Report creation date: 14.10.2008 - 10:10
Countr(y/ies): Denmark
Chapter(s): 1,2,21,22,23,24,241,242,243,244,245,246,3,31,32,33,4,41,42,421,422,423,424,425,426,427,428,429,4210,43,5,51,511,512,513,514,515,516,517,518,519,52,53,531,532,533,534,535,536,537,538,539,5310,6,61,62,63,64,7,71,72,73,8,81,811,812,813,82,821,822,83,831,832,84,841,842,9,91,92
Denmark/ 1. Historical perspective:
cultural policies and instruments
The development of public cultural
policy and institutions in Denmark is closely linked to the cultural and
political movements that fostered Danish democracy and the welfare state. When
Denmark adopted its first democratic constitution in 1849, responsibility for
support to art and culture gradually shifted from the Royal Court to the newly
constituted civil administration.
Culture in Denmark already had a
solid feudal tradition and a well-established infrastructure, consisting of
absolutist secular and ecclesiastical cultural institutions, upon which to build.
In Denmark, cultural life and the
authorities have had a mutual commitment to one another since the Middle Ages.
The Reformation of 1536 transferred responsibility for culture from the Church
to the Court. Until the June Constitution of 1849 and the advent of democracy,
it was almost exclusively the King and the members of his court who, to varying
degrees, showed interest in and funded culture.
Cultural policy under the absolute
monarchs was elitist, but cosmopolitan compared to the new bourgeois culture
that emerged from the increasingly influential merchant and civil servant
classes in Copenhagen around the middle of the 18th century. The bourgeoisie,
which was predominantly Danish in contrast to the mainly German aristocracy,
argued for a national orientation of cultural policy. The rapprochement
between the Social Democratic labour movement's class-based perception of
culture and the Radical Party's popular education philosophy, during the period
of reconciliation in the 1930s, laid the political foundations for the
formation of the welfare based cultural policy after WWII and the setting up of
the Ministry of Culture in 1961. The price paid was that culture was now
perceived and defined, first and foremost, as a national phenomenon.
Although the public cultural policy
was a part of the post-war national construction process, the general
objectives and means were defined in the universal concepts of enlightenment
philosophy. What had not been culturally realised in the traditional bourgeois
public sphere since the French Revolution and the revolution of 1848 should now
be realised in the framework of the welfare state. Public cultural policy,
financed and organised by the state and municipalities, was meant to guarantee
artistic freedom and cultural diversity. Art and culture were thought as a
means for building up the cultural and aesthetic competence for all citizens,
to enable them to take part in the development of a democratic welfare
society.
Allocation of grants, through
autonomous arts councils, experts committees, institutions and other
"arm's length" bodies, inspired by the Danish tradition of self-
governance, were organised to guarantee the independence of arts and culture
from economic and political interests. Ideally, the ministry's role was as an
architect to build a house of culture with rooms for all. As suggested by the
original name, The Danish Ministry for Cultural Affairs (Ministeriet for
Kulturelle Anliggender), the role of the Ministry as state authority was first
and foremost a political and administrative framework designed to improve the
conditions for art and culture, but not to interfere with the content. Neither
politicians nor civil servants, but independent peer groups, should grant money
to the arts, i.e. through The Danish Art Foundation (Statens
Kunstfond) established in 1964.
In the 1960s, the focus of Danish
cultural policy was on the dissemination of professional art. The strategy was
called democratisation of culture. The welfare state distributed
cultural goods to all Danes, whether they lived in Copenhagen, small provincial
towns, or urban districts. All parts of the country and all social groups were
to have access to theatre, music, libraries, etc. of a high standard and
provided by professionals. They were to have the opportunity to encounter and
thereby learn to appreciate "art of good quality". Therefore, state
support of the arts should be given to the very best that the Danish artistic
community produced. The same applied to the public cultural institutions and
activities, whether organised on national, regional or local level.
However, it soon became evident that
not all Danes appreciated what some considered "incomprehensible fine art
of modernism". As a result, a broader concept of culture was introduced into
the cultural policies of the 1970s. The new ideals and strategies of cultural
democracy showed more respect for cultural diversity and the right to
pluralism. It guaranteed the right of creativity and self-expression.
Decentralisation was strengthened. Decisions on cultural policy should be taken
as close to the citizens as feasible. The state should support amateur as well
as professional activities. In a broader sense, it also meant that the state
should support diverse cultural groups including minorities.
In the 1980s, the aims of cultural
politics often took another course. Cultural activities were often considered
as tools to serve social purposes. Culture and art were to solve problems of
unemployment of young people, attracting tourists with the purpose of economic
development, securing highly skilled employees for new advanced companies, etc.
In 1992 the Ministry of Culture
introduced aim- and result-management of the state institutions, with performance
contracts as a steering compass. The purpose was to secure cohesion between
the political expectations and the results of the institutions. The overall aim
still was to support the creative arts, cultural education and research,
cultural heritage, media etc. with the mission to promote general education and
cultural development of the citizens. At the same time the economic rationale
of cultural policy has been still more emphasised as a part of the
"experience economy" since late 1990s. This line has been improved by
the present government parallel with the overall aim to give priority to
professional arts policy, improving the conditions for the most talented
artists and to develop new artistically talents.
Finally cultural policies in Denmark
in recent years has been rethought in light of globalisation, migration and
digitalisation. The cultural discussion to day is to a high degree focusing on
what constitutes "danishness", Danish cultural heritage and national
identity as coherent narratives in a multicultural world.
Denmark/ 2. Competence, decision-making
and administration
2.1 Organisational structure
(organigram)
Denmark/ 2. Competence,
decision-making and administration
2.2 Overall description of the
system
Danish cultural policy is both
centralised and decentralised; one of the reasons is that the development of
public cultural policy and institutions in Denmark is closely linked to the
cultural and political movements that fostered Danish democracy and the welfare
state. Different concepts of culture have been a central wheel in this process.
Since Denmark adopted its first democratic constitution in 1849, social
movements and a broad range of popular associations have flourished in Denmark.
Liberal Movements for agricultural cooperatives, folk high schools and the
later worker movement included culture as a social dimension and as a process
in which everyone should participate. According to the bourgeois position in
the late 18th century, cultural policy should concentrate on national art
promotion dominated by the urban elite in the capital of Copenhagen. Present
Danish cultural policy is constructed in this complex spectrum, from national
patriotism focusing on the arts to the popular movement's broader conception of
culture.
The political responsibility for
public cultural policy is placed with the Danish Parliament
(Folketinget), the Government and the Ministry of Culture. The
state level sets the overall framework for national and local cultural policies
(see chapter
2.1 state level) and puts forward guidelines for international cultural
exchange and cooperation.
The national level
The overall coordinating executive
power for policy initiation, planning and implementation lies with the Ministry
of Culture. The final legislative and budgetary powers rest with the
Parliament. A special parliamentary Committee of Culture (Folketingets Kulturudvalg)
deals with cultural policy issues. The powerful Ministry of Fincance
(Finansministeriet) sets after amendment in the Parliament (Folketinget) the
financial framework for budget allocations to arts and culture.
The competence of the Ministry of
Culture encompasses creative arts, music, theatre, film, libraries, archives,
museums, protection and preservation of buildings and monuments, archaeology
and higher education and training. Furthermore, its responsibilities include
intellectual property rights, radio and television, sport and international
cultural cooperation, with a primarily focus the EU, Nordic Cooperation, the
Council of Europe, UNESCO and the UN.
Since the Ministry of Culture was
established in 1961, actual policy implementation and competence has been
increasingly delegated to a complex framework of cultural agencies, councils,
committees and cultural institutions with different tasks, competences and
degrees of autonomy (see chapter
2.1 organigram A and B):
The current role of the Ministry and
its associated bodies is as follows:
Some of the important state
institutions are: the Royal Theatre (Det Kgl. Teater), the Royal
Museums of Fine Arts (Statens Museum for Kunst), the National Museum of
Denmark (Nationalmuseet), the Royal Library (Det Kgl. Bibliotek) and
the Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts (Det Kgl. Danske Kunstakademi)
encompassing the School of Visual Arts (Billedkunstskolerne), the School
of Conservation Konservatorskolen), and the School of Architecture(
Arkitektskolen).
Approximately 700 independent
cultural institutions around the country are partly funded by the state.
In principle, the independent
institutions with state funding and the independent institutions financed
by the state and municipalities together, in principle, will also have to
follow the overall objectives defined in the legislative frameworks for the
institutions and the management schemes of the performance contracts
corresponding to the state institutions. However, the result obligations in
accordance to realise the overall aims defined by law, the strategies,
activities and administrative requirements defined by the performance contracts
and demands of continual evaluation are less extensive, depending on how big a
share of the the total economy of the institution the state is supplying.
Examples of these institutions are the regional theatres: Aarhus Theatre,
Aalborg Theatre and Odense Theatre, and the five provincial
symphony orchestras of Aarhus, Aalborg, South Jutland, Odense and Zealand.
The regional and local level
Denmark is in the middle of a
fundamental structural transformation of the public sector. The Local
Government Reform (kommunalreformen), passed by the Parliament in 2005, has
decreased 275 municipalities and 14 counties to 98 municipalities and 5
regions. The reform came into force on 1 January 2007 and will be fully
implemented by 2012.
According to the reform, the former
cultural responsibility of the counties, now abolished, has been transferred to
either the state level or the new municipalities e.g. the state has taken over
the responsibility for regional theatres, orchestras, museums etc., while the
new grand municipalities have been given the full political, administrative and
financial responsibility to handle cultural institutions and activities with a
natural local affiliation including libraries, museums, sport facilities,
amateur activities etc. In case of libraries and museums the municipalities
still has to act according to the legislative framework agreed upon on a
national level.
The new regions do not have ongoing
responsibility for cultural activities.
The Council of Municipalities (Kommunernes Landsforening, KL) is a co-ordinating
organisation for the 98 municipalities in Denmark, with the mission to promote
the interests of its members. KL is an important actor in the negotiation,
planning and implementation of cultural policy, especially after the
abolishment of the counties and the transfer of more cultural responsibility to
the municipalities.
The Faeroe Islands and Greenland
Within the framework of the United
Kingdom of Denmark (Rigsfællesskabet), the Faeroe Islands and Greenland have
extensive freedom to improve, manage and finance their internal affairs, i.e.
public cultural policy. The Faeroe Islands is an autonomous nation within the
realm of the Danish National State of Denmark, governed by the Lagtinget
(Parliament) and Landsstyret (the government). Pursuant to the Faeroese Home
Rule Act of 1948, the government is in charge of cultural affairs.
Consequently, the parliament legislates while administration of the cultural
fields is the responsibility of the Faeroese Home Rule Government.
Similarly, Greenland is an
autonomous nation within the realm of Denmark. By establishment of the Home
Rule Government in 1979, Greenland took over the responsibility for its own
libraries, archives, museums, art institutions, high schools, Greenland Radio /
TV and the church. The common constitution of the United Kingdom of Denmark
primarily manifests itself in the common royal house, common currency and
common foreign policy.
Levels outside the public system
Outside the system of public cultural
policy, a large number of agents in the civic society and the private sector
have considerable influence on the planning, implementation and innovation of
cultural activities. The political parties have, according to the Danish
Constitution, the responsibility for passing legislation on culture in the
Parliament. The political parties, artists unions and other institutions in
civic society have indirect influence on the implementation of cultural policy
e.g. through the nomination of members to boards for management schemes, e.g.
the Danish Arts Foundation (Statens Kunstfond) and the Danish Arts
Council (Kunstrådet).
In recent years, the private sector
has gained more influence in the cultural sector, due in part to the very
liberal Law on Private Foundations of Public Utility, which makes
it easy for private foundations, companies and individual citizens to support
cultural institutions, activities and new projects with tax exemptions. In
recent years, several new institutions and projects have been realised
according to the private foundation model; an excellent example is the new
Danish Opera House, which was opened in Copenhagen in 2005 as the new
residence for The Opera of the Royal Theatre (see chapter
5.1.5).
Denmark/ 2. Competence,
decision-making and administration
2.3 Inter-ministerial or
intergovernmental co-operation
Since 2000, the Danish Ministry of
Foreign Affairs and the Danish Ministry of Culture have through a collaboration
agreement been working to promote Denmark's international cultural
exchange. International Coordination is an independent team at the Danish
Arts Agency (Kunststyrelsen). It acts as the operating staff to carry out
the Danish Arts Agency's duties in connection with the collaboration agreement.
Among others it is the to negotiate cultural agreements and programmes as
authorised by the Danish Ministry of Culture and the Danish Ministry of Foreign
Affairs and to follow up on and administer cultural agreements entered into.
In their collaboration on
international cultural exchange through the Danish Arts Agency, the Danish
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Danish Ministry of Culture also aim at
strengthening the collaborative network among all Danish institutions etc.
working with international cultural exchange.
The Danish Centre for Cultural
Development (DCCD) (Center for Kultur og Udvikling) organised in the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs is especially taking care of international cultural
exchange organised for developments purposes (see chapter
2.4).
The Ministry of Economic and
Business Affairs (Erhvervsministeriet) promotes cooperation between the
cultural sector, i.e. Danish design, and the business sector. The Ministry
of Education (Undervisningsministeriet) takes care of cultural education in
schools and provides subsidies to various activities devoted to leisure and
cultural minority groups. Cultural activities for children are improved by the Network
for Children's Culture (Børnekulturens Netværk) established in cooperation
with the Ministry of Family and Consumer Affairs (Familie- og Forbrugerministeriet)
and the Ministry of Education. Voluntary organisations and
amateur activities are primarily regulated and financed by the Law of
General Education managed by the Ministry of Education. The Ministry
of Refugees, Immigration and Integration Affairs (Ministeriet for
Flygtninge, Indvandrere og Integration) is responsible for several
projects for minorities, immigrants and refugees, often together with the
Ministry of Culture and the Ministry of Education.
Denmark/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.1 Overview of main structures
and trends
As a small state, since WWII,
Denmark has sought to play an active role in the international field of
cultural co-operation, within Nordic cooperation through the Nordic Council (Nordisk
Råd) (the forum for Nordic parliamentary co-operation formed in 1952) and the Nordic
Council of Ministers (Nordisk Ministerråd) (the forum for
governmental co-operation formed in 1972), the Council of Europe, United
Nations / UNESCO and the EU.
Nordic cooperation has been, and is,
essential because of the common models of public cultural policy (see chapter
9.1 The Nordic Cultural Model ), dialogues and exchanges of common
cultural experiences and a considerable cultural budget, which makes possible
the implementation of several projects in the cultural field each year, e.g.
joint Nordic film production (see chapter
2.4.3).
