effort of all linguistic and cultural groups to defend the country in the
Finno-Russian wars of 1939-40 and 1941-44. The civil society, which was
splintered into networks of leftist and bourgeois associations and federations
e.g. in labour union activities, sports, consumers' co-operatives, adult
education and some sectors of the arts and culture, was unified stepwise in the
1980s and 1990s - or, more precisely, the political and ideological splits were
nullified by the forces of market economy.
Under the surface of apparent
cohesion there are social and economic trends which may in the long run
generate tensions and raise new difficult challenges to central government and
local and regional decision makers, including those of cultural policy and
administration.
One such trend is uneven regional
development, or, in other terms, the accumulation of employment opportunities
and population to the Helsinki Metropolitan region and to a number of major
cities. This development, together with stringent central government financial
policies which have stagnated public support for the arts an culture - and
especially to cultural institutions - has started to shape both the audience
composition and the content provision by the artists and cultural and art
institutions. The result might be, in the longer run, even more rapid
concentration of cultural and art supply to Helsinki Metropolitan area and
other big city centres, increased competition in these centres and subsequent
division of labour and content differentiation in art provision and cultural
services in these areas. This, in turn might have in the longer run negative
effects on overall national cohesion.
The second trend is the increasing
inequality in terms of income distribution and relative poverty. Since the
recession of 1991-1993, subsequent boosts in rapid economic growth, and the
"marketisation" of the public sector, have increased income
inequality and relative poverty (number of people having a net income of less
than 60% of the national medium). These trends, and the subsequent inequality
in opportunities to consume and enjoy the arts and culture by everyone in every
part of the country, are probably the main threats to cohesion promoted by the
arts and culture at present.
The third trend concerns the role of
the EU in regional development and development of national arts and culture.
There is a paradox that most industrial and occupational sectors - including
the arts and culture - have gained more than what they have lost during the EU
membership and its trans-national policies; yet the citizens' attitude to the
EU as a whole has become increasingly negative. Within one year's period
2005-2006 the share of people with a negative attitude to Finnish membership
has increased from 23% to 31% and the share of positively oriented decreased
from 42% to 33%. The division here is scarcely a problem from the point of view
of Finnish national cohesion. The intensity of attitudes is neither high enough
that the EU issue, if couched in general terms, would cause national cleavages.
The negative attitudes, however, reflect problems in communication policies of
the central government in respect to more specific EU policies. Politicians
inform citizens about the "games" played in Brussels, not about
outcomes and consequences of specific policies. Failures in "games"
are reported by the media, while positive outcome are seldom reported. This
happens also to cohesion policy programmes of the EU, which forebodes better
future for national cohesion of the member countries than for the cohesion of
the EU itself.
These three assessments are
conjectures, but they identify potential basic logics of the interplay between
economic factors, national and EU policies and national regional policies. As
an outcome of this interplay emerge cohesion problems, which should be paid
attention to in the financing of arts and in organising the management of
cultural and art institutions. The Finnish cultural policy programmes do not
deal directly with these trends of development.
Finland/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.5 Media pluralism and content
diversity
Although the media sector (and also
the telecommunications sector) has been liberalised in Finland in the same
manner as in the other EU member states, the public broadcasting company (YLE,
the Finnish Broadcasting Company, FBC) has maintained its position as the
bastion of "public service". The organisational reforms both of the
television channels and radio channels have aimed at better division of labour
that also allows the production and diffusion of high quality cultural
programmes. Organisational reforms have also been made to accommodate digital radio
programmes and the imminent switch to digital TV broadcasts. These reforms will
favour more efficient use of the old stock of artistic and cultural assets of
the FBC and the better provision of new cultural programmes. The FBC has
recently opened up an extensive part of its "programme heritage" to
audiences via the Internet; and it has been diversifying its cultural and art
programmes with the channels made possible by digitalisation. The adding of
"cultural news" to the standard programmes of YLE's television and
radio programmes was the first step in this development.
Otherwise, the concentration of
media seems to continue. SanomaWSOY, by far the largest Finnish media company,
has increased its turnover through international acquisition to 2.7 billion euros
in 2006; the Swedish media giant Bonnier has in recent years increased its
ownership in the Finnish media (acquisition of the commercial channel MTV3) and
in book publishing (acquisition of one of the major Finnish publishing houses).
The counterbalance in the public sector is still the Finnish Broadcasting
Company, but its turnover in 2006 was only 384 million euros. The second
largest media company Alma Media has a turnover of about 300 million euros
after having sold its television activities to Swedish companies Bonnier and
Proventus. There are also some further signs of concentration taking place in
the wholesale and retail of books and in cinema and video distribution.
These concentration processes have
been monitored by the Finnish competition authorities, of which the executive
authority, the Finnish Competition Authority, operates under the Ministry of
Trade and Industry. Its objective is to protect sound and effective economic
competition and to increase economic efficiency by promoting competition and
abolishing competition restraints. The Market Court is the higher legal instant
in competition cases. The Competition Authority has investigated several merges
and potential monopoly / trust cases in different sectors of the media and
culture industries.
It is difficult to assess how media
concentration will affect the quality and diversity of cultural contents. It is
assumed that media concentration, commercialisation and homogenisation of
content supply go hand in hand. Afternoon papers (or more generally the
"yellow press") and commercial radio have been identified in Finland
as examples of this development. On the other hand, e.g. in book production,
concentration and the birth of new vigorous small publishing companies have
gone hand-in-hand.
Some studies have opened up a new
perspective in the issue of media pluralism and content diversity. They have
pointed out that in the case of publicly supported media the diminishing public
support leads to "mainstreaming" of production, that is, maintaining
good standard quality, but at the same time optimising audience appeal without
risk taking. This trend has been observed in theatre repertoires, but it has
been argued that it also prevails in feature film production.
If the share of domestic products in
the media and culture industries is considered as a measure of content
diversity, Finland can display a reasonably good account, as the following
figures demonstrate:
Table 4:
Share of domestic products in different sectors of culture industries, in %,
2002/2003
Field |
Share
in % |
Book publishing (share of domestic
titles of all published) |
83 |
Television (share of domestic
titles of total programmed broadcasts) |
55 |
Phonograms (share of domestic
phonograms of total phonogram sales) |
54 |
Cinema (share of domestic film
audiences of total cinema audiences) |
22 |
Video (share of total sales /
rentals) |
14
/ 5 |
Source:
Statistics Finland, Kulttuuritilastot / Cultural Statistics 2005.
Finland/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.6 Culture industries: policies
and programmes
The "culture industries"
has not been a central concept in Finnish cultural policies, which have, by and
large, focused on arts, heritage issues, cultural services, cultural
participation and consumption of culture. This is reflected in the financing
figures: only the press, radio- and television, film production and
distribution and, to a minor extent, also book publishing, have special
appropriations in the state budget and their appropriations are close to nil in
the municipal / city budget. Architecture and design have been subsidised as
artforms, and the performing arts are considered a part of cultural services
and not as branches of the culture (or creative) industries. As the
professional and basic arts education are not within the jurisdiction of
cultural policy decision-making but are considered part of overall educational
policies, the labour market issues of culture industries have neither been
dealt with in art policies and cultural policies in any other sense as artist's
social welfare security.
Since the 1970s, there have been
studies defining culture industries in terms of given industrial branches; in
the most recent studies the culture industries have been defined as industrial
sub-sectors of copyright industries. As the line is drawn between culture
industries and the "rest" of the copyright industries, the latter
contain computer software, information systems, advertising and mass media (the
press and traditional audio-visual media, i.e. radio and television), and the
culture industries, which are:
In this classification, artistic
work and heritage are seen as basic "primary industries" for
production and distribution activities and consequently cultural policies
pertain only to those sub-sectors of the media and cultural production which
distinctly base their value-adding processes to artistic work and heritage.
This distinction is not, however, taken universally as the basis in defining
either culture industries or the domains of cultural policies.
The recent Creativity Report,
written under the auspices of the Ministry of Education and Culture, takes
overall creativity (also in education and working life) as its starting point
and, in respect to culture industries, prefers the British concept of creative
industries to that of the above narrower concept. The narrower concept seems,
however, to be the starting point in the recent efforts of the Ministry to
start to promote cultural exports and creative industries.
There is a trend of increased
internationalisation of Finnish culture industries both in terms of Finnish
acquisitions of foreign companies and the acquisition of Finnish media
companies by foreign companies. This development has involved competition
between the major media companies of the Nordic countries, where one of their
objectives has been expansion in the Baltic Sea Region. In 2001, the Finnish
"media giant", SanomaWSOY, bought VNU - a Dutch journal publisher,
and this and other acquisitions have boosted its turnover to 2.7 billion euros
in 2006. Recently, the other two Nordic media giants, Norwegian Schibsted and
Swedish Bonnier competed for ownership of the second largest Finnish media
conglomerate, Alma Media and especially its television activities. Bonnier won
and gained (together with Proventus Industrier AB) the control of Alma Media's
commercial television channel.
The Finnish culture industries have
maintained a high level of domestic content (see chapter
4.2.5).
In recent years, the main issue in
the financing of culture industries has been the promotion of exports (see chapter
2.3, chapter
2.4.1 and chapter
2.4.2). From a longer time perspective, the two main topics of national
debate in respect to the promotion of culture industries have been the
financing of domestic film production and the switch to digital TV by the
Finnish Broadcasting Company (YLE / FBC). The former debate has focussed mainly
on money: the need for increased support for national film production, which
has in recent years found popularity among domestic audiences and gained
(especially through the success of Aki Kaurismäki's "art films" and
Finnish documentaries and short films) international visibility also. The
Finnish Broadcasting Company (FBC) set a close deadline for its switch to
digital TV broadcasts and the economic feasibility and audience acceptance of
this decision has been publicly doubted and criticised. The overall
digitisation of the radio- and television broadcasts as well as developing new
interactive services was made financially possible by the sale of the stocks of
DIGITA (the company responsible for the stations and terrestrial broadcasting
and transmission networks of the FBC) to the French company TDF. DIGITA will
continue letting out the station and network services to the FBC and will also
be responsible for digitising networks and providing technical solutions for
interactive digital services.
The main financiers of Finnish
feature film production are the Finnish Film Institute, broadcasting companies,
(increasingly, only the public one, i.e. the Finnish Broadcasting Company) and
AVEK (The Promotion Centre for Audiovisual Culture). AVEK is maintained by
Kopiosto, the copyright organisation for copying compensation. Financing can be
based on bi-lateral or trilateral agreements between these three parties. There
are no longer formal contractual partnership agreements between them. The
Nordic Film and Television Fund, Eurimages, and the EU Media Plus programme
provides additional funding and also encourages public-private partnerships.
Public support for other branches of
culture industries, especially for book and phonogram production is very
limited. On the other hand, authors and translators and the authors, performers
and producers in the music industry receive public copyright / neighbouring
rights compensation through the copyright and neighbouring rights
organisations. A certain amount of this compensation is used to finance
collective services to rights owners. The main sources are library
compensation, other copying compensation, including the retransmission of radio
and television broadcasts, and the playing of recorded music in public spaces
(including radio and television broadcasts).
Finland/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.7 Employment policies for the
cultural sector
Estimates of employment figures in the
cultural sector vary depending on the definition of "cultural sector"
and "cultural occupations". If we limit the definition to artistic
professions (literature, criticism, translation, visual arts, architecture,
design, performing arts and entertainment, music and musicians and some
"creative" professions in audiovisual production processes) the total
number in 2000 was 15 000 professionals. More than 20% were employed by
art institutions, 35% worked as freelance artists and 45% in the entertainment
business (musicians being the largest group). ). If we take a comprehensive
definition of culture, including the media, all workers in the culture
industries, advertising, crafts and related industries, libraries, museums and
archives, printing, maintenance of amusement parks, etc, and take also into
account all employed persons irrespective of their occupation within the
cultural fields (whether they work in culture-related occupations or not),
their number was as high as 85 900 in 2003, or four percent of the
gainfully employed labour force. The gainfully employed in culture-related
occupations, irrespective of their sector of employment, was 66 000 in
2000, and gainfully employed persons in cultural sectors working in cultural
occupations was 36 700. There are, thus, four different measures of the
artistic and cultural labour force; and if sectors such as printing, media
technologies and advertising and related managerial occupations are subtracted
from the calculations, there would be much lower figures.
The issue of employment became
salient after the recession of the early 1990s, although it took some time
before any measures were taken in the cultural sector. The Ministry of
Education and Culture has drafted its own employment strategy, but the focus of
this strategy is to enhance the functioning of the education system as a whole,
not specifically education and training of artists and professionals for the
cultural sector. A report on the employment effects of the cultural sector was
prepared in 1997-1999, and the National Board of Education has more recently
calculated the future needs for the labour force in the cultural sectors. There
has been criticism that art universities and particularly the cultural and
media programmes of the polytechnics are causing unemployment by admitting too
many students and producing too many graduates. Calculations of the National
Board of Education have supported this criticism and the Ministry has reduced
the number of admissions. The working groups on culture industries and some
sector-specific research projects have presented more specific proposals for
developing culture industries and enhancing their employment effects.
Some Finnish cities, particularly
the city of Helsinki, have prepared policy plans for the "creative
industries" to promote employment opportunities. They have also worked
actively with other European cities to develop creative industries in cities or
specific city quarters (creative clusters).
The latest Finnish National
Action Plan for Employment (October 2004), which is otherwise in accordance
with the revised European Employment Strategy (EES) adopted by the European
Council in 2003, does not pay any attention to cultural labour markets.
Finland/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.8 New technologies and cultural
policies
The previous two Finnish governments
installed in 1999 and 2003 emphasised the central role of the new ICT in
economic and social development, or, in more general terms, in enhancing the
development of the information society. The 2003-2007 government, which
proposed in its programme a number of intersectoral policy programmes, included
among them a policy programme for the information society. Neither in this
programme nor in a later more specific implementation strategy were the arts
and culture mentioned as special target areas. On the other hand, the Ministry
of Education and Culture has contributed to the national information society
plans by proposing goals and means to develop Finland into a
"cultured" and "enlightened" information society. The
Ministry drafted two plans already in the mid- 1990s: Information Strategy
for Education and Research and a report on Culture-Oriented Information
Society. These documents have been updated twice, the former for the years 2000-2003
and 2004-2007, and the latter for the years 2000-2003 and 2004-2010. The most
recent update of the latter document ("Culture in the Information
Society") proposes strengthening cultural policy aspects within
information society policies in the domains of content industries, cultural
heritage, citizens' access to information and cultural services and in
international and EU co-operation. Following the proposed plans and strategies
the Ministry has assigned special funding for the development of a "cultural"
information society. Yet most of these allocations have been channelled to
education; only rather small grants and subsides have been allocated to the
cultural sector itself for the digitisation of public libraries, museums and
archives, for improving information systems and to some cultural information
society projects.
