Report creation date: 14.10.2008 - 09:53
Countr(y/ies): Bulgaria
Chapter(s): 1,2,21,22,23,24,241,242,243,244,245,246,3,31,32,33,4,41,42,421,422,423,424,425,426,427,428,429,4210,43,5,51,511,512,513,514,515,516,517,518,519,52,53,531,532,533,534,535,536,537,538,539,5310,6,61,62,63,64,7,71,72,73,8,81,811,812,813,82,821,822,83,831,832,84,841,842,9,91,92
Bulgaria/ 1. Historical perspective:
cultural policies and instruments
In the late 19th and early 20th
century, the climate for culture was constructed of values and goals towards
self-affirmation, harmonisation with European culture, openness to foreign
cultural influences, enlightenment and, to some extent, emulation. Cultural
institutions were regarded as a means to boost the self-confidence of the
nation and assert the values of European culture.
This atmosphere changed when the
Communist regime took over in 1948. During 45 years of communist rule, cultural
policy was characterised by:
The arts were regarded as a means of
education and enlightenment rather than as entertainment and therefore
responsibility for the arts and culture was declared as the exclusive domain of
the state. Totalitarian cultural institutions were created covering all spheres
of cultural life. The social system consistently advocated and practised
political and cultural protectionism from the perspective of communist
ideology.
The regime change marked the end of
any form or participation of private enterprise in the dissemination of
cultural values and works of art. For example, a Cinefication and Cinema
Industry Act, passed in early 1948, eliminated private enterprise in
filmmaking and film import and distribution became a state monopoly.
Nationalisation of private printing houses began in 1947 and most were closed
down in May 1948. A new Book Printing Act was passed in 1949, which
effected changes similar to those in the film industry. The creation of a
Committee for Science, Art and Culture in 1948 replacing the former National
Culture Chamber was the final move to establish a centralised system of
cultural administration, which imposed total control over all spheres of
cultural life and de facto turned culture into an instrument to achieve
non-cultural - i.e. political, ideological, social and propaganda - objectives
of the state.
The creative unions (tvorcheski
suyuzi) became a transmitter of the state monopoly on culture and
controlled the entire process of creation and dissemination of works of art,
virtually eliminating individual expression. Artists, who were closely
connected with the state even before the establishment of totalitarian rule,
now became wholly dependent on the Communist Party-State and de facto turned
into civil servants.
By the early 1950s, the system of
state cultural institutions was fully established and running smoothly. Each
element of this system was hierarchically subordinated and subject to dual -
State and Communist Party - control. The cultural policies pursued at the time
were ideologically orthodox, and any form of dissent from the official line was
penalised.
It was only after 1956 that the echo
of Khrushchev's reforms brought about a certain thaw in the ideological
climate, trumpeted by the ruling Bulgarian Communist Party as its "April
Policy", which was promptly abandoned after the "Prague Spring"
in August 1968. The subsequent period of stagnation was extolled as a period of
"flowering socialist art".
In the early 1970s there was a move
to introduce the so-called "public-cum-state principle" in the
administration of culture, which presupposed the involvement of all governing
bodies and a radically extended range of people, in decision-making processes.
The Bureau and the Presidium of the Committee for Culture were elected bodies,
but their heads and members could not take office without the approval of the
National Assembly and the State Council. Public participation in cultural
debates soon turned into a ritual designed to provide legitimacy to decisions
already taken. The promotion of "the public-cum-state principle" as a
democratic achievement of Bulgarian cultural policy proved to be a demagogic
propaganda campaign: despite the proclaimed participation of governing bodies
in culture, the real decision making took place in the Communist Party.
Nevertheless, Bulgarian artists as a
whole had won a significant amount of creative independence by the end of the
totalitarian period. State control over creative unions loosened and they
became a kind of safe haven for members. Instead of brutally suppressing
criticism, the creative unions began granting certain privileges and financial
security to a selected few. Under the influence of Soviet perestroika in
the mid-1980s, some of the creative unions turned into opposition associations
of intellectuals and their 1989 congresses became forums for attacks against
the communist system.
Bulgaria's new cultural policy model
after 1989
Culture was one of the spheres worst
affected by the economic and spiritual crisis during the course of transition.
At the same time, the ongoing reforms in society have had a particularly
positive impact on culture.
During the transition period,
cultural development in Bulgaria was searching for the best way forward.
Concepts frequently changed. Few activities of the different levels of
government were followed up. There was little coordination between different
levels of the administration. Main responsibilities for financing culture were
decentralised and then recentralised. The private business sector had little
interest in supporting cultural activities.
Over the last few years, things are
starting to clear up. New regulations are being implemented which clearly
define the responsibilities of the different administrative levels of
government. Considerable steps forward are being taken by civil society. The
third sector is consolidating and the business sector is starting to show signs
that they are willing to adopt a new attitude of partnership.
Bulgaria's new cultural policy model
is still developing, but its most important elements are already in place:
Bulgaria/ 2. Competence,
decision-making and administration
2.1 Organisational structure
(organigram)
Bulgaria/ 2. Competence,
decision-making and administration
2.2 Overall description of the
system
At the national level,
responsibility for the formulation and implementation of cultural policies is
shared between the legislature (the National Assembly), and the executive
(the Council of Ministers). At the local level, cultural policies are
implemented by the bodies of local self-government.
The supreme central executive body
with the right to initiate legislation in the sphere of culture and formulate
the main principles of national cultural policy is the Ministry of Culture.
The Ministry of Culture is headed by
a Minister, Deputy Ministers and a Secretary General. The Office of the
Minister includes a Political Cabinet with Protocol Service and Public
Relations Service, and an Inspectorate. The Minister is advised mainly by a
Collegium and several expert councils representing various arts fields.
The Ministry consists of eleven
directorates, nine of which report to the deputy ministers: "Theatre,
Variety and Circus Arts", "Music and Dance", "Museums,
Galleries and Visual Arts", "Immovable Cultural Monuments' Preservation",
"Legal Affairs and Property Management", "Books and
Libraries", "Regional Cultural Activities", "Copyright and
Neighborhood Rights" and "European Integration and International
Co-operation".
The Secretary General is in charge
of two directorates responsible for: "Human Resources, Income Policy and
Administrative and Business Affairs" and "Strategies and Programmes,
Programme Budgeting, Financial Resources Management and Finance and Accounting
Services".
With the introduction of the new
Structural Regulation of the Ministry of Culture in June 2006, the Council of
Ministers transformed the existing national art centres, which had been
"hands-on" structures with an autonomous legal status and budget,
into Directorates (the National Music and Dance Centre, the National Centre of
Museums, Galleries and Visual Arts, the National Book Centre and the National
Theatre Centre). The reason given for this transformation was failure to
optimise the resource options in previous years. The centres had not been able
to raise any significant non-budget (external) funding and budget funds could
not be assigned only to independent experts or structures. "It is
necessary to more carefully allocate taxpayers' money in the operational
legislative regulations, while rendering an account of the reasonable security
and financial effectiveness" (Kr. Philipova, former director of the
National Theatre Centre and current director of the new Directorate).
The National Film Centre and the
National Institute of Monuments of Culture, which is in charge of the
protection of cultural landscapes, remain structures with an autonomous legal
status and budget.
The activities of the Agency and the
Institute are guided by a programme approved by the Minister of Culture,
supervised by a deputy minister and implemented by their respective directors.
The lower levels of cultural
competencies correspond to the constitutional division of territorial
administrative units: districts (oblast) and municipalities (obshtina).
The main unit of territorial administration is the municipality (of which there
are 262), which is legally autonomous, and has property rights and freedom of
association. At the municipal level, cultural competence is exercised in the
form of local self-government, including financial control which is distributed
among the respective municipal Councils on Culture.
Bulgaria/ 2. Competence,
decision-making and administration
2.3 Inter-ministerial or
intergovernmental co-operation
Along with the administrative
breakdown of cultural competence, there are inter-departmental commissions'
co-ordinating central government activities. Culture is just part of the
general competence of these commissions, which have been set up for other
fields such as education, foreign policy, youth, tourism, and ecology. There are
standing and interim interdepartmental commissions which have
consultative capacities and the right to initiate legislation. There is a
consultative Council on Cultural Affairs which reports to the President of the
Republic.
Since 1997, the National Council for
Ethnic and Demographic Issues (NCEDI), within the Council of Ministers, has
operated as a state and public body. According to Article 1 of the
NCEDA's regulations, the aim of NCEDI is "implementation of consultations
and cooperation and coordination between the government structures and
non-government organisations, aiming at the formation and realisation of a
national policy regarding ethnic and demographic issues and migration". In
2004 the NCEDI was transformed into the National Council for Interethnic
Interaction. http://www.ncedi.government.bg
Ad-hoc inter-ministerial groups are
established in relation to different projects, programmes and national
initiatives - e.g. Project Implementation Units (PIU) for EU funded programmes,
National Committees, National Councils and working groups.
The National Council on the
Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage was established in 2006. The
Council on Cultural Diversity was also established in 2006 and is mainly
in charge of integration of minorities. The Inter-ministerial Advisory Group on
the European Year of Intercultural Dialogue was established in April
2007.
Bulgaria/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.1 Overview of main structures
and trends
In recent years, the Republic of
Bulgaria's international cultural policy has been characterised by openness,
dialogue, and emphasis on integration into international cultural structures
and organisations. Bulgaria is open to European and world culture, and
encourages the promotion of the top achievements of national culture abroad in
various ways. The following are the main priorities of Bulgaria's international
cultural policy:
For more information see the
official web site of the Ministry of Culture http://www.mc.government.bg.
Up to 1 January 2007 and onwards,
Bulgarian international cultural policy has been focused on improving the legal
framework and active preparation for full participation in cultural matters at
EU level.
Bulgaria has been playing an
important role in mainstream political and cultural initiatives of the
governments of the SEE countries, in view of its increasing responsibilities as
a future EU member in the current regional context.
Bulgaria/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.2 Public actors and cultural
diplomacy
These agencies have elaborated a
long-lasting and fruitful collaboration both with the public and private sector
in culture. The cooperation projects vary from traditional forms of artistic
exchange (e.g. exhibitions, workshops, performances, touring etc.) to research
and cultural policy development.
In Bulgaria the most present ones are:
Institut culturel français et de cooperation, Goethe Institut, British Council,
Cervantes Institut (opened in 2005) and the Swiss Cultural Programme in
Bulgaria (Pro Helvetia) withdrew its grants program by the end of 2006, due to
the fact that Bulgaria joins the EU in 2007.
This active collaboration at
multiple levels brings up the Bulgarian cultural sector closer to the European
values and act not only as bilateral but also as multilateral instrument of
cultural diplomacy.
While performing its main tasks in
cultural diplomacy, the Ministry of Culture works in close collaboration with
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the National UNESCO Commission, foreign
representations (e.g. embassies, consulates, cultural institutes) etc.
Bilateral cultural co-operation
In the period 2001 - 2005, Bulgaria
concluded 79 bilateral agreements and protocols in the field of cultural
cooperation. This number includes cultural cooperation programmes covering
specific areas of the cultural sector e.g. cinema production, cultural heritage
etc.
Bulgaria has 10 cultural institutes
abroad, which were established as a result of bilateral agreements. They are
situated in European capital cities: Berlin, Bratislava, Budapest, Prague,
Moscow, Skopje, Warsaw, Vienna (the Haus Wittgenstein) and Paris. Since 1
October 2006, the Academia Bulgaria di Arte e Cultura, "Boris
Christoff" (a residency providing master classes to young Bulgarian opera
talents in Rome) will be included within the Bulgarian Cultural Institute in
Rome.
Bulgarian culture was presented in
Brussels and other Belgian cities during the four-month festival Europalia
- Bulgaria 2002. Participation in Europalia.Europa in
Belgium (October 2007-February 2008) is ongoing.
Memorandums and agreements have also
been signed for some major events of international scale e.g. large scale
exhibitions, residential programmes etc. More detailed information on the
international treaties is available in chapter
2.4.3.
Besides the annual state support for
international cultural cooperation through the budget of the Ministry of
Culture, other instruments are available e.g. the Communication Strategy for
the EU Accession of Bulgaria. It was launched in 2002 with the aim to
promote the new European image of Bulgaria, where cultural and artistic
initiatives have a core role. Through project subsidies allocated by the
government, via the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, public and private
organisations could participate in initiatives aimed at promoting Bulgarian
culture and civilisation in Europe, at disseminating EU values to the general
Bulgarian population.
Bulgaria/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.3 European / international
actors and programmes
Bulgaria participates in
multilateral cultural co-operation in several ways:
Title of international legal
instrument |
Year
of adoption, accession, ratification |
Entry
into force |
Convention for the Protection of
Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict with Regulations for the
Execution of the Convention - The Hague, 1954 |
Official
Gazette No. 24/07.11.1956 |
07.11.1956 |
Second Protocol to the Hague
Convention of 1954 for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of
Armed Conflict (1999) |
Ratification
14.06.2000 |
|
UNESCO Convention Concerning the
Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (1972) |
Accepted
on 07.03.1974 |
17.09.1975 |
UNESCO Convention on the Means of
Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of
Ownership of Cultural Property (1970) |
Ratification
15.09.1971 |
24.04.1972 |
Convention on the Protection of
the Underwater Cultural Heritage (2001) |
Official
Gazette No. 24/23.09.2003 |
Not
yet in force |
The Universal Copyright Convention
(1971) |
Accession
07.03.1973 |
07.06.1975 |
Convention for the Safeguarding of
the Intangible Cultural Heritage (2003) |
Official
Gazette, No. 12, 7.02.2006, Ratification 10.03.2006 |
10.06.2006 |
UNESCO Convention on the
Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions |
Official
Gazette, No. 97/01.12.2006, Ratification 18.12.2006 |
18.06.2007 |
European Cultural Convention (1954) |
Accession
09. 09. 1991 |
09.
09. 1991 |
European Convention for the Protection of the Architectural Heritage
of Europe (1985) |
Official
Gazette, No. 13/15.02.1991 Accession 31.01.1991 |
01.05.1991 |
European Convention on the
Protection of the Archaeological Heritage (Revised) -1992 |
Ratification,
Official Gazette, No. 30/1993 Ratification
02.06. 1993 |
25.05.
1995 |
European Convention for the
Protection of the Audiovisual Heritage and Protocol (2001) |
Signature
08.11.2001 |
Expected
entry into force 01.01.2008 |
27.04.2004 |
01.08.2004 |
|
European Convention on
Transfrontier Television (1989) |
03.03.1999 |
01.