The Council of Europe is
important because of the European Convention on Human Rights and the
additional protocols (ratified by Denmark in 1953 and included in Danish
legislation by Law no. 285 on 29 April 1992), the European Court of
Human Rights, the Convention for the Protection of National Minorities
(ratified in Denmark 22 December 1997 and set in to force on 1 February 1998)
and concrete cultural policy actions such as the Compendium of Cultural
Policies and Trends in Europe (launched in 1999) and the National
Cultural Policy Reviews (initiated since 1986).
Denmark is working actively to
protect national minorities in connection with its membership of the United
Nations - and has obliged itself to protect ethnic, religious and linguistic
minorities, according to the Convention of Citizenship and Political Rights
from 23 March 1976, Article 27. In 1992, at the 47th UN General
Conference, a resolution (47/135) on the Legal Rights of National, Ethnical,
Religious or Linguistic Minorities was declared. Denmark was co-initiator
to the resolution, stating several important rights for people belonging to
such minorities. The declaration incorporates also an obligation for the states
involved to make sure that these rights are being practiced. A resolution in
this regard has been on the agenda at the UN Conference and UN Human Rights
Commission. Denmark seeks membership of the UN Human Rights Council at the
elections in 2007. The candidacy enjoys the support of all the Nordic
countries.
Denmark has been a member of UNESCO
since 1945. The Danish UNESCO Commission administration is placed at the
Ministry of Education. The Ministry of Culture has been the proactive body in
the process of negotiating, implementing and monitoring the UNESCO Convention
on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions
adopted by the UNESCO General Conference in October 2005. The Convention
has been approved by the Parliament, December 18, 2006. The Ministry of Culture
will at least ones a year call the cultural institutions to a general
conference to hear and discuss what has been implemented in the individual
institution. The first conference was hold in the Ministry of Culture, January
10, 2007. The institutions represented and the members of the parliamentary
Committee of Culture all welcomed and the Convention as a useful tool to
improve cultural democracy and diversity on a national, European and global
cultural level.
Denmark has consistently led an
active role in the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE)
regarding the promotion and protection of national minorities. This is
illustrated by the membership of a German minority representative in the Danish
delegation to the meetings in OSCE. At the last meeting of the OSCE Council of
Ministers, on 4-5 December 2006, the human rights obligations of the
organisation were emphasised by Denmark for future focus.
Today, the EU is the most important
European framework for international cultural cooperation together with the UN
/ UNESCO on the global scale. Denmark has been an increasingly active member of
the EU since 1973 - especially in the cultural field following Denmark's
proactive role in the initiation, preparation and formulation of the cultural Article 128
of the Maastricht Treaty, which states:
Denmark sets the standard with
respect to fast implementation of EU regulations into national legislation and
it has the lowest number of infringement proceedings before the Court of
Justice. Because of the Danish tradition for open public debate and
administration, Denmark is continuously arguing for more transparency in the EU
system and for implementation of clear and visible results for individual
citizens, artists and cultural institutions. In recent years, Denmark has
worked actively to see greater enlargement ever of the European Union succeed
and is participating in all the cultural programmes of EU (see chapter
2.4.3).
The coordinating and treatment of EU
and WTO issues is issued by the European Affairs Committee in the
Parliament. All the political parties in the Parliament are represented in the
Committee. A Report on reforming the FolketingŽs treatment of EU issues, dealing
with the inclusion of the sector committees, controlling the principle of
subsidiarity, a better basis for decisions and openness, was approved by the
European Affairs Committee, 10 December 2004. The report can be downloaded: http://www.eu-oplysningen.dk/english.
Formerly Denmark has still 21
bi-lateral cultural cooperation agreements with others countries most of them
European Countries. The conditions for budget, cooperation activities etc. will
have to be laid down in negotiations between the cultural ministries involved
every second year. The last negotiation concerning bilateral cultural
cooperation took place with Austria in 1995. Since then, appropriations
allocated by the Ministry to bilateral national cultural cooperation have been
handed over to the institutions.
Denmark/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.2 Public actors and cultural
diplomacy
The Ministry of Culture co-operates
with other ministries and authorities e.g. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Udenrigsministeriet)
with regards to the cultural dimension in the Danish Embassies around the
world, The Danish Centre for Cultural Development (DCCD, Center for
Kultur og Udvikling) and the informal forum of dialogue between the Heads of
State and government of 25 countries and the President of the European
Commission Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM). The purpose of ASEM is to promote
and deepen the relationship between Asia and Europe in three main areas 1)
political dialogue, 2) economic issues and 3) social, cultural and educational
issues.
Publicly mandated actors for
international cooperation are the following:
The major instruments used in
international cultural relations are co-operation treaties (EU, the Nordic
Council of Ministers, UNESCO, WTO etc.). But also co-production agreements on
specific areas (e.g. film co-productions in EU and the Nordic Council of
Ministers, see chapter
2.4.3) are used. Finally all the cultural institutions directly or
indirectly funded and regulated by the state i.e. The Royal Museum of Fine Arts
(Statens Museum for Kunst), The National Museum of Denmark (Nationalmuseet),
the Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts (Det Kgl. Danske Kunstakademi) and other
advanced educational institutions of Arts and Culture, Denmark's Radio
(Danmarks Radio), Central Libraries etc. are obliged to cooperate and develop
international cultural relation on a Nordic, European and global scale.
A major development in
trans-national co-operation in the field of cultural education and training and
other fields of international cultural cooperation in recent years has been a
change from a Nordic focus to a European - especially after the wall was broken
down in 1989 and the inclusion of new member countries in the EU in 2006.
It's different to assess the trends
in public financial support for international cultural co-operation in your
country, because it is in calculated in the general budgets of the
institutions. But the international cooperation of the institutions has been
increased in recant years thanks to higher priority in the performance
contracts with the institutions and special initiatives taken by the Ministry of
Culture. I.e. a special support scheme for young Danish Artist to go to Berlin
for inspiration and educational purposes was issued by the Ministry in November
2006.
The total amount of grants in 2005
for international cultural cooperation handled by the Danish Arts Foundation
(Statens Kunstfond) and the Danish Arts Council (Kunstrådet) was
43.4 million DKK. The grants were distributed to the following purposes:
Additionally, the Danish Arts
Council can offer ordinary grants for several international activities over the
year. The number of grants varies and it is difficult to separate the national
grants from those supporting international activities. Altogether, the Danish
Art Council expects to spend 16 million DKK for ordinary grants for
international cultural exchanges in 2007.
Denmark/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.3 European / international
actors and programmes
EU
In recent years, as a member of the
EU, Denmark has been working to achieve:
UNESCO
Denmark has been a member of UNESCO
since 1945. The administration of the Danish UNESCO Commission is situated
within the Ministry of Education. The Ministry of Culture has been the primary
body for implementing and monitoring the UNESCO Convention on the Protection
and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, which was ratified
by Denmark in December 2006.
Denmark regards the Convention as a
"lighthouse" for the cultural policy area and as a tool in the
ongoing national, European and global fight for artistic freedom and cultural
diversity. The Minister of Culture stated, at a meeting on the potential of the
Convention held at the Ministry of Culture in January 2007, with Danish art
organisations and other representatives from cultural life as participants:
"Culture cannot only be
regarded as being determined by the market. Public support is necessary in a
small country like Denmark if the country wants to obtain and develop an
autonomous culture and a national identity...The Chairman of the European
Commission, José Manuel Barosso, has precisely expressed the perspective of the
Convention in relation to the strengthening of the EU fight for global cultural
diversity: A world without culture is like a house without mirrors. A world
without cultural diversity is like a house without windows".
Denmark is working actively for a
joint EU, or as many EU-countries as possible, to ratify the UNESCO-resolution
on cultural diversity. The meeting also pointed out that it is an essential
task for the EU and its members to make sure that the aim and principles of the
convention will not be affected by the bilateral agreements with the USA.
Nordic Co-operation
Within the framework of the Nordic
Council (Nordisk Råd) and the Nordic Council of Ministers (Nordisk
Ministerråd), Denmark has been seeking the:
A new structure for cultural
co-operation was proposed and prepared during the Danish presidency of the
Nordic Council of Ministers in 2005. The aim was to add more energy, visibility
and new working methods to Nordic cultural co-operation and to add more focus
to the national contributions. The Reform was passed by the Nordic Council of
Ministers in 2006.
The most profound changes in the
reform are that the Nordic cultural co-operation has been moved from institutionalised,
sectarian thinking, towards thematically defined projects and time-limited
programmes. This will result in more funds for new initiatives and projects and
the new organisation, with less institutions and committees but bigger
programmes, will make cultural co-operation more user-friendly and visible to
the public. The reform also implies that the following cultural institutions
were to be closed down on 1 January 2007: Nordiskt Center för Scenekonst - NordScen, Nordisk Institut för Samtidskonst
- NIFCA, Nordiska
musikkommittéen - NOMUS, Nordiska
litteratur- och bibliotekskommittéen - NordBok.
In the Nordic cultural co-operation
and in the period of 2007-2009, focus will be placed on the following:
Denmark is also taking part in the
nomination of candidates for Nordic cultural prizes. The Nordic prizes are the
following:
The Nordic Culture Fund (Nordisk Kulturfond) is a Nordic body of cooperation,
whose task is to support cultural cooperation in the broad sense between the
Nordic countries. The Nordic Culture Fund awards about 25 million DKK
every year to cultural projects in the Nordic Region or Nordic projects outside
the Nordic Region. The projects that are supported reflect the entire cultural
life and involve all areas including visual art, theatre, music and dance,
literature and new media. Education, research and trans-sector projects are
also supported, but these projects must have a clear connection with art and
culture. Projects that can receive support from the Fund must include at least
three Nordic countries or autonomous areas (the Faroe Islands, Greenland and
the Aaland Islands).
Further information on Nordic
cultural cooperation is available at http://www.norden.org/. See also chapter
9.1 The Nordic Cultural Model.
ASEM
Among other global initiatives, that
Denmark wishes to stimulate and take part in is the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs' ASEM-co-operation.
Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) is the informal forum of dialogue between the Heads
of State and government of 25 countries and the President of the European
Commission. The purpose of ASEM is to promote and deepen the relationship
between Asia and Europe in three main areas 1) political dialogue, 2) economic
issues and 3) social, cultural and educational issues.
In July 1994, the European
Commission had already published Towards a New Strategy for Asia, stressing the
importance of modernising its relationship with Asia, and of reflecting
properly its political, economic and cultural significance. The Commission
Communication of September 2001 Europe and Asia: A strategic framework for enhanced
partnerships reaffirmed this objective. Summit-level meetings were held in Copenhagen in September
2002, Hanoi in October 2004 and Helsinki in September 2006. The ASEM 5 Summit
in 2004 adopted the ASEM Declaration on Dialogue among Cultures and Civilisations,
reaffirming that cultural diversity as the common heritage of humanity is an
important driving force for economic progress and social development, conducive
to building a more stable and peaceful world. ASEM partners' efforts helped to
rally support for the UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of
the Diversity of Cultural Expressions. ASEM partners are committed to
developing cultural exchanges as well as protecting and promoting cultural
expressions. Two ASEM Ministerial Conferences on Culture and Civilisations were
held, and the next one will be held in Malaysia in June 2007.
Several initiatives have been launched, including the Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF), with
headquarters in Singapore, which strives to promote the international and
inter-cultural dimension of the ASEM process. ASEF arranges and sponsors
seminars, exhibitions and other international and inter-cultural events. In
2001, a secretariat was established in Seoul for the ASEM DUO Fellowship Programme,
which will strive to increase the number of exchange students and researchers
between Asia and Europe to up to 5 000 over 5 years.
Town Twinning
Of special interest to
municipalities is Town Twinning, as a springboard to closer
international cultural cooperation. Denmark has formed a historic tradition for
international contacts across national borders of twin-towns. Today, local
authorities are leading this international cooperation. In 2006, local
authorities were cooperating with corresponding local authorities of 3 twin
towns in Europe. Twin town cooperation was, to a high degree, developed between
towns in the Nordic countries, often supported by the Nordic Council of
Ministers. Today, the EU's Foundation for Town-Twinning is often
used by the local authorities in Denmark to develop twin-town cooperation on a
European scale. LGDKŽs homepage (http://www.LGDK.dk/13)
includes a survey of foreign local authorities requesting town twinning
cooperation or local government partnership in Denmark.
Denmark/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.4 Direct professional
co-operation
Numerous Danish cultural and art
institutions, artists' associations and regional administrations are engaged in
international cultural exchange and in the presentation of Danish culture
abroad. Most importantly, artists, curators and cultural institutions from all
branches of the arts cultivate contacts and networks abroad, resulting in
performances and exhibitions, as well as invitations to foreign artists to
visit Denmark.
In addition to artists' fees,
private donations and corporate sponsorships, government funding is made
available to artists who engage in international cultural exchanges. The
Danish Arts Council (Kunstrådet) provides financial support for the
promotion of Danish literature, music, performing arts and visual arts, and
awards grants on application to support activities such as the participation of
Danish artists in events abroad, translations of Danish literature,
and visiting programmes for artistic or cultural representatives from
abroad. The Danish Arts Council also supports the presentation of significant
foreign art in Denmark.
Literature
The Danish Arts Council's Committee
for Literature provides support for the following international purposes:
Libraries
The Danish National Library
Authority plays an active part in international cooperation within the
field of libraries, documentation and information. The Danish National
Library Authority plays an active role in the work of a number of international
organisations as well as participating in several networks where
dialogue and cooperation can provide inspiration for continuous development of
the Danish library system - i.e. IFLA, LIBER, NORON and NAPLE. International
initiatives within the Danish National Library Authority are, among others, the
following:
Visual arts
The Danish Arts Council's
(KunststyrelsenŽs) Committee for International Visual Art (Det
internationale billedkunstudvalg) realise international activities in the field
of the visual arts and provision of international information on Danish visual
arts. The Committee for International Visual Art:
Furthermore the Danish Arts
Foundation's (Statens KunstfondŽs) Committee for Visual Arts (Billedkunstudvalget)
are purchasing and grants etc. for individual artists to international
purposes.
Film
International coproducing is crucial
to financing Danish films. Moreover, coproduction agreements with foreign
partners provide access to funds from international subsidy schemes, for
example, Eurimages and Nordic Film & TV Fund, while sharing experience and
creative input across national borders in general benefits the development of
Danish cinema. According to Film Policy Accord 2003-2006, the Danish Film
Institute (Det Danske Film Institut, DFI) may award subsidies to
foreign-language feature films and documentaries during this period. The
parties to the accord later agreed to raise the limit to 30 films for the full
period. Also other international activities like Copenhagen International
Film Festival are financed and organised by the Danish Film Institute. The
Aim of festival is stimulate film production of high artistic quality.
Committee for Film and Theatre
(Film- og scenekunstudvalget), the Danish Art Foundation (Statens Kunstfond),
support and stimulate individual film directors international exchange, studies
etc. threw travel grants etc.