The strategy of the Ministry of
Transport and Communications has been much stronger and swifter in respect to
the promotion of new information technologies. This is witnessed e.g. by the
recent (2007) amendment of the Act on the Amendment of Sections 4 and 7 in
the Act on Television and Radio Operations. This made the licensing of
mobile television - DVB-H (Digital Broadcasting Video / Handheld) easier than
licensing traditional digital terrestrial television operations. The amendment
makes granting of programme operating licences for DVB-H the task of the
Finnish Communications Regulatory Authority (FICORA), the independent
communications regulator. There will be no rounds of invitations for
applications as is the case with traditional television, but, instead,
applications can be filed as needed. Programme operating licences are required
for radio and television channels only. Other services, such as video on
demand, multimedia and information society services, can be offered without a
programme operating licence, by direct arrangement with the network operating
license. However, the public service broadcaster YLE and the commercial digital
terrestrial television licenses do not need a separate programme operating
licence for simulcasts on the DVB-H network. Commercial negotiations are
required with the network operating license, i.e. Digita, to access the network
(see chapter
5.3.8).
Finland/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.9 Heritage issues and policies
The big heritage issues in the early
1990s were the protection of historically valuable buildings and the urban and
rural landscapes; and the most heated debate centred on the feasibility of
delegating more decision-making power to the local level in matters concerning
physical planning ("zoning"). During the 1991-1993 recessions these
issues lost some of their relevance and the more traditional archaeological and
museological issues and issues of heritage digitisation have come to the
forefront. The archaeological and museological policies are planned and
implemented by the National Board of Antiquities, an expert agency supervised
by the Ministry of Education and Culture. The Ministry of Environment also has
a central role, if the heritage concept is broadened to cover the protection of
built heritage and national landscapes. In this role the Ministry of
Environment is responsible for the preparation of certain national
environmental and landscape protection programmes as well as national land use
guidelines. Furthermore, it has actual official tasks, such as the confirmation
of regional plans as well as decision-making linked with the Building
Protection Act and the protection of state-owned buildings.
The outlines for the digitisation of
cultural heritage for all "memory organisations" (museums, archives
and libraries) are defined in the information strategy documents of the
Ministry of Education and Culture and a special committee report on the
heritage strategy in the information society. The digitisation is carried out
in all three sectors as an integral part of all activities; the three
"memory sectors" have established bodies for co-operation and the
ministry has financed digitisation projects in different sectors and regions of
the country.
In 2005, there were 165
professionally managed museums, with more than three hundred operating
locations. Two-thirds of these museums were historical museums, the rest were
special museums, arts museums and museums of natural history. Twenty of the
museums are regional historical museums and 16 regional art museums. The
re-organisation of the whole museum sector has been planned by an ad hoc
committee, but the recent revision of the Museum Act only refines the
criteria for "professionally managed" museums which are entitled to
receive formula-based central government subsidy. The future of the museum
sector will depend to a great extent on how the recently reformed statutory
central government subsidy system will actually improve the financial situation
in the museum sector. From the point of view of minorities, of importance is
the SIIDA-Institute, the home of the Sámi Museum and the Northern Lapland
Nature Centre. With its cultural and nature exhibitions, SIIDA provides in its
collections and exhibitions items of Sámi culture and nature of Northern Lapland.
The National Board of Antiquities
drafted in 2002 a proposal for the national strategy of cultural tourism, with
an emphasis on sustainable development. The Finnish Tourist Board (under the
Ministry of Labour and Industry) deals also with the issues of cultural tourism
and the regional councils take up these issues in their regional tourism
strategies.
For more information, see
European Heritage Network: Country profile Finland
Finland/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.10 Gender equality and cultural
policies
Gender equality has never been
explicitly stated as an objective in Finnish cultural policy. Thus its
development must be seen as a part of the general development of gender
representation and legislative and administrative efforts to make gender
representation more equal in all fields of society.
Since the 1970s, Finnish gender
policies have converged into a Nordic version of "state feminism",
where the main means used have been legal measures, official monitoring and
positive action, including parity clauses and quotas in the representation and
employment of women in the labour market. Since the Beijing Conference (Fourth
World Conference on Women), government policy has been reformulated
increasingly in terms of mainstreaming and along the lines expressed in
the main EU documents addressing gender equality in representation, employment,
career advancement and salaries. This new approach was crystallised in the
revised Equality Act of 1995, the 1997 Government Programme on
Equality (subtitled "From Beijing to Finland") and the further
revision of the Equality Act in 2005.
As the government 1995 Bill for
the Amendment of 1986 Equality Act was presented to Parliament, the need
for new legislation was justified in terms that "...in many
respects the goals (of the previous legislation) have not been achieved.
Despite changes in legislation the position of women is still distinctly lower
than that of men in working life, in the family and in the decision-making
mechanisms of society. Especially in working life the objectives of equality
have not been achieved. The new law aims at recognising these problems and
solving them".
Despite these general arguments, the
main practical consequence of the 1995 revision of the Equality Act was
the centralisation of responsibilities for monitoring gender equality and the
enforcement of a quota requirement for equal representation of men and
women (min. 40% of both genders) in state and municipal executive and expert
bodies. The latter stipulation has altered the "gate-keeping system"
in the arts and culture, because e.g. the arts councils and municipal boards
responsible for cultural affairs must comply with its quota requirement. The
1997 government programme for equality and the equality provisions in the
programmes of the subsequent governments in 1999 and 2003 have underlined the
need to mainstream all public programmes and legislation pertaining to central
government and municipal administration activities. Extensive research and
development activities have been initiated and they have also covered the arts
and culture.
Despite these legislative and
research and development activities, the issues of equal pay and the modes of
monitoring gender differences in wages, salaries, recruitment procedures and
promotion have remained controversial from a gender equality point of view. The
new 2005 revision of the Equality Act aims at solving these controversies
by expanding the obligation of public agencies and private enterprises to
present annual (or at least triennial) equality plans with detailed gender
equality accounts. This obligation was also expanded to cover secondary and
higher level educational institutions, including the art universities.
In 2004, the Ministry of Education
and Culture contracted CUPORE, the Foundation for Cultural Policy Research, to
carry out an equality evaluation in the main domains of cultural policy. The
evaluation report, identifying inequalities and proposing methods for effective
mainstreaming, was delivered to the Ministry in October 2004. Its main
recommendations were included in the Government Equality Programme for the
years 2004-2007.
Finland/ 4. Current issues in
cultural policy development and debate
4.3 Other relevant issues and
debates
The listing, in chapter
3.3, of the more recent policy objectives and the identification, in chapter
4.1, of the main trends in policy issues and priorities cover all the main
relevant issues and topics of debates in the Finnish contemporary cultural
policy scene. We can, however, add to these lists the debate concerning the
problems of two national cultural institutions, the Finnish National Opera
(FNO) and the Finnish Broadcasting Company (FBC).
The troubles of the FNO started in
2005, when, after an artistically successful previous year, the box-office
income fell drastically and the annual deficit of the financial year was 1.8
million euros. It proved impossible to cover the deficit in 2006; there were
plans to reduce the regular personnel by 40 staff members and the number of
performances by 20%; all staff members were due to be laid off for two months
in spring 2007. The protests of the staff and the resignation of the newly
appointed musical director led, finally, to the resignation of the General
Director. The new stream-lined Executive Board, headed by the former Governor
of the Bank of Finland and the new General Director, confirmed a reform
programme, reducing personnel by 54 persons by the year 2010 and costs worth
2.8 million euros annually.
Two more general questions were in
the background of this development. What level of artistic ambition is appropriate
for a small country; and what is an appropriate share of the total public
financing to be used for the National Opera? A further question was who should
have the right to decide these issues.
The troubles of the Finnish
Broadcasting Company (YLE) started with the decision to switch to digital
broadcasts. The deadline for antenna networks was 1 September 2007; after that,
the viewers had to have a digital adapter or digital television set; the cable
companies could convert the digital channels to analogue format until February
2008. The problem with adapters, the YLE's inability to maintain clear
subtitling in the digital broadcasts and the general confusion in programme
planning, led to protests: an increasing number left their license fee unpaid and
financial losses amounted to millions of euros. At present (December 2007),
200 000 households watch without paying. As the YLE had just managed to
decrease its annual deficit from 51 million euros to 17 million euros, it had
to start new cost-cutting programmes, which has infuriated employees. Due to
the need for cost-cutting, the YLE also announced that it can no longer be a
co-sponsor, with the state and the City of Helsinki, in the construction of the
new Helsinki Music Centre, which is to provide the home concert hall for the
Helsinki City Orchestra, as well as for the Radio Symphony Orchestra.
These two cases are only extensions
of a more general concern whether the present level of public financing of the
arts and culture can be maintained on the present level, where it has been
slowly raised after the economic recession of 1991-1993. This concern is linked
to a specific issue: the need to maintain and reform the unique feature of the
Finnish financing system. The public financing system was built in the 1970s
and 1980s, year after year, increasingly by the money that the Ministry
received from the annual profits of the government monopoly company -Veikkaus
Ltd, which operates the lottery, lotto and sports betting activities. After the
recession of 1991-1993, the costs of public cultural services - especially the
central government transfers to the municipal public library system - were
increasingly financed from these profits. Due to the unrealistic expectations
of the lottery profits, the decrease in profits in 2001-2002 caused financing
problems and exacerbated disputes between grant recipients (arts and culture,
scientific research, youth and sports). All of these issues, as well as
increased competition from Internet betting, precipitated a reform of the
legislation. The reform of the National Lottery Act - which actually
covers, in addition to the lotto, lottery and sports betting, the entire
"gambling sectors" - activated all relevant interest groups of
present and potential beneficiaries. A solution satisfying all interested
parties was achieved and new legislation enacted. At the same time, it was
stipulated that the central government subsidies to public libraries would be
gradually financed from regular budget appropriations ("tax-payers money"),
not from the profits of Veikkaus. In recent years, these profits have been
rather high and regular state budget funding has also been substantially
increased (see chapter
6).
However, this legislative
achievement has been overshadowed by another issue that has its roots in new
technologies and the globalising of betting markets. This issue is whether
national gambling monopolies can be justified when the restrictions on free
competition in the service sector are otherwise abolished. There has been
direct pressure to abolish national monopoly legislation by such international
betting companies as British Ladbrokes, which has tried in several law suits to
prove that national lottery and game monopolies violate EU legislation on free
competition. So far, the European Court of Justice has not taken a definite
stand in the case of gambling monopolies and the situation did not change as
the new EU directive on the liberalisation of trade and services was enacted.
In any case, national lottery monopoly companies, including Veikkaus Ltd, will
face ever-hardening competition vis-à-vis Internet transmitted betting and
games.
The issue of maintaining the present
publicly subsidised cultural service systems has a broader ramification as
regards the role of the arts and culture in regional and local development.
Cultural statistics and studies indicate that despite the maintenance of these
systems, artistic and cultural activities and the cultural labour force are
concentrating in major cities and especially in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area.
One proposed solution to maintain equitable service provision has been
"decentralised concentration", that is centralising services to major
regional centres which provide networked services to the whole region.
However, to a certain extent, the
funding of cultural projects within the programmes financed from the EU
Structural Funds has proved that culture is an important dimension of
development. The Regional Development Strategy of the Ministry of Education and
Culture for the years 2003-2013 set eight objectives. Three of them relate to
equity of services, maintenance of local and regional heritage values, identity
and protection of aesthetic environments; five objectives relate to the
economic and social benefits accruing from enhanced regionally equitable
cultural development. The strategy, however, proposes only a few concrete means
for achieving these objectives.
Finland/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.1 Constitution
The following provisions of the new
Finnish Constitution (1999) have immediate relevance for focusing and limiting
the sphere of cultural policies. The first item defines the Constitutional
basis of cultural policy decision-making and administration; the other
Constitutional provisions guarantee citizens' rights and liberties - including
freedom of the arts - and the cultural rights of minorities.
Chapter 1, Section 6, states the
equality principle that applies to "everybody", not only to Finnish
citizens; this is, of course, relevant from the point of view of aliens and
non-naturalised immigrants;
Chapter 2, Section 12, guarantees
freedom of expression but also stipulates potential restrictions relating to
pictorial programmes that are necessary for the protection of children and may
be laid down by an Act; section 16 (on Educational Rights) guarantees the
freedom of science, the arts and higher education;
Chapter 2, Section 17, defines
Swedish language as a parallel national language to Finnish, designates Sami,
Roma and Finnish Sign Language as minority languages and Sami as an indigenous
culture and stipulates the rights of the Sami and other minority groups to
develop their own language and culture;
Chapter 11, Sections 120, stipulates
that the Island / Province of Aland will have an autonomous status such as will
be defined by special legislation;
Chapter 11, Section 121, guarantees
cultural autonomy for the Sami living in the Sami Homeland municipalities (in
Lapland).
Finland/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.2 Division of jurisdiction
The Finnish cultural policy system
evolves along the state-municipalities axis. The constitution and legislation
on municipal administration defines the role of municipalities vis-à-vis the
state.
Despite the autonomy of the
municipalities (which includes rights to define the rate of municipal income
tax), municipal cultural institutions are to a large extent dependant on
central government subsidies (transfers) to the municipalities. These
subsidies, aiming at equity in the regional and local provision of performing
arts and cultural services, go either to municipalities and through
municipalities to the municipal cultural institutions and activities), or
directly to cultural and art institutions which are operated as non-profit
organisations (usually associations of foundations). In the former case, it is
up to the municipalities to decide to what extent they use the subsidies for
the purpose they were calculated to be used.
The central government system is
also decentralised to a large extent: the role of the main cultural and art
institutions, agencies and arm's length bodies is defined by specific legislation.
The Constitution stipulates that no non-public organisation can exercise
authoritative public decision-making powers without such special legislation.
Alongside the Constitution, the key
pieces of legislation on the jurisdictional division between the state and in
cultural sector are:
The special instances of autonomy
and cultural rights are defined in the Constitution and specified with special
legislation (see chapter
5.2, category XII of the listed legislation and chapter
5.1.9 on language legislation).
Finland/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.3 Allocation of public funds
The following Acts provide the
legislative basis for financing the arts and culture. The first Act provides
the legal and administrative basis for the national lotto, lottery and sports
betting monopoly and the second Act specifies the use of profits. The remaining
Acts provide the legislative framework for state transfers (subsidies) to
municipal and local cultural activities and services (including the financing
of local / municipal theatres and orchestras). These acts are frequently
accompanied with decrees by the Council of State (Cabinet) or the ministries,
which specify in greater detail e.g. the tasks and criteria of professionalism
of the institutions. While debating and confirming the annual state budget,
Parliament can also pass temporary exceptions to general financial legislation
(Budget Laws). Consequently the acts have frequent, (and sometimes even
a long row of similar annual) amendments.