07. 1999 |
European Landscape Convention
(2000) |
Official
Gazette, No 94/2004 Ratification
24.11.2004 |
01.03.2005 |
Council of Europe Framework
Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society (2005) |
Signed
on 27. 10. 2005 |
Not
yet in force |
In 2005, under the aegis of the
Bulgarian President and the Director General of UNESCO and the Secretary
General of the Council of Europe, the initiative for Cultural Corridors in
South-East Europe got under way. Launched at a summit held in Varna in 2005,
this process had a large regional outreach and resulted in a Strategy for
identifying, preserving, using and promoting cultural corridors of South-East
Europe in a sustainable manner (Opatija, Croatia, 1 June, 2006).
Bulgaria joined the EU's Culture
2000 Programme (2000-2004) in 2001. The European Integration Department, at the
Ministry of Culture's European Integration and International Cultural
Cooperation Directorate, is responsible for disseminating information about the
programme as well as consulting potential applications and co-ordinating
activities. The Euro-Bulgarian Cultural Centre also provides assistance to
applicants wishing to apply for Culture 2000 funding.
As an accession country to the EU,
Bulgaria had official access to the programme for 2005-2006. After becoming a
full member in January 2007, Bulgaria will take part in the New Communities
Programmes and respectively in Culture (2007-2013), Europe for Citizens, Media
and Life-Long Learning.
During the period 2001-2006, 74
projects with Bulgarian participation were approved under the Culture 2000
programme (total of annual, multi annual and literary translation projects with
Bulgarian leader, co-organizer and associated partner). Out of these there were
21 Bulgarian leaders, 38 co-organisers and 7 associated partners. Ten were
multi-annual projects (with Bulgarian leaders or co-organisers altogether).
Bulgaria joined the MEDIA II
Programme in 2000, winning grants for two projects. In 2002, the country joined
the MEDIA Plus Programme, and in 2004 a National MEDIA Desk was opened as a
separate administrative body of the National Film Centre Executive Agency.
During the period 2003-2006, 93 projects with Bulgarian participation were
approved by the programme, amounting in total to 1 014 120 euro
(excl. media training).
Bulgaria joined the MEDIA II
Programme in 2000, winning grants for two projects. In 2002, the country joined
the MEDIA Plus Programme, and in 2004 a National MEDIA Desk was opened as a
separate administrative body of the National Film Centre Executive Agency.
During the period 2003-2005, 84 projects with Bulgarian participation were
approved by the programme, amounting in total to 1 168 766 euro.
The participation of Bulgarian
professionals in training under the Media Training Programme, for the period
2003-2005, was enabled by 21 successful projects, which were granted
24 146 euro and 2 329 BGN (a total of 25 337 euro).
In June 2003, Bulgaria was among the
first countries in the region of South-East Europe to join the Regional
Programme for Natural and Cultural Heritage in SEE (RPSEE) organised by the
Council of Europe and the European Commission (with support from the Culture
2000 programme). By the end of 2004, the 1st Component an "Institutional
Capacity Building Plan" was accomplished. Since then, the process under
the 2nd Component (Integrated Plan for Rehabilitation Projects) provides
opportunities for the establishment of improved political and professional
foundations, as an argument for future partnership initiatives, for carrying
out reconstruction and conservation works and investment projects. As a result
of the RPSEE, an Assessment Report of the Architectural and Archaeological
Heritage in Bulgaria was accomplished, and a Priority Intervention List (PIL)
of cultural monuments was adopted.
Being a full member of the
Francophone Community since 1993, Bulgaria carries out a number of activities
in this framework, which are an intrinsic part of multilateral cultural
cooperation. As such, the country is regularly, and actively, involved in
francophone initiatives on the international scene - in artistic, political and
expert formats (including the debates on the drafting and the ratification of
the UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of
Cultural Expressions). Main activities are organised during the annual
celebration of 20th March, the International Francophone Day.
The Council of Ministers of Culture
in SEE was established in March 2005,
in Copenhagen with the aim of contributing to improving the external visibility
of the region (inspired by the Nordic Council model). The Charter on the establishment
of the Council has been signed by Albania, Bulgaria, Greece, Croatia, FYROM,
Romania, Serbia and Montenegro etc. The Presidency of the Council is arranged
on a rotating principle, in alphabetic order. Cultural diversity is considered
a defining factor; therefore constructive collaboration in the cultural policy
field and the spirit of dialogue are key foundations for further developing
South East Europe as an area of political and economic stability. Bulgaria
holds the Presidency for the period 1 April 2006 - 31 March 2007 and, as such,
it hosted the Second meeting of the Ministers of Culture (Varna, June 2006)
where the Opatija Strategy (see above) was approved and an Action Plan for its
implementation was adopted.
The Ministry of Culture is responsible
for its implementation in cooperation with other relevant bodies (e.g. the
Bulgarian National UNESCO Commission).
Bulgaria/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.4 Direct professional
co-operation
The Culture Programme of the
European Cultural Foundation and the ECUMEST Association operated in Bulgaria
from 2001 to 2005. The programme developed a regional pool of experts in
cultural policy-making and in research, thus ensuring a long term network and
dialogue among the stakeholders in the field.
Initiatives of the private sector in
the arts are ongoing within the existing international networks. Although not a
part of the official national policy instruments, these exchanges contribute a
great extent to the image of Bulgarian contemporary arts abroad. Festivals,
workshops, international exchanges in performing arts, media, film, visual arts
etc. are run mainly by NGOs and supported by international funding.
Bulgaria/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.5 Cross-border intercultural
dialogue and co-operation
Cultural cooperation is incorporated
in the existing PHARE-CBC grant schemes with all neighbouring countries
(Serbia, Macedonia, Greece, Turkey and Romania). The most successful of these
schemes are those in the fields of cultural heritage, traditional arts and
crafts, and youth exchange.
Bulgarian individuals and
organisations are eligible for the existing international mobility programmes.
The US Artslink programme encourages and supports the exchange of
artists and cultural managers between the United States and Central Europe,
Russia and Eurasia (residencies, projects). Between 2001 and 2006, 8 Bulgarian
artists and managers received support for residencies in the United States.
For more information, see our Intercultural Dialogue section.
Bulgaria/ 2.4 International cultural
co-operation
2.4.6 Other relevant issues
A special policy under the Ministry
of Culture is directed towards the Bulgarian diaspora in Serbia (Western
Outskirts), Ukraine, Moldova and Kosovo. Donations of books and materials in
the Bulgarian language are provided. Theatre performances, exhibitions and
other cultural activities are organised.
Large scale international events -
such as festivals, competitions and other cultural manifestations - are held in
the majority of the big cities in Bulgaria. They are all included in the National
Cultural Calendar, published annually by the Ministry of Culture on their
website: http://www.mc.government.bg.
Most of the cultural events are organised by the local / regional authorities,
in close cooperation with NGOs and agencies. The organisers apply for project
subsidies to the Ministry of Culture, but the largest part of their budgets
comes from local sources (municipalities, districts and private funding).
International participation in events is supported and facilitated, to a great
extent, by embassies and foreign cultural services.
Bulgaria/ 3. General objectives and
principles of cultural policy
3.1 Main elements of the current
cultural policy model
In the course of Bulgaria's transition
to democracy and a market economy, a series of cultural reforms have been
conducted in the past ten years, with the following objectives:
Decentralisation, regarded as the top priority at the start of transition,
has remained a controversial issue both for cultural circles and the general
public. At present, there are three sources of conflict:
The fiscal policy pursued by the
national government was a centralised model of budget financing with subsidies
equally shared among the existing networks and cultural institutions. In a
context of economic crisis and budget restrictions, this meant less and less
funds for their core activities and doomed some of the structures to de-professionalisation.
In the past few years the Ministry of Culture has started financing the
cultural activities of these institutions on a competitive basis, which makes
it possible to provide differentiated support to the individual cultural
institutions, depending on their contribution to culture and the artistic and
economic results of their activities. This new way of financing is based on the
transfer of part of the state subsidies for cultural institutions to concrete
creative projects on the basis of equal treatment of applicants.
In recent years, joint financing -
by the national and municipal budget - of theatres, opera houses and
philharmonic orchestras has been a definite achievement. However, due to the
permanent financial problems of the municipalities it has been difficult to
reach agreements with the Ministry of Culture on their contributions, and
municipalities do not always keep their part of the deal. That is why
developing local cultural policies and strategies still remains a good intention
rather than a fact. Cinema and literature have no state-subsidised
structures-state subsidies are rather granted to individual projects on the
basis of competitive bidding.
Bulgaria/ 3. General objectives and
principles of cultural policy
3.2 National definition of culture
The Protection and Development of
Culture Act defines culture as
"the activity associated with
the creation, study, dissemination and protection of cultural values, as well
as the results of this activity".
This definition applies to culture
in the narrow sense and tends to serve cultural institutions, the arts and
activities associated with them. Culture in the broader sense, related to
humans and human development at large, is an important aspect of the quality of
life. In the present period of transition, culture may become a main propellant
of democratisation and a mainstay of civil society.
Bulgaria/ 3. General objectives and
principles of cultural policy
3.3 Cultural policy objectives
Bulgaria is still at the beginning
of the road towards democratisation of culture, but on the whole its national
cultural policy objectives overlap with the principles of cultural development
observed by the Council of Europe and EU member states:
Bulgaria/ 4. Current issues in
cultural policy development and debate
4.1 Main cultural policy issues and
priorities
Bulgaria's national cultural policy
priorities include:
EU accession as a major general
policy objective poses great challenges to national cultural policy. While
leading into all-European cultural processes, Bulgaria's cultural policy must,
at the same time, strengthen the place of Bulgarian culture in Europe by
preserving its national identity and values. Cultural policy aims to support
the creation, protection and dissemination of cultural values, as well as to
create an environment which promotes and protects cultural diversity, freedom
and creativity.
The Ministry of Culture co-operates
with other government institutions in the sphere of education, environment,
tourism, sports, etc., as well as with numerous NGOs and community associations
to achieve these cultural policy objectives. Balancing the interests of
national art centres, local government, NGOs and the different professional
cultural associations has been the guiding principle of recent policy.
The Ministry of Culture's current
concept of cultural policy formulation and implementation puts special emphasis
on the subsidiarity principle, which presupposes shared obligations and
responsibilities for the common good among institutions and citizens not only
and not simply in their capacity as taxpayers, but through voluntary
contribution of part of their time, energy and imagination. In the transition
period the idea of subsidiarity helps to create a new type of community rather
than chaos, as the state eventually relinquishes its leading role.
Bulgaria/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.1 Cultural minorities, groups
and communities
The Tables 1 and 2 below provide
data on the population breakdown in Bulgaria and derived from the most recent
population census (2001).
Table 1:
Population by ethnic group and mother tongue, 2001
|
By
ethnic group |
By
mother tongue |
Bulgarian |
6 655 000 |
6 697 000 |
Turkish |
747 000 |
763 000 |
Gypsies (roma) |
371 000 |
328 000 |
Others |
69 000 |
71 000 |
Non stated |
62 000 |
45 000 |
Total |
7 929 000 |
7 929 000 |
Source:
Population census 2001
Ethnic group: "Community of people, related to each other by origin
and language, and close to each other by mode of life and culture";
Mother tongue: "The language which a person speaks best and which is
usually used for communication in the family (household)".
Table 2:
Population by religion, 2001
Religion |
Total
number |
Christian (East Orthodox, Catholic
and Protestant) |
6 639 000 |
Moslem (Sunni and Shiite) |
967 000 |
Unknown |
25 000 |
Not stated |
283 000 |
Others |
15 000 |
Total |
7 929 000 |
Source:
Population census 2001
Religion: "Membership, determined historically, of a person or
his parents and grandparents to a given group with certain religious
views".
The Parliament ratified the
Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (Council of
Europe) in 1999.
In the course of the National Debate
on Bulgarian Cultural Policy, held in 1998, the executive and NGOs stressed
their common view of minority culture as an integral part of the national
cultural heritage.
Despite its limited budget, the
Ministry of Culture offers financial support to projects such as the Roma
Cultural and Information Centre, the Roma Musical Theatre, festivals and
projects of different cultural groups, etc. A Public Council on Cultural
Diversity has been established at the Ministry as an expert consultative body.
In 2006, the Department for Cultural Integration, Ministry of Culture organised
several regional workshops for government and non-government experts working in
the field of culture on issues related to cultural integration of ethnic
minorities. These seminars were undertaken in cooperation with the individual
municipalities and chitalistas (cultural houses). The programme of each seminar
was adapted to the specific needs of the region.
NGOs such as the Open Society
Foundation, the Interethnic Initiative for Human Rights, SEGA, and the International
Centre for Minority Studies and Intercultural Relations, provide support for
periodicals, media events and live performances of various cultural groups.
This support is given on the basis of results from sociological surveys, which
have shown that minority cultural groups are increasingly consumers rather than
just producers of cultural products. That is one of the reasons why in early
2003, two state cultural institutes were founded in regions with large Turkish
communities: the Kadrie Lyatifova Institute in Kurdjali and the Nazim Hikmet
Institute in Razgrad. Their mission is to create and stage musical, dance and
theatre productions; to preserve elements of Turkish identity such as language,
traditions and cultural heritage; and to promote intercultural tolerance and
dialogue.
An important development was the
creation of a National Council of Ethnic and Demographic Issues (NCEDI) within
the Council of Ministers Decree No 449 on the 4.12.1997, which included
representatives from various minority cultural groups. In 2004, the NCEDI was
transformed into the National Council for Interethnic Interaction. The Council
is working on the development of a national policy in consultation with
different government agencies and non-governmental organisations. The non-government
organisations from the minorities sector are critical of the Council in
relation to its limited legal powers - it is only a consultative body, without
power to impose sanctions where infringements occur. The integration of
cultural minorities has been identified as a national priority along with
decentralisation of support for their education. Local level Councils for
Ethnic and Demographic Issues have also been established in the different
regions and include representatives of the respective local minority cultural
communities. (see: http://www.ncedi.government.bg).
In 2005, the NCEDI granted funding
to projects related to minorities in the amount of 143 000 BGN, from
which:
An internet portal regarding ethnic
minorities was created (http://www.ethnos.bg),
with the support of the Council and with the participation of the "Open
Society- Sofia" and the Bulgarian Helsinki Committee. The objective of the
portal is to be a communication forum between the donor organisations and their
beneficiaries. The portal is oriented towards NGOs working in the area of
minority issues, law enforcement NGOs, government institutions - ministries and
regional agencies, district and municipal councils on ethnic and demographic
issues, and the media. It provides information about basic documents, which set
the framework for the minorities' integration processes, about legislation,
about donor programmes, information about minority NGOs, international
organisations, media, universities, projects in Bulgaria, and studies of
minorities.