Music
Performing arts
Committee for Film and
Theatre (Film- og Scenekunstudvalg), the Danish Art Foundation (Statens
Kunstfond), support and stimulate individual performing art directors to
international exchange, studies etc. threw travel grants etc.
The Committee for the Performing
Arts administrated by the Danish Arts Council (Kunstrådets
Scenekunstudvalg) co-ordinates a number of international activities in the
field of performing arts, provides support for guest performances by Danish
theatrical companies abroad etc.
Cultural heritage
The International Council of
Museums Denmark (ICOM) is the Danish national committee of the
international museum organisation ICOM. The purpose of ICOM Denmark is to
manage and facilitate communication between the Danish members and the
international organisation.
ICOM Denmark cooperates with the
Danish department of UNESCO.
Denmark/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.5 Cross-border intercultural
dialogue and co-operation
Government programmes supporting
intercultural dialogue and co-operation are mainly channelled via
intergovernmental organisations such as the Danish Centre for Culture and
Development (DCCD, Center for Kultur og Udvikling) and CIRIUS. The
co-operation between the intergovernmental organisations and specific target
groups is carried out in co-operation with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
(Udenrigsministeriet) and DANIDA (Danish International Development Assistance),
the ministry's agency for international development activities.
The Danish Centre for Cultural
Development (Center for Kultur og Udvikling) is an independent institution
related to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs by a performance contract. DCCD
promotes cultural co-operation between Denmark and the developing countries in
Africa, Asia, the Caribbean, Latin America, and the Middle East through
presenting art and culture, from the developing countries, to the Danish
public. An example of this work is organizing festivals celebrating other
cultures, presenting Danish art and culture in the developing countries, and
functioning as a knowledge and counselling centre for Danish institutions and
organisations which, in recent years, have upgraded cultural co-operation with
the developing countries. One major festival, Images of the Middle East, is
presented in this compendium's Cases of Good Practice on Intercultural Dialogue.
Projects and programmes within DCCD
are, among others, the following:
For more information see: http://www.dccd.dk/ and chapter
4.3.
Denmark is also participating in EU
and Nordic programmes supporting trans-national youth exchange and co-operation
within Europe, Eastern Europe, the Caucasus region and the Mediterranean
countries. The programmes entitled Youth in Action and the Nordic
Children's and Youth Committee Scheme (Nordisk Børne- og Ungdomskomités
tilskudsordning) and are managed by CIRIUS.
The Danish government is also
supporting programmes with the aim of strengthening democracy and intercultural
understanding in the Middle East and developing countries. These are managed by
the Danish Youth Council (Dansk Ungdoms Fællesråd). See: http://www.duf.dk/
Several Danish NGOs apply for the
above mentioned funding in view of maintaining and establishing cross-border
intercultural dialogue and co-operation. Danish institutions and associations
also work on cross-border intercultural activities with no significant grant
support, but supported by structures set up to enhance co-operation activities.
Examples of such structures are the UNESCO Associated Schools Project.
See: http://www.unesco-asp.dk/
- the Asia-Europe Foundation: http://www.asef.org/
- the Etwinning network: http://www.etwinning.net/.
Denmark's present development policy
underlines the importance of international cultural co-operation and an
increasing focus on cultural dialogue and values. Government allocations to
humanitarian assistance through the Danish NGOs amounted to a total of DKK
402.3 million, corresponding to approximately 36.4 % of total Danish
humanitarian assistance and 3.7 % of total development assistance in 2005.
For more information, see our Intercultural Dialogue section.
Denmark/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.6 Other relevant issues
In recent years, the Danish
Ministry of Refugees, Immigration and Integration Affairs (Ministeriet for
Flygtninge, Indvandrere og Integration) has been improving the use of cultural
activities as a means in the integration process of immigrants and ethnic
minorities. The Ministry has established a couple of funding pools to be
applied by local organisations and initiatives, e.g. pools to improve
participation of people with other ethnical backgrounds in sporting clubs and
other leisure time activities (see also chapter
4.2.1).
Denmark/ 3. General objectives and
principles of cultural policy
3.1 Main elements of the current
cultural policy model
The Danish cultural model can
primarily be conceptualised as a variation of the architect model.
According to the architect model, the state fashions the framework for a
country's cultural development through a ministry of culture, which follows
overall policy objectives and approaches from a general perspective. Decisions
about overall cultural policy are made - in theory - by the government, after
public debate and representations to the minister and ministry of culture.
Cultural policy is designed to serve
democratic objectives, training in democracy being considered an important
social goal in itself, to guarantee artistic freedom by subsidising the arts
and to promote equal access for all by funding centralised and decentralised
cultural institutions. The state builds the house, but leaves it up to the
tenants to decorate the rooms. The financial conditions faced by artists and
permanent institutions depend primarily on public-sector funding and are, to a
lesser extent than under the facilitator and patron models,
subjected to commercial conditions in the form of sales of works, ticket sales,
private donations or sponsorship (for further information, see chapter
9.1: The Nordic Cultural Model). Although the high degree of public
funding of the cultural sector is a characteristic paradigm of the Nordic
cultural architect model the present government has given high priority to
improve the ticket-income of the institutions and to stimulate the private
investment and funding of cultural life. So the intention is to transform the
Danish cultural model towards a facilitator model (see The Nordic Cultural
Model- Summary)
This transformation of cultural
policy in direction of a facilitator model has been a general trend in most
European countries in recent years. However, in some respects the Danish
architect model continues to stand apart from other architect models in Europe:
Denmark/ 3. General objectives and
principles of cultural policy
3.2 National definition of culture
In Danish cultural policy since 1961
four conceptualisations of culture can be identified. These four are all of
direct relevance to the analysis of the cultural policies in Denmark 2007:
Modernism secularised religion into
culture. The bourgeois culture concept was of art, which was to help
liberate and form the individual on a rational, enlightened and individualised
basis. Art was seen as a field in its own right, a specialist profession and as
a tool of education and enlightenment to develop the cultivated individual.
The spirit of the Enlightenment was making itself felt as part of
the modern breakthrough, with its belief in progress and democracy.
The concept of art and art as a
specialised profession in modern society forms the overall basis for Danish
cultural policy since World War II and especially since 1961.Under the
headline, the democratisation of culture, Denmark attempted - from the
1960s to the mid-1970s - to implement goals by concentrating on dispersing
information on the arts to as many population groups and geographical areas as
possible within the nation state. Cultural policy was chiefly founded on ground
of a humanistic concept of art and enlightenment.
During the 1970s, this strategy was
transformed into a strategy of promoting cultural democracy. This did
not mean that the dissemination of professional art in all its forms was
demoted. It simply meant that it was supplemented with a cultural policy with a
more locally based and broader cultural aim. The humanist concept of cultural
policy, which focused on the arts and the dissemination of the arts, was
supplemented by a sociological and anthropological concept of culture,
which included the multitude of values, lifestyles and activities of everyday
life.
Furthermore, the anthropological
concept of culture facilitated the development of culture in the independent
Danish nation Greenland, which achieved cultural autonomy in 1979.
From the mid 1980s - to the mid
1990s, public cultural policy was instrumental for social purposes due to
growing unemployment, especially among young people. The concept of culture
was, in several policy documents and legal acts, defined in socio-economical
terms.
A new orientation in the policy of
promoting artistic creativity was introduced by the report entitled Denmark's
Creative Potential 2000 (Danmarks kreative potentiale 2000) launched by the
Danish Ministry of Culture together with the Ministry of Business and Economic
Affairs, with the purpose "to draft a new joint agenda for cultural policy
and trade and industrial policy" (see chapter
4.1). The concept of culture was defined in economical terms as a
supplement to the humanistic and anthropological concepts of culture.
The follow-up report Denmark in
the Culture and Experience Economy - 5 new steps, published in 2003,
strengthened this focus on the economic potential of art and culture as
artefacts in the global experience economy and the formation of the new creative
classes. The concept of culture was distinctively defined in economic terms.
Finally, culture, parallel to this
economic instrumentalisation, has been defined as the "soul of the
people", as a common identity and mental amalgamation of people,
language and nation.
Denmark/ 3. General objectives and
principles of cultural policy
3.3 Cultural policy objectives
The political thinking behind the
establishment of the Ministry of Culture in 1961 was pragmatic and
administrative. The official explanation was that the Ministry of Education,
which previously had the main administrative responsibility for funding
culture, was becoming too big an unmanageable from a cultural perspective. As a
result, "it was considered appropriate to assemble the administration of
all matters concerning culture under the auspices of a special ministry."
(Centraladministrationen 1960, White Paper 301, 39). The Ministry was
also supposed to be responsible for in conjunction with the universities,
research, art and culture - an interesting starting point in light of the
contemporary debate, in which calls have been made for a closer symbiosis
between art, science and teaching.
However, no explicit objectives were
defined as a starting point for the setting up of the Ministry of Culture. As
suggested by the original name - the Ministry of Cultural Affairs - it was, and
should be, merely a political and administrative framework designed to improve
the societal conditions for culture, but not interfere with the content.
The overall objectives, therefore,
must be sought in the history of ideas outside the Danish Ministry of Culture,
in the laws of culture implemented since then (see chapter
5.2 and chapter
5.3) and in the public cultural debate - The Danish Minister of
Culture, Julius Bomholt on the occasion of the opening debate of the Danish
Parliament, in October 1963, set up to formulate the "arm's length"
principle as a motto for cultural policy, in order to allay suspicions among
members of Parliament and others, who feared state control and political
interference in the arts and cultural life generally:
"A true cultural policy must be
extremely liberal. If one wants to cultivate democracy, one must first
democratise the structural conditions determining cultural activities based on
the motto: "Funding yes, control no!" (Julius Bomholt, October 1963).
Although there have been several
amendments in the legislation and regulation concerning the support granted by
the Danish art policy bodies since 1963, the objective and principle of the
above system has remained intact. This is also the case with the new structure
organised through The Danish Arts Agency, The Danish Arts Foundation
and The Danish Arts Council (see chapter
3.1 and chapter
8.1). The most distinctive change has been the gradual extension of
cultural policy to cover new areas, without arms length evaluation.
Denmark/ 4. Current issues in
cultural policy development and debate
4.1 Main cultural policy issues and
priorities
From the mid-1990s, performance contracts
with cultural institutions and their management has been introduced in the
cultural arena to stimulate efficiency in the implementation of the overall
aims. It can be argued that the general trends from that time moved in two
directions.
On the one hand, the general art
policy, which supported the individual artists and the main cultural and
educational institutions on central and local level, was continued parallel to
the decentralised strategy of cultural democracy. In 2003, the Ministry's administration
of the different councils for theatre, music and literature etc. were merged
into a new common administrative construction called the Danish Arts Agency
(Kunststyrelsen). The separate councils for theatre, music etc. were put
together in a common body called the Danish Arts Council (Kunstrådet)
with the aim to stimulate a common platform for Arts policy, like the national
arts councils n Norway and Sweden, a better coordination and new
inter-aesthetic approaches. General support for visual art, literature,
theatre, music, international art exchange etc. is now allocated by the
Committees of Visual Arts, Literature, Performing Arts, Music and International
Visual Arts in the Danish Arts Council.
The allocations for the individual
artists are still implemented by the different arms-length committees for
literature, music, visual arts, film and theatre in The Danish Arts
Foundation (Statens Kunstfond). See chapter
2.1 and chapter
2.2.
Other institutions such as The
Danish Film Institute (Det Danske Filminstitut) and the Danish National
Cultural Heritage Agency (Kulturarvsstyrelsen) are in general subsidising
Danish film production, distributing state support to local Art and Cultural
Heritage Museums, alongside their role as advisory bodies for the Ministry and
government in artistic and cultural matters.
In recent years, the public cultural
debate has, among other issues, focused on whether the symbiosis between
cultural policy and experience economy (see chapter
3.3) risks undermining the original aims of cultural policy with regard to
the arts.
Parallel cultural policies in Denmark
today are being rethought in the light of globalisation, migration and
digitalisation. The cultural discussion is, to a high degree, focusing on what
constitutes or is exemplary of "danishness", Danish cultural heritage
and Danish national identity may act as a coherent narrative in a multicultural
world and how to stimulate high artistically professionalism and young artists.
In December 2004, the Danish
Minister for Culture announced the plan to compile a cultural canon. In April
2005, he appointed 7 canon committees corresponding to the 7 main art forms
within the Danish Ministry of Culture's remit, namely: architecture, visual
arts, design and crafts, film, literature, music and performing arts. The
overall aim of The Danish Cultural Canon, published by the Ministry in
2006, was to stimulate public dialogues, discussions and activities on the
national identity questions, but also to stimulate a discussion on how to
improve and evaluate the quality of art.
The Danish cultural canon is,
according to the Ministry, "a collection and presentation of the greatest,
most important works of Denmark's cultural heritage". It was intended:
Denmark/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.1 Cultural minorities, groups
and communities
The only official recognised
minority in Denmark is the German minority living immediately north of the
Danish-German Border. It is difficult to determine the precise size of the
minority, for the control of matters relating to the minority has not been
permitted since the Copenhagen-Bonn Declaration in 1955. However, it is
estimated that the minority has 15-20 000 members in North Schleswig. Of a
total population of 250 000 in the region, this number corresponds to a
segment of 6-8 % of the population.
The German minority in North
Schleswig runs its own private schools and a wide spectrum of social and
cultural institutions. The minority, although marked by the many changes of
history, today plays an important part in the borderland. Previous conflicts
have been overcome, and the German minority, together with the minorities south
of the border, is a good example of peaceful co-existence of minorities and
majorities in Europe.
Bund Deutscher Nordschleswiger (the association of North Schleswigers) is the German
minority's central organisation. Its objective is to promote and develop
further the German language and culture in North Schleswig. At the same time,
the minority wants to act as a bridge between Denmark and Germany and as a
bridge to Europe (Further information see: http://www.bdn.dk/).
Denmark has received refugees from
around 70 countries in the world. The biggest population groups are from the
former republic of Yugoslavia, Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Vietnam,
Iran and stateless Lebanese from Palestine. In total, 8.4 % of the Danish
population have a foreign background; this amounts to 452 095 people - 39
% of whom are Danish citizens - of a total population of 5 million.
Targeted measures and support
programmes
Although no special considerations
have been made in a juridical way towards cultural minorities in Denmark, with
referral to the general protection of minorities in the Danish Constitution
(see chapter
5.1.1) and the different international conventions ratified by Denmark (see
chapter
2.4.1), several initiatives have been taken in order to give immigrants and
minorities a voice in the integration process:
See also chapter
2.4.5, chapter
2.4.6, chapter
5.1.1 and chapter
8.3.2.