Table 5:
Legislation covering the allocation of public funds in the cultural sector
LEGISLATION |
COMMENTS |
Lottery Act (1047/2001) and Pool Betting Decree (241/1993) |
The act and the decree give the
government the right to contract a monopoly of 1) lottery / lotto, football
pools and betting, 2) slot-machines and casinos, and 3) harness race betting
to their appropriate organisers; orders the returns to be channelled to the
state budget and earmarks their use to specific "good" purposes |
Act Regulating the Use of the
Profits of Lottery / Lotto, Football Pools and Betting (1054/2001) |
Defines the shares of the annual
returns of lottery / lotto and sports betting as follows: 25% to sports, 5%
to youth policy measures, 17.5% for scientific research and 35% to the arts |
Act on Central Government
Transfers to Municipalities
(1147/1996), frequent amendments for levelling local and regional
inequalities, compensating inflation and taking other financial transaction
between central government and municipalities into account. |
General financing law defining the
relative share of the state and municipalities in producing public services
and provides the basic rules for calculating and allocating the transfer of
state subsidies to municipalities |
Act on Financing Education and
Culture (originally 705/1992; now
635/1998), main amendments 1186/1999, 1071/2005, a new amendment will be
passed by Parliament as a Budget Law in 2007. |
Specific Financing Law
defining the rules for calculating and allocating central government
transfers (subsidies) to municipal and none-profit service organisation
including professional local and regional theatres, museums, orchestras and
libraries and organisers of basic arts education |
Municipal Cultural Activities Act (728/1992, amended 1681/1992) |
Legislative basis for the central
government support to non-institutional cultural activities in municipalities |
Museums Act (729/1992, amended 1959/1995, 1166/1996, 877/2005,
1076/2005) |
Legislative basis defining
professional museums eligible for central government subsidies according to
the "financing law" |
Theatres and Orchestras Act (730/1992, Parliament has recently passed an amendment,
which adds criteria emphasising artistic aspirations over and above sheer
commercial success |
Legislative basis defining
professional theatres and orchestras eligible for central government
subsidies according to the "financing law" |
(Public) Library Act, (904/1998), specified by Decree 1078/199,
defining the tasks of the central Library and regional libraries in the
public library system |
Legislative basis defining the
tasks of public (municipal) libraries eligible for central government
subsidies according to the "financing law" |
Act on Discretionary Government
Transfers, (688/2001) |
Act lays down the grounds and
procedures that apply to granting discretionary government transfers
(occasional grants-in-aid) to socially or culturally important activities or
projects. |
Source:
Data Bank FINLEX http://www.finlex.fi/en/
Finland/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.4 Social security frameworks
Cultural workers, including most of
the cultural professionals employed in publicly owned or publicly supported
cultural service systems - including the performing arts - are covered by the
compulsory social security and pension systems. The same is the case with those
who are more permanently employed by enterprises of the culture industries and
by professional / trade associations in the fields of the arts and culture.
This overall social security protection does not, however, cover free
(self-employed) artists and free-lance cultural workers.
There have been attempts to improve
the unemployment insurance and social security system of (especially pension
system) of other self-employed artists and non-taxable grant receivers. The
general pension law, the Act on the Pensions of Artists and Some Particular
Groups of Short-Time Workers, has standardised the situation for freelance
artists and professionals who are employed and working in the premises of an
employer. The position of the "free artists" and persons enjoying
non-taxable grants has remained weak. There have been demands for reforms in
three areas:
Some progress has been made in all
of these areas (e.g. in relation to the insurance and pension payments based on
the accumulation of artists' grants), but most reform proposals still wait to
be enacted legislatively. It seems that the proposal, which will offer the
possibility for free artists and freelancers to enrol in the pension insurance
system of agricultural entrepreneurs, may offer the best reform alternative.
For more information, see our Status
of Artists section.
Finland/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.5 Tax laws
There are no legislation or special
administrative arrangements that would offer incentives for sponsorship. On the
other hand, income taxation legislation (Income Tax Act, paragraph 57)
offers tax deductions within a narrow general limit (min. 850 euros, max.
27 000 euros) for donations to the state, universities or to non-profit
organisations in the arts and science which are considered culturally
significant by a special Tax Relief Board. Tax-deductible donations for
the preservation of national cultural heritage do not have an upper limit.
The Income Tax Act (paragraph
22) also defines the criteria for non-profit organisations ("organisations
accruing collective benefits"), which can have income tax relief for their
small-scale non-commercial business activities. The Value Added Tax Act
considers organisations obliged to pay VAT if, on the basis of the Income
Tax Act, they are considered liable to pay income tax. There have been
debates under which condition this tax relief may be in conflict with the EU
Treaty, Article 87, which prohibits competition distorting subsidies
or financial transfers of any other forms of resources to market organisations.
Regarding tax rates, the Finnish VAT
Act has been enacted to suit the valid EC / EU VAT directives. The basic
VAT-rate in Finland is 22%. The rate of VAT is 8% for books and income fees of
cultural, art and entertainment services and performances (entrance fees to
museums, box office receipts from cinemas, theatres, orchestras and circus,
music and dance performances). The VAT-rate on the price of newspapers and
journals is zero. Sales of works of art in art galleries initially had a
zero-rate of VAT; this however was revised on the basis of a decision by the
European Court of Justice which found that these sales are not services and
therefore must be taxed at the basic rate - which has been the case since the
corresponding amendment of the VAT-legislation in 2002. The VAT on sales of
(not-exported) work of art, by artists or by individual owners of artist's
rights, is eight per cent.
Finland/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.6 Labour laws
The main legal instruments that
regulate the use of the Finnish labour force are the Act on Labour Contracts
and the Act on Civil Servants. Both define the rights of the employees
and the obligations of the employers. The Finnish tri-partite system of collective
bargaining (income negotiations) "activates" these laws regularly and
may result in their revision. They - as well as the rounds of collective
bargaining - are relevant from the point of view of performing arts and
cultural services. Self-employed artists and freelance workers are, of course,
outside these laws and the more comprehensive system of collective bargaining,
although the result of the latter may influence also the level of income the
latter groups receive from their work.
General labour laws also have
regulations that concern discrimination, yet the protection against gender
discrimination is stipulated in the Equality Act (see chapter
4.2.10).
For more information, see our Status
of Artists section.
Finland/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.7 Copyright provisions
The present Finnish Copyright Act
was passed in 1961, and has been altered twenty times since then. The recent
twenty-first change was in October 2005 after a three year controversial
preparation process. At the final stage, the Government Bill was heavily
criticised and was finally passed after a clause on monitoring the future
development and potential revision from the point of view of consumer interests
was included. The critics argued that the new act is stricter than was required
by the EU Directive in respect to private copying and the criminalisation of
supplying and possessing programmes for removing copy protection encoding (see chapter
4.3).
Despite the conflict concerning the
new copyright act, it probably will have only minor effects on the functioning
of the Finnish copyright system in practice. Within the legislative frame of
the Copyright Act, the main copyright and neighbouring rights organisations (of
authors and translators, composers, performing artists, producers of records
and audiovisual programme etc.) will also in the future protect effectively
authors' and producers' rights and the rights for the public performance of
music and the reproduction rights. The Finnish Copyright Law stipulates
that an extended collective licence permits the use of an author's work or an
artist's performance, when a licence agreement has been reached between the
user and the copyright management / compensation collecting organisation (CMO),
representing a reasonably high number of Finnish authors and performers in a
particular field.
Since 1984, there has been a system
of collecting levies on copying media. The products subject to a levy include,
at present, all recordable audio and video devices that are used for private
copying, such as blank VHS tapes, CDs, and DVDs, as well as digital audio and
video recorders (e.g. mp3 players and HDD video recorders). In 2000-2005, the
annual returns of the system have been around 10-12 million euros. These
returns are allocated by the Ministry of Education and Culture to the main
copyright organisations, which distribute them partly directly to the copyright
owners, partly as indirect collective compensation for training, R&D and
production subsidies. The collective compensations are also administered by the
copyright organisations or their promotion centres, such as AVEK, the Promotion
Centre for Audiovisual Culture, ESEK (the Performed Music Promotion Centre) and
LUSES (the Music Creation Promotion Centre).
The main copyright collecting
organisations are Kopiosto (reprographic and digitation compensation, radio-
and television programme retransmission compensation and private copying
compensation), Teosto (music authors' and publishers' rights compensation,
private copying compensation, public music playing compensation) and Gramex
(music neighbouring rights compensation, private copying compensation). The
total returns to Kopiosto in 2006 were 24.8 million euros; the corresponding
returns in music copyright and neighbouring rights to Teosto and Gramex were
together about 66 million euros. Other less prominent, but evolving, CMOs are
Kuvasto (for visual arts), Sanasto (for writers and translators) and Tuotos
(for producers in the culture industries).
The Ministry of Education and
Culture is responsible for copyright legislation and administration. Teosto
(see above) has been contracted by the Ministry of Education and Culture to
collect the compensation from the levy on media copying. Teosto has a special
unit, the Private Copying Unit, for this purpose. The CMOs also have a joint
organisation, the Copyright Information and Anti-Piracy Centre, for monitoring
and preventing copyright violation.
Finland/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.8 Data protection laws
The three main laws are the Personal
Data File Act (523/1999), the Act on the Exercise of Freedom of
Expression in Mass Media (460/2003) and the Act on the Protection of
Privacy in Electronic Communication (516/2004). The first of these laws
(harmonised in 1998 to concur with Directive 95/46/EC of the European
Parliament and of the Council) pertains to the protection of individuals
with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such
data. The second law stipulates the responsibility of publishers and producers
of public performances and network communications in respect of preventing the
publishing of false or insulting information on individual actors. The third
law is on public data service providers, to protect the confidentiality of
communication and privacy of the users of communication networks. The
protection of individual privacy is also stipulated in general terms in the
Finnish Constitution.
The implementation of the data
protection legislation is organised by the Data Protection Ombudsman and the
Data Protection Board. The implications of this legislation and its management
for cultural policy can be seen in three areas: 1) protection of persons
belonging to minority groups, 2) direct advertising in culture industries, 3)
protection of personal privacy vis-à-vis media exposure and the media's right
of expression.
There are no studies yet on how all
these national and EU legislations and their implementation might have started
to shape the media, cultural industries and cultural policy implementation.
Finland/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.9 Language laws
The Swedish-speaking Finnish
population is not only a national minority. The basic ideology of
nation-building stipulates that Finland has two parallel cultures, one based on
the Swedish-language and the other on the Finnish-language. The rights of the
Swedish-speaking population are guaranteed in the newly re-codified Finnish
Constitution (1999) and further enacted by a special Language Act,
which, together with some special laws, provides for equality for official
(administrative, court) use of the native language and access to education and
public careers. The new Language Act was passed in 2003 and was enforced
from the beginning of 2004; it does not expand language rights but aims at
better safeguarding of these rights in practice.
The Constitution gives a special
position also to Sami people (as an indigenous culture), to the Roma people and
to the users of sign language by mentioning them specifically, but guarantees
all minority groups the right "...to maintain and develop their own
language and culture". The language rights of these minorities, as well as
foreigners, in legal and administrative processes are guaranteed with laws and
statutes. The cultural rights of these groups are also enshrined by the
ratification of international conventions, especially by the European Framework
Convention for the Protection of National Minorities and the European Charter
for the Protection of Regional or Minority Languages.
Finland/ 5.2 Legislation on culture
Finnish politicians and civil
servants still often repeat an old adage inherited from the period of Swedish
rule: "land skall med lag byggas" (the nation shall be
built by laws). This, of course, refers first and foremost to Constitutional
order, but it is also the basic principle of policy implementation. Even the
reforms that characterised the construction of the Finnish welfare state were
legislatively enshrined, and the easiest way to identify the principal elements
of Finnish cultural policy is to examine the corpus of laws and statutes
pertaining to the cultural sector.
Table 6 below gives an overall view
of legislation currently in force by the end of 2005 that directly addresses
cultural policy issues or indirectly shapes them. It also indicates some recent
amendments, which, in a way, document the implementation of the new policy
objectives and items of debates listed in chapter
4.3. The comments in the right hand column explain the contents and
cultural policy relevance of the listed legislative acts, decrees and
international conventions and agreements. More details on sector specific
legislation are available in chapters
5.3.1 - 5.3.10.
The Table in toto
demonstrates the supremacy of Parliament as the final instance in deciding not
only annual state budgets but also more stable legal frameworks for public financing;
the first section (Section I) indicates the role of the Council of State not
only as the main initiator of new legislation, but also the top echelon of
public administration and as the co-ordinating executor of overall central
government policies.
The horizontal decentralisation of
the Finnish cultural policy system as discussed in chapter
3.3 is reflected in the laws and decrees found throughout Table 6. The role
of agencies and arm's length bodies, regional authorities and the autonomous
local administration (municipalities) becomes apparent in the section listing
the more specific legislation concerning the financing of the arts and culture.