The Ministry of Culture, the Nesebar
and Varna Municipalities provide support for the annual 3-day "Ethnos
Festival". The festival takes place in both municipalities and its main
objectives are to present the culture of the various ethnic communities located
in these areas and to support their development and preservation. The following
actors are involved in the organisation of the festival: the Varna Community
Center "Chitalishte Hristo Botev", the United Arts School Nesebar as
well as the cultural organisations of the different ethnic communities.
Roma
In 2004, a government "Action
Plan" was adopted for implementing the "Decade of Roma
Inclusion" (2005-2015) and a budget of 37 622 000 euro is
expected for the duration of this programme. The Programme "Decade of Roma
Inclusion" is an initiative adopted by eight countries in Central and
Southeast Europe and supported by the international community. It represents
the first cooperative effort to change the lives of Roma in Europe. An action
framework for governments, the Decade will monitor progress in accelerating
social inclusion and improving the economic and social status of Roma across
the region. The international community is supporting the Decade. This includes
the Open Society Institute, the World Bank, the European Commission, United
Nations Development Program, the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in
Europe, Council of Europe, and most importantly, Roma leadership, including
international Roma organisations (for further information look for the website http://www.romadecade.org).
Another important element concerns
an amendment to the Media Act, which eliminates the danger of
regionalisation of minority culture, i.e. the creation of ethnic regions by
means of radio and TV broadcasts as a prelude to ethnic-based territorial
differentiation.
The National Framework Programme on
Equal Integration of Roma into Bulgarian Society adopted in 1999 is the most
important measure concerning minority cultural groups. This programme resulted
from an agreement between several dozen Roma organisations and a government
representative, and was adopted by a Council of Ministers resolution. The
Framework Programme identifies several priorities:
The active participation of the Roma
community in elaborating and implementing the Programme is of crucial
importance.
In 2005, the Open Society Institute
- Sofia continued to support the development of a network of Roma community
centres, by strengthening their capacity to organise advocacy campaigns. Ten
advocacy campaigns took place under the project, including campaigns for equal
access to education, introducing access to health mediators - as one of the
social services provided by municipalities, improving housing in Roma
neighborhoods, etc.
Bulgaria/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.2 Language issues and policies
According to the Constitution of the
Republic of Bulgaria, the official language is Bulgarian. The issue of
"mother tongues" (the term "minority language" is not used
in the Bulgarian Constitution, which regards "mother tongue" as the
more relevant term) is addressed in two specific laws. The first concerns radio
and TV broadcasting, regulated by the Radio and Television Act [Article 12
(2)], which lists the cases in which programmes may be broadcast in a
language other than the official one: 1) when they are aired for educational
purposes and 2) when they are designed for Bulgarian citizens whose mother
tongue is not Bulgarian. The second addresses the status of "mother tongue"
as a subject in Bulgarian schools, regulated by the National Education Act [Article 8
(2)] and the Syllabus and Minimum Comprehensive Education Act [Article 15
(3)]. According to the provisions of the first Act, students whose mother
tongue is not Bulgarian are entitled to mother tongue tutoring in municipal
schools, with the state providing protection and exercising control; the second
Act defines "mother tongue" as a "compulsory optional
subject", which means that if students want to study their mother tongue,
the municipality or the state is obliged to provide them with this opportunity.
Public debate was mainly focused on
the previous Act and was related to the possibilities of municipalities to
provide the necessary resources and qualified trainers. Separately,
nationalistic oriented citizens and media were disputing the necessity of news
broadcasting in Turkish on BNT, but these voices did not get wide public
support.
Bulgaria/ 4.3 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.3 Intercultural dialogue:
actors, strategies, programmes
In Bulgaria, the National Council
for Co-operation on Ethnic and Demographic Issues (NCCEDI), under the aegis of
the Council of Ministers, is the main national level institution which is
responsible for coordinating policies related to intercultural dialogue. It
facilitates cooperation between state bodies and NGOs of different minority
groups and considers policy proposals submitted by other Ministry departments.
Following approval by the Council of Ministers, the NCCEDI monitors, analyses
and coordinates measures aimed to:
Regional Councils on ethnic and
demographic issues are being created within the administrative structures of
district governments. They are responsible for implementing nationally approved
measures in their relevant district / region, as well as for developing
relevant regional strategies and programmes.
The NCCEDI receives annual funding,
from the Council of Minister's budget, to support organisations of ethnic
minority groups and their activities. The following types of projects are
eligible for funding:
In 2004, the National Council
adopted the "Strategy for Educational Integration of Children and Students
from Ethnic Minority Groups". This strategy and follow-up action
plans were developed by the Ministry of Education and Science for the school
years 2004/2005 and 2008/2009. For more specific information on the strategy
and the action plan see: http://www.ncedi.government.bg/MoES-STRATEGY.htm
and http://www.ncedi.government.bg/1_Action%PlanStrategyBGL.htm
One of the conclusions reported on
in the national strategy is that "the history and culture of minorities
are insufficiently presented" in the general school curricula. Activities
designed to address this deficiency are outlined in the National Action Plan:
Both the national strategy and
action plan were drawn up on the basis of a report conducted by the
International Centre for the Study of Minorities and Cultural Interaction,
available from: http://www.imir-bg.org.
Culture plays a key role in the
National Action Plan on the Roma Inclusion Decade (2005-2015). The main purpose
of this action plan is to achieve sustainable and cultural integration of the
Roma people in Bulgarian society. The following activities have been envisaged:
The authorities responsible for
realising these activities are: the Ministry of Culture, the NCCEDI, the
Folklore Institute under the Bulgarian Academy of Science and non-governmental
organisations.
For more information, see:
Database of Good Practice on Intercultural Dialogue and our
Intercultural Dialogue section.
For more information on the
government's National Strategy for the European Year of Intercultural Dialogue
please see: http://ec.europa.eu/culture/eac/dialogue/strategies_en.html
Bulgaria/ 4.3 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.4 Social cohesion and cultural
policies
In Bulgaria, social cohesion is a
priority, in which cultural components have multiple inputs at central and
local levels, through various actions and projects implemented by institutions,
local authorities and NGOs.
An example of a large campaign was
the 2005 European Year of Citizenship through Education, lead by the
Ministry of Education but in close collaboration with all the parties concerned
(see chapter
8.3.2 for details or visit http://www.citizenship-bg.org/en/index.html).
There is no consolidated information
about the development and implementation of public policies to promote social
cohesion at national and regional levels, although multiple actions are taking
place. One of the exceptions is the annual conference on artists (painters)
with physical disabilities, organised by the municipality of Lovech.
The theatre is seen as a resource
which can help disabled children to integrate into society, by giving them
skills to overcome isolation, to improve their self-confidence and feelings of
self-worth, as well as to provide them with a greater network of social
contacts. The non-governmental sector is taking the first steps towards the
implementation of different initiatives in this context. The establishment of
the Foundation "Avanstage" is one example. Since 2000, it has been
involved in the international programme of the Madrid based Institute for
Mediterranean Theatre. In 2003, Avanstage carried out a national workshop
entitled "The Different Theatre", for disabled children and young
people. In 2004, it supported the participation of 7 disabled young people (from
Kardjali) in the International Theatre Workshop, held in Montpellier, France.
In 2005, two theatre workshops were organised in the sea-side resort of
"Albena", for children and youth associated with specialised centres
for disabled people, from 15 Bulgarian municipalities. In 2006, an
international conference was to be held on issues related to integrating
disabled people.
Bulgaria/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.5 Media pluralism and content
diversity
Bulgaria has state- and
private-owned radio stations and television networks providing national
coverage, as well as numerous private radio and television stations providing
local news coverage. Cultural events and issues of international, national and
local relevance are covered extensively in their programmes. Both the
state-owned and private electronic media have numerous, mainly weekly,
programmes for minority cultural groups. For example, the daily Turkish news
programme broadcast by the Bulgarian National Television.
According to the regulations of Article 71
of the Radio and Television Act, BNR (Bulgarian National Radio) and BNT
(Bulgarian National Television) should provide assistance to the creation and
dissemination of national audio and audiovisual productions:
The Radio and Television Fund was
created by Article 98 of the Radio and Television Act. The
money made available to the Fund is raised by:
Resources collected via the Fund are
to be used for the financing of:
There is a lack of transparency of
media ownership and capital in the commercial broadcasting sector, with no
public register of ownership. The provisions on media ownership in the Law
on Radio and Television (1998) - and also the Telecommunications Law
(2003) and the Law for the Protection of Competition (1998)
- aim to prevent broadcasters from monopolizing or even dominating the market.
In practice, however, there are no effective anti-monopoly regulatory
mechanisms.
Two articles in the Law on Radio
and Television refer to the monopoly prevention:
Article 105 (4) The following shall be ineligible to apply for a license:
.... 9. any telecommunications operators placed in a monopoly situation on the
market;
Article 108. Upon submission of documents for the granting of licenses
under Article 111, the applicants shall declare that they do not
hold any interests, shares or rights of any other kind to participation in
radio and television operators, in excess of the permissible limit, according
to the anti-trust legislation of the Republic of Bulgaria. (The Competition
Protection Act defines the concentration of economic activity, and the Commercial
Law regulates the procedures for transformation of companies).
Up to now (2006), no measures have
been taken to combat concentration in the media sector, even if the issue is
being actively discussed between the media experts. One of the discussion
panels at a seminar for radio and television activities' regulation, held in
June 2004 by the Council for Electronic Media, and with the support of the
Council of Europe, was devoted to concentration in the media sector. The
circumstances in Bulgaria had developed mainly a vertical system of
concentration - the telecommunication operator, in the majority of cases, is an
owner both of a television and of a radio channel, of the studio complex, of
the broadcasting equipment, of the transmitting cable network - i.e. of the
entire chain for media broadcasting.
The seminar concluded that there is
a deficit of media concentration regulation and that it is in the public
interest that regulation should be a compulsory part of the Radio and Television
Act.
There is no available statistical
data on the correlation between imported and locally produced programmes in
Bulgaria. The Radio and Television Act sets the programming quotas:
there must be at least 50% of the total annual programme time for European and
Bulgarian programming, excluding newscasts, sports shows, game shows on radio
and TV, commercials and the radio and TV market, when that is practically
possible.
The NGO Centre for Social Practices
has been working for two years on a project called "Voices of Exclusion: Minority
Empowerment Through the Media", which includes a series of training
seminars for minority communities - Turks, Roma and Muslim Bulgarians - that
are conducted in the country's mixed regions. The aim of the project is to
empower minorities and facilitate dialogue via media programmes, thereby
inserting their agendas into the public debate and sensitising decision-makers.
The project provides a one year training programme for students from these
groups to become leaders, to put together production teams - and most of all -
to learn how to communicate their messages via the media. The goal is to help
them to be understood; for their messages to be read, watched and listened to
with the hoped effect of generating support for their cause. It is very important
that the real voices of the Turks, Roma and Bulgarian Muslims are heard and
understood by the others.
The training programme is made up of
300 school hours taught in 11 units (each of them lasting three days). The
"Voice Of Exclusion" project is financed by the EuropeAid programme
of the EU.
The press is entirely privately
owned and provides the widest coverage available on public debates on reforms
in the field of culture. Recent issues reported on have included reforms in the
theatre, the Protection and Development of Culture Act, the Media Act,
production of pirated CDs, cultural heritage protection, etc.
Bulgaria/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.6 Culture industries: policies
and programmes
There is no official definition of
"cultural industries", but the following formulations are mentioned
in the public speeches of the Deputy Minister of culture: "Cultural
industries refers to industries producing and distributing cultural goods or
services; those industries which have their origin in individual creativity,
skill and talent and which have a potential for wealth and job creation through
the generation and exploitation of intellectual property".
In the past few years, the culture
industries in Bulgaria have been increasingly perceived as a sector with an
important contribution to local, regional and national development, and an
impact on the local labour market.
A Council of Europe funded pilot project
on "Cultural Diversity and Cultural Enterprise" was launched in
Bulgaria in 2001. This project - implemented in close co-operation with the
Euro-Bulgarian Cultural Centre - was designed to analyse Bulgaria's potential
in the sphere of culture industries and identify possibilities for their
development. Culture industries include traditional industries (radio and
television, recording industry, film-making and publishing), as well as
cultural activities which are on the boundary between traditional arts and new
flexible forms of creativity in the media, advertising and design.
Stage two of this project (carried
out in 2002) targeted media and enterprise in this field; developing specific
models of funding and, in the longer term, creating an agency for the
development of the culture industries.
The development of culture
industries at the regional and local level is also a priority in projects under
the PHARE Economic and Social Integration Programme (education and
establishment of information centres for the Roma population). In the period
2003-2004, 19 regional projects were implemented under PHARE (BG 0102.03) -
"Development of Cultural Tourism in Bulgaria" with a total budget of
4 726 000 euro.
The film industry relies on state
subsidies and support from foundations, international organisations and
sponsors. Most co-productions are with European countries (especially Germany,
France and Greece). The Ministry of Culture's National Film Centre Executive
Agency is in charge of the allocation of state subsidies on a competitive
basis. The Centre's main partner is the Bulgarian National Television, which
sets aside part of its budget for Bulgarian film production.
There are several private film
distributing companies, three of which - Sunny Films, Alexandra Films
and Duga Films - are the Bulgarian partners of the top seven
international film distribution companies.
In the period 2001-2004 the
Ministry's National Book Centre promoted the publishing of non-commercial
Bulgarian and translated literature. The Book Aid Programme (created in 1991)
has supported publishers of certain types of literature on a competitive basis:
contemporary Bulgarian literature and literary heritage; Bulgarian human
studies, reference works and encyclopaedias, and translated human studies
literature. The Programme has supported 230 projects with a budget of BGN
412 707. There are partnership programmes with the French, German and
British cultural institutes to support the publication of translated
literature.
In 1995, the Open Society Institute
(Budapest) launched a project supporting the translation of works in human
studies and social sciences in Bulgaria. This ongoing project has provided
support for the translation and publishing of 124 titles proposed by more than
40 publishing houses.
Bulgaria's major recording companies
have licensing contracts with international companies such as Sony, PolyGram,
BMG and EMI, and exercise strict control over the copyright of authors,
producers and performers.