Denmark/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.2 Language issues and policies
There is no official statutory
document that nominates Danish as the national language for the Kingdom of
Denmark - although Danish is spoken by almost all of its inhabitants and it is
the official language in all official documents, e.g. the Constitution
(Grundloven), and it used in the Parliament (Folketinget), as well as in the
army. The Danish language has also formed the structure of the Danish sign
language used by those who are deaf and hard-of-hearing.
There is no legislation on Danish
language and spelling. Danish language policy is not meant to be normative but
to serve as a recommendation and guide, according to the Danish Ministry of
Culture. This was the purpose of the Danish language authority (Dansk
Sprognævn)a scientific institution founded in 1955 is to set out guidelines and
give advice on the use of the language, and not to set rules or control the
evolution of the Danish language, which has been spoken for more than a
thousand years.
In 2004, a report (Sprogpolitisk
redegørelse) was launched by the Danish government, in which the importance of
the Danish language as carrier of the Danish identity is stressed. According to
the report, it is the Danish language that binds the nation together. It is
therefore important to maintain its capacity as a complete language that can be
used in order to express thoughts and ideas in all aspects of existence, not just
as a means to exchange information but also as a social element and a carrier
of civil society and every day life in Denmark.
Several concrete initiatives have
been taken in recent years including:
Denmark/ 4.3 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.3 Intercultural dialogue:
actors, strategies, programmes
There is no specific legislation
covering interculturalism, apart from the very important legislative frameworks
for the Home Rule of the population in Greenland and the Faeroe Islands. In
compliance with the Danish tradition of self-governance, responsibility for the
implementation of cultural policy and cultural projects for cultural
minorities, groups and communities lies with the institutions, institutes,
councils and boards.
The Centre for Cultural Development
/ DCCD, The Danish Cultural Institutes and CIRIUS are the major organisers of
intercultural dialogue in Denmark and abroad, financed by private and public
funding.
To some extent the councils and
boards within the agencies of the Ministry of Culture, the state cultural
institutions and the local cultural institutions, spread over the country and
funded partly by the state and the municipalities, also take responsibility in
developing special programmes and measures for "the new Danes",
refugees and other new audiences.
Examples of initiatives promoting
intercultural dialogue:
For more information, see:
Database of Good Practice on Intercultural Dialogue and our
Intercultural Dialogue section.
For more information on the
government's National Strategy for the European Year of Intercultural Dialogue
please see: http://ec.europa.eu/culture/eac/dialogue/strategies_en.html
Denmark/ 4.3 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.4 Social cohesion and cultural
policies
Social cohesion at national and
local level is an underlying consideration in all major parts of Danish
cultural policy and in the general political debate in Denmark. Almost every
Danish Minister of Culture has put special emphasis on the common Danish
cultural heritage as a way of understanding oneself as a people - and as means
to meet other cultures with an open mind in an ever more globalised and
multicultural world.
An explicit policy in the field of
social cohesion has yet not been formulated, but new initiatives have social
cohesion as an underlining theme:
Further examples are available, but
the above-mentioned are probably the most pronounced in the overall picture.
Denmark/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.5 Media pluralism and content
diversity
Geographically, the Danish radio and
television field can be divided into three levels:
Ownership: The Danish TV and radio ownership structure cannot
be divided into public, commercial and non-for-profit, whereas TV 2 Denmark is
owned by the state, but funded by advertising. TV 2 - which is planned to be
sold - is therefore both public and commercial, and the station has to fulfil
certain public service obligations. The Danish radio and TV stations (in 2003 a
total of 330) can be divided as follows:
Ownership: |
Public: 17 |
Private: 313 |
Financing: |
Commercial: 117 |
Non-commercial: 213 |
All terrestrial TV and radio
stations must apply for a license, while satellite- or cable-stations only need
a registration to the Radio and Television Board. Non-commercial private TV and
radio stations can apply for government support.
Daily Newspapers: In September 2006, Denmark has 30 daily
newspapers that were published 5-7 times a week; 16 are distributed on a
national level, 7 on a regional level, and 17 on a local level. 8 of the
national and regional newspapers are being freely distributed, the rest of the
newspapers are sold by subscription. Two media companies each own 4 of the 16
nationally distributed newspapers.
Domestic Media and Programmes: There are no anti-trust measures to prevent media
concentration in Denmark. However, the Danish Competition Authority regulates
the media as well as all other companies. There are almost no imported radio
programmes on Danish radio channels. The Danes preference for programmes in the
Danish language limits the import of foreign programmes.
No national survey has been made on
how many programmes are shown and produced in Danish Television. However, it is
well proven that the number of Danish television programmes shown on TV is
lower than the amount of programmes in Danish on the radio stations - although
even commercial Danish TV-stations abroad broadcast programmes with Danish
content, in order to attract Danish viewers.
In the Table below, the share of
Danish TV-programmes is shown as 78 % of the share of television viewing in
Denmark.
Table 1:
Share of domestic TV-programmes, 2005
TV-station |
Share
of viewers |
Share
of Danish produced programmes* |
DR TV |
33% |
64% |
TV 2 (2004) |
40% |
60% |
TV Danmark |
5% |
31% |
Total |
78% |
59% |
Source:
MedieStatistikBanken: http://www.mediedanmark.dk/statistikbank and yearly reports
from the TV-stations.
*
including co-productions and transmissions from abroad in the Danish language,
e.g. sports events). The numbers show the share of the total
broadcasting time used for Danish produced programmes, including repeats.
The total share of domestic media
programmes is considered to be lower than the above, whereas the commercial TV
stations - for example TV Danmark - do not have a public service obligation and
therefore are free to show a greater share of imported programmes.
The 8 regional TV 2-stations, which
are subject to their public service contracts with the state and their share in
the income of license fees, are obliged to produce and broadcast local content.
Regional radio channels of DR are required by DR's public service contract.
Local, private TV stations, in a 24 hours national network, must have at least
30 minutes per day of local news or other programmes focusing on the local
community. Other local radio- and TV-stations are not obliged to broadcast
programmes with local content, unless this is part of their broadcasting
license.
Culture and Media Education: There are no TV channels designated solely to arts and
culture in Denmark, but DR's radio channel P2 is specially designated to
classical music and culture programmes. The public service television channel
DR2 and the private television channel DK4 both have a quite a large share of
programmes on arts and culture, including some regular programmes.
Scholars with a degree in humanities
have the possibility to take a special degree in journalism at the Danish
School of Journalism. Since the late 1990s, journalism has also been offered as
a degree at Roskilde University and The University of Southern Denmark, with
the purpose of educating journalists with a more academic profile. Those
students reading journalism at Roskilde University also have to study a second
subject (e.g. in humanities) to obtain a higher qualification (e.g. Master's
degree). In September 2007, the Danish School of Journalism is going to
co-operate with Aarhus University in providing a degree in journalism. With
this training, journalists with a regular qualification in journalism will have
the possibility of taking a university degree in journalism which deals with
arts and cultural issues.
Main recent debates:
In spring 2002, the Danish
government decided to privatise the television station TV 2, which had been
partially financed by license fees since its foundation in 1988. However, even
though the station is to be privatised, it must still abide by certain public
service obligations with respect to news and current events and a continued
economic commitment to Danish film. Writing in 2006, TV 2 has not yet been
sold, because of unfinished lawsuits in the EU. TV 2 has been accused of
receiving illegal state support (see chapter
2.1 and chapter
4.2).
The digitalisation of the television
net will, in the long term, change conditions for, especially, TV 2. TV 2's
advantage of being the only commercial TV-station with access to the public
TV-net will be diminished over time, and TV 2 will, therefore, in the long run
give up its public service obligations.
Denmark/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.6 Culture industries: policies
and programmes
Two reports published by the
Ministry of Culture and the Ministry of Business and Economic Affairs dealt
with the definitions of the culture industries and the culture and experience
economy. In the report "Denmark's Creative Potential" published in
2000, the Danish cultural industry is defined as including the following areas:
music, theatre, literature, art, film and video, the press, radio and
television, architecture and design, and entertainment parks and toys. In the
report "Denmark in the Culture and Experience Economy" from 2003,
this definition is widened to include: fashion, advertising and tourism.
In the year 2000/2001, the Danish
culture industries made approximately 175 million DKK, which is comparable to
7.3 % of the total trade of the private business sector in Denmark.
Approximately 12 % of the Danish work force was employed in the culture
industries in that year.
In the year 2000/2001, the value of
Danish culture industries exports amounted to 68 million DKK, which compares to
16 % of total Danish exports.
Against the background of the
above-mentioned reports, the Ministry of Culture and the Ministry of Economic
and Business Affairs will, in the coming years, work to:
Specifically, the two ministries
have, to date, commenced 11 initiatives - with more to come.
Examples of concrete initiatives to
promote the interplay between culture and business:
Culture industry companies are often
evolved around one or more creative persons. However, often, the creative
persons do not possess the business competences, such as management,
salesmanship and budget planning. The main challenge to small and medium sized
culture industry companies, therefore, is the ability to develop business
competences and implement a business strategy in their company.
Since 2005, Roskilde University has
provided a Masters degree in experience management, educating people from the
culture and experience business to meet the challenges of the experience
economy.
Many of the art training institutes
are also focused on educating their students to be able to operate in the
labour market of the culture industries, e.g. two new courses of study for
music producers were established at the Danish rhythmic music conservatories in
2002 (see also chapter
8.3.1).
Denmark/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.7 Employment policies for the
cultural sector
In Denmark there are no special
employment policies for the cultural sector. The employment policies for art
and culture follow the current Danish labour laws, which are valid for all
Danes regardless of their profession. See chapter
5.1.4, chapter
5.1.5, chapter
5.1.6.
Denmark/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.8 New technologies and cultural
policies
Denmark/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.9 Heritage issues and policies
Danish heritage policy is being
implemented and managed through the Danish National Cultural Heritage Agency
which was established in 2002 (issues of cultural heritage were
formerly divided between the Ministry of Industry and the Ministry of Culture).
In this way, an integrated approach to heritage policy is being promoted.
Recent debates and developments:
Denmark/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.10 Gender equality and cultural
policies
Denmark/ 4. Current issues in
cultural policy development and debate
4.3 Other relevant issues and
debates
For the last five years, the Danish
debate on cultural politics has focussed on the following general topics:
Other questions raised in the public
debate are:
One important topic which has also
been dominating the debate is the sale of TV 2, which, in 2005, was appealed to
the Court of the European Union in Luxemburg, with reference to the
EU-articles on state support and competition, which are formulated in the vague
wordings of the sections on cultural and media politics (see chapter
4.2.5 and chapter
5.3.8).
Denmark/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.1 Constitution
There are no articles in the Danish
constitution directly related to cultural rights or questions of cultural
politics. These are indirectly included in the agreements of protection of
human rights as defined in the Danish constitution, on chapter 7 relating to
religion, and chapter 8 on personal freedom, in particular on property rights,
freedom of speech and freedom to gather. Positive human rights, e.g. the right
for social security and the right for free education, are also protected.
According to the constitution,
personal freedom is inviolable. Restriction of liberty can therefore not be
used against people with particular religious or political convictions. The
court controls the legality of the restriction of liberty.
These constitutional freedoms came
into prominence with the "cartoon crisis" of 2006, where the Danish
press, to a great extent, including the daily newspaper
"Jyllandsposten" in which the controversial drawings of the Islamic
prophet Muhammed were first published, and the cartoonists who had made the
drawings, all supported the publication by referring to the constitutional
provision of freedom of speech. Others, meanwhile, including some Islamic
communities, argued against the Act by referring to the provisions of freedom
of religion and freedom of personal violation.
The Danish court has, lately, not
shown reticence in the question of the protection of human rights
internationally. In 1992, the European Convention on Human Rights was legally
made a part of Danish justice and has, since then, formed the basis for the
criticism of not only administrative decisions, but also the legislation.
Denmark/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.2 Division of jurisdiction
In accordance with the new local
government reform, passed by the Parliament in 2005, the competence for culture
by a number of new laws has been legally divided by in a new way between the
national, regional and local / municipal levels of government (see chapter
5.3).
Denmark/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.3 Allocation of public funds
Neither the Ministry of Culture nor
the Minister of Culture can dispense or intervene in the allocation of public
funds for culture, according to the Laws of the State Arts Foundation and
the Danish Arts Council. This has not been changed in recent years (see chapter
5.2 and chapter
4.1).
However, through tax allowances for
companies, foundations etc., private investments in art and culture are
favoured by, for example, allowing gifts for cultural institutions or
investments in art to be tax allowances (see chapter
5.1.5).
Denmark/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.4 Social security frameworks
Besides the regular labour market
legislation, there are no special social security arrangements for artists and
cultural workers in Denmark. Several initiatives, however, have been taken to
improve the conditions for this group of citizens. Among other things, a
proposal has been suggested in Politics of Culture in Denmark, the most
comprehensive work on Danish cultural policy initiated by the Ministry of
Culture (see Duelund 1995, chapter
9.1), to establish a special unemployment fund for people with no income -
since artists do not lack jobs, only their jobs often have no financial
outcome. Moreover, a proposal in the report suggested establishing a security
arrangement in the form of a minimum payment to all citizens, including artists
and cultural workers. None of these suggestions, or similar initiatives, has
been realised. Artists operate under the same social security system as all
other citizens (see chapter
5.3.9).
For more information, see our Status
of Artists section.
Denmark/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.5 Tax laws
As mentioned in chapter
5.1.4, culture is taxed on the same basis as regular tax regulations,
according to the present Danish law. However, some special agreements have been
made in order to stretch the random income of Danes employed in the cultural
sector. Artists with a maximum income of up to 539 000 DKK per year can
store the amount in up to approximately 10 years for later taxation. This does
not count for performing artists (Act nr. 1062 of December the 17th 2002).
Medals of honour that are granted, and that are not applied for by the artists
themself, are also exempted from taxation.
Act nr. 1389 of 20 December 2004 has made it easier for companies to invest in art or
culture, in general, and public supported institutions, without any sponsoring
restrictions. When a company buys a painting, 25% of the price can be deducted
for tax purposes. Buying art for private companies has also given artists the
possibility to actually earn a reasonable living from selling their works of
art - and at the same time to give greater exposure to art among the Danish
people in general.
In recent years, a great number of
private Danish foundations have sponsored museums and art and music festivals
due to lucrative tax arrangements that make donations to culture possible by
advantageous tax regulations and deductions for private companies. Foundations
are considerably favoured in the question of taxation. Foundations are, more or
less, in charge of deciding when to pay the taxes themselves. In the
calculation of the yearly taxable income, foundations are allowed to subtract
all donations awarded but also appropriations for set aside for later
donations.
Moreover, the foundations are
allowed to subtract an amount, up to a maximum of 25 % of the yearly donations,
a so-called allowance of consolidation, for the purposes of public utilities or
charities. Foundations often take advantage of this system when supporting
cultural projects.