Table 6:
Current legislation pertaining to cultural policy and cultural administration
in Finland
MAIN
CATEGORIES OF CULTURAL POLICY LEGISLATION |
COMMENTS |
I. CULTURAL POLICY DECISION-MAKING
AND ADMINISTRATION |
|
Decree on the Ministry of
Education and Culture
(162/1997, amended 873/1997, 170/1998, 442/2000, 319/2000); Ordinance on
the Organisation and Functions of the Ministry of Education (380/2003). |
These enactments stipulate the
structure and functioning of the Ministry. The higher legislative basis
consists of the Constitution (731/1999); the Act on the Council of State
175/2003; the Ordinance on the Organisation and Functions of the Ministries
(262/2003, frequent amendments).) |
Act on Organising the
Promotion of the Arts
(328/1967, amended 635/1997, 366/2000, 667/2002, 283/2004)) |
Created the present system of
national and regional arts councils |
Act (1401/2006) and Decree (311/2007) on the (EU)
Structural Funds |
Organises the relationship between
the national authorities and administrative units in planning, financing and
implementing the programmes financed within the framework of EU Structural
Funds |
Decree of the Ministry of
Education on the jurisdiction of the Board of Education and Province Offices
in the Management of Structural Funds Administration (933/2001) |
Delegates the planning,
implementing and decision-making functions of the Ministry in the EU
Structural Funds Programme to the Board of Education and Provincial Offices |
Act on the National Board of
Antiquities (282/2004, original 31/1972,
amended 1016/1987, 1080/2001) |
Defines the task and organisation
of the main expert and policy implementing body of heritage policies. |
Decree on the National Board of
Antiquities (417/2004) |
Specified the Act on the Board of
Antiquities e.g. in respect of the status of the National Museum |
Act on Finnish National Gallery
(Art Museum) Act (566/2000, amended 504/2004;
original act 186/1990) |
Provides an umbrella organisation
for three state-owned art museums: domestic, foreign and contemporary art
museums |
Acts on Finnish Film Archive (891/1978) and on the Archiving of Films
(576/1984) |
Organise the national
administration of film archiving |
Act on the Library for the
Visually Impaired ( 638/1996, amended 835/1998,
originally 11/1978) |
Provides national book services
for the visually impaired |
Decree on the Board for Specific
Grants to Visual Artists
(116/1997) |
Organises the administration of
compensation for displaying public art works in public places |
Act on the Classification of
Audiovisual Programmes
(775/2000) and the Board of Film Classification (776/2000) |
Age classification of programmes
for the protection of children against exhibition of pornography and
violence; violations punishable according to Chapter 17 of the Finnish Penal
Code |
Act for the Promotion of Film Art (28/2000) |
Provides a legal basis for the
activities of the Finnish Film Foundation (founded in 1969) to support
national film production |
II. PROMOTING THE ARTS, ARTISTS
AND CREATIVITY |
|
Act on Art Professors' and
Artists' State-Grants (734/1969,
amended 143/1995, 367/2000, 666/2002, 196/2005) |
Provides the legislative basis for
the artists' grants system; amendment 143/1995 abolished the 15-year grants
and made the system more purposeful |
Act on Grants and Subsidies for
Authors and Translators (236/1961,
amended 1080/83, 1067/1993, 1272/1994, 1358/1995, 1040/1996249/ 2002,
665/2002) |
Provides grants to authors and
translators to compensate the library use of their works |
Act on Some Specific Grants for
Visual Artists (115/1997, amended 664/2002) |
Provides grants for visual artists
for the public display of their works |
Council of State Decision on
Extraordinary Artists' Pensions
( 75/1974) |
Provides additional pensions for
senior artists and finances their artistic work |
Act on State Guarantees for Art
Exhibitions (411/1986, amended 639/1991,
336/1994, 390/1997, 1116/2001)) |
Guarantees insurance for the
organiser of art exhibitions |
Act on the Pensions of Artists and
Some Particular Groups of Short-Time Workers (662/1985, amended frequently). |
Safeguards the pension payments
and pension rights in short-term employment contracts that are typical for
musicians, performing artists, journalists, set-designers, etc. |
III. FINANCING CULTURAL AND ART
INSTITUTIONS AND CULTURAL SERVICES
|
|
Act on Central Government
Transfers to Municipalities
(1147/1996), frequent amendments for levelling local and regional
inequalities, compensating inflation and taking other financial transaction
between central government and municipalities into account. |
General financing law defining the
relative share of the state and municipalities in producing public services
and provides the basic rules for calculating and allocating the transfer of
state subsidies to municipalities. |
Act on Financing Education and
Culture (originally 705/1992; now
635/1998), main amendments 1186/1999, 1071/2005, a new amendment will be
passed by Parliament as a Budget Law in 2007. |
Specific "financing
law" defining the rules for calculating and allocating central
government transfers (subsidies) to municipal and none-profit service
organisation including professional local and regional theatres, museums,
orchestras and libraries and organisers of basic arts education |
Lottery Act (1047/2001) and Pool Betting Decree (241/1993) |
The act and the decree give
the government the right to contract a monopoly of 1) lottery / lotto,
football pools and betting, 2) slot-machines and casinos, and 3) harness race
betting to their appropriate organisers; orders the returns to be channelled
to the state budget and earmarks their use to specific "good"
purposes |
Act Regulating the Use of the
Profits of Lottery / Lotto, and Sports Betting (1054/2001). |
Defines the share of the annual
returns of lottery / lotto, and sports betting as follows: 25% to sports, 5%
to youth policy measures, 17.5% for scientific research and 35% to the arts |
Government Decree on Organising
Lotteries (1345/2001) |
Specifies the technical rules for
minor (non-monetary prize) lotteries organised e.g. by voluntary associations
to finance "good causes" |
IV. PROFESSIONAL CULTURAL AND ART
INSTITUTIONS AND MUNICIPAL CULTURAL SERVICES |
|
Act on the National Board of Antiquities (282/2004, original 31/1972, amended 1016/1987,
1080/2001) |
Defines the task and organisation
of the main expert and policy implementing body of heritage policies. |
Decree on the National Board of
Antiquities (417/2004) |
Specified the Act on the Board of
Antiquities e.g. in respect of the status of the National Museum |
Act on Finnish National Gallery
(Art Museum) Act (566/2000, amended 504/2004;
original act 186/1990) |
Provides an umbrella organisation
for three state-owned art museums: domestic, foreign and contemporary art
museums |
Acts on Finnish Film Archive Act (891/1978) and on the Archiving of Films
(576/1984) |
Organise the national
administration of film archiving |
Act on the Library for the
Visually Impaired ( 638/1996, amended 835/1998,
originally 11/1978) |
Provides national book services
for the visually impaired |
Municipal Cultural Activities Act (728/1992, amended 1681/1992) |
Legislative basis for the central
government support to non-institutional cultural activities in municipalities |
Museums Act (729/1992, amended 1959/1995, 1166/1996, 877/2005,
1076/2005) |
Legislative basis defining
professional museums eligible for central government subsidies according to
the "financing law" |
Theatres and Orchestras Act (730/1992. Parliament has recently passed an amendment,
which adds criteria emphasising artistic aspirations over and above sheer
commercial success. |
Legislative basis defining
professional theatres and orchestras eligible for central government
subsidies according to the "financing law" |
(Public) Library Act (904/1998), specified by Decree 1078/1998 defining the
tasks of the central Library and regional libraries in the public
library system |
Legislative basis defining the
tasks of public (municipal) libraries eligible for central government
subsidies according to the "financing law" |
Act on Discretionary Government
Transfers (688/2001) |
Act lays down the grounds and
procedures that apply to granting discretionary government transfers
(occasional grants-in-aid) to socially or culturally important activities or
projects. |
V. ADULT EDUCATION |
|
Act on Voluntary Adult Education (632/1998, amended 1292/2004, 1200/2004)) |
A new integrating law that defines
the traditional forms of voluntary adult education and lays the ground for
public support |
Decree on Voluntary Adult
Education (805/1998) |
Specifies the previous act |
VI. ARTS EDUCATION AND TRAINING OF
THE ARTISTS |
|
Higher Education Development Act (1052/1986, amended 1207/1993, 943/1996, 1279/2001) |
Guarantees stable financing of the
universities - including art universities (University for Art and Design,
Sibelius-Academy. Academy of Fine Arts, Theatre Academy) - and defines
related performance expectations |
Universities Act (645/1997 amended 1059/1998, numerous other amendments). |
Defines the units, structure,
functioning and internal and external organisation of the system of
universities, including art universities (see the comment above). |
Act on Basic Education in the Arts (originally 424/1992, now 633/1998, amended 518/2000) |
Integrates the organisation of
extracurricular art education for children and youth and lays the basis for
its public financing |
Vocational Education Act (630/1998, frequent amendments |
Legislative basis for lower
vocational education, including culture (handicraft, design, audiovisual
media, visual expression, dance and music ) |
Polytechnics Act (351/2003 and Decree (351/2003) |
Define the objectives and
organisation of polytechnic education, including higher professional /
vocational education in the arts, culture, media and humanities |
Act on Pilot Programme on
Postgraduate Studies in Polytechnic Institutions (645/2001) |
A further step to remodel
polytechnics to parallel universities degree structure |
VII. BROADCASTING, FILM, MASS
MEDIA, CULTURE INDUSTRIES |
|
Film Art Promotion Act (28/2000) |
This act provides a legal basis
for the functioning of the Finnish Film Institute |
Decree on the Promotion of Film
Art (121/2000) |
Specifies the previous act |
Act on Radio and Television
Activities (744/1998) |
Defines the prerequisites for the
broadcasting operations and their licensing by public authorities |
Act on the Finnish Broadcasting
Company (FBC, 1380/1993, amended
746/1998) |
Defines the role of the FBC
as a public service radio and television company and defines the mode of its
(parliamentary) control |
Act on the Classification of
Audiovisual Programmes
(775/2000) and the Board of Film Classification (776/2000) |
Age classification of programmes
for the protection of children against exhibition of pornography and
violence; violations punishable according to Chapter 17 of the Finnish Penal
Code |
VIII. TAXATION |
|
Act on Value Added Tax (1501/1993), especially amendments 1265/1997 and
1071/2001 of paragraph 85a that defines a lower tax rate (8%) for cultural
products (books) and cultural and entertainment services (tickets to
performing arts, performances, cinema, zoo, museums, etc.) |
Several amendments due to the EU
directives, the latest (1071/2002) extended the law to cover the trade on art
objects |
Decree on Value Added Tax (50/1994) |
Specifies the previous law |
IX. FREE COMPETITION |
|
Act on Competition Restrictions (480/1992), major amendment 400/2003, 447-448/2004,
(318/2004) Act on the Finnish Competition
Authority (711/1988) Decree on the Finnish Competition
Authority (66/1993) Market Court Act (1527/2001) |
Bases of the Finnish legislation
on competition restriction and it administration; harmonised to correspond to
the EU directives |
X. COPYRIGHT AND NEIGHBOURING
RIGHTS |
|
Copyright Act (original 174/1927, now 404/1961, twenty-one amendments).
The latest amendment bill precipitated by the Directive 2001/29/EC on
the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the
information society was not passed by Parliament in 2002, was drafted anew
and presented to the present Parliament in March 2004 and was passed in
October 2005. Parallel to this process Parliament has decided on the
ratification of the WIPO Copyright Treaty and the WIPO Treaty on Performances
and Phonograms. |
Numerous special amendments due to
the EU copyright directives and international agreements; an extensive system
of copyright organisations has evolved for enforcement of the law and for
collecting and distributing the revenues of copyright compensation. |
XI. CULTURAL HERITAGE |
|
Museums Act (729/1992, amended 1459/1995, 1166/1996, 1076/2005) |
Legal bases for professional
museum activities and their organisation |
Act on Archaeological Sites (295/1963, amended 68/1995, 563/1995, 702/1995,
798/1996) |
Provides legislative basis for
protection of sites and their excavation |
Archives Act (831/1994, previous act 184/1981) |
Provides legislative basis for the
National Archive system and for the principles regarding the deposit of
relevant archive materials in and support for public and private archives |
Decree on Archives (1012/1982) |
Specifies the previous act |
Act on Film Archiving (576/1984) |
Provides legislative basis and
principles for archiving film material |
Physical Planning and Construction
Act (132/1999) |
Provides the legislative basis for
physical planning and protection of the built environment |
Protection of Buildings Act (60/1985, amended 1152/1993) |
Provides a legislative resort for
the protection of historically significant buildings |
Act on Restricting Export of
Objects of Cultural Value (previously
445/1978, now 115/1999) |
Takes into consideration the
Council Regulation (EEC) 3911/1992 |
Act on the Administration of the
Suomenlinna Fortress
(1145/1988) |
Provides the legislative basis for
the administration of a fortress site that belongs to the UNESCO World
Heritage List |
XII. MINORITIES AND IMMIGRANTS |
|
Finnish Constitution (731/1999), paragraph 17 |
Defines the Swedish language as a
parallel national language to Finnish, specifies Sami, Rom and Finnish Sign
Language as minority languages; designates Sami as an indigenous culture and
stipulates the rights of the Sami and other minority groups to develop their
own culture |
Language Act (423/2003, originally 148/1922) ) and Sami Language
Act (1080/2003, originally 516/1991) |
The Language Act specifies the
right and obligation for official use of the two national languages in
different Swedish-Finnish population contexts. The Sami Language Act provides
for the right to use the Sami language officially at least through
interpretation and to receive official documents in Sami. |
Decree on the Board for Developing
the Official Use of the Swedish Language
(1037/2000) |
Provides an agency for
co-ordinating and developing the official use of the Swedish language |
Finnish Constitution, paragraph 121 |
Guarantees cultural autonomy for
the Sami living in Sami Homeland municipalities |
Act on the Sami Parliament (974/1995, amended 975/1995, 1726/1995, 888/1996) |
Provides the legislative basis for
the advisory elected body that must be heard in Sami affairs |
Act on the Autonomy of Aland (144/1991) |
Stipulates the internationally and
constitutionally confirmed autonomy of the province of Aland |
Finnish Constitution, Chapter 2 |
Deals with human rights issues
from general equality and discrimination to educational rights and rights to
own native language and culture |
Aliens Act (301/2004, frequent amendments) |
Stipulates the rules for
foreigners to enter and stay in Finland, defines their human and political
rights and rights to stay and unite with their family members; the law has
been amended numerous times; a new integrative bill is currently going
through the parliamentary process |
Decree on Labour Offices
Authorised to Carry out Tasks Stipulated in the Aliens Act, 421/2006 |
Specifies the previous law,
defines its implementers at regional level of the state administration |
Act on the Integration of Immigrants
and Reception of Refugees
(493/1999, amended 118/2002, 1292/2002, 1215/205) |
Guarantees the material and
economic basis for the immediate care and integration of immigrants and
refugees |
Decree on the Integration of
Immigrants and Reception of Refugees
(511/1999) |
Specifies the previous law |
XIII. INTERNATIONAL CULTURAL
CO-OPERATION |
|
Decree on the National Entry into
Force of the Constitution of UNESCO
(549/1956, amended 426/1967) |
International agreements,
conventions, charters, etc. are entered in force by national legislation (by
acts of Parliament or decrees) that incorporate them into national
legislation or amends the latter to the required extent. |
Decree on the National Commission
for UNESCO (163/1966, amended 1168/1992) |
See the comment above |
Decree on the National Entry into
Force of the Constitution of the Council of Europe (410/1989) |
See the comment above |
Decree on the National Entry into
Force of the European Cultural Convention
(98/1970) |
See the comment above |
Decree on the National Entry into
Force of the Nordic Cultural Treaty
(909/1971) |
Se the comment above |
Decree on the National Entry into
Force of the Statutes of the Nordic Cultural Fund (199/1977) |
See the comment above |
XIV. THE MAJOR INTERNATIONAL
CONVENTIONS, CHARTERS AND AGREEMENTS ON HUMAN AND CULTURAL RIGHTS RATIFIED BY
FINLAND |
|
|
|
|
|
Finland co-operates on a national
basis and as a Member State of the European Union with the following
international organisations in minority issues: the United Nations, Council
of Europe, Council of the Baltic Sea States, OSCE, ILO, UNESCO. |
Source:
databank FINLEX http://www.finlex.fi/en/
Finland/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.1 Visual and applied arts
Finnish legislation on the arts and
artists covers on the one hand public support and artists' rights on an
individual level and, on the other hand, public support to the cultural and art
institutions. The latter will be discussed in greater detail in chapter
7.2.
The following Table contains
information on the main legislation for the arts and individual artists. It
indicates that this legislation pertains mainly to financial support, that is,
the systems of artists' grants and pensions and support to projects and to the
enhancement of creative environments. See also chapter
8.1.1 to 8.1.3.
Table 7:
Promoting the arts, artists and creativity
LEGISLATION |
COMMENTS |
Act on Art Professors' and
Artists' State-Grants Act
(734/1969, amended 143/1995, 367/2000, 666/2002, 196/2005) |
Provides the legislative basis for
the artists' grants system; amendment 143/1995 abolished the 15-year grants
and made the system more purposeful |
Act on Grants and Subsidies for
Authors and Translators
(236/1961, amended 1080/83, 1067/1993, 1272/1994, 1358/1995, 1040/1996249/
2002, 665/2002) |
Provides grants to authors and
translators to compensate the library use of their works |
Act on Some Specific Grants for
Visual Artists (115/1997, amended
664/2002) |
Provides grants for visual artists
for the public display of their works |
Council of State Decision on
Extraordinary Artists' Pensions
( 75/1974) |
Provides additional pensions for
senior artists and finances their artistic work |
Act on State Guarantees for Art
Exhibitions (411/1986, amended 639/1991,
336/1994, 390/1997, 1116/2001)) |
Guarantees insurance for the
organiser of art exhibitions |
Act on the Pensions of Artists and
Some Particular Groups of Short-Time Workers (662/1985, amended frequently). |
Safeguards the pension payments
and pension rights in short-term employment contracts that are typical for
musicians, performing artists, journalists, set-designers, etc. |
Source:
databank FINLEX http://www.finlex.fi/en/
Finland/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.2 Performing arts and music
Legislation for performing artists
is the same as the general legislation covering individual artists presented in
Table 7 in chapter
5.3.1, see also chapter
7.2.
Finland/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.3 Cultural heritage
Policies for the preservation and
presentation of cultural heritage consist of the following elements: protection
of monuments and historically significant buildings, archaeological and
cultural sites, preservation and presentation of cultural heritage items in
museums, and the protection of cultural sites and built environment through
physical and construction planning (zoning). In all these activities, the
National Board of Antiquities has a central role together with the Ministry of
Environment; physical planning (zoning) is the responsibility of the regional
councils and municipalities.