In 2005, a research project entitled
"The Creative Industries in Plovdiv - an Economic Perspective" was
carried out with the support of the British Council and its goal was to map the
creative industries in the town.
In 2006, a new research project
entitled "The Economic Contribution of Copyright-based Industries in
Bulgaria" was assigned by the Ministry of Culture to a working group
involving university lecturers and experts in collaboration with the WIPO
(World Intellectual Property Organisation).
This survey is the first
comprehensive study of the contribution of copyright and related rights-based
industries (copyright-based industries) to the Bulgarian economy and was
conducted in the period August 2006 - February 2007.
The collected CI economic data for
2003 and 2005 allows for additional specialised analyses of different segments
of the copyright-based industries, including in-depth analyses of the most
successful and rapidly developing sectors of software, publishing and printing,
and film industries. This data is also a good basis for future comparisons on a
national and international scale.
Table 3:
Contribution of the copyright-based industries to the GDP in 2005
|
Total
in BGN |
Share
of total gross output |
Share
of GDP |
Gross output of the core copyright
industries |
2 498 559 000 |
2.71% |
- |
Total gross output created in
economic activities related to copyright and related rights in Bulgaria |
4 155 101 000 |
4.51% |
- |
Total gross output |
92 132 091 000 |
100.00% |
- |
Added value of the core copyright
industries |
672 270 000 |
1.91% |
1.57% |
Added value created in economic
activities related to copyright and related rights in Bulgaria |
1 204 229 000 |
3.42% |
2.81% |
Total gross added value |
35 220 410 000 |
100.00% |
- |
Total GDP |
42 797 407 000 |
- |
100.00% |
Source:
"The Economic Contribution of Copyright-based Industries in
Bulgaria", 2006.
For the period 2003-2005, the survey
identified that the gross value added derived from the current prices index
grew by 50% over three years only, which exceeded the growth rates of the
economy as a whole (11.5%). If favorable conditions continued and the sector
received adequate public support, it might become one of the engines of the
Bulgarian economic development in near future.
Employment in the sector of
copyright-based industries
In 2005, 104 814 people in
Bulgaria were employed in economic activities related to copyright and related
rights, almost one in every 20 people employed. 55 861 people worked in
the core copyright-based industries only, i.e. more than half of the people
employed in the sector.
A fast increase in the number of
people employed in copyright-based industries is registered for the period
2003-2005. The growth rate exceeds more than three times the growth of
employment in the economy as a whole.
Book publishing and print and Software and databases are the two largest core
copyright-based industries - they both contributed 0.51% each to the gross
value added in the country in 2005.
The second fastest developing sector
is Software and databases - it registers growth of 93%. The third fast
developing sector is Architecture which falls into the category of
partial copyright-based industries. During the surveyed period, it showed a
growth in value added by +81% taking into account the inflation, a growth in
gross product by 23% and 16% of growth in employment.
The exported goods and services of
the Publishing and printing industry amounted to between euro 5.45 million
and euro 6.84 million a year for the period 2003-2005 while the imports grew
steadily and the increase for 2005 only was 68%.
It is obvious that the first
successes in the fight against intellectual piracy and the strengthening of the
legislation in this field have resulted in a triple increase in payments made
abroad while the income from rights and licenses in Bulgarian products of
intellectual property remains at a constant level.
With the share of value added of the
core copyright-based industries in 2003 equal to 1.3% of the GDP, Bulgaria
ranks last among the 19 states that have conducted surveys applying this
methodology (after Greece and Portugal).
Based on the project results, the
following recommendations can be outlined:
For more information on the research
project entitled "The Economic Contribution of Copyright-based
Industries in Bulgaria".
Bulgaria/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.7 Employment policies for the
cultural sector
National statistics record the
number of employed persons by branches of the economy. The problem is in the
nomenclature of the different branches. For example, individuals working in the
cultural sector are included in the employment data of both "Culture and
Information" and "Leisure and Sports" (average annual number of
employed). It is currently not possible to disaggregate the figures below.
Table 4:
Employment in the cultural sector, 1998-2003
|
Culture
and information |
Leisure
and sports |
1998 |
||
Total employed |
41 286 |
11 145 |
No. employed in the private sector |
23 566 |
6 578 |
1999 |
||
Total employed |
40 724 |
10 737 |
No. employed in the private Sector |
23 546 |
6 452 |
2000 |
||
Total employed |
33 785 |
11 441 |
No. employed in the private sector |
18 105 |
6 663 |
2002 |
Culture** |
|
Total employed |
28 777 |
|
No. employed in the private sector |
11 218 |
|
2003 |
Culture** |
|
Total employed |
28 980 |
|
No. employed in the private sector |
11 141 |
Source:
Statistical Yearbook, National Statistical Institute.
* Since
the National Statistical Institute has changed its classification for
"Culture and
Information" and
"Leisure and Sports", there is no data available for 2001.
**
For the period 2002 - 2003 the National Statistical Institute (NSI) submitted
not-yet-published
data only
on the "Culture" section.
The main issues regarding employment
in the cultural sector are low payments / salaries and a declining number of
state-subsidised cultural institutions. This has prompted many gifted young
people to emigrate in search of better working conditions abroad.
In 2003, the average monthly salary
in the cultural sector, according to the information from the NSI, was 231.91
BGN. The average salary in the "education sector" was 261.06 BGN, and
206.09 BGN in the "social services sector".
In 2003, the "Employment in
support of the Bulgarian Theatre" programme was introduced as a joint
project of the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy and the Union of Actors in
Bulgaria. This programme provides employment options for persons on longer term
contracts which have been made redundant including: actors; theatre-craftsmen;
property, stage and lighting workers - all those with a specific experience,
knowledge and skills. These persons can be re-employed by the theatres
for a fixed period (one year) and be paid a fixed minimum salary including
social insurance. This is a very important programme. During the reform of the
Bulgarian theatre sector, the number of the theatres remained the same while
the number of jobs / positions were considerably decreased (from 3 400 in
1996 to 1 850 in 2003). These reforms created serious disruptions to the
theatres as several positions were merged and qualified staff were let go. In
2004 the Programme provided employment to 240 professionals through a financial
contribution of 451 440 BGN. In 2005 the programme included 437
unemployed theatre specialists from all Bulgarian municipalities, with the
involvement of both state and municipal theatres.
Bulgaria/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.8 New technologies and cultural
policies
A three-year joint project was
established by the Ministry of Culture and the UNDP programme "Community
Development and Participation through the Chitalishte Network" (a
follow-up of the 1997-2000 project on "Community Participation and
Development in Bulgaria"). It has been supported by the Dutch Government's
Matra Programme and USAID. This project was designed to increase the public
role of the Chitalishte (community culture clubs) as traditional
cultural and educational centres in Bulgaria, and to offer effective models for
their modernisation and participation in local community life. Three hundred Chitalishte
are permanent partners of the project, and another 600 are involved in a
broader range of activities. There are 25 Internet centres in Chitalishte located
in smaller population centres, which offer computer literacy courses and help
overcome the information inequality among the inhabitants of Bulgaria.
The Ministry of Culture is actively
involved in one of the axes of development in the Information Society for
All Programme - "building a civil society and democratic thinking
through art and culture" - by networking 11 regional, 16 municipal and 40
large Chitalishte libraries. Access to the network will enable
interactive communication with Bulgaria's libraries, museums, art galleries and
media. Public libraries will thus complement the educational system by helping
children and young people acquire basic knowledge and skills of searching for
and analysing information. The rich multimedia resources available during
after-school activities will help overcome children's unequal opportunities for
access to new technologies. Numerous foreign surveys show that children benefit
in both academic and social terms from easy access to various information and
communication technologies from an early age. Early acquisition of skills of
self-learning in libraries will give children a more complete education and
additional skills that will enable them to study alone as they grow up.
In 2002, the National Culture Fund
held a competition for funding music information sharing, as well as the
creation and maintenance of an information database and Web page of Bulgarian
music culture and authentic folklore. A link between all NFC funded pages and
databases with the web-site of the Euro-Bulgarian Centre was made, in order to
facilitate access to information about the Bulgarian music culture.
Since 2002, the National Music and
Dance Center has been supporting a series of 6 educational concerts of the
"Ensemble for electro-acoustic music - EEM", which presents
electronic arrangements of classical works and contemporary electro-accoustic
pattern pieces to young people. In the framework of the annual "New
Bulgarian Music Festival", a concert with works of Bulgarian composers of
electronic-music is included.
Bulgaria/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.9 Heritage issues and policies
The present Monuments of Culture
and Museums Act (1969) states two main groups of monuments that are
described as movable and immovable. This regulatory differentiation is due to
the different modes, procedures and proponents of movable and immovable
monuments of cultural protection.
The total number of immovable
monuments of culture in 2006 was 39 547.
The movable monuments of culture
with the greatest scientific and cultural value are included in a National
Museum Stock. The stock register is kept at the "Museums, Galleries and
Fine Arts" Directorate of the Ministry of Culture.
State funding sources
The Republican budget, endorsed
each year by the Parliament, provides funding in the field of immovable
cultural heritage preservation, allocated in line with the following scheme:
1. Through the budget of the
Ministry of Culture
For each financial year, the
Ministry of Culture devises a proposal for the benchmarking of the state
subsidy funding for specific monuments and specific types of work that the
Minister of Culture approves. The following criteria for selection of monuments
to be included in the "State Assignment" have priority in the
proposal preparation:
2. Through the budget of the
Ministry of Finance, which
secures credits for investigation and protection of monuments of culture that
are covered by the allotted funding for the site.
3. Through the budget of the
municipalities - subsidy for specialised
activities for monuments of culture with local importance.
4. Through the "Religious Denominations"
Directorate with the Council of Ministers.
Regional and local government
funding sources
The financing of the local level
activities for preservation of architectural and archaeological heritage comes
from the following sources:
Annual Target Subsidy from the
Ministry of Culture - The
Minister of Culture concludes contracts with municipalities for the carrying
out of clearly specified activities on certain sites included in the programme
prepared in advance. The budget subsidy covers part of the expenditures under
that programme (generally between 50% - 80%), and the respective municipality
provides the balance.
Municipal budgets adopted every year by the Municipal Councils
Private funding and sponsors include the private owners of monuments, foundations,
national and international NGOs, including The Foundation "А. G.
Leventis", The World Monument Fund, the Headlеy Trust and The
Foundation "Messerschmidt".
Tax relief
The state extends tax relief to the
owners and users of immovable monuments of culture as compensation for the
specific restrictions on their rights and the specific obligations that they
have to assume. Building-monuments of culture are exempt from "tax on
buildings" provided that they are not used for economic purposes (in
compliance with Article 24 of the Local Taxes and Fees Act).
At present, tax relief and the
financial incentives for protection of the cultural and historic heritage are
quite limited.
The restoration and conservation
market is still in an embryonic state, and there is little, if any competition.
The status of the three forms of property (private, state and municipal) has
been regulated, but there are no financial incentives or tax relief for their
support. Experts are currently working on laws on moveable and immovable
monuments of culture which are expected to eliminate the shortcomings of the
system of heritage protection, control and funding. In the course of drafting
new legislation, a strategy has been designed on the development and
functioning of museums as an institution in the Bulgarian cultural landscape,
and this strategy requires establishing a national information system; control
and evaluation systems; a national cultural heritage register; and the
reconsideration of the quality, density and functioning of the existing museum
network, and its interconnection with other spheres such as tourism and
education.
While expecting the preparation of a
new law for cultural heritage, a civil movement for the protection of cultural
monuments was set up. The movement insists that: the laws and international
conventions, ratified by Bulgaria, should be strictly observed; the monuments
database to be updated and a system for free access should be created; the
maintenance and control on heritage protection should be decentralised; clear
rules and transparent procedures for public control should be determined;
individuals who had issued permission for construction works on cultural
monuments, or had been free of controls in this area, should be prosecuted.
Public access to heritage
The measures for the accessibility
and interpretation of heritage are directly related to its usage as a resource
for development and its preservation within the framework of a collective
process with a large number of participants-partners. From this point of view,
the following topical questions are the subject of public debate: how to
educate and raise awareness of the participants in the preservation process; how
to facilitate their access to heritage; how to interpret heritage in order to
improve the efficiency of its usage without causing risks to its cultural
value.
In the last eight years, access to
monuments has been encouraged by the European Heritage Days (1999 -
"Traditional Architecture", 2000 - "Cultural Routes", 2001
- "Children, Youth and Cultural Heritage", 2002 - "Different
Ethnic Communities and Religions - Common Heritage", 2003 - "Cultural
Landscapes", 2004 - "Cultural Tourism", 2005 -
"South-Еast Europe - Shared Heritage" and 2006 - "Heritage
in the Information Society"). The European Heritage Days arouse an
increasing interest, involving an increasingly wider range of participants of
all age groups. These Days successfully apply the model of partnership among
central and local government authorities, state and non-governmental
organisations, the public and private sectors, with the participation of the
media (regrettably, quite insufficient yet). Traditionally, during the European
Heritage Days museums are free, and the monuments which are undergoing
conservation are open to the public.
Access to heritage is still
insufficiently encouraged and facilitated by tourist information systems:
signs, information boards, etc. There are not enough websites and guides for
cultural routes and historic settlements. Tourist information regarding
privately owned cultural heritage properties is almost nonexistent. The number
of specialised projects for tourist visual communication has been steadily
increasing of late.
Raising awareness of young people
National policy takes into account
the need to raise young people's awareness of the cultural heritage. The
curricula generally include information on the monuments of culture, in
connection with the subjects of history of fine art, culturology, archeology,
journalism and mass communication. Beyond the educational system, different
formats for raising awareness of the cultural heritage properties are used:
participation in the Council of Europe projects "European heritage
class" and "Europe, from one street to the other", in scientific
and exploration expeditions to cultural heritage sites, conducting research on
different themes related to heritage etc.
Representatives of the central
authorities, non-governmental organisations and experts are preparing an open
network for the exchange of information and ideas, and for the improvement of
the state policy in this respect, in the spirit of Recommendation No R of the
Council of Europe regarding Heritage Education.
The bi-lingual (Bulgarian and
English) multimedia "Children and the Cultural Heritage of South-Eastern
Europe" was made in Bulgaria in 2006. The project, financed by the British
Council Bulgaria and implemented by the Cultural Tourism Association in partnership
with the University for Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy and the
Bulgarian Committee of ICOMOS was a first attempt to present, in a contemporary
IT format adapted for children, the cultural heritage of the countries in the
region. The product, the "Treasure Quest" game is
accessible on-line at the address - http://www.otkrivam.com.