The private sector has, in recent
years, gained more influence in the cultural sector in accordance with the laws
passed by the Parliament. The Law on Tax Exceptions in the Cultural Area
(Law nr. 1389), passed by the Parliament in December 2004, made it possible for
private companies to buy visual art with tax reductions. It was the first law
dealing with tax reduction in public cultural policy ever passed by the
Parliament in Denmark. The very liberal Law on Private Foundations of Public
Utility makes it easy for private foundations, companies and individual
citizens to support cultural institutions, activities and new projects with tax
exemptions. In recent years, several new institutions and projects have been
realised according to the private foundation model. The best example is the new
Danish Opera House, opened in Copenhagen in 2005. The Opera House was initiated,
financed and built by the private A.P. Møller Foundation.
As previously mentioned, one of the
latest and biggest cultural activities financed by a private foundation, is the
building of the Opera House in Copenhagen, thanks to a gift of 2.5 billion DKK
from the Almenfond of the A.P. Møller Group - one of the biggest
shipping companies in the world.
This has given rise to a discussion
on the taxation privileges of foundations, in acknowledgement of the fact that
it is the taxpayers who provide the charity for the foundations in the end,
because of the favourable tax rules that are offered to private companies and
foundations.
In 2004, this lead to an enquiry in
the Danish parliament (see chapter
2.2), which suggested an analysis of the development of the donations from
1995-2003 - divided into areas of activity, institutions and regions, as well
as defining genres and types of art and culture. The enquiry concluded in a
report (Samspillet mellem private fonde og den offentlige kulturpolitik)
published by the Ministry of Culture the same year. The report showed that,
including construction projects, approximately 8.7 % of the income of the
Danish cultural institutions in 2003 came from private donations. Questions of
a more qualitative character, which had been the reason for the enquiry in the
first place, were not evaluated in the report.
The number of private foundations in
Denmark in 2006 was approximately 14 000, which is high compared to other
European countries. There are no official statistics on Danish foundations,
whereas the exact amount of money donated to philanthropic purposes is
inapplicable. Many foundations are very small and locally rooted, and they,
therefore, choose not to be registered at the Danish Commerce and Companies
Agency. Nevertheless, it is a fact that the number of foundations is rising.
The Danish rate of VAT on cultural
services and goods is 25%. Books and music CD's are also taxed at 25% in
Denmark.
Denmark/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.6 Labour laws
As mentioned in chapter
5.1.4 and chapter
5.1.5, there isn't any specific labour law in Denmark that applies to
artists or other people employed in the cultural field. The current Danish labour
law is valid for all Danes, regardless of their profession.
For more information, see our Status
of Artists section.
Denmark/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.7 Copyright provisions
In Denmark, protection of copyright
lies in the field of cultural policy, and the Copyright Act (Consolidated Act on Copyright, 2006), Bekendtgørelse
af lov om ophavsret, nr. 763 of 30 June 2006) is the responsibility of the
Ministry of Culture. The Act specifies and defines the mutual rights and
obligations of the author, producer and user. The Danish artists' rights
protection represents the "droit d'auteur" tradition, which asserts
the authors' and performers' economic and moral interests.
According to Danish and Nordic
tradition, copyright laws must primarily protect the rights of the creator and,
ideally, serve as the undisputed guarantor of aesthetic freedom and financial
revenue to the artists. Under the Danish Copyright Act, the originator
of a literary or artistic work holds copyright in that work. The Act was
thoroughly reviewed by Parliament in 1995 and has subsequently been amended in
1996, 1998 and 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2007 with the primary purpose to
implement the different EU directives with relevance for copyright in the Act.
Examples of protected works are
literature, music, theatre, film, the visual arts - including photography,
architecture, decorative arts - and computer programmes. It is the expression
of the work which is protected - that is to say, the work's singular design or
presentation. Protection does not extend to ideas, concepts, procedures,
methods or algorithms. Copyright applies from the moment of creation of the
work. Thus, protection does not depend on any kind of registration. The
copyright runs for 70 years following the death of the copyright holder.
Infringement of copyright may incur
civil liability and criminal liability in the form of fines or imprisonment.
Provisions aimed at protecting neighbouring rights e.g. performing
artists (actors, musicians, dancers, etc), audio producers (record companies),
film producers, radio and TV companies, photographers and producers of
catalogues, tables and databases etc are also covered by the Copyright Act.
The term of protection for these rights is 50 years from the time of
production. The term of protection for databases etc, however, only runs for 15
years from production or publication. Registration is no prerequisite for
protection in this field either.
The Copyright Act fulfils
Denmark's international obligations with regard to the protection of rights set
forth in the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
(TRIPS), the Berne Convention, the Rome Convention, and the European Agreement
on Protection of Television Broadcasts. The Act also complies with European
directives on the protection of computer programmes, rental and lending rights,
satellite broadcasting and cable re-transmission, the term of protection, and
the protection of databases.
The Danish (and Nordic) copyright
legislation provides for organisations made up of copyright holders entering
into collective agreements with users and producers regarding compensation for
individual works and performances, the size of royalties, etc.
Rights holders under the Copyright
Act have established collecting societies, which administer the copyright
on behalf of the holder. Examples of collecting societies in Denmark are
COPY-DAN, KODA, NCB and Gramex. Under the COPY-DAN umbrella, such societies
recover and distribute remuneration paid in connection with cable
re-transmission of television programmes, the sale of blank audio and video
tapes, as well as the copying of protected material. COPY-DAN also administers
remuneration for the commercial resale of works of art (droit de suite) and the
exclusive rights of painters and sculptors. KODA is in charge of authors'
rights to public performances of music. The Nordic Copyright Bureau takes care
of the mechanical rights of music in connection with the distribution of CDs,
films, etc. Gramex controls the remuneration to performers and producers from
sound recordings in connection with public performances on radio and television
and other public performances.
In principle, all the main aspects
of copyright legislation in Denmark and the other Nordic countries have been
identical for many years. The pan-Nordic unit of jurisdiction may be considered
as a practical provision to encourage cultural development and exchange in the
Nordic countries as well as a tool to improve general understanding of
specifically Nordic solutions for international copyright co-operation,
especially under the auspices of the EU.
Copyright in the Nordic countries is
based on § 2 of the national Copyright Acts. However, in all of the
countries, copyright is limited by a number of exemptions to secure "fair
use". The legitimate economic interests of the copyright holders to
protect their rights are weighed against public demand for free utilisation of
protected works. Technically, this weighting is carried out by imposing limits
on the rules. Three different legal constructions restrict copyright in
principle:
This latter model, the collective
agreement license, in particular clearly illustrates the common perception of
the basic problem facing copyright legislation in the Nordic countries: Finding
a balance between the copyright holder's right to control of, and remuneration
for, the exploitation of his / her own work and society's need for quick and
easy access to knowledge, information, etc.
Recent changes, debates and
challenges
Thus, the Danish / Nordic approach
to solving the basic copyright problem is pragmatic. Voluntary agreements
between the parties provide as flexible a clearing mechanism as possible.
Digital innovations have increased the need for pragmatic solutions to the
clearing problem. In the right form, the Nordic agreement model and collective
administration could be one of several answers to this challenge.
The European Union's copyright
policy, so far, in most areas has been advantageous to authors and performers
as an alternative to the Anglo-American copyright legislation, where artists
enjoy only a minimum of protection. But, in recent years, the Commissioner of
the Internal Market has to a higher degree handled the intellectual property
rights from the point of view of trade and industry rather than a mean of
cultural policy, i.e. the economic and moral rights defined in the tradition of
authors' rights.
In particular, the following issue
is of concern: modifying the so called "Non-binding recommendation",
raised by Commissioner Charlie McCreevy of the EU-Commission in 2005, in which
the governance of on-line cross-border music licences in the EU is handed over
to 2-3 multinational companies. The recommendation is a threat to the Nordic
and Danish tradition of administration on copyright. The recommendation is a
so-called "soft-law-approach", meaning not binding. It will, however,
from a Danish point of view, lead to chaos in the European declarations on
copyright and cause problems for small countries and music areas. This expected
development is working against the UNESCO Convention on the Protection and
Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, which the EU has worked
so hard to encourage member countries to adopt in a co-ordinated manner. Now,
Europe's cultural diversity would be seriously jeopardised if the current
system of collective management of creators' rights is going to be carried out,
as it is argued by The Danish Artists Council. The modifying suggestions were
to be discussed at a meeting in January 2007.
From a Danish point of view, one of
the most important challenges for copyright protection in the years to come is
how to prevent piracy in the global reality of digitalisation. The issue
requires an international answer from the UN, UNESCO, GATS or another global
organisation. On the internal lines, Denmark will have to renew the Copyright
Act according to the digitalisation of Danish cultural heritage
organisations such as Denmark's Radio and Television (DR) (see chapter
5.3.8), the museums etc.. The purpose is to create a "win-win"
situation for both the right-holders, producers and the citizens by means of
the collective agreement license.
Denmark/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.8 Data protection laws
See chapter
5.1.7.
Denmark/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.9 Language laws
As mentioned in chapter
4.2.2, there is no official statutory document stating Danish as the
national language for the Kingdom of Denmark. Since 2002, Denmark has to a
hight degree followed the EU-regulation (BEK nr. 618 of 22/07/2002) in which
all citizens from the European Union are entitled to receive instruction in
their native language. This also includes citizens from the Faeroe Islands,
Greenland and the Danish minority in northern Germany. Native language teaching
for Danes living south of the Danish border in Germany has been regulated since
the Copenhagen-Bonn Declaration from 1955.
Greenland and the Faeroe Islands
have had their own language policy since the introduction of home rule in 1948
and 1979. The Greenlandic language policy, insisting on Greenlandic as the
county's main language, has been subject to several internal and external
discussions over the years. To day Greenlandic is the main language. But Danish
and English is also emphasised as second and third languages in schools and the
society to avoid ethnic isolation and as proactive mean to participate in the
globalisation process. "Wee will not have to build Chinese wars around
Greenland, as the present Minister of Culture in Greenland" pronounced at
a conference on Greenlandic culture policy organised in capital Nuuk, December
2005.
The national TV and radio-stations
(DR and TV2) are obliged to live up to their public service responsibilities
and broadcast national and local programmes, including news programmes, in
Danish, according to the recent Act on Media from 2006. Danish
minorities in northern Germany are benefiting from this public service
agreement, as well as inhabitants in Greenland and the Faeroe Islands who are
still members of the Danish Kingdom. Please see chapter
5.3.8 on media legislation.
Major public institutions like DR,
The Royal Theatre and the Museum of Art are more and more regarded as a means
to create awareness of Danish identity, cultural heritage and language.
Although Danish language authorities prefer to set guidelines and not to
legislate for the use of Danish - there has been a tendency to prioritise
Danish culture and language, when new cultural initiatives are taken. The
preservation of the Danish language and its impact on Danish identity is an
underlying theme in the present cultural policy and it enjoys the attention of
leading politicians and scientists.
Denmark/ 5.2 Legislation on culture
In resent years a number of new laws
have been amended within the specific sectors of cultural policy in accordance
with the new local government reform, passed by the Parliament in 2005. The
local government reform implied that the competence for art and culture has
been legally divided in a radical new way between the national and local /
municipal levels of government (see chapter
5.3).
Denmark/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.1 Visual and applied arts
In general 3 levels of legislation
are regulating and defining the overall aims of the cultural institutions and
activities in the specific fields of art and culture in Denmark:
The present Laws on Visual Arts
encompass the following institutions and issues:
The Danish Arts Foundation
and the Danish Arts Council are the basic bodies in Danish Cultural
Policy for supporting the Arts in the different fields (see chapter
2.2). Both councils have a special committee for the visual arts to manage
subsidies to the visual and applied arts.
The first Law concerning the
Danish Arts Foundation (Lov om Statens almindelige Kunstfond nr. 170 af 27
maj 1964) was passed by the Parliament May 15, 1964.Three-year working
grants are awarded by the foundation as subsidies to promising young talent and
lifelong subsidies are awarded to artists recognised for long-term
accomplishments within the arts. Three-year working grants are awarded by the
foundation as subsidies to promising young talent and lifelong subsidies are
awarded to artists recognised for long-term accomplishments within the arts.
Travel scholarships are awarded to artists wishing to find inspiration abroad
(see chapter
2.2).
The law has been amended several
times since then with the purpose to extent the laws to new fields of the arts.
E.g. subsidy- schemes for applied arts was enclosed in 1969, architecture in
1978, film and theatre in1994.
The first Law concerning the
Danish Arts Council (Lov om Kunstrådet, nr. 230, 2. April 2003) was passed
by the Parliament Marts 20, 2003. The purpose was to construct a comprehensive
subsidy structure for the different form of arts administered by the Danish
Arts Agency (see chapter
2.2). There have been no amendments to the law.
The Departmental Order on Visual
Arts in 2003 (Lov om billedkunst, nr. 1004 af 29. november 2003) stated the
right to compensation for works of the visual artist displayed in exhibitions
halls concerning. The order was tightened in 2006 (Bekendtgørelse nr. 1062 af
25. oktober 2006).
Denmark/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.2 Performing arts and music
Theatre
The first comprehensive framework
for state aid to performing arts and theatres was set out in the Theatres
Act in 1963 (Lov nr. 202 af 31. maj 1963 concerning Theatre passed by
the Parliament 14 May, 1963)
The purpose was to establish the
basis for continuous development of Danish dramatic art and culture. The Act
was designed to enhance the choice of theatre available to audiences,
emphasising quality, diversity and innovation. Ensuring ample geographic
distribution and guaranteeing the needs of diverse audience groups also come
within the remit of the Act.
The first Theatres Act has
subsequently been amended on more than twenty occasions since 1963. Among the
most recent are restrictions concerning the reimbursement of state support to
local theatres (Lov nr. 1104 passed by Parliament December 21, 1994) and new
rules for support to local theatres (Lov nr. 103 om ændring af
teaterloven og lov om regionale kulturforsøg passed by the Parliament February
22, 1996).
The most recent most recent Law
on Theatre (Lov nr. 519, passed by Parliament 21 June 2005) related to the
implementation of the Local Governmental Reform in the field of Theatre.
Music
Denmark became the first country in
the world to adopt definitive legislation in the field of music. Subsidies in
the field of music are granted pursuant to the Music Act, which was
passed in 1976 (Lov nr. 306 af 10. juni 1976 om musik passed by the Parliament
26 May 1976)
The main purpose was to support the
permanent symphony orchestras, the development of Danish art of music and other
initiatives such as development of regional institutions of music. The Act has
subsequently been amended on many occasions, most recently in 2000, with an
addendum on rhythm music studios (Lov nr. 341 af 17. maj 2000 om ændring af
musikloven passed by the Parliament 11 May 2000)
The Danish Arts Foundation
(see chapter
5.3.1) has a special committee for Three-year working grants awarded by the
foundation as subsidies to individual composers. Lifelong subsidies are awarded
to composers recognised for long-term accomplishments within the art of music.