Table 8: Main legislation on cultural heritage
LEGISLATION |
COMMENTS |
Museums Act (729/1992, amended 1459/1995, 1166/1996, 1076/2005) |
Provides the basis for the
recognition of professional museums and guarantees them steady public support |
Act on Archaeological Sites (295/1963, amended 68/1995, 563/1995, 702/1995, 798/1996) |
Provides legislative basis for
protection of sites and for the right to archaeological excavations |
Archives Act ( 831/1994, amended 689/1999, 163/2004 ) |
Provides legislative basis for the
National Archive system and for the principles for deposition of relevant
archive materials in and support for public and private archives |
Act on Film Archiving (576/1984) |
Provides legislative basis and
principles for archiving film material |
Physical Planning and Construction
Act (132/1999) |
Provides the legislative basis for
physical planning and protection of built environment |
Protection of Buildings Act (60/1985, amended 1152/1993) |
Provides a legislative basis for
the protection of historically significant buildings |
Act on Restricting Export of
Objects of Cultural Value
(previously 445/1978, now 115/1999) |
Takes into consideration the
Council Regulation (EEC) 3911/1992 |
Act on the Administration of the
Site of Suomenlinna Fortress
(1145/1988) |
Provides the legislative basis for
the administration of a fortress site that belongs to the UNESCO World
Heritage List |
Source:
databank FINLEX http://www.finlex.fi/en/
Finland/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.4 Literature and libraries
Public lending right
compensations are covered by a special grant system under the Act on Grants
and Subsidies for Authors and Translators (1961, latest amendment 2002).
There is a special board for peer group evaluation and the system is now
administratively integrated into the Arts Council of Finland. In 2000, 2
million euros were distributed in the form of grants to fiction writers and
translators.
The Public Library Act was
originally passed in 1986 (latest amendment in 1998). It provides the
legislative basis defining the tasks of public municipal libraries eligible for
central government subsidies according to the Financing Law. The Public Library
Decree (1998) specifies this Act. Legislation on archives is presented in
Table 8, chapter
5.3.3.
For more detailed information see
Table 7 in chapter
5.3.1 and Table 14 in chapter
7.2.
Finland/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.5 Architecture and environment
Architecture is considered to be an
art form and architects as artists. Therefore, public support of architecture
and architects on an individual level is outlined in legislation presented in
Table 7 in chapter
5.3.1 for individual artists.
The Protection of Buildings Act
(60/1985, amended 1152/1993) protects buildings, built areas and built cultural
environments, which have value from the perspective of cultural history. This
protection pertains to buildings in zoned areas. The Land Use and Building
Act (132/1999) defines the zoning system (where municipalities have the
zoning monopoly) and thus the "ex ante protection" of built
environments. Archaeological sites and monuments and church buildings are
protected by the Act on Archaeological Sites and Monuments (295/1963)
and the Church Act (635/1964) respectively.
Finland/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.6 Film, video and photography
Legislation pertains mainly to the
production of feature and documentary films, to television and radio activities
and the censorship of films and videos (and, currently also to computer and
console games).
Support for national production of
feature films is channelled via the Finnish Film Foundation. The Act and
Decree on Film Production (2000) defines the organisation of financial
support channelled via the Foundation and also other forms of support for the
promotion of film production and distribution. The Acts on Radio and
Television, on the Finnish Broadcasting Company and on the State Television
and Radio Fund are all important from the point of view of the
"markets" for national feature film and independent television
programme producers. The Finnish censorship system for films, videos and games
is considered both flexible and effective in its present form.
Table 9:
Legislation on film, radio, television
LEGISLATION |
COMMENTS |
Film Art Promotion Act (28/2000) |
This act was needed to provide a
legal basis for the functioning of the Finnish Film Institute |
Decree on the Promotion of Film
Art (121/2000) |
Specifies the previous act |
Act on Radio and Television
Activities (744/1998, amendments 490/2002,
394/2003, 1190/2005) |
Defines the prerequisites for the
broadcasting operations and their licensing by public authorities |
Act on the Finnish Broadcasting
Company (FBC, 1380/1993, amended
746/1998) |
Defines the role of the FBC as a
public service radio and television company and defines the mode of its
(parliamentary) control |
Act on the State Television and
Radio Fund (745/1998) |
Defines the organising the
collection and the mode of use of radio and television licence fees |
Act on the Classification of
Audiovisual Programmes
(775/2000) and the Board of Film Classification (776/2000) |
Act on the Classification of
Audiovisual Programmes (775/2000) and the Board of Film Classification
(776/2000) |
Source:
databank FINLEX http://www.finlex.fi/en/
Finland/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.7 Culture industries
There are only few laws that pertain
directly to the culture industries. They pertain to film production and radio
and television (see chapter
5.3.6). There is also legislation on content, that is, on age
classifications of audiovisual products for the purpose of preventing children
from being exposed to the exhibition of pornography, violence, horror or "...other
contents that may have a detrimental effect on their development". On
the other hand, there is extensive legislation on freedom of expression,
libelling and protection of privacy.
VAT legislation, which (congruent to
the respective EU directives) allows levies at a lower tax rate (8% instead of
22%) on cultural goods and services. An Income Tax Law allows tax relief
on donations to a number of socially significant associations and foundations
(charities).
Legislation guarding free
competition has obviously had some preventive effects also in the culture
industries as to the formation of price-setting monopolies and cartels. The
Finnish agency responsible for the implementation of this legislation (Finnish
Competition Authority) undertook an investigation (1998-1999) into a major
fusion of the leading Finnish media company with a major publishing house and a
company of kiosks distributing books and journals. In some other EU countries,
the EU directives that aim at preventing competition restrictions have
jeopardised the prevailing systems of setting fixed book prices by publishers
and, therefore, these systems have been interpreted as a cartel-based
restriction of competition. The fixed book price system was abolished in
Finland in 1972.
The Finnish Film Foundation, which
is the main public agency responsible for the support of cinema, had no
legislative basis previously besides the Foundation Act that stipulates
for the founding, organisation and administration of public and private
foundations. In the re-codification of the Finnish Constitution (1999), special
attention was paid to the importance of not delegating public powers to private
organisations without affirmation by an enacted law. This led to the need to
prepare and pass the Film Art Promotion Act in 2000. Basically, the new
law has not altered the modus operandi of the Film Foundation.
Finland/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.8 Mass media
See Table 9 in chapter
5.3.6 for the main broadcasting legislation.
TV programme quotas are set out in
the 1998 Act on Radio and Television Activities and adhere to the
stipulations of the EU Directive "Television Without Frontiers". The
Finnish legislation follows Articles 4.1 of the Directive
that presupposes the transmission of European programmes on TV-channels for ...
a majority proportion of their transmission time, excluding the time
appointed to news, sports events, games, advertising and teletext services".
Following the stipulations of Article 5 of the Directive, the
Finnish Act on Radio and Television Activities set a quota of 15% for
programmes by independent producers, with a clause that these programmes must
have been produced during the last five years.
Finland/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.9 Legislation for self-employed
artists
The main legal framework pertaining
to the direct support to the arts and artists and its organisation is based on
the Act on the Organisation of Promotion of the Arts and Art Professors and
State Artists' Grants Act (see also chapter
8.1.1). In addition, the Act on State Guarantees for Art Exhibitions
provides indirect support measures that facilitate the dissemination of
creative work.
The framework for artists aims at
overcoming economic and social handicaps due to the atypical nature of artistic
work. A major issue is income and company taxation. Attempts have been made to
improve the tax treatment of grant and copyright income and to introduce the
right to income averaging (including tax deductible costs) over several years.
See also chapter
5.1.4.
For more information, see our Status
of Artists section.
Finland/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.10 Other areas of relevant
legislation
The importance of the legislation on
prevention of unfair competition has proved to be important from the point of
view of providing a level playing field for small and medium sized enterprises
and for guaranteeing entry to the market for new companies and new ideas /
works of art as basis of cultural production.
Finland/ 6. Financing of culture
6.1 Short overview
The major role in financing the arts
and culture in Finland is played by the central government and the
municipalities. The main fields financed predominantly by the state and the
municipalities are artistic creation (support to the arts and artists),
cultural and art institutions (including those of the performing arts), and
maintenance of cultural heritage, general arts education and professional
education in the arts and culture. The main forms of financing are direct
budget financing, transfers (directly or via other public authorities to the
recipients) and some forms of tax expenditure. The direct financing of culture
industries (apart from cinema) is rather insignificant.
In practice, the central government
and municipalities are the sole public financiers; in addition the Finnish
Broadcasting Company and the copyright organisations - if the collective use of
copyright compensations can be considered "public". There is no
independent regional administration which would provide direct public funding
although regional arts councils, foundations and regional councils play an
intermediary role between the municipal governance, central government and EU
financing.
Using the definition of culture
which was applied by the EUROSTAT pilot survey of financing and expenditure on
culture and referring to the figures presented in chapter
6.3, the share of the central government financing is 58.3%. If we use the
traditional narrow definition, leaving out archives, scientific libraries and
education, the expenditure (the net current expenditure) is divided fifty-fifty
between the two levels of government. According to statistics from 2001, the total
capital investments and transfers of the central government were only 18.1
million euros and those of local (municipal) government 85.5 million euros. The
fact that central government property management has been recently re-organised
to be managed under the auspices of a public corporation makes it, for the time
being, difficult to assess the actual central government capital investment in
the arts and culture. Using the broader definition and including the above
(assumedly too low) figures of capital investment, the share of cultural
expenditure (net) on culture was about 3% of the total state budget in 2001 and
1.4-1.5% of the total public expenditure (central government and
municipalities, pension funds excluded).
The figures below highlight two
recent trends in public funding of the arts and culture. Since 2001 the
financing by the central government has substantially increased and the share
of finance from the state monopoly on lotto, lottery and sports betting has
also substantially decreased.
Table 10: Finnish
central government financing channeled through the Ministry of Education and
Culture to the arts and culture, in million euros, 2001-2007
Year |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
Financing |
292.6 |
302.3 |
315.5 |
331.4 |
351.9 |
368.4 |
391.3 |
Source:
Statistics Finland, Kulttuuritilastot / Cultural Statistics 2005, 224,
227
http://www.minedu.fi/OPM/Linjaukset_ja_rahoitus/?lang=en
Table 11: Share of
central government financing (Table 10) by the profits from Veikkaus Ltd*
Year |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
Financing |
204.5 |
179.7 |
191.2 |
188.1 |
185.3 |
190.4 |
188.9 |
Share |
69.9 |
59.4 |
60.4 |
56.8 |
52.7 |
51.7 |
48.3 |
Source:
Statistics Finland, Kulttuuritilastot / Cultural Statistics 2005, 224,
227
http://www.minedu.fi/OPM/Linjaukset_ja_rahoitus/?lang=en
*
The government company operating the monopoly for lotto, lottery and sports
betting.
Despite the recent growth, the level
of central government financing exceeded the pre-1991-1993 recession level for
the first time only in 2006. This trend seems to continue in 2007 and 2008,
because recent revisions of the legislation on state transfers to municipalities
stipulate that inflation compensation will be carried out in 2008 and, hence,
more regularly and without ad hoc changes. The share financed by the profits of
Veikkaus Ltd has declined, because the new legislation stipulates that the
central government subsidies to public municipal libraries will be gradually
paid from the regular budget (tax payers' money). However, fears have been
expressed that the new increases will be taken from Veikkaus profits, which
would increase the dependence of the arts and culture on the interest of the
people to gamble and the gamblers' loyalty to the games of national monopoly
companies.
The financing by municipalities
reached 1992 levels in 2001, but has levelled-off since then because of the
worsening economic conditions of most of the Finnish municipalities. There are
plans to reform the structure of the Finnish system of municipal administration
by better targeted and more efficiently organised services and by merges of
small municipalities. If carried out, these reforms will scarcely improve the
economic position of cultural service systems.
There is no exact measure of
household spending on art and culture. The household surveys on cultural
spending include items such as newspapers and journals, TV-licence fees, PC-equipment,
programmes, games, schoolbooks, encyclopaedias, and photography services. If we
take all these items to measure cultural consumption, its share in the total
household spending is about 1.6-1.8%. If we take into account only traditional
cultural items, that is paintings, works of design, cinema, theatre and
orchestra tickets, tickets to exhibitions and museums and purchases of records
and fiction books, the share of this consumption of the total household
spending is about 0.4%.
Finland/ 6. Financing of culture
6.2 Public cultural expenditure per
capita
According to a broader (EUROSTAT)
definition of culture, the annual public cultural expenditure for current net
costs, without media and professional education, was 143.60 euros in 2001 and
167.7 euros in 2005. The ratio of the expenditure to the GDP was 0.54% in 2001
and 0.56% in 2005. The growth in 2001-2005 was approximately 18.3%;
considerably higher in the case of the central government (22%) than in
municipalities (about 18%). The overall structure (transfers / direct
expenditure) of the state expenditure has remained mainly unchanged.
Finland/ 6. Financing of culture
6.3 Public cultural expenditure
broken down by level of government
Table 12: Public
cultural expenditure, by level of government, in million euro, 2001 and 2005
Level of government |
Expenditure |
%
of |
Expenditure |
%
of |
Year |
2001 |
2005 |
||
Central government total: - direct expenditure - transfers to municipalities - direct transfers to non-profit
art institutions and cultural organisations |
419.2 181.3 117.9 120.0 |
56.3 24.3 15.8 16.2 |
504.0 222.1 121.1 160.8 |
57.2 25.2 13.7 18.3 |
Municipalities |
325.8 |
43.7 |
377.2 |
42.8 |
Total public expenditure |
745.0 |
100.0 |
881.2 |
100.0 |
Source:
The 201 Finnish data were compiled for the EUROSTAT survey, 2004, the 2005 data
has been extrapolated from data presented in "Culture by Regions" of
Statistics Finland, 2007.
Finland/ 6. Financing of culture
6.4 Sector breakdown
Table 13 below provides statistics
on the distribution of expenditure by sectors (domains and sub-domains) of
cultural activities in 2001. There is no more recent data for detailed
distribution by sectors. The data pertains only to current expenditure (net).
The heritage sector includes art museums and the figures on education include
only the higher (university level) education in the arts.
The figures reflect the overall
dominance of two sectors: libraries and performing arts. This is understandable
both historically and economically. In addition opera and classical music have
been the flagships of Finnish culture abroad; they are also the most
"labour intensive" sectors that are supported by the central and
local governments.
The category of socio-cultural
activity includes the cultural expenditure used by the municipalities for
cultural administration and to support non-institutional cultural activities
and productions. Municipalities receive central government transfers for
maintaining this sub-sector.