On the occasion of the launching of
the site, in Sofia a working meeting-seminar took place entitled "Heritage
Pedagogy - Children and the Cultural Heritage of South-Eastern Europe".
During the seminar, discussions were held on the possibilities and the
prospects for associating young people to the values of heritage by way of the
contemporary information technologies.
In recent years, the national
movement "Bulgarian Heritage" organises the initiative "Preserve
the Bulgarian Heritage" with the participation of students and pupils from
all over the country who work on national archaeological sites guided by
archaeologists. This initiative is implemented under the aegis of the President
of the Republic of Bulgaria.
Policy on digitisation
After the accession of Bulgaria to
the European Union, a comprehensive and long term policy for the development of
the information society in Bulgaria and for digitisation in the field of
cultural heritage was set.
For more information, see
European Heritage Network: Country profile Bulgaria
Bulgaria/ 4.2 Recent policy issues
and debates
4.2.10 Gender equality and cultural
policies
Gender equality and culture is
mainly on the agenda of NGOs. For example, the Bulgarian Gender Research
Foundation is an independent NGO promoting social justice, gender equality and
human rights through research, education, legislative changes and advocacy. The
Open Society Foundation has a special Gender Programme which provided a total
USD 255 584 in support of various projects in 1999-2001. Some NGOs
deal specifically with the equal integration of women from the minority
cultural communities - especially Roma women - into the mainstream life of
Bulgarian society.
Bulgaria/ 4. Current issues in
cultural policy development and debate
4.3 Other relevant issues and
debates
The Red House Centre for Culture and
Debate, and various partners, organises on
a regular basis debates and discussions on different cultural policy issues
(national strategy for culture, culture in Bulgarian foreign policy, public
financing of culture, and Bulgarian culture in the EU etc.).
In connection with the Europalia
Bulgaria 2002 Festival in Brussels, the Red House Centre for Culture and Debate
and the team that organised the festival held a round table on "Europalia
- How the State Builds Its Images before the World".
Family of NGO's for Art and Culture (http://familia.cult.bg)
is an informal forum of Bulgarian art and cultural organisations, carrying out
awareness-raising and advocacy campaigns. Its main goal is to promote the role
of civil organisations as an active partner in the development of cultural
policies at local and national level. In 2006, it initiated a civic advocacy
campaign to encourage municipal funds for culture.
The Map of the Cultural Sector in
Bulgaria (http://map.cult.bg/site) is an online directory of cultural
organisations in Bulgaria, presenting thematic activities and featuring
multiple mapping visualisations and research-based case-studies; it aims to
showcase innovative managerial practices. Its English section aims to promote
cultural cooperation.
Bulgaria/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.1 Constitution
Texts from the Constitution of the
Republic of Bulgaria, which directly refer to the cultural field, are the
following:
Article 3. Bulgarian shall be the official language of the Republic.
Article 13
(1) The practicing of
any religion shall be free.
(2) The religious
institutions shall be separate from the state.
Article 18
(1) The state shall enjoy exclusive
ownership rights over the nether of the earth; the coastal beaches; the
national thoroughfares, as well as over waters, forests and parks of national
importance, and the natural and archaeological reserves established by law.
Article 23
The state shall establish conditions
conductive to the free development of science, education and the arts, and
shall assist that development. It shall organise the conservation of all
national monuments of history and culture.
Article 36
(1) The study and use of
the Bulgarian language shall be a right and an obligation of every Bulgarian
citizen.
(2) Citizens whose
mother tongue is not Bulgarian shall have the right to study their own language
alongside the compulsory study of the Bulgarian language.
Article 39
(1) Everyone shall be
entitled to express an opinion or to publicise it through words, written or
oral, sound or image, or in any other way.
(2) This right shall not
be used to the detriment of the rights and reputation of others, or for the
incitement of a forcible change of the constitutionally established order, the
perpetration of a crime, or the incitement of enmity or violence against
anyone.
Article 40
(1) The press and the
other mass information media shall be free and not be subjected to censorship.
(2) An injunction on, or
a confiscation of printed matter or another information medium shall be allowed
only through an act of the judicial authorities in the case of an encroachment
on public decency or incitement of a forcible change of the constitutionally
established order, the perpetration of a crime, or the incitement of violence
against anyone. An injunction suspension shall lose force if not followed by a
confiscation within 24 hours.
Article 54
(1) Everyone shall have
the right to avail himself of the national and universal human cultural values
and to develop his own culture in accordance with his ethnic
self-identification, which shall be recognised and guaranteed by the law.
(2) Artistic, scientific
and technological creativity shall be recognised and guaranteed by the law.
(3) The state shall
protect all inventors' rights, copyrights and related rights.
Bulgaria/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.2 Division of jurisdiction
The institutional and statutory
forms of organised action in the sphere of culture include: state cultural
organisations; municipal cultural organisations; private culture organisations
and mixed cultural organisations. The so-called cultural institutions within
the meaning of the Protection and Development of Culture Act, which are
state or municipal cultural organisations, are largest in number. Cultural
institutions are authorised to determine their own tasks and conduct subsidiary
activities, including business. They are publicly financed legal entities and
are wholly or partly financed by the Ministry of Culture, and by municipal
budgets on the basis of contracts on co-funding of activities in the sphere of
culture concluded between the Ministry of Culture and municipalities.
The so-called regional cultural
institutions constitute a specific case: they are incorporated, transformed and
dismantled by the Council of Ministers on the motion of the Minister of Culture,
after a co-ordinated decision with the Regional Governor of the Municipal
Council on whose territory they are located. Regional cultural institutions are
financed by contributions from the municipal budget on whose territory they are
located, target state subsidies, and contributions from the neighbouring
municipalities to which they provide services.
Municipal cultural institutions are
legal entities with an autonomous budget, which are incorporated, transformed
and terminated by a decision of the Municipal Council, in co-ordination with
the Minister of Culture. They are financed by the municipal budget.
Private cultural institutions are
incorporated, transformed and dissolved upon request by natural persons and /
or private legal entities according to the provisions of the Commercial Code,
the Persons and Family Act, or the Not-for-Profit Legal Entities Act in
force since the beginning of 2001. Private cultural institutions, as well as
NGOs, are treated equally with all other institutions and natural persons when
competing or bidding for projects and programmes in the sphere of culture,
cultural heritage and the arts.
Bulgaria/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.3 Allocation of public funds
In the Republic of Bulgaria, the
municipality is the main administrative territorial unit, of local
self-government. The Municipal Council is the main authority. Representatives
are elected from their respective constituencies for a period of 4 years.
At the end of 2002, first regulatory
steps were taken to normalise the financial decentralisation of public
services, to be carried out by the municipalities including cultural
activities. The main aim was to increase local income and a maximum level of
local autonomy as well as to define the character and content of municipal
services.
Upon Decree of the Council of
Ministers (No.°16/2003), all public services were divided into two groups:
2003 was the first year that this
division of labour was realised and is seen as a serious step forward to
strengthen local self-government and to overcome problems of the individual
municipalities.
In 2006, the Bulgarian government
developed the Decentralisation Strategy and the Programme for Implementation
of the Decentralisation Strategy 2006-2009 - an important document
aimed at raising the efficiency and quality of services delivered to the
citizens (see also http://www.namrb.org/?act=news&id=69).
Bulgaria/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.4 Social security frameworks
Social security for artists is
regulated by the Labour Code and the Ordinance on Social Security of
Persons who Practice a Liberal Profession and of the Bulgarian Citizens Working
Abroad (2000). Under these laws, artists practising a liberal profession
are treated equally with those who have registered companies as sole traders or
partners in commercial corporations under the Commercial Code. In all
three cases, artists have two options to pay:
Artists (just like all other
employees) who have signed a contract of employment (e.g. an artist employed by
an advertising agency) are subject to compulsory social security contributions
at the rate of 37% of their gross income to be paid by the employer (2% to be
paid by the employee). Another contribution is made to the Occupational
Training and Unemployment Fund. The rate is 4% (3% to be paid by the
employer and 1% to be paid by the employee).
Taking into consideration the unique
nature of the work performed by artists, an amendment was made to the Transitional
and Final Provisions of the Protection and Development of Culture Act which
now entitles artists who have worked for at least 4 of the past 12 months
(without entering into an employment relationship in artistic associations) to
obtain unemployment benefits.
For more information, see our Status
of Artists section.
Bulgaria/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.5 Tax laws
To encourage private persons and
companies to sponsor the development of the arts and culture, a tax deduction
is provided to resident and non-resident natural persons and legal entities.
This amounts to up to 10% for donations for cultural purposes, as well as for
conservation and restoration of historical and cultural monuments, or for
grants. The rate of tax deduction was increased from 5% to 10% under amendments
to the Corporate Income Tax Act adopted at the beginning of 2002.
There is a unified rate of VAT of
20% for everything in Bulgaria - including cultural goods and services.
According to a draft Bill on VAT, under preparation by the Ministry of
Finance, the levy of VAT on the tickets for concerts and performances may be
cancelled as of 2005. The same bill envisages a VAT exemption on activities carried
out by the Bulgarian National Radio, Bulgarian National Television and
Bulgarian News Agency and for which these institutions receive a subsidy from
the state.
There is a debate going on in the
National Assembly on a bill proposing some tax concessions which would support
Bulgarian culture.
Bulgaria/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.6 Labour laws
See chapter
5.1.4.
For more information, see our Status
of Artists section.
Bulgaria/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.7 Copyright provisions
The Copyright and Neighbouring
Rights Act, passed in 1993, protects a maximum range of copyright and
neighbouring rights. In 1995, the Parliament ratified the Rome Convention and
the Geneva Convention.
On 25 July 2002, the 39th National
Assembly passed an Act to amend the Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Act,
which brings Bulgarian legislation in line with its commitments to its
international agreements with the World Intellectual Property Organisation and
with the World Trade Organisation Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of
Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS).
Articles in Bulgaria's Copyright
and Neighbouring Rights Act supplement and adjust the legal framework to
include provisions on the fair use of works in the new Internet environment and
the introduction of new technologies. The purpose is to adjust copyright
protection to the new environment and harmonise certain aspects related to
regulations on the right to reproduce and distribute works via the Internet.
Legal protection is also provided to
database producers. Producers are granted special rights on the original
selection or arrangement of the database for a period of 15 years. Special
attention is also paid to organisations for collective copyright management.
They have been assigned an increasing role in guaranteeing the observance and
protection of copyright and neighbouring rights. Under Article 26
of the Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Act, royalties on recording for
personal use are payable to the organisations representing the different
categories of copyright holders under the Act. Such organisations are also
authorised to represent members in disputes of civil law.
According to the Ordinance
Establishing a Procedure and Terms for the Allocation of Funds from Fines
Collected under Article 97 of the Copyright and Neighbouring
Rights Act, adopted by the Council of Ministers in 2002, 50% of the money
collected are transferred to the bank account of the Culture National Fund, and
the remaining 50% to the Ministry of Culture budget. They are to be used for
copyright protection.
By the end of 2005, some very
important legislative acts, in the protection of the rights on intellectual
property, were initiated by the Ministry of Culture and passed by the
Parliament.
The Act to Amend and Supplement
the Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Act was adopted. Thus, the regulation
of two new directives of the European Union was incorporated into Bulgarian
legislation, namely:
The legislative changes also
regulate, and in much more detail, the procedures for the legal administrative
powers of those authorities within the Ministry of Culture, which are
responsible for monitoring compliance in this field. The new legislation also
increases the fines which are applicable for any violations.
Finally, the bill envisages some
amendments to the international and private law regulations, related to
Bulgaria's forthcoming membership of the EU, which will be become effective
when the EU Accession Treaty will come into force.
In September 2005, the Act on
Administrative Control on the Production and Trading of Optical Disks, Matrixes
and other Storage Media Containing Copies or Objectives of the Copy and
Neighbouring Rights was introduced. The law envisages clear and accurately
written orders and conditions for obtaining the respective registration or
licensing permission, as well as a very detailed mechanism for control,
prevention and sanctions, which guarantees conformity with the law, both in
execution, by the state bodies, of activities for the administration of these
regimes, and in implementation of the regulated business activates.
The project "Establishment of a
national network for cooperation and exchange of information related to the
protection of rights on intellectual and industrial property" was realised
under the PHARE Programme. The Project's main objective is to create an
informational system for the exchange of data needed for execution of control,
in the observance of the rights related to intellectual property.
Case law regarding copyright and
neighbouring rights is in the process of being established within the Bulgarian
Courts.
Bulgaria/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.8 Data protection laws
A Law on the Protection of
Personal Information (Official Gazette No.°1/2002) regularises the
protection of physical persons in the processing of personal data, as well as
concerning access to these data. The objective of the law is to guarantee the
inviolability of person and personal life, as well as to protect physical
persons from illegal processing of personal data and to regulate access to such
data. Under the provisions of this law, "personal data" is defined as
"information about the physical person, which reveals his physical,
mental, psychological, marital, economic, cultural or civil identity".
Bulgaria/ 5.1 General legislation
5.1.9 Language laws
See chapter
4.2.2.
Bulgaria/ 5.2 Legislation on culture
Table 5:
Overview of cultural legislation in Bulgaria
Title of Act |
Year
of adoption |
Amended
and supplemented |
1. Protection and
Development of Culture Act |
1999; Official
Gazette No. 50/01.06.1999 |
Official
Gazette No. 1/2000; Official
Gazette No. 34/2001 |
2. Copyright and
Neighbouring Rights Act |
1993 Official
Gazette No. 56/29.06.1993 |
Official
Gazette No. 63/1994; Official
Gazette No. 10/1998; Official
Gazette No. 28/2000; Official
Gazette No.107/2000; Official
Gazette No. 77/2002 Official
Gazette No.105/
2005 Official
Gazette No.30/
2006 |
3. National Chitalishte
Act |
1996 Official
Gazette No. 89/22.10. 1996 |
Official
Gazette No. 95/1997; Official
Gazette No. 90/1999 |
4. Compulsory Deposit of
Copies of Printed and Other Works Act |
2000 Official
Gazette No. 108/29.12.2000 |
- |
5. Act to Amend the Radio
and Television Act |
1998 Official
Gazette No. 138/1998 |
Official
Gazette No. 60/1999 Official
Gazette No. 81/1999 |
6. Film Industry Act |
2003 Official
Gazette No. 105/2003 |
|
7. Act on Administrative
Control on the Production and Trading in Optical Disks, Matrixes and other
Storage Media, Containing Copies or Objects of the Copy and Neighboring
Rights |
Official
Gazette No. 74
/2005 |
|
8. Maecenas Law |
|
2006 |
Bills |
In
progress |
|
1. Bill to Amend the
Protection and Development of Culture Act |
Currently
being drafted |
|
2. Monuments of Culture
Bill |
Considered
and in the process of being adopted by the Council of Ministers |
|
3. Bill to Amend the
National Chitalishte Act |
Considered
and in the process of being adopted by the Council of Ministers |
|
4. Theatre Bill |
Currently
being drafted |
The Law on Maecenas, adopted
in 2005, provides new opportunities for the funding of culture in Bulgaria.