The Danish Arts Council (see chapter
5.3.1) has special committees to manage subsidies to arts of stage as well
as the art of music.
Denmark/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.3 Cultural heritage
Museums
Museums are regulated by the Danish
Museum Act (Lov nr. 118 af 15. april 1964 om Statstilskud til Kunstmuseer
passed by the Parliament April 3, 1964). The Act establishes the function of
museums within each museum category (culture, art and nature), conditions for
state recognition, and subsidy arrangements. The Act also includes provisions
on archaeological research conducted by museums, Danefæ (official
treasure trove) and Danekræ (natural history finds). The law has been
amended on several occasions. In 1974 the Law on Cultural Heritage Museums
passed by the Parliament Marts 14, 1974 (Lov nr. 193 af 29. marts 1974 om
ændring af lov om statstilskud til kulturhistoriske museer). Most recently a Law
concerning Compulsary Deliveries of Publiced Material has been passed by
the Parliament (Lov nr. 1439 passed by the Parliament 22 December 2004).
Archives
The first Danish Act on Archives
was passed by the Parliament May 8 1992 (Lov nr. 337 af 14. maj 1992 om
offentlige arkiver m.v.). The Act lays down the overarching principles
governing public archives and how public bodies are to treat their records. The
Public Archives Act requires public bodies to submit their records to
the State Archives so that they can be made accessible to the public after a
period of thirty years. Municipalities are not obligated to submit their
records to the public archives.
The Act has been amended twice most
recently in 2005 (Lov nr. 563 af 24. juni om
ændring af en række love på kulturområdet (Udmøntning af kommunalreformen på
kulturområdet) related to the Local Government Reform which implies more
local responsibility to the Municipalities (see chapter
2.2).
Denmark/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.4 Literature and libraries
Literature
Denmark's first Literature Act
was adopted in the spring of 1996 (Lov nr. 477 af 12. juni 1996 om litteratur
passed by the Parliament May 31, 1996). The objective of the Act is to promote
literature and access to literature in Denmark, while also promoting Danish
literature abroad. The Act applies to Danish and translated literature,
including prose, poetry, drama, children's and young adult literature as well
as cultural literature and non-fiction. The most recent Law on Literature
was related to the foundation of the Danish Arts Council (Lov om Kunstrådet,
nr. 230, 2. April 2003 passed by the Parliament 20 Marts 20 2003). According to
the law a special committee to manage subsidies to literature was established
as a part of the Arts Council (see chapter
5.3.1).
Libraries
The public lending right
remuneration scheme, introduced originally in 1946, represents the most
significant funding of Danish literature. Pursuant to objective criteria,
remuneration is distributed to authors and translators of books published in
the Danish language for use in public libraries.
In 2000, Parliament adopted new
legislation on libraries: The Libraries Act of 17 May 2000 (Lov nr. 340
af 17. maj 2000 om biblioteksvirksomhed passed by the Parliamant 4. May 2000).
The Act primarily aims at providing a better framework for public libraries to
carry out their information and cultural policy duties in an information
society. In addition to books and audio books, the Act now requires that public
libraries provide musical recordings, Internet access and digital multimedia.
The most recent Act on Libraries
was amended in 2002 (Lov nr. 1053 af 17. december 2002 om ændring af lov om
biblioteksafgift passed by the Parliament 11 November 2002). The Act dealed
with a change in the margin of expenditure to public lending rights fee.
The Danish National Library
Authority (Biblioteksstyrelsen) is the Danish government's central
administrative and advisory body to the public libraries and the research
libraries and is an independent agency under the Ministry of Culture.
The Authority advises the government
on the organisation, co-ordination and strategy for the Danish library service
and gives professional advice to ministers and public authorities, as well as
local authorities, libraries and information services etc. The Authority plays
an active part in international cooperation within the field of libraries,
documentation and information.
The Authority administers a number
of statutory government grants for library purposes and is responsible for
retrieving and collating statistical information about Danish libraries.
Furthermore, the Authority acts as the secretariat for Denmark's Electronic
Research Library.
The Danish National Library
Authority distributes remuneration to authors and translators of books published
in the Danish language for use in public libraries (the public lending h fee).
Complaints against the Authority's decisions may be brought before a board
established specifically for that purpose.
Denmark/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.5 Architecture and environment
Architecture is not regulated by law
in Denmark. But several institutions and activities are initiated and financed
by public as well as private means. E.g. the Danish Centre for Architecture is
a commercially run foundation. Its objective is to act as an information and
development centre for architecture and building culture with a view to
generating contacts and building bridges between architecture as art and
building as a commercial enterprise. The centre is also entrusted with increasing
interest in and awareness of quality in our physical surroundings.
The Danish Arts Foundation
Committee of Architecture allocated scholarships, work and travel grants
individual architects (see chapter
2.2). It is also within the committee's remit to support architectural
competitions and the preparation of outline projects.
Denmark/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.6 Film, video and photography
With the adoption of the 1972 Film
Acc (Lov nr. 236 af 7. juni 1972 om film og biographer passed by the Parliament
31 May 1972) the old film fund was abolished and replaced by the
state-administered Danish Film Institute. At the same time, the cinema
licensing system was abolished, and film now came within the province of the Finance
Act.
Today, the Ministry of Culture is
responsible for the overall administration of state institutions connected with
the Danish film industry.
The most recent Film Act came
into force in March 1997 (Lov nr. 186 af 12. marts 1997 om film passed by
the Parliament 27 February 1997). The Act fused the formerly independent film
agencies - the National Film Board of Denmark, the Danish Film Institute and
the Danish Film Museum - into one agency now known as the Danish Film
Institute. The Media Council for Children and Young People was also established
at this juncture to replace the National Film Censorship Board, the agency
responsible for censoring films and videos aimed at children and young people
following the abolition of adult censorship in 1969.
The Danish Film Institute is
responsible for promoting the art and culture of film in Denmark by granting
financial support to film production and other initiatives. It supports the
development of film as an art form and Danish film and cinema culture.
Support granted to feature films is
two-pronged: (1) the Consultant Scheme, which supports the development and
production of films, based on an evaluation of the artistic merits of the
individual project; and (2) the 60-40 scheme, which allows the Film Institute
to grant subsidies of up to 60 per cent without the necessity of the foregoing
consultancy. The Film Institute also supports short and documentary films that
promote educational, artistic and cultural activities.
Video is regulated according to the Film
Act of 1994 (Lov nr. 435 af 1. juni 1994 om mærkning af videogrammer)
passed by the Parliament May 24, 1994.
Denmark/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.7 Culture industries
Information is currently not
available.
Denmark/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.8 Mass media
According to the present Danish
Broadcasting Act (see Bekendtgørelse af lov om radio- og
fjernsynsvirksomhed from May 2nd 2006), all TV and radio-stations require a
license or a registration by the Danish Radio and Television Board.
DR, TV 2 Danmark A/S and the
regional TV2 stations are all part of the Danish public service radio and
television. By living up to the public service requirements, they obtain access
to the nationwide broadcasting net and - except TV 2 Danmark A/S - a share of
the income from the license fees. DR and the regional TV 2 stations each have a
public service contract with the Ministry of Culture. TV 2 Danmark Ltd. has,
instead of a contract, a public service license.
In the public service contracts /
license, the TV and radio-stations commit themselves to providing the Danish
public with a broad selection of programmes and services including news
coverage, information, education, arts, culture and entertainment. They also
commit themselves to quality, comprehensiveness and multiplicity, and in
programme planning, they are obliged to consider freedom of speech and to aim
at objectivity and impartiality. Moreover, the public service TV and radio
stations are obliged to consider Danish language and Danish culture.
The public service broadcasters each
have specific quotas for news coverage, Danish dramatics and programmes for
children, which they are obliged to follow. The public service broadcasters are
also obliged to broadcast programmes on arts and culture, but there are no
specific quotas that they must adhere to.
There are no ownership regulations.
Concerning quotas on the share of foreign programming, Danish broadcasters only
have to adhere to the EU-directives relating to a certain quota for European
programmes. There are no regulations concerning the share of Danish programmes
that must be broadcast, although the public service contracts and licenses
include the request for consideration of the Danish language and culture.
Every fourth year, the different
parties of the parliament enter into a media agreement regulating the
media area, including the contents of the public service contracts and
licenses.
Recent / impending amendments
Denmark/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.9 Legislation for self-employed
artists
There is no special legislation for
self-employed artists other than the general law, for example the tax laws (see
chapter
5.1.4-6).
For more information, see our Status
of Artists section.
Denmark/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.10 Other areas of relevant
legislation
Copyright
In Denmark, protection of copyright
lies in the field of cultural policy, and the Copyright Act (Consolidated Act on Copyright, 2006, Bekendtgørelse
af lov om ophavsret, nr. 763 of 30 June 2006) is the responsibility of the
Ministry of Culture. The Act specifies and defines the mutual rights and
obligations of the author, producer and user. The Danish artists' rights
protection represents the "droit d'auteur" tradition, which asserts
the authors' and performers' economic and moral interests.
Examples of protected works are
literature, music, theatre, film, the visual arts - including photography,
architecture, the decorative arts and computer programs. It is the expression
of the work which is protected - that is to say, the work's singular design or
presentation. Protection does not extend to ideas, concepts, procedures,
methods or algorithms.
Copyright applies from the moment of
creation of the work. Thus, protection does not depend on any kind of
registration. The copyright runs for 70 years following the death of the copyright
holder.
Infringement of copyright may incur
civil liability and criminal liability in the form of fines or imprisonment.
Related rights
Provisions aimed at protecting
performing artists musicians, dancers, etc), audio producers (record
companies), film producers, radio and TV companies, photographers and producers
of catalogues, tables, databases etc are also covered by the Copyright Act.
The term of protection for these
rights is 50 years from the time of production. The term of protection for databases
etc, however, only runs for 15 years from production or publication.
Registration is no prerequisite for protection in this field either.
Denmark/ 6. Financing of culture
6.1 Short overview
The ambitions in recent years to
finance a bigger part of cultural activities by private means e.g. tax
reductions (see chapter
5.1.5) has, in 2006, raised a debate on changes in the public financing of
culture: Has the public budget been reduced or increased? A conservative
estimation from the Ministry of Culture is an increase of about 300 000
DKK in 2006, compared to 2001. Research conducted by the Artists organisation
DJBFA (Danish Jazz, Beat and Folk music Authors) concluded that there
was a reduction of approximately 400 000 DKK. It is impossible to draw the
right conclusion without an independent investigation.
The share of the state budget
allocated for culture in 2005 was 2.3 %. The total amount of state expenditure
in 2005 was DKK 389 362.0 million (not including interest, taxes and
duties). The household spending on cultural activities and goods (including
tickets for cinema, theatre, concerts, museums and zoos, books, newspapers and
periodicals, movie rentals, CD's, videotapes and camera films) was, in the
period 2002-2004, on average DKK 6 034 per household per year. This
corresponds to 2.5 % of the total household budget. These figures were produced
by Statistics Denmark (http://www.dst.dk/)
Denmark/ 6. Financing of culture
6.2 Public cultural expenditure per
capita
Public culture expenditure per
capita, in 2005, was DKK 2 639.35. This corresponds to 0.97 % of the GDP
per capita. The public cultural expenditure for 2005 is compared here with the
GDP for 2004, which, in October 2006, was the latest figure available. The GDP
per capita in 2004 was DKK 272 000.
Denmark/ 6. Financing of culture
6.3 Public cultural expenditure
broken down by level of government
Table 2:
Public cultural expenditure: by level of government, in million DKK, 2005
(budget figures)
Level of government |
Total
2005 |
%
2005 |
Total
2003 |
%
2003 |
Total
2000 |
%
2000 |
State (federal)* |
8 919.5 |
62.5% |
8 409.8 |
63.1% |
7 550.3** |
64.7% |
Regional (amter + HUR) |
519.9 |
3.6% |
485.0 |
3.6% |
407.4 |
3.5% |
Local (kommuner) |
4 843.2 |
33.9% |
4 427.8 |
33.2% |
3 711.0 |
31.8% |
TOTAL |
14 282.6 |
100.0% |
13 322.6 |
100.0% |
11 668.7 |
100.0% |
Source:
The Danish Ministry of Culture.
*
Including TV / radio licenses (DKK 3 479.0 million in 2005) and receipts
from the state football pools (tipsmidler - DKK 1 022.9 million in
2005). It also includes expenditure from the Ministry of Traffic for press
distribution support and money transferred to regions for cultural agreements.
**
The amount added from the Palaces and Properties Agency budget of 2000 cannot
be compared directly with the amounts from 2003 and 2005. In 2000, the Agency
was not yet divided into two sections and the amount included in the Table
above consists only of expenditure for certain large renovation projects for
historic buildings. The numbers from The Palaces and Properties Agency included
in the Table above are: 33.3 in 2000, 226.8 in 2003 and 232.5 in 2005).
In 2003 and 2005, an additional
level of government appears in the budgets of the Ministry of Culture, namely
The Greater Copenhagen Authority (HUR), which is a politically-governed
regional organisation covering the Greater Copenhagen Region. In the above
Table, the culture expenditures of HUR are added to the regional level,
although the municipalities in the capital region supply part of the funding
for HUR.
By 2007, both HUR and the existing
regional governments (amter) will be abolished. Instead, five new
regional governments will come into existence. These will only have limited
influence on cultural policies. The prime amount of expenditure of HUR and the
regional level (amterne) will, in 2007, be transferred to the state (see
chapter
2.2).
The expenditures for sports have
been subtracted from the budget figures in the above Table. Sports, however,
are a considerable part of Danish cultural policy. In 2005, the public funding
to sports amounted to DKK 4 163.8 million, corresponding to 23 % of the
total budget for culture. This expenditure is mainly provided by the
municipalities.