Table 13: State cultural
expenditure, by sector, in euros, 2001
DOMAINS |
Current
public |
Central
govt direct
expenditure |
Central
govt transfers
to municipalities |
Central
govt |
Local
govern. all current expenditure |
|
% |
Total |
Total |
Total |
Total |
Total |
|
CULTURAL HERITAGE |
15.2 |
113 564 329 |
35 354 551 |
12 238 000 |
17 132 778 |
48 839 000 |
Historical monuments and archaeological sites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 917 676 |
11 917 676 |
|
|
|
|
Museums (historical & art) |
|
101 646 653 |
23 436 875 |
12 238 000 |
17 132 778 |
48 839 000 |
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARCHIVES |
1.7 |
12 188 516 |
12 188 516 |
|
|
|
LIBRARIES |
30.53 |
226 895 533 |
16 633 774 |
81 000 000 |
3 363 759 |
125 898 000 |
Public |
|
214 695 533 |
4 433 774 |
81 000 000 |
3 363 759 |
125 898 000 |
National library functions |
|
12 200 000 |
12 200 000 |
|
|
|
ARCHITECTURE |
0.1 |
1 011 716 |
513 375 |
|
498 341 |
|
VISUAL ARTS |
5.5 |
40 749 871 |
35 991 835 |
|
4 758 036 |
|
Visual arts |
|
5 639 928 |
4 079 144 |
|
1 560 784 |
|
Design |
|
3 795 210 |
959 562 |
|
2 835 648 |
|
Photography |
|
979 497 |
617 893 |
|
361 604 |
|
Multidisciplinary |
|
237 951 |
237 951 |
|
|
|
Education |
|
24 842 000 |
24 842 000 |
|
|
|
Non-allocable |
|
5 255 285 |
5 255 285 |
|
|
|
PERFORMING ARTS |
30.0 |
223 685 778 |
55 523 060 |
17 961 000 |
69 017 718 |
81 157 000 |
Music |
|
55 066 949 |
17 168 414 |
9 321 000 |
2 035 535 |
26 482 000 |
Dance |
|
3 255 233 |
940 269 |
|
1 699 964 |
615 000 |
Music theatre, opera |
|
37 800 840 |
|
|
35 936 840 |
3 864 000 |
Theatre |
|
88 715 986 |
1 473 339 |
8 640 000 |
28 406 647 |
50 196 000 |
Multidisciplinary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other arts |
|
938 732 |
|
|
938 732 |
|
Non-allocable |
|
5 795 038 |
5 795 038 |
|
|
|
Education |
|
30 146 000 |
30 146 000 |
|
|
|
BOOKS AND PRESS |
3.0 |
22 368 491 |
8 047 536 |
|
14 320 955 |
|
Books |
|
6 198 943 |
4 497 988 |
|
1 700 955 |
|
Press |
|
13 380 000 |
760 000 |
|
12 620 000 |
|
Not allocable |
|
2 789 548 |
2 789 548 |
|
|
|
AUDIOVISUAL & MULTIMEDIA |
2.0 |
14 987 775 |
4 055 560 |
|
10 932 215 |
|
Cinema |
|
14 987 775 |
4 055 560 |
|
10 932 215 |
|
Radio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Television |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sound recordings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multimedia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTERDISCIPLINARY |
7.4 |
55 359 228 |
12 900 474 |
6 718 754 |
|
35 470 000 |
Socio-cultural activities |
|
42 458 754 |
|
6 718 754 |
|
35 740 000 |
Cultural relations abroad |
|
6 432 946 |
6 432 946 |
|
|
|
International institutions |
|
3 676 108 |
3 676 108 |
|
|
|
Administration |
|
2 791 420 |
2 791 420 |
|
|
|
NOT ALLOCABLE BY DOMAIN |
4.6 |
34 210 570 |
98 570 |
|
|
34 112 000 |
Not allocable |
|
34 210 570 |
98 570 |
|
|
34 112 000 |
TOTAL |
100.00 |
745 0001 807 |
181 314 251 |
117 917 754 |
120 023 802 |
325 746 000 |
Source:
Finnish data compiled for the EUROSTAT survey, 2004.
Table 13 also demonstrates that the
culture industries are only marginally supported by the central government -
and even less so by the municipalities. The only sub-sector that receives more
substantial public support is film production. Public broadcasting is not
included in these statistics. The public service television and radio of the
Finnish Broadcasting Company (YLE) is financed by licence fees; which make up
about 90% of the total turnover (383.5 million euros in 2006). In addition to
producing and purchasing cultural programmes, the YLE finances the Radio
Symphony Orchestra, is co-financier and co-producer in feature film production
and pays considerable copyright and neighbouring rights compensation to
copyright organisations. All these expenditures amount to about 18% of the
total turnover.
For the public financing of the arts
and artists, see Table 15 in chapter
8.1.1.
Finland/ 7. Cultural institutions
and new partnerships
7.1 Re-allocation of public
responsibilities
The division of financial
responsibilities between the two main financiers, that is the state and the
municipalities, is clear. The state takes care of the national cultural institutions,
including university level arts education; and it supports also the culture
industries, mainly cinema. It also provides financial transfers to
municipalities for levelling disparities in the provision of arts and cultural
services (including professional education for cultural professions and an
extensive system of basic arts education) throughout the country, through the
statutory system of state subsidies. The state also bears the main
responsibility for the central national infrastructure: construction and
renovation of nationally significant buildings, maintenance of the main
information and communication systems; and it also subsidises construction and
communication costs of the national networks of cultural service institutions.
Municipalities maintain the basic
cultural services and their infrastructure. Minimum services can be found in
small rural municipalities where they consist of public libraries and support
for some socio-cultural events and activities; the maximum service system can
be found in the Helsinki Metropolitan Region consisting of the City of Helsinki
and three other municipalities. Between these two extremes, other cities can be
divided into three categories: major cities, regional centres and small towns.
In this classification, the presence / absence of a university and other
institutions of higher education and culture make a clear difference.
Universities and institutions of higher education guarantee sufficient
interested audiences for the arts and culture. Economically the worst off are
the regional (province centres) that must maintain reasonable provision of arts
and cultural services but have small and fragmented audiences and pay
relatively higher costs for maintaining this provision. There are some
indications that the systems of regional institutions - libraries, historical
museums and arts museums - assigned with a special regional role and given
additional subsidies have problems in fulfilling this role effectively.
In more general terms, it has been
argued that the state has, in recent years - at least until 2006 - retracted
from more active support and levelling policies and forced the municipalities
to carry a heavier financial burden. The municipalities in turn expect that the
cultural institutions increase their own earned income and box office earnings.
The recent reform of the statutory system of central government subsidies will,
however, improve this situation at least to a certain extent. In this reform,
the state has promised to compensate for the lag it has allowed to emerge in
the statutory transfers and has also committed not to deviate any more from the
statutory norms.
Finland/ 7. Cultural institutions
and new partnerships
7.2 Status/role and development of
major cultural institutions
In order to understand the nature
and functioning of the Finnish cultural and art institutions, we must return to
the legislation.
Table 14: Current
legislation pertaining to cultural and art institutions in Finland
CULTURAL
POLICY LEGISLATION ON INSTITUTIONS
|
COMMENTS |
FINANCING CULTURAL AND ART
INSTITUTIONS AND CULTURAL SERVICES
|
|
Act on Financing Education and
Culture (originally 705/1992; now
642/1998, amended 1186/1999, 1075/2005) |
Specific "financing law"
defining the rules for calculating and allocating central government
subsidies to e.g. professional theatres, museums, orchestras and general arts
education |
Act on State Subsidies to
Municipalities (688/1992, amended 1313/1993 1147/1996,
1102/1997, 1061/1998, 1126/1998, 1075/2005)) |
General financing law defining the
rules for calculating and allocating the transfer of state subsidies to
municipalities |
Lottery Act (1047/2001) |
The revision of old legislation;
gives the government the right to contract a monopoly for 1) lottery / lotto,
football pools and betting, 2) slot-machines and casinos, and 3) harness race
betting to their organisers; orders the return of the profits to the state
budget and earmarks their use for specific purposes |
Act Regulating the Use of the
Profits of Lottery / Lotto, Football Pools and Betting (1054/2001) |
Defines the shares of the annual
returns of lottery / lotto, football pools and betting as follows: 25% to
sports, 5% to youth policy measures, 17.5% for scientific research and 35% to
the arts |
Government Decree on Organising
Lotteries (1345/2001) |
Specifies the technical rules for
all forms of lotteries |
PROFESSIONAL CULTURAL AND ART
INSTITUTIONS AND MUNICIPAL CULTURAL SERVICES |
|
Act on National Board of
Antiquities (282/2004, original 31/1972,
amended 1016/1987, 1080/2001) |
Confirmed the legislative basis
for the main expert and policy implementing body on heritage |
Decree on National Board of
Antiquities (417/2004) |
Specified the Act on the Board of
antiquities e.g. in respect of the status of the National Museum |
National Art Museum Act (566/2000, amended 504/2004, previous act 185/1990) |
Provides an umbrella organisation
for three state-owned art museums (those of domestic, foreign and
contemporary art) |
Finnish Film Archive Act (891/1978, amended 590/1989) |
Organises the administration of
film archiving |
Act on the Library for the
Visually Impaired (11/78, 638/1996, amended
835/1998) |
Provides national book services
for the visually impaired |
Previously, Act on the
Inspection of Video and Other Audiovisual Programmes (697/1987), now the Act
on the Classification of Audiovisual Programmes (775/2000) |
Age classification of programmes
for the protection of children against exhibition of pornography and
violence; violations punished according to Chapter 17 of the Penal Code |
Act on the Board for Film
Classification (775/2000) |
Specifies the role and composition
of appeal and review body of the Film Classification agency |
Act for Promotion of Film Art (28/2000) |
Provides legal basis for the
activities of the Finnish Film Foundation (founded in 1969 to support national
film production and film art). |
Municipal Cultural Activities Act (728/1992, amended 1681/1992) |
Legislative basis for central
government support to non-institutional cultural activities in municipalities
|
Museums Act (729/1992, amended 1959/1995, 1166/1996, 1072/2005) |
Legislative basis defining
professional museums eligible for central government subsidies according to
the "financing law" |
Theatres and Orchestras Act (730/1992, amended 1277/1994, 1460/1995, 642/1998,
1075/2005)) |
Legislative basis defining
professional theatres and orchestras eligible for central government
subsidies according to the "financing law" |
(Public) Library Act (originally 235/1986; now 904/1998, amended 134/1990,
725/1992) |
Legislative basis defining the
tasks of public (municipal) libraries eligible for central government
subsidies according to the "financing law" |
(Public) Library Decree (1078/1998) |
Specifies the previous act |
ADULT EDUCATION |
|
Act on Voluntary Adult Education (632/1998) |
A new integrating law that defines
the traditional forms of voluntary adult education and lays ground for their
public support |
Decree on Voluntary Adult
Education (805/1998) |
Specifies the previous act |
ARTS EDUCATION AND TRAINING OF THE
ARTISTS |
|
Higher Education Development Act (1052/1986, amended 1207/1993 943/1996, 1279/2001) |
Guarantees the stable financing of
universities - including art universities (University for Arts and Design,
Sibelius-Academy. Academy of Fine Arts, Theatre Academy) - and defines
related performance expectations |
Universities Act (645/1997 amended 1059/1998) |
Integrates the structure,
functioning and internal and external organisation of higher education and
its units, including the arts universities (see the comment above). |
Act on Basic Education in the Arts (originally 424/1992, now 633/1998, amended 518/2000) |
Integrates the organisation of
extracurricular art education for children and youth and lays basis for its
public financing |
Decree on Basic Education in the
Arts (255/1995) |
Specifies the previous law |
Vocational Education Act (630/1998) |
Legislative basis for lower
vocational education, including culture (handicraft, design, audiovisual
media, visual expression, dance and music |
Decree on Vocational Education (811/1998) |
Specifies the previous law |
Act (633/1998) |
Defines the objectives and
organisation of polytechnic education, including higher professional /
vocational education in the arts, culture, media and humanities |
Polytechnics Decree (256/1995) |
Specifies the previous act |
Act on Pilot Programme on
Postgraduate Studies in Polytechnic Institutions (645/2001) |
A further step to remodel
polytechnics to parallel universities degree structure |
Source:
databank FINLEX http://www.finlex.fi/en/
The category financing cultural
and art institutions and cultural services illustrates the vertical
decentralisation and organisation of joint financing for the arts and culture -
especially cultural institutions and services - by the central government and
local governments (municipalities). The first law in the list, the Financing
Law, provides the formulas that are used to assess the shares of municipal
and central government in the financing of different institutional sectors
(public libraries, professionally managed museums, professional theatres and
orchestras and the organisations providing extra curricular art education). The
next law only indicates how close the relationship between the central
government and local self-government (municipalities) are financially: the
former provides financial transfers for the latter and gives them equal
opportunities in the overall provision of public services.
The category of cultural and art
institutions demonstrates the legislative basis for the cultural
institutions. These laws and decrees actually specify the types of professional
institutions that can be included in the sphere of a financing law made up of
joint central government - municipal financing. Some of the national
institutions like the National Opera and the National Theatre are private
organisations, a foundation and a joint stock company, respectively. They are
financed on an annual contractual basis and do not have special laws like the
National Art Gallery (see Table 14, second section). There is no law either for
the Radio Symphony Orchestra, which is operated within the Finnish Broadcasting
Company (YLE), or for the National Museum (which is still only a department of
the National Board of Antiquities.
The institutions of professional education
and training are administratively separated from the rest of cultural
administration, because they are within the jurisdiction of the Department of
Education and Science of the Ministry of Education and Culture (see chapter
2.1). These educational institutions form a hierarchical line from the
secondary level of vocational education via polytechnics (N=29, with most
having special programmes for the arts, arts management, media and humanities)
to the art universities (N=4). This line has includes also the earlier
extensive the system of music schools and conservatories and, at the lowest level,
it is supported by the system of extra curricular "general" arts
education and the specialised secondary schools of art.
Further important institutions can
be found in the category of adult education. The different forms of
adult education (civic colleges, municipal study circles, adult education
centres), which all had earlier separate legislative bases, which now
have been integrated within one umbrella act.
It is difficult to pin down any
general trends of development within this diverse institutional sector. There
is a trend that is closely connected with the on-going processes of
desetatisation and the adoption of the doctrine of New Public Management. These
processes and doctrines appear for example as a system of performance contracts
and the introduction of net budgeting and business accounting systems in
central government and municipal accounting. There are also parallel demands
that cultural and art institutions must earn more income as a ratio to their
total expenditure. Recently in the public budgeting and account system the need
to monitor and report the efficiency and longer term impacts of publicly
financed activities have been emphasised There are no definite earned income
ratio criteria, however the City of Helsinki has indicated informally that it
finds it difficult to finance institutions where their earned income is less
than 20% of the total expenditure.
Finland/ 7. Cultural institutions
and new partnerships
7.3 Emerging partnerships or
collaborations
Many of the institutions financed by
the state and the municipalities are, in their legal form, private companies,
foundations or associations and thus we could also speak of private-public
partnerships. Even in these cases, funding based on their own earnings
(sales of tickets etc.) is rather limited. The ratio of earned income varies
between 10 per cent (Radio Symphony Orchestra) and 55 per cent (some private
museums). Due to the high level of public subsidies, most of these institutions
should be classified as "public", at least according to the criteria
defined by the System of National Accounts. Multiple partnerships can be
found in capital investments, especially in the construction of buildings. As a
case in point we can use the Sibelius-House in Lahti, a city close to Helsinki.
The main financiers of the concert hall were the City of Lahti and the state,
but the role of the private investors, the wood industry enterprises, was also
significant. Wood was used predominantly as the construction material and the
firms wanted to open up new areas for the use of Finnish wood. The City of
Lahti owns the building, but it is operated as a joint stock company. Similar
partnerships have emerged also in the context of EU programmes, financed from
the Structural Funds, for example the Sami museum in Lapland and a couple of
regional cultural centres.
In order to understand the rather
limited number and type of partnerships in financing and organising cultural
and artistic activities, we must also have a brief look at the private
financing.