Under the provisions of this law, the state supports and encourages the
Maecenas with tax relief, determined in special legislation- the Corporate
Income Tax Act and the Personal Income Tax Act. Under the terms and provisions
of the Law, the tax base is reduced to 15% in cases of grants. An annual
state award was established in order to stimulate this process, which will be
administered by the Minister of Culture.
Bulgaria/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.1 Visual and applied arts
There is no special law on visual
and / or applied arts in Bulgaria.
Bulgaria/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.2 Performing arts and music
A Theatre Bill is currently
being prepared which would recognise the multiple forms of theatre making up
the theatre network in Bulgaria. Under this proposed Bill, equal treatment is
to be given to all theatrical organisations when competing for project
funding. It also outlines the shared rights and responsibilities of the
state and local authorities in development of theatrical activities in
Bulgaria.
Bulgaria/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.3 Cultural heritage
The legislative framework of the
"cultural and historical heritage" sector is defined by two main
normative documents. The state cultural policy's main principles are fixed in
the Protection and Development of Culture Act, which is a common
normative act for the entire field of culture. The Law of Cultural Monuments
and Museums regularises the legal relations in the sector. Unfortunately it
is one of the most outdated regulations (since 1969) among the operative laws
in the country.
The draft of a Law to amend and
supplement this act is aimed at introducing the Council of Europe's Regulation
No°3911/92 regarding the export of cultural valuables. In the draft, a new
chapter has been created on the "Export and temporary export of movable
cultural monuments". The rules for granting export permission are defined
as such: while the export of movable cultural monuments which are of national
value is not allowed, except temporarily, with the permission of the Minister
of Culture and in a thoroughly limited number of cases. The reproduction of
cultural monuments in copies is regulated, and the definition of "exact copies"
and "copies for educational, representative or commercial use" is
given. At the same time, moves to establish the Inspectorate for cultural
heritage were made to bring the new regulations into practice. It is envisaged
that the Inspectorate will build a united information system for the management
of cultural monuments together with the Ministry of Interior and the Customs
Agency.
Cultural heritage laws are currently
being drafted. They are expected to provide concessions to private owners of
monuments or buildings on condition that the status of the respective item is
preserved. At present, all forms of public and private ownership in the
sphere of cultural heritage are possible. State property may be managed by
local and municipal structures, as well as by individual legal entities.
A new Bill on Cultural Monuments
and Museums of Culture is currently in the process of being adopted by the
Council of Ministers.
The regulation of an integrated
digital information system in the field of country governance is provided for
by Decree No. 36 of 14 February 2001 of the Council of Ministers.
In the field of cultural heritage
preservation, although no comprehensive programme exists for establishing
interactive information awareness, there are certain developments both in the
legislation and in the sphere of practice, namely:
Bulgaria/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.4 Literature and libraries
In 2000, a new law was adopted
regarding the obligatory depositing of copies of printed and other works. The
objective of the law is to ensure the collection and preservation of copies of:
printed works, works circulated / disseminated by sound recordings, cine-film
or electronic format stored by physical and juridical persons, dissertations
and research works qualifying for academic recognition. These can be works
protected within the country and / or produced by Bulgarian citizens
abroad. Orders, medals, badges and plaques, coins and bank-notes, post stamps
designed for usage in the country are also included in the law. It also regulates
the preservation of complete collections of works as part of the national
cultural heritage, ensuring public access to compulsory copies, as well as
preparation, publishing, and dissemination of bibliographic information.
The Copyright and Neighbouring
Rights Act defines public lending as "distribution of a work, which
means the sale, exchange, donation, rental or lending, import and export, as
well as the offer for sale or rental of any originals and copies of the
work".
Bulgaria/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.5 Architecture and environment
Matters related to the preservation
of the architectural heritage are addressed in the Law for Organisation of
the Territory and the Law of Cultural Monuments and Museums.
According to expert opinion, there are some inconsistencies between the
provisions in these two laws. The Law of Cultural Monuments and Museums
indicates which state bodies are authorised to implement the management and
supervision, investigation and protection of cultural monuments. However, the
division between their competences causes some problems in practice, for
example, one immovable cultural monument comprises of great number of movable
ones, which may be under the responsibility of a different administrative body.
In the majority of cases, the main problems are linked to insufficient funding.
However, the law does not envisage any stimuli, or relief for the private
owners of immovable cultural monuments. At the same time, it imposes upon them
the duty of maintaining the monument in good condition, assuring access to it
and a number of other responsibilities. Directly connected with the issue about
funding is also the question about ownership of different cultural monuments.
State property receives the majority, while little is left for others. At the
same time, there is a lack of specialised state bodies based in the regions,
which impedes badly needed site management. This creates some problems towards
the decentralisation of cultural heritage management and does not allow for
effective usage and potential of local authorities.
Bulgaria/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.6 Film, video and photography
The main change in the film sector
over the past ten years concerns the model of public financing. Funds are now
granted to individual film projects, and not to production structures. This
provides more equal chances for emerging independent producers who have to
compete with the previously monolithic production studios. The main objective
is to develop a film industry that is capable of gaining its own share of the
domestic market, to gradually meet all-European criteria and to integrate into
the European structures and markets for audio-visual products.
The Film Industry Act (2003)
regulates the distribution, promotion and exhibition of films throughout the
Republic of Bulgaria and defines state support for the film industry, thus
creating conditions for its development.
State policy priorities fixed in the
Film Industry Act (2003) are:
The National Film Centre is
an Executive Agency being established as an administrative unit of the Minister
of Culture. It is a legal body which is funded by the state budget and revenues
collected from its own activities. The Agency:
Consultative and expert bodies are
being established for the Agency as follows:
The State Budget Act provides
an annual subsidy to the Agency, the yearly amount of which should not be less
than the total of the average budget for the previous year, including: 5
feature films, 10 full-length documentaries and 120 minutes animation, as well
as membership fees to international organisations, funds and programmes, and
funds to maintain the Agency.
The State Budget Act also
stipulates that financial support for the production of Bulgarian films must
not be less than 30% of the average budget from the previous year for different
types of films and must not exceed 80% of the budget for new projects.
Financial support for participation
in European co-productions can be given up to a maximum of 10% of the
production costs, in cases when foreign co-producers have ensured financing for
the entire film.
The National Film Council proposes a
quota each year to support new Bulgarian films, amounting to no more than 10
percent of the total support for film production.
The Act provides detailed conditions
on the state support given to the exhibition and distribution of Bulgarian
films and films which have been co-produced with other European countries, or
countries with which the Republic of Bulgaria has signed agreements.
The Act also regulates the licensing
of film producers and cinemas.
Bulgaria/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.7 Culture industries
See information on the Film
Industry Act 2003 in chapter
5.3.6.
Bulgaria/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.8 Mass media
The Radio and Television Act
sets the following programming quotas: at least 50% of the total annual
programme time for European and Bulgarian programming, excluding newscasts,
sports shows, game shows on radio and TV, commercials and the radio and TV
market, when that is practically possible. Bulgarian National Television must
allocate at least 10% of the National Budget subsidies and Radio and Television
Fund subsidies for the production of Bulgarian TV films.
Blank tape levies are regulated by Article 26
of the Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Act. According to Article 26
(1), "any author of a work recorded on audio- or video-recording
media, any performer [...], as well as any producer of any such phonogrammes,
shall have the right to a compensatory royalty..." Paragraphs 2, 3 and 4
identify the payers, recipients and rates of royalties due under Paragraph 1.
Bulgaria/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.9 Legislation for self-employed
artists
Artists pay taxes under the Personal
Income Tax Act, which allows them to deduct 50% of their expenses from
taxable income received for the creation of works of art, science and culture,
folk arts and crafts, and copyright royalties. Furthermore, taking into account
the specificity of creative work, the legislation provides an opportunity for
income averaging derived from creative work undertaken in the course of more
than one year (e.g. the writing of a book), but not exceeding four years.
Artists thus avoid the progressive annual income tax.
For more information, see our Status
of Artists section.
Bulgaria/ 5.3 Sector specific
legislation
5.3.10 Other areas of relevant
legislation
Information is currently not
available.
Bulgaria/ 6. Financing of culture
6.1 Short overview
After a long period of steady
decline in public cultural expenditure, which fell to a post-1989 record low in
1996 and 1997 (which also saw a record low GDP and GDP share of cultural
expenditure), there was an upward trend starting in 1998. Cultural expenditure
did not, however, increase in real terms, and remained below the 1990 level
even in 2002. Nevertheless, the relative growth and structural reorientation of
support for creative projects has been of paramount importance. There was an
increase in cultural expenditure as a percentage of Bulgaria's consolidated
budget for the first time in 1998, when it almost recovered to the 1990 level
of 1.84%.
The GDP percentage of cultural
expenditure is a more significant indicator. Unfortunately, the 1990 level
(1.09% of GDP) has not been reached yet, but this is only logical given the
currency board arrangement and severe restrictions in the entire sphere of
public financing.
Nevertheless, the GDP percentage of
cultural expenditure has been tending to grow, albeit hesitantly. 1998 and 1999
this growth was significant - from 0.44% in 1996 to 0.78% in 1999, or by around
73%. Regrettably, in the past seven years - from 2000 to 2006 - the GDP
percentage of cultural expenditure has stabilised at around 0.7%.
In the past ten years, direct
cultural expenditure has remained below 1-1.2% of the total expenditure of
municipalities, due to their low budget revenues. Municipalities claim that
this is because they are not free to allocate local taxes and fees themselves,
and that chronic under-funding dooms them to default on their obligations.
The expenditure of households for
cultural goods and services are being calculated by the national statistics
under the grouping of "Leisure time, cultural recreation and
education" and cannot be separated. In the beginning of 2004, the National
Statistical Institute carried out a study of household budgets in 2003. The
results which are related to culture are given in the table below:
Table 6: Household
expenditure for leisure time, cultural recreation and education, in BGN,
1999-2006
|
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
Average per household |
119 |
124 |
124 |
141 |
162 |
174 |
193 |
210 |
Average per person |
43 |
45 |
46 |
53 |
62 |
68 |
76 |
84 |
Structure - % of all expenditures |
3.7 |
3.6 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
3.9 |
3.8 |
3.9 |
3.8 |
Source:
National Statistical Institute, 2006.
An example of positive change and of
"good practice" in cultural policy is the "Culture"
Programme set up by Sofia City municipality. The Programme will support
projects that will be selected by public tender with clearly stated priorities,
criteria and evaluation mechanisms. This is a sign of significant change in the
municipal authorities' attitude towards the financing of culture because it
opens up the possibility for support not only of traditional cultural
institutions (as at present), but also for authors and groups which do not
belong to these organisations. The non-government sector in the cultural
sphere, which is more flexible and creative, should at last get the chance to
develop its potential more adequately. Before the start of the programme, the
nongovernmental cultural institutions did not have any source of public
funding. Therefore, the cultural sector regards this initiative as a serious
investment, despite the modest annual budget of BGN 1 000 000
allocated to the programme for 2005 and 2006.
Bulgaria/ 6. Financing of culture
6.2 Public cultural expenditure per
capita
The figures in the table below are
calculated on the basis of annual NSI data, on the size of the population based
on births and deaths, and data from the last census conducted in March 2001.
Table 7:
Public cultural expenditure per capita, in USD, 1995-2005
Year |
Expenditure
per capita |
%
of GDP |
1995 |
9.69 |
0.6 |
1996 |
5.26 |
0.4 |
1997 |
5.63 |
0.4 |
1998 |
10.54 |
0.7 |
1999 |
11.88 |
0.8 |
2000 |
15.05 |
0.6 |
2001 |
16.86 |
0.7 |
2002 |
13.94 |
0.75 |
2003 |
16.65 |
0.66 |
2004 |
18.76 |
0.67 |
2005 |
22.32 |
0.74 |
2006 |
26.68 |
0.64 |
Source:
The only figures available for 2000 and 2001 are quoted by B. Tomova in
"Financing of the Arts:
Between the State and the Market,"
Economic Report on Culture Technological Park Project,
Sofia, 2001 (in Bulgarian).
Bulgaria/ 6. Financing of culture
6.3 Public cultural expenditure broken
down by level of government
Table 8:
Public cultural expenditure: by level of government, in BGN, 2005 (budget
figures)
Level of government |
Total |
%
share of total |
State (federal) |
198 889 553 |
65.49% |
Regional (provincial, Länder) |
n.a. |
n.a. |
Local (municipal) |
104 800 000 |
34.51% |
Total |
303 689 553 |
100% |
Source: Ministry of
Finance, National Budget Act; Ministry of Culture, Financial Department.
Note: Figures presented in Table 8
include all expenditures of the Ministry of Culture (subsidy from the state
budget plus income from own resources) and state subsidies for the BNR,
BNT, archives.
Expenditures on the central level
are allocated to: cultural institutions, the Ministry of Culture, Bulgarian
National Radio, Bulgarian National Television, territorial sections of the
General Archive Directorate, the Council of Ministers, investment expenditures
for social projects and programmes of the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy
and a subsidy for the Museum of Education from the Ministry of Education and
Science.