Denmark/ 6. Financing of culture
6.4 Sector breakdown
Table 3:
State cultural expenditure: by sector, 2005 (budget figures in million DKK)
Field / Domain / Sub-domain |
Direct
expenditure(state)1 |
Transfers
(to other levels of government)2 |
Counties |
Munici-palities |
Total |
%
total |
Cultural Goods |
1 852.3 |
49.2 |
129.1 |
3 050.0 |
5 080.6 |
35.6% |
Cultural Heritage |
898.5 |
49.2 |
127.6 |
431.9 |
1 507.2 |
10.6% |
Historical
Monuments3 |
274.8 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
274.8 |
1.9% |
Museums
and zoos |
623.7 |
49.2 |
127.6 |
431.9 |
1 232.4 |
8.6% |
Archives |
330.3 |
0.0 |
1.5 |
0.0 |
331.8 |
2.3% |
Libraries |
623.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2 618.1 |
3 241.6 |
22.7% |
Arts |
1 324.5 |
82.1 |
312.1 |
691.7 |
2 410.4 |
16.9% |
Visual Arts (including
architecture and design) |
125.4 |
0.0 |
4.8 |
2.7 |
132.9 |
0.9% |
Visual
arts |
86.2 |
0.0 |
4.8 |
2.7 |
93.7 |
0.7% |
Architecture
and design4 |
39.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
39.2 |
0.3% |
Performing Arts |
1 199.1 |
82.1 |
307.3 |
689.0 |
2 277.5 |
15.9% |
Music |
305.5 |
27.8 |
65.7 |
521.9 |
920,9 |
6.4% |
Theatre
and Musical Theatre5 |
893.6 |
54.3 |
241.6 |
167.1 |
1 356.6 |
9.5% |
Multidisciplinary |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
Media |
4 394.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
14.5 |
4 408.7 |
30.9% |
Books and Press |
550.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
550.5 |
3.9% |
Books |
221.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
221.2 |
1.5% |
Press6 |
329.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
329.3 |
2.3% |
Audio, Audiovisual and Multimedia |
3 843.7 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
14.5 |
3 858.2 |
27.0% |
Cinema |
369.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
14.5 |
383.9 |
2.7% |
Radio
and television7 |
3 474.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
3 474.3 |
24.3% |
Other |
1 217.3 |
0.0 |
78.7 |
1 087.1 |
2 383.1 |
16.7% |
Interdisciplinary |
1 013.1 |
0.0 |
4.5 |
2.7 |
1 020.3 |
7.1% |
Socio-cultural |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
Cultural
Relations Abroad |
43.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
43.4 |
0.3% |
Administration8 |
130.8 |
0.0 |
n.a. |
n.a. |
130.8 |
0.9% |
Educational
Activities |
838.9 |
0.0 |
4.5 |
2.7 |
846.1 |
5.9% |
Not allocable by domain |
204.2 |
0.0 |
74.2 |
1 084.4 |
1 362.8 |
9.5% |
TOTAL |
8 788.2 |
131.3 |
519.9 |
4 843.2 |
14 282.6 |
100% |
Source:
The Danish Ministry of Culture. Kulturpengene 2005. Finanslov 2005. Decimals
can differ.
1
Including receipts from the state football pools.
2
Since 1999, groups of municipalities have had the possibility of
establishing a cultural agreement with the Minister of Culture for the period
2004-2007. By such an agreement, the groups of municipalities take over a part
of the state's tasks and obligations - and therefore also a yearly cultural
framework budget for allocation. These are the only cultural amounts that are
transferred from the state to other levels of government. In consequence of the
local government reform, all cultural agreements will have to be renegotiated
before the end of 2006. In January 2007 all the agreements has renegotiated.
3
Including expenditure for cultural assignments of the Palaces and
Properties Agency granted from the Ministry of Finance.
4
Architecture is included in the Table above. In Denmark, architecture is
considered as part of the cultural sector. The expenditure for supporting
architecture was, in 2005, approximately DKK 11.1 million and the part of the
education budget earmarked for architecture was DKK 243.9 million.
5
In 2005, the government granted a special amount of DKK 167.8 million for
the building of a new Theatre House for The Royal Theatre. This amount is
included in Table 2.
6
The distribution support for the press is supported by the Ministry of
Traffic. This expenditure will be transferred to the Ministry of Culture by
2007. The figure in the Table also includes DKK 39.5 million, funded by the Ministry
of Culture, for cultural magazines and periodicals. Moreover, certain
periodicals and magazines are exempted from VAT, which thereby provides
indirect support.
7
Radio and television are almost exclusively supported by license funding,
which is not included in the state budget. The division between radio and
television cannot be made up. Some municipalities support or run local TV and
radio-stations, but there is no information available on the total amount of
these expenses.
8
It is not possible to allocate the administration expenditure on the
regional and local level.
Sports are a part of the expenditure
of the Danish Ministry of Culture. However, in this Table - as well as in the
previous one - the expenditure for sports has been subtracted from the total
budget.
Major changes in specific fields
The following numbers are regulated
according to inflation, for better comparisons:
Denmark/ 7. Cultural institutions
and new partnerships
7.1 Re-allocation of public
responsibilities
There has been no re-allocation of
public responsibility for culture in recent years, e.g. privatisation or
outsourcing of activities. However, the ambition is that a bigger part of the
cultural activities and institutions should be financed by private means, from
companies, foundations and patrons (see chapter
5.1.3).
Denmark/ 7. Cultural institutions
and new partnerships
7.2 Status/role and development of
major cultural institutions
Most of the cultural institutions
have undergone major changes in the legal and financial status according to the
Local Government Reform that came into force on 1 January 2007. The
reform implies a new responsibility between the state and local level in the
Danish cultural model (see chapter
2.2 and chapter
5.3). No institutions have been transformed to e.g. private companies.
Denmark/ 7. Cultural institutions
and new partnerships
7.3 Emerging partnerships or
collaborations
In recent years, the government has
be active in stimulating a new partnership between public cultural institutions
and private sponsors and foundations through the contract management system
(see chapter
4.1), experimental projects for artists and the cultural industries (see chapter
4.2.6) and tax exemptions for private companies, foundations and sponsors
(see chapter
5.1.3).
Denmark/ 8. Support to creativity
and participation
8.1 Direct and indirect support to
artists
See chapter
8.1.1.
Denmark/ 8.1 Direct and indirect
support to artists
8.1.1 Special artists funds
Denmark has separate state support
systems for individually creative and practising artists,
just as the other Nordic countries (Finland, Norway, Sweden and Iceland). This
is an exceptional dimension in the so-called Nordic Cultural Model (see chapter
9.1 The Nordic Cultural Model)
The role of The Danish Arts Foundation
(Statens Kunstfond) is to promote Danish creative artists. By use of the
arms-length principle, the Danish Arts Foundation distributes funding and
grants to individual artists in the form of scholarships, bursaries, commission
honoraria and prizes, purchases of works of visual art, crafts and design for
depositing in state institutions and providing visual art works in public
buildings and facilities. The Danish Arts Foundation was established by the
Danish government in 1964. The Foundation's sphere of activity is defined by
the Arts Foundation Act passed by the Parliament in 1964. The
Foundation's appropriation is determined by the annual government budget.
Since 2003, the secretariat of The
Danish Arts Foundation has been administered by The Danish Arts Agency.
The role of the Danish Arts
Council (Kunstrådet) is to promote the development of art in Denmark and
Danish art abroad. The Council has two principal tasks:
The Danish Arts Council may take
independent initiatives and express itself on matters that fall within its area
of competence. The Council's sphere of activity and tasks are defined by the Arts
Council Act (Law on the Danish Arts Council, nr. 230 of April 2. 2003 The
scope of the Council's grants is determined by the annual Finance Act.
The Danish Arts Council was established on 1 July 2003 to replace a list of
independent councils on individual cultural areas.
The Danish Arts Agency (Kunststyrelsen) is an administrative unit under the Danish
Ministry of Culture. The agency administers the financial support provided for
artists and artistic activities by the Danish state, which is mainly granted by
the two arms-length bodies: the Danish Arts Council and the Danish Arts
Foundation. The Danish Arts Agency is also responsible for the international
cultural exchange programmes of the Ministry of Culture and the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs, and facilitates continuous cultural exchange between Denmark
and foreign countries in the fields of literature, music, the performing arts
and the visual arts.
See also chapter
5.2 on legislation for culture and chapter
5.1.7 on copyright.
Denmark/ 8.1 Direct and indirect
support to artists
8.1.2 Grants, awards, scholarships
It is a characteristic element in The
Nordic Cultural Model (see chapter
9.1) that the award landscape since the 1960s has been dominated by
grants, scholarships for training, travel bursaries, work grants etc. organised
by public institutions like the Danish Arts Foundation, the Danish
Arts Council and the Danish Arts Agency (see chapter
2.2).
In recent years individual artists
as well as public cultural institutions have increasingly also received grants,
awards and scholarships by some private Danish foundations. One of the reasons
is the status quo of the total public budget for culture (see chapter 6).
Another is that the private sector has gained more influence in the cultural
sector, due in part to the very liberal Law on Private Foundations of
Public Utility, which makes it easy for private foundations, companies and
individual citizens to support cultural institutions, activities and new
projects with tax exemptions. In recent years, several new institutions and
projects have been realised according to the private foundation model; an
excellent example is the new Danish Opera House which was opened in
Copenhagen in 2005, thanks to a gift of 2.5 billion DKK from the Almenfond
of the A.P. Møller Group - one of the biggest shipping companies in the world
(see chapter
5.1.5).
Among other important old and new
private foundations in Denmark 2007 with scholarships, travel bursaries, work
grants, awards etc. are: The new Carlsberg Foundation and the Tuborg
Foundation, established by the biggest breweries in Denmark, the Augustinus
Foundation (established by a former tobacco company). A few years ago BG-Bank,
one of Denmark's well consolidated banks, sponsored the organising of BG
Bank Literary Award for authors among others also for authors which has
published their first book.
The number of private foundations in
Denmark in 2006 was approximately 14 000, which is high compared to other
European countries. There are no official statistics on Danish foundations.
Many foundations are very small and locally rooted, and they, therefore, choose
not to be registered at the Danish Commerce and Companies Agency. Nevertheless,
it is a fact that the number of foundations is rising.
There is no official statistics on
the amount of money donated by private bodies to awards, work grants,
institutions etc. in the cultural field. A report Samspillet mellem private
fonde og den offentlige kulturpolitik ( The relation between private
foundations and the public cultural policy in Denmark) published by the
Ministry of Culture 15 December, 2004 on request of the parliamentary Committee
of Culture showed that, including construction projects, approximately 8.7
% of the income of the Danish cultural institutions in 2003 came from private
donations. The donations for cultural activities and artists were in fact lower
(ca. 2.2 %) because 75 % of the donations were allocated as support for
constructions projects in the period investigated (1995-2003).
Questions of a more qualitative
character, which had been the reason for the enquiry in the first place, were
not evaluated in the report. But in fact e very small parts of the award
landscape in Denmark are private financed. That is also due to grants for
start-ups or newcomers.
See also chapter
2.2, chapter
2.4, chapter
5.1.5 and chapter
7.
Denmark/ 8.1 Direct and indirect
support to artists
8.1.3 Support to professional
artists associations or unions
Denmark has not public support for
the activities of artists associations or unions regulated by law. According to
the basic elements in the Nordic Cultural Model (see chapter
9.1) it is up to the artists themselves to organize and finance their
associations or unions threw taw-free subscription. As collective bodies for
the artist the unions can apply for support to special projects etc. in the
Ministry of culture. The individual members can as well as non-organised
artists apply for grants in the different councils, committees and other public
bodies build up to support the individual artists , i.e. the Danish Arts
Foundation (see chapter
2.2).
According to Danish and Nordic
tradition, copyright laws must primarily protect the rights of the creator (see
chapter
9.1 The Nordic Cultural Model).
The Danish (and Nordic) copyright
legislation provides a legal framework for organisations made up of copyright
holders entering into collective agreements with users and producers regarding
compensation for individual works and performances, the size of royalties, etc.
Rights holders under the Copyright Act have thus established collecting
societies, which administer the copyright on behalf of the holder. Collective
agreement license is a special Danish / Nordic construction, which involves
users entering into an agreement with a representative organisation, granting
users the right to use all of the copyright holders' works of the type in
question, including works that do not fall under the auspices of the
organisation. In other words, agreement licenses are based on voluntary
agreements entered into between the parties, but also involve an element
similar to compulsory licenses in relation to outside copyright holders.
See also chapter
5.1.7.
Denmark/ 8.2 Cultural consumption
and participation
8.2.1 Trends and figures
Since 1993, there has, in general,
been an increase in the amount of time spent watching television. This can be
seen as the result of an increase in the supply of television broadcasting and
a decrease in the participation at museums and theatres and other classical,
public financed and organised cultural institutions, especially for people aged
over 60 years. Instead, there has been an increase in participation in
rhythmical concerts and cinema going.
Reasons for changes in cultural
habits seem to be:
Compared to the rest of Europe,
Denmark and the other Nordic countries have higher cultural participation rates
and higher use of public cultural institutions, from libraries to symphony
concerts (see chapter
9.1 The Nordic Cultural Model).
Table 4:
Participation in cultural activities, percentage of adults over the age of 15
Type of activity |
1987 |
1993 |
1998 |
2004 |
Heavily subsidised by the state
(having participated at least once during the last year) |
||||
Theatres
(including opera, musical, ballet) |
40 |
37 |
41 |
39 |
Art
exhibitions / museums |
37 |
44 |
38 |
35 |
Museums
other than art museums |
36 |
44 |
41 |
32 |
Classical
concerts |
12 |
16 |
17 |
14 |
Rhythmical
concerts |
29 |
33 |
39 |
42 |
Cinemas |
58 |
52 |
59 |
66 |
Libraries |
63 |
64 |
60 |
66 |
Without large public subsidies |
||||
Reading
newspaper on a daily basis |
83 |
75 |
68 |
56 |
Reading
fictional literature on a weekly basis |
36 |
29 |
29 |
31 |
Watching
television more than 2œ hours on weekdays |
|
|
29 |
37 |
Listening
to radio more than 3 hours on weekdays |
|
|
35 |
28 |
Listening
to recorded music daily |
50 |
36 |
43 |
36 |
Watching
video / DVD almost weekly |
22 |
33 |
35 |
30 |
Using
the Internet daily during leisure time |
|
|
5 |
43 |
Playing
computer games almost weekly |
|
|
|
17 |
Capturing participation rates at
local level for popular culture events (no data available) |
Source:
Trine Bille et al: Danskernes kultur- og fritidsaktiviteter 2004 - med
udviklingslinjer tilbage til 1964. Akf forlaget 2005.
Main development trends
There has been an increase in the
amount of time spent watching television over the last ten years. This can be
seen as a result of an increase in the supply of television broadcasting.
On the contrary, the share of
inhabitants reading a daily newspaper has decreased over the last ten years.
This can be seen as a result of new possibilities for being updated on news via
television and Internet.
There has been a decrease in visits
to museums and theatres over the last ten years. Instead, there has been an
increase in attendance at rhythmical concerts and cinema going.
The cultural activity of the Danish
inhabitants is very much dependent on differences, with respect to social,
demographic and geographic circumstances. The degree of cultural activity is
very much connected to the level of urbanity, education, employment, country of
origin and lifestyle. People living in rural districts are the least culturally
active, whereas people living in the capital are the most cultural active with
regard to the number of different cultural activities in which people
participate. People without education and people without employment are also
the least culturally active, whereas the longer the education and the bigger
the salary the more culturally active people are on average.