The main source of private financing
of the arts and culture in Finland is the private grant-giving foundations. It
has been estimated that Finnish cultural foundations provide 50 million euros
annually to the arts and culture (including heritage and the funding of
research in the humanities and social sciences); out of this amount probably
15-20% is given as direct support to the arts (as prizes, grants and project
financing). Some surveys on private sponsorship suggest that the annual
sponsorship contribution of the main banks and companies (particularly
insurance companies) to the arts and heritage are at present approximately 10
million euros. This includes also purchases of works of art to the art
collections of the companies.
Two problems have given rise to some
debates and also to some attempts for reforms. The first of these is a
technical one: how to handle sponsorship money in the accounts of the public
institutions. Is it earned income, which might reduce public support, or should
it be kept outside the regular public budgeting? The former alternative seems
to prevail. The second is a moral issue: if public institutions receive private
sponsorship money, what rules must be set to avoid the potential economic
linkages between the sponsor and the sponsored, e.g. the informally agreed duty
of the latter to purchase facilities from the former over and above the regular
tendering procedures. No specific legislation has been considered necessary in
this respect, only some outlines for an ethical code have been provided by
government working groups.
In recent years increased attention
has been paid to the public-private partnerships in the culture industries. The
only well-established partnerships of this type can be found in film production
where a coalition of three partners, the Finnish Film Foundation (a public
foundation financed through the budget of the Ministry of Education and
Culture), television companies (the Finnish Broadcasting Company and commercial
television companies) and AVEK, the Promotion Centre for Audiovisual Culture
(financed from collective funds gathered as copyright compensation), co-operate
on a tri-partite basis in financing film production. From among these partners,
AVEK finances mainly experimental and documentary films and media art.
In general the copyright
organisations (see chapter
5.1.7) play an important role in financing the arts and culture. Although
most of the copyright compensation goes to individual artists and producers,
the collective funds have been a distinct feature of the Finnish system. The
financing by AVEK was already referred to; the other copyright organisations
also maintain other promotion centres such as ESEK, the Finnish Performing
Music Promotion Centre and LUSES, the Finnish Music Creation Promotion Centre.
There have been some attempts to
encourage the formation of "creative clusters" which would encourage
more effective use of artistic creativity by companies. The objective has been
to foster new entrepreneurship and promote the export of Finnish cultural
goods. The focus has been by and large on design and architecture, the field,
where creative artistic visions and industrial interest have traditionally met
each other.
For the recent efforts of the
Ministry of Education and Culture to develop a network-based partnership
promoting export of Finnish culture, see chapter
2.3.
Finland/ 8. Support to creativity
and participation
8.1 Direct and indirect support to
artists
See chapters
8.1.1 to 8.1.3.
Finland/ 8.1 Direct and indirect
support to artists
8.1.1 Special artists funds
The main legal provisions for the
direct support of artistic creativity is the Act on Art Professors and State
Artists' Grants. It is administered by the arts council system, which
subsequently provides the following forms of direct support:
In 2005 the total number of grants
to be distributed was 495 grant years, distributed as 1-year, 3-year or 5-year
grants or as shorter project grants. Furthermore there are grants where, upon
application, the writers and artists are compensated for public use and display
of their work. The artist professors (at the most eleven) have a higher annual
income and they can be appointed at the most for five years. Artist grants,
professorships, project grants and copyright compensation grants amounted to
11.6 million euros in 2005 (see Table 15 below). If we add to that prizes,
commissions, competitions, support for travel, material costs, special
productions and exhibitions, etc., the direct support to artists amounted to
more than 14 million euros in 2005.
In addition some other grants and
subsidies worth 3.9 million euros are channelled via the Arts Council system to
experimental, multi-arts production, production centres and promotion of
children's culture. As Table 15 below indicates, the total support through the
arts councils amounted in to more than 19 million euros in 2005.
There is also an extraordinary
artists' pension system, managed jointly by the Ministry of Finance and the
Ministry of Education and Culture. It provides flat monthly payments to the
recipients and, in addition to being a social security instrument, functions
also as a long-term grant for senior artists still active in their creative
work. When this is added to "regular support", the central government
allocation to artists and their special projects amounted to almost 30 million
euros in 2005.
Table 15: Support of the
Arts Council of Finland by financing schemes, in euro, 2005
Support for artistic work
(artists) |
11.6
million |
Public lending right grants for
writers & translators * |
2 573 040 |
Public lending right grants for
illustrators |
50 000 |
Public display grants for visual
artists |
841 000 |
Public lending right grants for
musicians & composers |
120 000 |
Artist grants ** |
7 319 790 |
Artist professors |
487 590 |
State Prizes *** |
219 000 |
Support for artistic projects
(artists / groups / collective bodies) |
3.9
million |
Film culture |
228 000 |
Project grants |
735 850 |
Ateliers and workshops for visual
artists |
35 000 |
Visual artists' publications |
55 000 |
Exhibitions of visual arts |
520 000 |
Children's culture |
486 000 |
Short-term theatre projects |
175 000 |
Travel grants |
248 290 |
Media, circus and
multidisciplinary projects |
192 000 |
Policy programme for design |
155 780 |
Design projects |
135 000 |
Drama literature (premiere
performances) |
214 500 |
Policy programme for architecture |
129 400 |
Artist in residence scheme |
241 160 |
Dance culture |
38 000 |
Dance productions |
171 370 |
Production of photographic art |
89 500 |
Publishing of photographic art |
65 000 |
Support for collective bodies |
3.9
million |
Regional activities in
photographic art |
205 000 |
Regional cinema centres |
400 000 |
Regional operas |
327 000 |
Cinema productions |
360 000 |
Projects of literature |
60 000 |
Concert activities |
206 000 |
Reading and creative writing |
200 000 |
Music competitions |
50 000 |
Music master classes |
340 000 |
Orchestras (outside the statutory
subsidy system) |
219 910 |
Dance theatres / companies
(outside the statutory subsidy system) |
380 000 |
Theatres (outside the statutory
subsidy system |
1 010 000 |
Commissioning of compositions |
65 000 |
Interaction between art and
research |
70 000 |
TOTAL |
19.4
million |
Source:
Valtion taidetoimikuntalaitoksen myöntämä tuki 2005 - Support
granted by the Arts Councils 2005, Arts Council of Finland, Facts and Figures,
1/2006 Grants, awards, scholarships.
*
Including non-fiction writers (257 300 euro);
**
Including long- term artist grants valid in 2005;
*** Including
state prizes for merits in children's culture (24 000 euro).
Finland/ 8.1 Direct and indirect
support to artists
8.1.2 Grants, awards, scholarships
Most special schemes for artists
such as copyright compensation, prizes, travel bursaries, artists' residence
programmes, purchase of works of art schemes etc. have been administratively
integrated into the system of arts councils. Table 15 in chapter
8.1.1 gives a comprehensive overview of the whole landscape of this
support. This picture can be complemented by grants from private foundations
and funds and from the business sector. In the latter half of the 1990s the
support from private foundations and funds increased substantially, due to the
good returns from the stocks they owned. In 2002 the support of the private
foundation sector to the art and artists was 16-17 million euros, and about a
half of that was allocated alone by the Finnish Cultural Foundation. There is
no up-to-date information on the total amount of business sponsorship, but
sponsoring and purchase of works of art by major business companies currently
is around 10 million euros. However, sponsoring contributions are increasingly
delivered in the form of services, and direct monetary support is decreasing
respectively.
Finland/ 8.1 Direct and indirect
support to artists
8.1.3 Support to professional
artists associations or unions
The Ministry of Education and
Culture supports national art associations and cultural organisations with
discretionary subsidies. The total amount of these subsidies is approximately
42-45 million euros, which covers approximately 35% of their operating costs.
Furthermore, the state supports associations and organisations indirectly by
subsidising events, festivals and exhibitions they organise.
Municipalities also support these
associations and organisations directly from their own budgets and from the
funds transferred by the state to municipalities for cultural non-institutional
activities.
Some fields of professional artistic
and cultural work, like actors and musicians have strong unions for collective
bargaining.
Finland/ 8.2 Cultural consumption
and participation
8.2.1 Trends and figures
There are at least three ways to
measure and assess participation in cultural life: consumption of cultural
goods and services, participation and time use surveys (how often people visit
events or how much of their time they use for reading etc.), and box office
figures.
Consumption figures in Finland
indicate no major changes in recent year's in the aggregate annual expenditure
of households on the arts and culture. The nominal rise of expenditure on
selected cultural items in 1996-1998 was 6-7%, which included newspapers,
journals, TV licences, PC-instruments, programmes and games. The increases were
most prominent in PC-related activities, records and CD-ROMs and in the
purchase of tickets to concerts.
Some participation data is provided
by the following two Tables, based on the sample-based survey of leisure-time
activities of Finns. Unfortunately, the time series stops at 2002.
Table 16: Cultural
participation for cinema, arts and heritage, in 1981, 1991, 2002
Years |
1981 |
1991 |
2002 |
1991 |
1981 |
2002 |
1981 |
1991 |
2002 |
Cultural participation by gender |
T
% |
T
% |
T
% |
M
% |
M
% |
M
% |
W
% |
W
% |
W
% |
Cinema: visited during the last
six months |
41 |
35 |
37 |
35 |
44 |
37 |
38 |
35 |
37 |
Concerts: visited during the last
12 months |
35 |
34 |
40 |
27 |
29 |
35 |
40 |
39 |
44 |
Theatre: visited during the last
12 months |
45 |
37 |
36 |
28 |
36 |
27 |
52 |
46 |
44 |
Opera: visited during the last 12
months |
6 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
8 |
6 |
8 |
Dance performances: visited during
the last 12 months |
25 |
18 |
22 |
14 |
19 |
16 |
31 |
22 |
27 |
Music, dance or theatre events:
visited during the last 12 months |
23 |
26 |
28 |
23 |
20 |
26 |
26 |
29 |
30 |
Art museums / exhibitions: visited
during the last 12 months |
37 |
44 |
42 |
38 |
29 |
37 |
43 |
50 |
47 |
Museums: visited during the last
12 months |
43 |
43 |
33 |
42 |
41 |
33 |
45 |
44 |
33 |
Historical monuments / sites:
visited during the last 12 months |
. |
. |
50 |
. |
. |
50 |
. |
. |
50 |
Archaeological sites: visited
during the last 12 months. |
. |
. |
16 |
. |
. |
18 |
. |
. |
14 |
Source:
Statistics Finland, Statistics on leisure time activities, http://www.stat.fi/til/vpa/tau
Table 17: Cultural
participation: using the media; reading, in 1981, 1991, 2001
Years |
1981 |
1991 |
2002 |
1981 |
1991 |
2002 |
1981 |
1991 |
2002 |
Use of the media / reading by
gender |
T
% |
T
% |
T
% |
M
% |
M
% |
M
% |
W
% |
W
% |
W
% |
Television: watches daily |
59 |
72 |
77 |
63 |
75 |
78 |
55 |
69 |
76 |
Video films, programmes: watches
at least once weekly |
. |
35 |
31 |
. |
40 |
33 |
. |
29 |
30 |
DV D: films, programme: watches at
least once weekly |
. |
. |
6 |
. |
. |
9 |
. |
. |
4 |
Radio: listens daily |
79 |
71 |
71 |
79 |
73 |
73 |
79 |
69 |
68 |
Music: listens daily |
|
67 |
69 |
|
67 |
73 |
|
66 |
66 |
Phonograms: regular listening |
87 |
82 |
75 |
90 |
83 |
73 |
85 |
80 |
77 |
Newspaper: reads at least one,
habitually |
96 |
96 |
87 |
97 |
94 |
88 |
96 |
96 |
87 |
Reads morning or afternoon papers
daily |
. |
82 |
76 |
. |
84 |
79 |
. |
80 |
74 |
Journal / magazines: reads at
least once a week |
63 |
62 |
52 |
63 |
60 |
51 |
62 |
63 |
53 |
Reading books: during the last six
months |
76 |
75 |
70 |
74 |
70 |
63 |
78 |
80 |
77 |
Reading books: during the last 12
months |
|
82 |
78 |
|
79 |
72 |
|
85 |
84 |
Visited library: during the last
six months |
53 |
59 |
60 |
50 |
55 |
55 |
56 |
62 |
67 |
Source:
Statistics Finland, Statistics on leisure time activities, http://www.stat.fi/til/vpa/tau
The Tables indicate that
participation has remained fairly stable during the monitored 12 year period.
There is some decline in reading books, listening to the radio and visiting
museums; and increases in going to concerts (which includes pop concerts),
visiting art museums and exhibitions and libraries. The increase in library visits
reflects, probably, the aspirations of public libraries of becoming information
and leisure centres by providing Internet links and broadening the scope of
borrowed materials to include recorded music and video films.
The same survey also provided data
on amateur activities. All individual artistic and cultural activities (such as
playing an instrument, singing, painting) have remained stable; there has,
however, been a substantial drop in the reading of books, especially among
younger generations in the period 1991-1999. This trend has continued in
1999-2002, although it seems that young people are presently reading more
selectively (1-5 books a month) than they did in the 1990s.
Finnish participation indicators
seem to suggest a relatively stable situation; there are, however, indications
that the situation might be in a gradual transition. The impact of the Internet
(especially console and PC games) and cellular phone services has not yet
altered the basic activity structure. The downward trend in the traditionally
high level of reading books and journals might, however, be one of the first
victims of the ongoing transformations
There are also pressures on cultural
institutions to generate more earned income. Box office receipts increased the
income of theatres and orchestras, but less so in the case of opera and
museums. The aggregate figures do not say much about the successes of
individual institutions. Yet, there are some indications that big theatre
companies that can invest in musicals and other popular productions for their
main stages and use their smaller stages for other productions (experimental
drama, children's plays etc.) have increased their audience figures.
The following four Tables provide
information on box office success of professional theatres, orchestras and
museum and cinemas in terms of number and type of the supplying organisations
and number of visitors / audiences. Theatres and symphony orchestras display a
stagnant development pattern, museums an expansive pattern and cinema a pattern
of recent revival based on increased popularity of domestic films. The data on
theatres, orchestras and museums pertain only to institutions that have been
financed within the statutory subsidy system or financing contracts. The
picture might be different, if all institutions were included.
Table 18: Performances
and ticket sales of the main professional theatres (excluding the National
Theatre and the National Opera) in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005
Year |
Number
of theatres |
Performances
by |
Tickets
sold in thousands |
1990 |
48 |
11 611 |
2 049 |
1995 |
53 |
12 065 |
2 148 |
2000 |
49 |
11 971 |
2 207 |
2005 |
48 |
11 591 |
2 125 |
Source:
Statistics Finland, Kulttuuritilastot / Cultural Statistics 2005, 108.
Tickets sold per capita in 2005: 0.40
Table 19: Museums
(administrative units*) and visitors in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2004
Year |
Museums |
Visitors |
1990 |
127 |
3 720 000 |
1995 |
134 |
3 994 000 |
2000 |
155 |
4 881 000 |
2004 |
163 |
4 778 000 |
Source:
Statistics Finland, Kulttuuritilastot / Cultural Statistics 2005, 63.
*
One unit can administer several sites.