Table 9:
Public cultural expenditure: by level of government, in '000 BGN,
1998-2005 (budget figures)
Level of government |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
Central |
72 810.1 (47.96%) |
113 838.3 (63.68%) |
103 250 (67.36%) |
99 300 (50.7%) |
120 114 (56.9%) |
172 136 (74.67%) |
181 712 (79.47%) |
198 889.6 (65.49%) |
Regional |
7.2 (0.005%) |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a |
n.a. |
Municipal / local |
49 935.8 (32.89%) |
58 041.4 (32.47%) |
500 31.3 (32.64%) |
51 600 (26.3%) |
n.a. |
53 000 (25.33%) |
46 947 (20.53%) |
104 800 (35.51%) |
Extra budgetary allocation |
29 051.3 (19.14%) |
6 891.1 (3.85%) |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a |
n.a |
n.a. |
Total |
151 804.4 |
178 770.8 |
153 281.3 |
196 300 |
211 100 |
225 136 |
228 659 |
303 689.6 |
Source:
Ministry of Finance, National Budget Act (adopted on an annual basis)
As indicated in the Table above,
considerable changes in the public expenditures for culture can not be
expected, even if the amounts are nominally increasing, they still remain at a
constant percent of the GDP. After 1999, expenditures for culture per capita
remained relatively stable.A significant change, in the proportion distributed
between central and local level budgets, was noticed in 2005. It is too early
to say if this will turn into a lasting trend, nevertheless it is evidence of
efforts by the executive power to implement real decentralisation in the
culture financing system.
Bulgaria/ 6. Financing of culture
6.4 Sector breakdown
Table 10: State cultural
expenditure: by sector, in BGN, 2006 (budget figures)
Field
/ Domain / Sub-domain |
Direct
expenditure |
Transfers
to institutions |
Transfers |
Total |
%
of total |
Cultural Goods |
10 404 000 |
4 500 000 |
|
14 904 000 |
4.78 |
Cultural Heritage |
7 832 000 |
|
|
|
2.55 |
Historical
Monuments |
1 351 000 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
Museums
and Galleries |
6 481 000 |
100 000 |
|
|
2.11 |
Archives |
|
4 400 000 |
|
4 400 000 |
1.41 |
Libraries |
2 572 000 |
|
|
|
0.82 |
Arts |
45 796 000 |
|
|
45 796 000 |
14.65 |
Visual Arts (including design) |
|
|
|
|
|
Performing Arts |
45 796 000 |
|
|
45 796 000 |
14.65 |
Music |
22 986 000 |
|
|
22 986 000 |
7.35 |
Theatre
and Musical Theatre |
22 810 000 |
|
|
22 810 000 |
7.30 |
Multidisciplinary |
|
|
|
|
|
Media |
9 411 000 |
110 300 000 |
|
119 711 000 |
38.27 |
Books and Press |
2 553 000 |
|
|
2 553 000 |
0.83 |
Books |
2 553 000 |
|
|
2 553 000 |
0.83 |
Press |
- |
|
|
|
|
Audio, Audiovisual and Multimedia |
|
|
|
|
|
Cinema |
6 858 000 |
|
|
6 858 000 |
2.20 |
Radio |
|
38 100 000 |
|
38 100 000 |
12.18 |
Television |
|
72 200 000 |
|
72 200 000 |
23.06 |
Other |
26 043 000 |
11 200 000 |
95
400 000 |
132 643 000 |
42.38 |
Interdisciplinary |
|
10 600 000 |
95
400 000 |
106 000 000 |
33.86 |
Socio-cultural |
|
|
|
|
|
Cultural
Relations Abroad |
94 000 |
600 000 |
|
694 000 |
0.22 |
Administration |
10 659 000 |
|
|
10 659 000 |
3.40 |
Educational
Activities |
14 527 000 |
|
|
14 527 000 |
4.64 |
Not allocable by domain |
763 000 |
|
|
763 000 |
0.24 |
Total |
91 654 000* |
126 000 000 |
95
400 000 |
313 054 000 |
100 |
Source:
Ministry of Finance, National Budget Act 2003; Ministry of Culture, Financial
Department.
*
This figure includes 73 312 000 BGN budget subsidy, plus
14 842 000 BGN from the revenue of the
Ministry of Culture.
Bulgaria/ 7. Cultural institutions
and new partnerships
7.1 Re-allocation of public
responsibilities
As a result of the dominance of the
state, public cultural institutions have retained their leading role and main
responsibility for the development of culture in Bulgaria for years. At the
same time, by steadily cutting annual public spending on culture, the state
gradually relinquished its former "total" responsibility for culture,
thus jeopardising the very survival of some cultural institutions. In the past
few years, the state has given priority to the re-allocation of public
responsibilities to the local level, however, without changing the status of
public cultural institutions.
Given the absence of a specific
statutory framework and clear agenda of cultural reform, private enterprise
aimed at divestment and establishment of non-governmental for-profit (and
partly non-profit) organisations has been haphazard and confined to certain
spheres of culture only, foremost the media and cultural industries, where a
free market model of cultural products and services was partly established.
As regards the NGO sector, support
for culture came foremost from outside sources or partners - mainly from the
Open Society Foundation and various European Union programmes, such as Raphael,
Ariane and Kaleidoscope, as well as donations from numerous foreign funds and
foundations, as well as from expatriate Bulgarians.
Today there are new actors in
cultural policies who have diversified the notion of who is responsible for the
development of contemporary Bulgarian culture and who are changing the
hierarchy of public responsibilities in this area.
Bulgaria/ 7. Cultural institutions
and new partnerships
7.2 Status/role and development of
major cultural institutions
The national strategy towards
decentralisation is vested in the Protection and Development of Culture Act,
which has changed the status of cultural institutions in Bulgaria. The act
classifies cultural institutions as "state institutions of national
importance" (financed wholly and with priority by the Ministry of Culture
budget); "state institutions" (financed by the Ministry of Culture
and municipalities); "departmental institutions" (financed wholly or
partly by the respective department, when they are institutions of a government
department); "municipal institutions" (financed by the municipal
budget); "regional cultural institutions" (financed by the respective
municipality on whose territory they are located, by municipal contributions
and supplementary funds determined on an annual basis by the National Budget
Act).
Cultural NGOs come in many varieties
and may call themselves alliances, societies, associations, foundations, funds,
unions, committees, centres, festivals, academies, Chitalishte,
trustees, independent theatres, federations, institutes, etc. Depending on
their function, they are classified mainly as operational and community NGOs. A
new Not-for-Profit Legal Entities Act, regulating their incorporation
and activities, was adopted in 2000.
Bulgaria/ 7. Cultural institutions
and new partnerships
7.3 Emerging partnerships or
collaborations
Today the state's main partners in
cultural policy implementation are the municipal departments of culture and the
commissions on culture at the municipal councils (the local parliaments). The
latter have their own, local cultural calendar; approve and follow their own
cultural budgets; support municipal cultural institutions and contribute to the
financing of state cultural institutions, as agreed with the Ministry of
Culture.
There are many forms of co-operation
with NGOs: recruitment of NGO activists and experts to the standing and interim
commissions of municipal councils; inviting NGO representatives to share their
views on issues of regional and local relevance; assigning specific tasks to
NGOs and providing the necessary resources; organising joint events with joint
activities and responsibilities, etc.
The Ministry of Culture promotes
partnerships between the governmental and non-governmental sectors. Joint
financing, activities and projects between the Ministry and NGOs, as well as
sponsorship by for-profit NGOs, have become a common practice in many spheres.
A trilateral agreement on
partnership in the formulation, updating, and implementation of the national
cultural policy was concluded in the beginning of 2002 between the National
Assembly's Committee on Culture, the Ministry of Culture and the National Civic
Forum of Culture (an association of cultural NGOs).
The interest and desire of private
businesses to support the development of culture and arts in Bulgaria is
starting to gain speed. According to research carried out in 2000 by the Soros
Arts Centre, "Business support for culture and art in Bulgaria",
among 100 Bulgarian and foreign companies active in the Bulgarian marketplace,
the majority of them (65%) have been providing support in the most wide meaning
of organisation and / or events related to arts and culture. The most active
are banks and financial institutions, service companies - communications,
airlines, etc., distributors of foreign products, followed by industrial
companies. Companies are most interested in providing sponsorship to:
To the list should be added
festivals, which attract the interest of a comparatively larger audience as
well as number of sponsors. Attention should also be paid to the attitude of
many companies which prefer to provide funding for "saving" something
of particular national value and / or significant forms of art, events or
cultural-historical heritage. The Soros study shows that, in Bulgaria,
sponsorship is seldom part of the integrated marketing strategy of the majority
of companies. Funds for sponsorship, advertising and donations are allocated
from the total budget and a unified approach is applied to them. The perfect
scenario would be the establishment of long-term partnerships (as in the case
of support for the "Sofia Film Fest" from a bank). Support for such
projects is more common as they are apart from the public and market interests.
Bulgaria/ 8. Support to creativity
and participation
8.1 Direct and indirect support to
artists
See chapter
8.1.1.
Bulgaria/ 8.1 Direct and indirect
support to artists
8.1.1 Special artists funds
The National Culture Fund (NCF) was
established by the Protection and Development of Culture Act and began
operating in November 2000. Its main goal is to support the development of
culture in accordance with national cultural policies outlined in the state
programmes for the corresponding period and spelled out in the Protection
and Development of Culture Act.
The governing body of the NCF is a
Management Board whose chairman is the Minister of Culture. Members of the
Board are distinguished cultural figures, representatives of unions of artists
and a representative from each of the municipalities, the Ministry of Culture
and the Ministry of Finance.
Funding for creative projects is
allocated on the basis of open tenders / competitions which are prepared and
approved by the Management Board. Priority areas for support are formulated at
the beginning of each year. All cultural organisations can participate in these
competitions, including non-profit organisations and individuals. The
applicants submit their documentation according to a specific application
procedure. The applications are examined and evaluated by commissions of
experts from different sectors. The Management Board discusses the decisions
made by the commissions of experts and reaches a final decision for funding
winning projects. The competition results are announced on the website of the
Euro-Bulgarian Cultural Centre: http://www.eubcc.bg, and the winners are informed by
personal letters.
The new priorities of NCF foresee
its development as an independent organisation, which takes part in the
formulation of Bulgarian cultural policy. In order to achieve this goal, the
NCF has outlined the following activities which it plans to undertake:
In 2003, a programme for
international cultural exchange and mobility was launched. Within this
programme, the NCF distributes yearly around 43 000 BGN (22 000
euro), dedicated to travel expenses of artists and managers on a competition
basis.
During 2003, the NCF studied the
opportunity to increase its resources through new partnerships with different
types of organisations. The NCF, together with the Soros Centre for Cultural
Policies and the Swiss Cultural Programme in Bulgaria organised and held a
joint competition to support new projects proposed by the young and youngest
generation artists in the whole spectrum of contemporary arts, including
training. The goal of the competition was to encourage the development of new
trends in the field of contemporary art and culture, to stimulate the
production of a variety of cultural products, and to contribute to their
"popularisation" and international exchange.
The State Prize "Paisii
Hilendarski" was established by Article 19 of Protection
and Development of Culture Act. Since 2000, it has been awarded on a yearly
basis to one eminent Bulgarian artist (author or performer) whose work is of
importance, or related to Bulgarian history and tradition. The Prize is given
by the Prime Minister based on proposals put forward by the Minister of Culture
(who in turn receives proposals from all state authorities and non-government
cultural organisations).
Since 2003, the Ministry of Culture
awards the yearly prize "Golden Age" in honour of the 24th May - a
Day of Bulgarian Education and Culture and Slavic writing. The Prize - honorary
decoration and a sum of 3 000 BGN - is given by the Minister of Culture
for contributions to the development and popularisation of Bulgarian culture.
In 2003, the Prize was awarded to 30 Bulgarian artists from all areas of culture.
They are nominated by the artists unions and national art centres.
Indirect state support for artists
and creativity is provided via various laws with provisions recognising the
specificity of creative work: employment relations, social protection in case
of unemployment, income tax, donations for cultural activities, social
insurance, etc. Notably, all those laws are currently being revised for the
purpose of harmonisation with the acquis communitaire.
Bulgaria/ 8.1 Direct and indirect
support to artists
8.1.2 Grants, awards, scholarships
The important positive role of NGOs
in the transition period has become obvious in the past five years. Recent data
shows that there has been an increase of third sector support for cultural
projects.
Foundations offer three main forms
of support to artists including:
The Open Society Institute, Future
for Bulgaria Foundation, Ss Cyril and Methodius Foundation, the 13 Centuries
Bulgaria Fund, and since 2000, the National Culture Fund, together with the EU
Phare Programme, granted a total of more than USD 13.6 million for
cultural projects between 1996-2004.
Table 11: NGO
contributions to culture 1996-2005 (in USD)
Organisation |
1996-1998 |
1999-2001 |
2002-2004 |
2005 |
Total |
Open Society Culture Media Libraries Women's Program Roma Program Total -of which Soros Centre for the
Arts |
- - - - - 4 850 322 -2 412 628 |
1 982 129 666 111 625 468 - - 3 073 708 -1 311 157 |
646 563 305 000 - 224 000 398 000 1 867 773 -194 210 |
- - - - - - - |
9 791 803 (-3 917 995) |
Future for Bulgaria |
427 530
|
- |
- |
- |
427 530 |
Phare Programme |
1 605 000
|
- |
- |
- |
1 605 000 |
13 Centuries Bulgaria |
49 636
|
- |
- |
- |
49 636 |
National Culture Fund |
|
236 695 |
1 457 311 |
- |
1 694 006 |
Total |
6 932 488 |
3 310 403 |
3 325 084 |
- |
13 567 975 |
Swiss Cultural Programme in
Bulgaria (Pro Helvetia) |
|
100 000
CHF |
300 000
CHF |
530 000
CHF |
930 000
CHF |
Obviously, the major sponsor of
culture 1996-2004 was the Open Society Foundation. At the same time the
Foundation, through its Soros Centre for the Arts, developed specialised
programmes (on visual arts, theatre, music, literature, cultural heritage), as well
as a comprehensive database through which it provides consulting services to
Bulgarian and foreign artists and experts.
According to information provided by
the non-governmental organisation "Bulgarian Donor's Forum"
(established in 2003), various donors provided support for projects in the
cultural area in the amount of 300 000 BGN for the year 2004. These
include the Swiss Cultural Programme Pro Helvetia, the European Cultural
Foundation, business companies (ING Bank, Post Bank) and charity business networks
(Rotary Club). The majority of these grants were directed towards modern art,
followed by support for the exploration and preservation of the cultural and
historic heritage.
The number of companies that donate
to charity is low, but is growing - from 4% in 2003 to 6% in 2005. A research
on the "Bulgarian Donor's Forum" indicates that 60% of the donations
are from international institutions and foundations from USA, Germany, Japan,
European Union and about 20% from Bulgarian private companies. Bulgaria
receives about 20 million euro from foreign donor's capital annually. More
recently, there is a noticed reduction of international involvement and an
increase in funding coming from the Bulgarian state budget.