With regard to gender, there is a
significant difference in respect of people not participating in cultural
activities. 26 % of men have neither been to a ballet, musical, opera, drama,
classical concert, museum or library during the last year, whereas this only
counts for 16 % of women.
With regard to age, cultural
participation starts to decrease when people pass the age of 60. For the
younger age groups, there is no difference in activity between different age
groups.
Inhabitants in Denmark with another
ethnical background than Danish do have a significant distinction from the
average pattern. One of these distinctions is in the rate of library use; 9 %
of ethnical Danes use libraries almost every week, while for immigrants with a
western background the number is 20 %, and for immigrants with a non-western
background the number is 37 %. The survey also suggests that immigrants use free
newspapers and Internet news sites more than ethnical Danes. On the contrary,
there are some cultural activities which immigrants attend less than ethnical
Danes, namely theatre, rhythmical concerts and sports arrangements. Regarding
the rest of the different cultural activities, there are no significant
differences between the participation in cultural activities of ethnical Danes
and immigrants.
Denmark/ 8.2 Cultural consumption
and participation
8.2.2 Policies and programmes
There is no explicit Danish policy
linking the overall aim of equal access to cultural life to broader issues of
civic participation, citizenship, civil society development / cohesion.
Examples of initiatives in the last
5 years to improve cultural participation are:
Debates on cultural participation:
Denmark/ 8.3 Arts and cultural
education
8.3.1 Arts education
The Ministry of Culture is
responsible for most of the tertiary education and training in the arts and for
courses provided by the Royal School of Library and Information Science.
All studies coming under the heading
of education and training in the arts are tertiary and conducted at state or
self-regulating institutes and colleges within the fields of architecture,
design, the visual arts, conservation, music, film, theatre and dance. Courses
are conducted over a period of four to six years.
The comprehensive educational system
of teaching and research in art and culture at Danish Universities are placed
in the Ministry of Education (Undervisningsministeriet).
Institutions
The higher arts education
institutions under the Ministry of Culture include education in design,
architecture, theatre, acting, dance, film, art, music and librarian education.
The largest schools are the schools
of architecture, the Royal School of Library and Information Science and the
schools of design, which together account for two-thirds of all students. The
six music academies account for roughly one-quarter, while the remainder of
students are distributed among film, theatre, the visual arts, and arts and
crafts studies.
In 1999, the Ministry of Culture
established three education councils. The councils provide general advisory
services to the ministry with respect to administering its institutes of higher
learning. These are: The Education Council for Architecture, Design, Visual
Arts and Conservation; the Education Council for Film and Theatre; and the
Education Council for Academies of Music.
All of these institutes have no
tuition fees. To be admitted to most of the courses, students have to pass an
exam.
In October 2001, there were a total
of 6 170 students enrolled in educational programmes within the province
of the Ministry of Culture. 1 040 students graduated from the institutions
in 2001.
Finance
From January 2007, all the
institutions, except two, will be financed solely by the state. More than half
of the budget for the two decentralised arts academies in Odense and Århus will
hence forward continue to be financed by the municipalities in concern
according to the agreements in the Municipality Reform (see chapter
2.2).
Until January 2007, the decentralised
arts academies and the decentralised acting schools were also supported by the
regional level (counties), which by 2007, will cease according to the
municipality reform (see chapter
2.2).
Total public spending on educational
programmes within the remit of the Ministry of Culture, in 2002, was DKK 778.6
million, of which the state's share is 775.1 million.
Amendments, aims and debates
The Ministry of Culture is the main
governmental body responsible for arts education and training in Denmark. In
the last five years, the main programmes and initiatives have been: 1) to
develop the training to also improve employment for graduates, 2) to improve
the profile of the individual institution, also in an international
perspective, and 3) to implement the impact of the Bologna process.
The focus on increasing employment
after training at the higher arts institutes has led to a decision by the
Ministry of Culture to lower the number of students admitted to courses as
there is concern that too many are being educated for too few jobs. Moreover,
the school managements are obliged each year to deliver a report on what the
institution is doing to improve the employment of the graduate students.
Advisory boards have also been established, including representatives from the
labour market, with the purpose of having a systematic dialogue between the
educational institutions and the labour market and thereby developing the more
opportunities for employment.
To improve the profile of the
individual institutions, there have been initiatives to raise the quality of
education e.g. the yearly budget for the institutions has not been decreased,
even though the number of students has. In the future, there will be extra
focus on attracting foreign students to the Danish higher arts institutions.
The Bologna process has had a big
impact on the Danish higher arts institutes. The architecture schools and the
academies of music have introduced bachelor degree as well as new Master
degrees. Also, the design schools and the arts academies will introduce the new
degrees before 2010.
The ECTS-system has been introduced
to most of the institutes.
Moreover, each course is in progress
of formulating so called qualification frameworks to describe the achieved
competences of the graduates. This will be finished before 2010.
All the courses are expected to
follow the developments of new technology in order to prepare the students for
the labour market, although there have been no specific programmes. In the
political agreement on cultural education for 2003-2007, extra funds were
allocated for IT-improvements.
Denmark/ 8.3 Arts and cultural
education
8.3.2 Intercultural education
Denmark has initiated or takes part
in several trans-national exchange and cooperation programmes within education.
Intercultural dialogue and co-operation are encouraged in all these programmes.
Some programmes focus particularly
on intercultural dialogue in the sense of inclusion, personal development,
active citizenship and democracy. Among these programmes are:
Others schemes are based on
bilateral agreements between Denmark and foreign governments or regions, for
example:
However, the majority of education
programmes available are the result of intergovernmental co-operation mainly
within EU and the Nordic area. EU's Lifelong Learning Programme (Grundtvig is
part of this) and the Nordplus programme support European cross-border
co-operation at all education levels, and there are EU programmes for
co-operation at higher education level with all continents. The decentralised
funds within LLP and Nordplus are administered by CIRIUS, an authority within
the Ministry of Education that supports the internationalisation of education
and training in Denmark. Further information is available at http://www.ciriusonline.dk/.
For more information, see our Intercultural Dialogue section.
Denmark/ 8.4 Amateur arts, cultural
associations and community centres
8.4.1 Amateur arts
Denmark has traditionally been very
active for in the voluntary cultural area, thanks to the public movements
behind Danish cultural policy (see chapter
1). In 2006, an inquiry "Kultur i lyst og nød" on the role and
status of amateur art and voluntary socio-cultural activities in the last
decades was published by the University of Southern Denmark, stating that
cultural amateurs are doing well and the field is very proactive. The major
problems are the recruitment of new members, especially young members. However,
voluntary organisations primarily financed and regulated by the Law on
General Education, managed by the Ministry of Education, are still favoured
by the politicians.
Danish cultural policy has also
traditionally been very active in the area of culture for children, especially
in the making of TV-programmes, many of which are well known all over the world
today in children's theatres and music schools. Culture for children has been
an important and official part of the work of the Ministry of Culture, with its
own department, working groups and secretariat since the 1970s. Result-oriented
contracts are encouraging the institutions to give their activities for
children a top priority. The Danish Film Institute has its own funding support
for the production of children's films etc.
In 2006, the report "Children's
Culture for all of Denmark" was published by the Network of Children's
Culture, together with a status-report on its work in 2005 and a plan of action
for 2006-2007. The Network of Children's Culture was established on 1 January
2003. The Network consists of the Danish National Library Authority, the Danish
National Cultural Heritage Agency, the Danish Arts Agency and the Danish Film
Institute. The aim of the network is to initiate and to co-operate on present
and future culture initiatives for children. The network should bring new
projects to life across existing cultural fields - and find amendments on the
existing culture-for-children-policy. The experiences of the activities
improved by the Network of Children's Culture in 2005 have been positive in all
parts of children's everyday life. The vision of the new plan of action for
2007 is that all children shall meet art and culture, that all professional
public cultural institutions will have to contribute to this aim and that all
forms of art will have to be available for children.
Finally, the Network of Children's
Culture has published a book "Children's Culture in the Municipality"
with ideas and inspiration to initiate projects for children's culture after
the Local Governmental Reform. The reform of the regions and municipalities has
given visible and clear division of responsibility between the new
municipalities and the state. It is expected that this will strengthen local
culture, including amateur culture. The new municipalities are now responsible
for local music schools, theatres, museums etc. (see chapter
2.1 and chapter
2.2). The voluntary work within the local amateur communities is - as it
was before the reform came in to force in January 2007 - still coordinated and
run by the municipalities.
More information on the work of the
network at http://www.boernekultur.dk/
Denmark/ 8.4 Amateur arts, cultural
associations and community centres
8.4.2 Cultural houses and community
cultural clubs
Denmark has had a public and deeply
rooted tradition for cultural houses, since the late 18th century and the
establishment of village halls as part of the Danish co-operative
society-movement. In the 1960s and 1970s, the movement was re-awakened by
self-organised citizens on the wave of the cultural and political changes in
1968. One of the first of this kind of houses was Huset (the
"House") in Copenhagen. The "House" established rooms for
musical and theatrical performances, exhibitions, debates and political
activities, just like the rest of the other self-organised houses in the big
cities of Europe at that time.
In the 1990s, more interest was
given to prestigious and well-established cultural houses in the
municipalities. The former village houses and community centres and their weight
in social gatherings and political involvement was weakened in the promotion of
professional art. The audience moved from being participants to spectators in
the new "cultural palaces". The art was isolated from its context.
The development of the cultural houses has been highly marked by the transition
from industrial society with a focus on solidarity and socio-cultural behaviour
- to the focus on art, experiences and creative classes in the experience
society. This development is now hosted by the new cultural houses, together
with the blooming café-life of the cities that has succeeded the old community
clubs.
There are no statistics on how many
visitors there are to the new cultural houses, nor is there any statistics on
the informal cultural lives of the cafés, private galleries, etc. However, it
is estimated that around 5 million Danes yearly are using the community
centres. There is no legislation or permanent funding available in this area.
Many community centres and cultural
houses, cultural amateurs and voluntary organisations are members of Joint
Cultural Councils in Denmark ("Foreningen af de Kulturelle Samråd i
Danmark"). The council is a national association of cultural councils,
which are umbrella organisations for local associations within the area of
culture and leisure-time activities. The association's tasks are, among other
things, to advise, inform, arrange meetings and conferences and liaise between
existing associations. In addition to these roles, the association handles all
contact with the authorities, co-operates with similar cultural associations,
national as well as international, and assists in establishing new councils.
Cultural councils existed in
approximately 90 of Denmark's 270 municipalities before January 2007. Members
of "Joint Cultural Councils in Denmark" are cultural councils,
associations or similar unions which again are umbrella organisations within
the area of culture and leisure-time activities. The main purpose of
"Joint Cultural Councils in Denmark" is to inspire and develop the
cultural area, and to influence, initiate, debate, exemplify etc. in order to
create the best possible conditions for all cultural activities. "Joint
Cultural Councils in Denmark" is working closely with the rest of the cultural
voluntary associations on a national basis. What will happen to the "Joint
Cultural Councils in Denmark" after the Municipality reform is still
unknown.
Further information see http://www.kulturellesamraad.dk/
Denmark/ 9. Sources and Links
9.1 Key documents on cultural policy
Duelund, Peter: The Nordic
Cultural Model. Copenhagen: Nordic Cultural Institute, 2003, 601 pp. The
book is a summary of the most comprehensive study of public cultural policy in
Denmark and the other Nordic countries since WWII. The research project was
started in 1998 and was completed during the autumn of 2002. In all, 60
researchers from within the Nordic Region, as well as outside it, were involved
in the project. The project has, among other things, shed light on the cultural
political goals of the Nordic countries, their financing and administration
methods, the cultural habits of the population and the role of Nordic cultural
politics in an international context. Light has also been shed on the
conditions for culture in the autonomous areas - The Faroe Islands, Greenland
and The Aland Islands - as well as on Sami cultural politics. More
information on the project is available at (or to order the book): http://www.nordiskkulturinsitut.dk/.
Duelund, Peter: Kulturens politik
(Politics of Culture in Denmark) in 18 volumes, commissioned by the
Danish Ministry of Culture (1993-1996). The final volume of the report - Den
danske kulturmodel (the Danish Cultural Model) (Duelund 1995) - summarizes
the results across the various branches of culture, and submits a catalogue of
ideas/proposals on the renewal and further development of cultural policy.
Denmark in the Culture and
Experience Economy. The culture and experience economy
is a growing field in Denmark. The booklet explores the future of stronger
ties between the arts and corporate sector in Denmark and presents the
government initiatives on five new target areas. The publication can be
download at: http://www.kum/dk/english.
Canon of Danish Art and Culture. The intensive work that lasted well over a year came to an
end in 2006. A group of Denmark's most important artists and most knowledgeable
art experts extensively examined hundreds of works of Danish art. The final
results have been published: A Canon of Danish Art and Culture. Read
more at: http://www.ku.dk/english.
Denmark/ 9. Sources and Links
9.2 Key organisations and portals
Cultural policy making bodies
The Ministry of Culture (links to
all the institutions, agencies, committees and other sub-headings)
http://www.kum.dk/
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs
http://www.um.dk/
The Ministry of Interior and Health
http://www.im.dk/
The Ministry of Refugees,
Immigration and Integration Affairs
http://www.nyidanmark.dk/en-us
The international cultural
cooperation of the Municipalities
http://www.lgdk.dk/
Contacts for the Municipalities
http://www.kl.dk/
Contacts for the Regions
http://www.regioner.dk/
About the Local Government Reform
http://www.kum.dk/
http://www.im.dk/
http://www.kl.dk/
http://www.regioner.dk/
EU Cultural Co-operation
http://www.ec.europa.eu/culture
http://www.euobserver.com/
The Nordic Cultural Co-operation
http://www.norden.org/
ASEM-samarbejde:
http://www.um.dk/da/menu/udenridspolitik/internationaleorganisationer/ASEM
Professional associations
The Danish Artists Council (with
links to all the artists' organisations etc)
http://www.dansk-kunstnerraad.dk/
The Danish Council for Copyright
(with links to the collecting societies)
http://www.ophavsret.dk/
Copyright and Fair Use, Stanford
University Libraries
http://www.fairuse.stanford.edu/
Grant-giving bodies
The Danish Arts Foundation
http://www.statenskunstfond.dk
The Danish Arts Council
http://www.kunstraadet.dk
Cultural research and statistics
Statistics Denmark (Danmarks
Statistik)
http://www.dst.dk/
Culture / arts portals
For general information of cultural
institutions, activities etc.
http://www.kuas.dk/
The
Council of Europe/ERICarts "Compendium of Cultural Policies and Trends in
Europe, 9th edition", 2008