Tickets sold per capita in 2005: 0.91
Table 20: Major symphony
orchestras: concerts and audience in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005
Year |
Number
of orchestras |
Symphony
concerts and other performances* |
|
Number
of performances |
Audiences;
persons |
||
1990* |
32 |
1 775 |
740 418 |
1995 |
30 |
1 966 |
991 478 |
2000 |
29 |
1 788 |
993 837 |
2005 |
31 |
1 918 |
992 387 |
Source:
Statistics Finland, Kulttuuritilastot / Cultural Statistics 2005, 133.
*
The performances of the National Opera are included in the statistics since
1993.
Tickets sold per capita in 2005: 0.19
Table 21: Cinemas and
their audiences in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2004
|
1990 |
1995 |
2000 |
2004 |
Number of cinemas |
264 |
241 |
228 |
219 |
Films shown |
762 |
479 |
409 |
396 |
Premieres |
172 |
147 |
170 |
189 |
Finnish feature films released |
14 |
8 |
9 |
13 |
Cinema admissions, millions |
6.2 |
5,3 |
7.1 |
6.9 |
Admissions per inhabitant |
1.3 |
1.0 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
Share (%) of domestic film viewers |
13.9 |
10.5 |
14.9 |
17.0 |
Box office receipts, in million
euro |
30.6 |
32.6 |
46.6 |
51.8 |
Average ticket price in euro |
4.9 |
6.1 |
6.6 |
7.3 |
Source:
Statistics Finland, Kulttuuritilastot / Cultural Statistics 2005, 161.
Tickets sold per capita in 2005: 1.31
Table 22: Book sales by
genre in 1994, 2001 and 2005, in million euros
Genre |
1994 |
2001 |
2005 |
Fiction |
31 |
37 |
39 |
Children's and books for young
people |
25 |
41 |
43 |
Encyclopaedias, large volume
reference books |
25 |
15 |
20 |
Other non-fiction |
79 |
90 |
92 |
Textbooks for comprehensive
schools |
30 |
43 |
51 |
Textbooks for upper secondary
schools, vocational schools etc. |
26 |
35 |
38 |
Total |
216 |
261 |
283 |
Source:
The Finnish Book Publishers' Association, http://www.skyry.net/y_english.htm
Sales of fiction and children books
/ books for young people, per capita in 2005: 15.5 euro
Table 22 provides information on
book sales by genre. From a longer perspective, children's books / books for
young people, non-fiction and textbooks have kept book publishing profitable;
the sales of fiction have been fairly stagnant since 2000, with only some minor
fluctuations.
Finland/ 8.2 Cultural consumption
and participation
8.2.2 Policies and programmes
In recent years many cultural
institutions have introduced audience education programmes and have increased
co-operation between schools, cultural institutions and artists. Some examples
are the audience education programme of the National Opera and the composer- in
- residence programmes of the Finnish Symphony Orchestras.
The extra curricular general arts
education system is, however, the vantage point that provides the basis
both for the continued professional training of artists and the creation of
competent, interested audiences.
The opportunities created for
children to participate in cultural life - production of children's books,
their provision in public libraries, children's theatre, participation
possibilities in visual arts and dance courses at cultural centres - is quite
extensive, at least in the cities.
There have been recent attempts to
integrate different arts development and arts education programmes into
creativity and cultural education programmes that focus on the whole life span
of a person from the nursery and primary school to adult and working life and
to retirement.
Finland/ 8.3 Arts and cultural
education
8.3.1 Arts education
The institutions of professional education
and training are administratively separated from the rest of cultural and
arts administration, because they are within the jurisdiction of the Department
of Education and Science of the Ministry of Education and Culture (see chapter
2.1). These educational institutions form a hierarchical line from the
secondary level of vocational education via polytechnics (N=29), with most
having special programmes for the arts, arts management, media and humanities
to the art universities (N=4). This line includes, also, the earlier extensive
system of music schools and conservatories and, at the lowest level, it is
supported by the system of extra curricular "general" arts education
and secondary schools with special art oriented curricula. Furthermore, the
graduates of the faculties of humanities are often employed e.g. by the
publishing houses and cultural associations and foundations. In 2001-2005, some
500 Bachelor or Master's level graduates graduated annually from these
universities and the number of graduates from the cultural and media programmes
of the polytechnics has escalated from 420 in 1999 to 1 700 in 2004.
The Finnish art universities have
adapted well to the grade and credit systems pre-supposed by the Bologna
process. In the polytechnics, where many professional degrees correspond to the
bachelor-level university degree, there is now interest to introduce new higher
level programmes and degrees.
The art schools, polytechnics and
art universities have been criticised for admitting too many students to their
study programmes. On the other hand, the present education policies do not set
qualitative performance requirements to educational institutions. Instead, most
of the public financing to the universities and other institutes of higher
education is based on the number of students and graduates.
The debates on general arts
education were brought to an end by the 1992 Act on Basic Arts Education
that obliged the municipalities to organise extracurricular arts education,
that is, extensive supply of art courses outside the regular school curricula.
The Act also stipulated statutory state subsidies to municipalities and private
institutions for this purpose. The lion's share of public funding for the new
system of basic arts education has gone, however, to music schools.
During the 1990s some cultural and
art institutions have started to develop experimental arts education programmes
of their own. Good examples are the educational programmes of the National Art
Gallery and the National Opera designed for school children.
Finland/ 8.3 Arts and cultural
education
8.3.2 Intercultural education
There are no standard programmes for
intercultural education in the curricula of the main Finnish education system.
In practice, "internationalisation" means student exchange or
transversal introduction of special international themes, courses and teaching
material to regular study programmes. University education in general and in
the social sciences and humanities (including art universities) in particular
is unavoidably international both in terms of content and international contacts.
Also, the business schools on all levels and public and private schools alike
organise special courses on learning about foreign cultures as part and parcel
of modern global business strategies. Art schools, universities and cultural
programmes of the polytechnics are in the forefront of development on all these
fronts.
In the educational system as a
whole, there are courses and campaigns to combat ethnic discrimination which
covers most educational institutions. The National Board of Education has been
active in planning, providing teaching material and in the follow-up of these
activities.
Finland has a network of cultural
workshops for young people and some of these have taken internationalism
transversally into their activity programmes. Multiculturalism is also promoted
by the Finnish Film Archive and the network of Finnish Film Clubs. The role of
the Finnish Broadcasting company is illustrated in the Finnish case study on
"Basaari" and related training of immigrant and minority groups for
media professions.
For more information, see our Intercultural Dialogue section.
Finland/ 8.4 Amateur arts, cultural
associations and community centres
8.4.1 Amateur arts
There are two and a half thousand
art (including associations of artists) associations, some seven hundred
heritage and museum associations and about a thousand associations for the
promotion of culture. It is difficult to assess which share of this total
organisational nexus focuses solely or partly on amateur arts or related
cultural activities.
Yet the associations of amateur art
and clubs of "art enthusiasts" (like film clubs, local and regional
associations for the promotion of visual arts) have played a central role in
the development of Finnish cultural life at the national, regional and local
levels. The most popular fields of amateur arts are theatre and music
(especially choir singing). The line between professional and amateur art is
diffuse. In 2004, there were 1 424 choirs with 45 253 members, the
best choirs perform to a high professional level. In 2005, there were 224
"folk artists" or "ITE-artists" (self-trained artists) with
varying artistic occupations and professional practices. About two per cent of
those who are 15 years or older belong to a theatre club or an amateur theatre;
the two main umbrella associations of amateur theatres have 750 amateur theatre
members. The associations of amateur art and art enthusiasts organise a great number
of events, exhibitions and festivals annually that involve thousands of
voluntary workers and receive subsidies from the Ministry of Education and
Culture, from cities / municipalities, from regional art councils, foundations
and funds (particularly from the Regional Funds of the Finnish Cultural Fund).
Finland/ 8.4 Amateur arts, cultural
associations and community centres
8.4.2 Cultural houses and community
cultural clubs
According to recent statistics, in
2006, there were more than 2 000 traditional (mainly rural)
"club-houses" and more than 93 major cultural houses. The former were
originally local arenas for political, educational and cultural mass
organisations and they are still meeting places for village and communal
activities. Some of the latter were constructed for the use of national
cultural, political or educational associations, but at present most of them
are owned by cities and offer premises for citizen's various artistic and
cultural activities. There is also a national network of congress and concert
centres that operate more or less on a commercial basis. However, at the same
time, they also provide venues for publicly subsidised companies, especially
symphony orchestras at a reduced price.
Much of the more modern
"club-type" activities are carried out and financed within the
publicly supported system of adult education; but there is also an emerging new
"third sector" which operates in small networks of voluntary
organisations and small business firms in the different fields of new media,
media arts and new ICT / Internet applications. The restaurant and
entertainment sectors maintain, increasingly, club-type organisations for their
core customers.
In three main cities (Helsinki,
Tampere and Turku), there are cultural centres which function as carrefours for
the immigrants and minority groups. At the initiative of the Ministry of
Education and Culture, a network of children's cultural centres was established
in 2003. The network has now ten centres, most of them in the main cities; they
are financed jointly by the state and municipalities.
Finland/ 9. Sources and Links
9.1 Key documents on cultural policy
Strategic documents of the Ministry
of Education and Culture
Government decision-in-principle on
arts and artists' policy. Publications of the Ministry of Education, Finland
2003:2 http://www.minedu.fi/julkaisut/kulttuuri/2003/opm23/opm23.pdf
Government decision-in-principle on
design policy (15 June 2000). http://www.minedu.fi/minedu/culture/muotoilu2005eng.doc
Hannele Koivunen: Staying Power
of Finnish Cultural Exports. The Cultural Exportation Project of the Ministry
of Education, the Ministry for Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Trade and
Industry. Publications of the Ministry of Education, Finland 2005:9. http://www.minedu.fi/julkaisut/kulttuuri/2005/opm09/opm09.pdf
Library Strategy 2010. Policy for
access to knowledge and culture. Publications of the Ministry of Education
2003:1. http://www.minedu.fi/minedu/publications/2003/kseng.pdf
Ministry of Education Strategy 2015.
Publications of the Ministry of Education, Finland http://www.minedu.fi/julkaisut/hallinto/2003/opm35/opm35.pdf
Creativity Strategy of the Ministry
of Education and Culture, 21.11.2005 http://www.minedu.fi/opm/hankkeet/luovuusstrategia/index.html
Research and statistics
Alho, Olli; Hildi Hawkins; Päivi
Vallisaari (eds.): Finland: A Cultural Encyclopaedia. Suomalaisen
Kirjallisuuden Seura, 1999.
Arts Council of Finland: The
Finnish National Report. Helsinki: Arts Council of Finland, Research and
Information Unit, (European Programme of National Cultural Policy Reviews,
Council of Europe), 1995. Prepared for the Council of Europe's review of
Finnish cultural policy.
Heiskanen, Ilkka, Anita Kangas and
Ritva Mitchell (eds.): Taiteen ja kulttuurin kentät. Perusrakenteet,
hallinta, lainsäädäntö ja uudet haasteet. (The Fields of Art and Culture. Basic
structures, governance, legislation and the new challenges; only in Finnish). Helsinki:
Tietosanomat, 2002.
Heiskanen, Ilkka, Pertti Ahonen,
Lasse Oulasvirta: Taiteen ja kulttuurin rahoitus ja ohjaus: kipupisteet ja
kehitysvaihtoehdot (Financing and Governance of Culture in Finland: Points of
Pain and Scenarios for the Future), Cupore publications no 6, 2005.
Ritva Mitchell: Development
and Present State of the Finnish System of Arts Councils. in Jorn Langsted
(ed): Arm's Length Bodies in Art Administration. University of Aarhus,
2003.
Tilastokeskus / Statistics
Finland: Joukkoviestimet / Finnish Mass Media 2004. Viestintä ja
kulttuuri / Culture and the Media, (bi-annual, the latest publication
synthesises media market statistics 2000-2004 2006; on-line statistics at http://www.stat.fi/til/jvie/tau.html
Tilastokeskus / Statistics
Finland: Kulttuuritilasto 2005 / Cultural Statistics. Viestintä ja
kulttuuri / Culture and the Media, 2006 (bi-annual, see also on-line tables at http://www.stat.fi/til/klt/tau.html)
Finland/ 9. Sources and Links
9.2 Key organisations and portals
Cultural policy making bodies
Ministry of Education and Culture
http://www.minedu.fi/minedu/index.html
Agencies, institutions
National Archive
http://www.narc.fi
National Board of Antiquities
http://www.nba.fi
Finnish National Gallery
http://www.fng.fi/
National Opera
http://www.operafin.fi
National Theatre
http://www.nationaltheatre.fi/
Finnish Film Archive
http://www.sea.fi
Professional associations
Union of Musicians
http://www.musicfinland.com
Artists' Association of Finland
http://www.artists.fi/english/index.html
The Union of Finnish Writers
http://www.suomenkirjailijaliitto.fi/
Finnish Book Publishers' Association
http://www.skyry.net
Finnish Chamber of Films
http://www.filmikamari.fi
The Finnish National Group of IFPI
http://www.ifpi.fi
Finnish Craft Organisation
http://www.taitogroup.fi
Association of Finnish Symphony
Orchestras
http://www.sinfoniaorkesterit.fi
Association of Finnish Theatres
http://www.teatteriliitto.fi/index_eng.htm
Grant-giving bodies
Arts Council of Finland
http://www.taiteenkeksustoimikunta.fi
Finnish Cultural Foundation
http://www.skr.fi/english/
Academy of Finland, Research Council
for Culture and Society
http://www.aka.fi/eng
TEKES, Funding Agency for Technology
and Innovations
http://www.tekes.fi/eng/
Sitra, the Finnish Innovation Fund
http://www.sitra.fi/en/
Copyright organisations
Teosto, Finnish Composers' Copyright
Society
http://www.teosto.fi/
Gramex, Copyright Society of
Performing Artists and Phonogram Producers
http://www.gramex.fi/
Kopiosto, Copyright organisation for
authors, publishers and performing artists
http://www.kopiosto.fi/
Kuvasto, Copyright association for
artists working in the field of visual art
http://www.kuvastory.fi
Tuotos, Copyright association for
audiovisual producers
http://www.tuotos.fi/english.html
Copyright Council at the Ministry of
Education and culture
http://www.minedu.fi/OPM/Tekijaenoikeus/?lang=en
National Board of Patents and
Registration
http://www.prh.fi/en.html
EFFI- Electronic Frontier Finland
http://www.effi.org/
Promotion and Information Centres
Finnish Music Information Centre
http://www.fimic.fi
Information Centre for Dance
http://www.tanssikeskustoimikunta.fi
Theatre Information Centre
http://www.teatteri.org
Esek, Performing Music Promotion
Centre
http://www.gramex.fi
AVEK, The Promotion Centre for
Audio-visual Culture
http://www.kopiosto.fi
FILI - Finnish Literature,
Information Centre
http://dbgw.finlit.fi/fili/eng/index.php
Cultural research and statistics
Statistics Finland
http://www.stat.fi/
Academy of Finland
http://www.aka.fi/
Centre for International Mobility
CIMO
http://www.cimo.fi
Foundation for Cultural Policy
Research
http://www.cupore.fi
National Repository Library
http://www.nrl.fi/english/index.html
Culture / arts portals
Cultural portal to Finnish cultural
life and institutions
http://www.kulttuuri.net/
The
Council of Europe/ERICarts "Compendium of Cultural Policies and Trends in
Europe, 9th edition", 2008