The ratio of state subsidies
delivered through the state budget (741 326 254 USD) to funds
provided by the third sector (13 567 975 USD) for support to cultural
projects between 1996 and 2004 is approximately 50:1, i.e. 2% of all funds
invested in cultural projects have been granted by NGOs. This ratio is common
to most European countries with well developed legislation, established
traditions, and a strong business community, where the volume of funds obtained
through sponsorship is between 1 and 6%.
Bulgaria/ 8.1 Direct and indirect
support to artists
8.1.3 Support to professional
artists associations or unions
Professional associations are
currently lobbying the Parliament for favourable social and labour legislation
for their respective professions, as well as for passage of specific
legislation facilitating the emergence of a market for works of art.
Artists association maintain social
funds offering members lump-sum aid or monthly supplements to recipients of
pensions below the poverty threshold. Members of professional associations are
entitled to discounts on goods and services from association-owned shops,
enterprises or recreation facilities.
Some associations negotiate
threshold rates of payment for certain professions with potential employers.
Only a few associations have a special fund for creative support which pays
part of the cost of creative activity and handles marketing.
Bulgaria/ 8.2 Cultural consumption
and participation
8.2.1 Trends and figures
A sociological survey on
"Public Opinion on Cultural Life, the Status of Artists and Cultural
Reform" conducted in 1997 found that an insignificant proportion of
Bulgaria's population (from 0.3% to 6% depending on the particular art form)
participate in the traditional forms of cultural life several times a month. If
we add the proportion of those who attend an art event once every few months,
we will get a relatively stable group of about 10% to 15% of the population
with comparatively active rates of participation in cultural life. Those who
never go to the cinema, theatre, opera, concert or art exhibition comprise
between 70% and 88% (depending on the particular art form) of the population.
The majority (56% of the population) own 100 to 500 books, 6% to 7% are active
book collectors, and 74% could not quote the name of the author or title of the
last book they bought.
During the last 10 years, the number
of young readers in Bulgaria increased by 15%, according to analysis of reading
habits carried out in November 2004 by the sociological agency
"ASSA-M" and commissioned by the Association "Bulgarian
Books" and the National Book Centre under the Ministry of Culture. This
study also indicated that 41% of the public do not read and had not purchased a
book in the previous three months. Of the reading public, only 41% purchased
books from bookshops and the remainder had received their books from friends.
In February 2005 the National Centre
for Research on Public Opinion carried out a study on "Cultural attitudes
and consumption of cultural products in Bulgaria". The study is
representative at national level and it was carried out by the method of
semi-standardised interviews. This is the first integral analysis for 15 years
which is devoted to national cultural preferences and values, to the frequency,
motivation and restraints in the demand for cultural products and services, as
well as the role of education in this process. The study demonstrated that the
main national leisure pursuit is watching TV - 57.4% of those interviewed. The
next preferences are book reading (8%), listening to music (6%), and in this
respect young people under 30 years of age are the leading group. Only 1.4% of
the population visits the theatre, movies, opera, ballet, or exhibitions on a
regular basis.
At the same time, 10.4% expressed an
interest in visiting the theatre, concerts, opera, ballet and exhibitions -
i.e. the difference between the real and the potential audience is 1:10. The
main reasons given by interviewees for not pursuing leisure activities of
personal interest to them were financial restrictions - 42%, lack of free time
- 16%, and tiredness at the end of the day - 14%. However, when interviewees
were asked for the reasons for not attending cultural events, the financial
restraints are rated only in third place (14%) i.e. the price of the tickets is
not the most important barrier. The reluctance to visit arts events is formed
at an earlier stage and is defined by arguments such as "people from my
social environment don't visit these places" - 32%, followed by "I
feel unprepared for this type of cultural entertainment" - 17%. Therefore,
the leading factor in low participation rates is more related to socio-cultural
factors, such as family, friends, and the environment.
The role of education at a young age
is a determining factor for development of the future consumer-connoisseur.
When analyzing the data from this study, the researcher Biljana Tomova draws
the following conclusion: "The observed reduction in demand for cultural
products and services over a period longer than a decade and the more and more
restricted access of households to various forms of cultural entertainment is
nowadays moving on to a completely new stage - one generation is lost for
Bulgarian culture."
There are no surveys monitoring the
participation of national minority groups or immigrant groups in cultural life.
Cultural participation in its
traditional forms is obviously declining. There are two main reasons for this:
economic hardship and a massive swing towards newer and more individualised
forms of dissemination of culture: TV, video, cable, satellite. This distinct
trend is associated with substantial changes not only in the frequency, but
also in the forms, standards, and criteria of cultural participation.
Table 12: Cultural
participation 1998 - 2006
Field / Year |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2002 |
2003 |
2005 |
2006 |
||||
Theatres |
|||||||||||
Number of theatres |
85 |
81 |
75 |
|
|
75 |
|
||||
Seats |
28 700 |
30 500 |
30 277 |
|
|
30 105 |
|
||||
Shows |
12 600 |
12 500 |
10 465 |
|
|
10 776 |
|
||||
Visits to theatres |
1 900 000 |
1 600 000 |
|
|
|
1 475 323 |
|
||||
Cinemas |
|||||||||||
Number of cinemas -in towns -in villages |
183 22 |
168 23 |
158 21 |
|
130 19 |
|
59 7 |
||||
Number of screenings -in towns -in villages |
100 074 99 633 441 |
84 314 84 080 234 |
103 876 103 488 388 |
|
136 422 136 145 277 |
|
157 247 157 154 93 |
||||
Visits -in towns -in villages |
3 204 000 3 189 000 15 000 |
1 923 000 1 909 000 14 000 |
1 860 484 |
|
3 530 595 3 508 000 2 595 |
|
2 580 000 2 578 000 2 000 |
||||
Ticket sales (million BGN) |
10 730.0 |
8 000 |
7 327 |
|
13 680 |
|
9 312 |
||||
Libraries and Chitalishte* |
|||||||||||
Field / Year |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2002 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
||||
Number of libraries -Library stock ('000 items) -books |
97 536
|
96 701
|
95 737
|
34 677
|
35 143
|
86 582
|
34 966
|
||||
Average loans per reader -books |
16 |
16 |
16 |
19 |
17 |
18 |
18.5 |
||||
Number of Chitalishte -in towns -in villages |
3 125 514 2 611 |
3 056 510 2 546 |
2 933 508 2 485 |
3 000 n.a. |
|
2 838 539 2 299 |
|
||||
Members (in '000) -in towns -in villages |
86 105 |
81 99 |
79 92 |
|
|
68 96 |
|
||||
Museums and galleries |
|||||||||||
Number |
230 |
224 |
220 |
220 |
|
229 |
|
||||
Visitors |
5 646 |
5 053 |
3 938 |
3 554.5 |
|
3 925.2 |
|
||||
-of which to art galleries |
1 685 |
1 503 |
880 |
590.6 |
|
395.6 |
|
||||
Film production |
|||||||||||
Field / Year |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2003 |
2006 |
||||||
Number of film produced |
32 |
88 |
79 |
86 |
125 |
||||||
Of which for television |
15 |
75 |
62 |
76 |
106 |
||||||
Full-length films |
6 |
8 |
13 |
12 |
23 |
||||||
Short- and medium-length films |
26 |
80 |
66 |
74 |
102 |
||||||
Television stations |
|||||||||||
Numbers |
31 |
32 |
86 |
98 |
102 |
||||||
Programmes-hours |
206 698 |
177 760 |
395 369 |
498 091 |
599 135 |
||||||
Radio stations |
|||||||||||
Numbers |
33 |
42 |
67 |
89 |
95 |
||||||
Programmes-hours |
354 664 |
392 055 |
493 376 |
525 511 |
591 834 |
||||||
Source:
Statistical Reference book 1999, 2001-2003, 2005, 2006; National Statistical
Institute, Bulgaria 2006.
*
Culture clubs.
**
From 2002 to 2004 and in 2006, the NSI covered libraries only stocking
more than 200 000 items.
***
Libraries stocking more than 2 000 items.
Note: From 2002, the NSI will
update data on theatres, cinemas and chitalishte on a five-year basis.
Table 13 and 14 provide data on
rates of participation in those areas of cultural life which do not receive
notable public subsidies, mainly the fields of book publishing and other
printed media.
Table 13: Published
books and brochures, 1998-2006
Year |
Titles
- Number |
Circulation
- thousands |
Average
circulation per book - thousands |
1998 |
4 863 |
11 873.9 |
2.4 |
2000 |
5 027 |
9 363.2 |
1.9 |
2001 |
4 984 |
6 567.1 |
1.3 |
2002 |
6 018 |
5 616.2 |
0.9 |
2003 |
5 511 |
4 483.5 |
0.8 |
2004 |
6 432 |
4 286.1 |
0.7 |
2005 |
6 029 |
3 917.1 |
0.6 |
2006 |
6
562 |
4 137.6 |
0.6 |
Source:
National Statistical Institute, "Bulgaria 2006", Sofia, 2006, http://www.nsi.bg
Table 14: Published
newspapers, magazines and bulletins, 1998-2006
Year |
Newspapers |
Magazines
and bulletins |
||||
Title
- copies |
Yearly
printing |
Titles
- copies |
Yearly
printing |
|||
Thousand
copies |
Per
capita - copies |
Thousand
copies |
Per
capita - copies |
|||
1998 |
644 |
428 430.3 |
51.9 |
639 |
14 121.3 |
1.7 |
2000 |
545 |
442 570.5 |
54.2 |
647 |
19 149.6 |
2.3 |
2001 |
465 |
375 244.2 |
47.2 |
678 |
16 999.4 |
2.1 |
2002 |
401 |
358 423.6 |
45.5 |
673 |
15 184.0 |
1.9 |
2003 |
386 |
297 687.7 |
38.1 |
661 |
17 034.3 |
2.2 |
2004 |
420 |
310 500.0 |
n.a. |
770 |
19 500.0 |
n.a. |
2005 |
386 |
297 687.7 |
n.a. |
746 |
13 665.2 |
n.a. |
2006 |
446 |
325 733.1 |
n.a. |
778 |
22 158.9 |
n.a. |
Source:
http://www.nsi.bg
Bulgaria/ 8.2 Cultural consumption
and participation
8.2.2 Policies and programmes
There is no explicit policy or
reference in government documents on culture linking participation in cultural
life to the broader issues of civic participation, citizenship, civil society
development / cohesion.
Special programmes or policy
initiatives to promote participation in cultural life are implemented mainly by
the Ministry of Culture through the national art centres. The latter subsidise
cultural programmes and creative projects promoting participation in cultural
life. The Ministry provides consistent, albeit limited financial support to
educational concerts, festivals, competitions, and amateur arts. Some cultural
institutions - theatres, opera houses, orchestras - offer discounts or free
shows for pensioners, students, and children.
Since 2000, the National Book Centre
has started granting active readers (pupils and students) book vouchers - in
total worth BGN 10 000 (approximately USD 6 000) - twice a year,
during the spring and autumn book fairs in Sofia. An individual active reader
could receive 10-50 USD per year.
The programme of the National Book
Centre, entitled "In aid of Libraries", was launched in 2004. Most of
the 7 thousand libraries in Bulgaria had not purchased any books in the
previous ten years because of the highly limited state subsidy. The programme
enables libraries to select the books they would like to acquire, but covers
only half of the cost necessary for their purchase - the other half they should
source themselves.
Bulgaria/ 8.3 Arts and cultural
education
8.3.1 Arts education
The responsibility for arts
education is shared between two ministries - the Ministry of Culture, which is
responsible for specialised arts secondary schools, and the Ministry of Science
and Education, which is responsible for the schools of general education and
their programmes in different arts sectors, as well as for higher level arts
education.
Two types of arts education
programmes are offered in Bulgaria: comprehensive arts education, which covers
arts courses from grades 1 to 12 in all schools, and specialised arts
education. The main orientation of comprehensive arts education programmes
throughout the past several decades was towards the classical forms of arts. A
contemporary concept of education in the arts and culture may begin to include
avant-garde arts, cultural heritage, design, culture of the urban environment,
photography and, audio-visual arts in the overall curriculum. To a great
extent, this concept has been enacted. There is an introductory course on
contemporary art forms provided in the compulsory programmes of fine arts and
music for 8 and 9 grades in the secondary general education schools.
Specialised arts education offers
continuous training in the arts at high-school (grades 8 to 12) and university
levels. Students from specialised arts schools and university students of music
and fine arts are studying web-design and computer technologies.
In Bulgaria, special attention is
paid to children who are gifted in the areas of science, art and sports.
Once-off financial aid, in the amount of three times the national minimum wage,
is granted to children who receive first, second or third place in
competitions, Olympiads or contests, in the area of arts, science and sports,
at municipality, national or international level. Incentives for gifted
children are also granted in the form of monthly scholarships, in the amount
equal to 50% of the minimum salary for the country. This grant may be applied
for by a child, parent (guardian), school director or social worker. Candidates
are evaluated by expert commissions, and the funds for this programme are
provided by the budget of the interested ministries for the relevant calendar
year. For 2005, the Ministry of Culture provided approximately 200 000 BGN
for 151 scholarships to gifted children (106 musicians and 45 artists) and for
28 one-off grants (11 musicians and 17 artists). In 2006, 154 scholarships were
provided.
As a country involved in the
building of the common European space for higher education, Bulgaria, from the
very beginning of the Bologna process, supports and fulfils all the decisions
adopted at the strategic progress levels. The objectives of the Bologna Process,
and the resolutions resulting from the Ministers' meetings in Prague, Berlin
and Bergen, are incorporated into national legislation. The autonomous high
schools incorporate the directions of the European common policy in their
organisation and in the substance of their activities (e.g. the stage structure
and the bi-cycle educational model have been implemented). In addition, the
functional structure of the systems for internal and external quality
evaluation is established; effective schemes for students' and lecturers'
mobility have been implemented; the common European instruments for the
provision of free competitiveness and maximum utilisation of academic students'
development has been adopted - i.e. the system for accumulation and transfer of
credits and the European diploma supplement.
Bulgaria/ 8.3 Arts and cultural
education
8.3.2 Intercultural education
Efforts to set up intercultural
education programmes in the system of secondary schools are the prerogative of
each individual educational institution. In 2005, the Ministry of Education and
Science (MES) set up a specialised department entitled "Intellectual
Development and Cultural Integration" under the Secondary Education
Directorate. This new Department, which has three sectors - "Cultural Integration",
"Religion" and "Talents" - is directly involved in
facilitating the integration of ethnic minorities in Bulgaria. The MES has also
set up a Consultancy Council on the education of ethnic minorities, as a
state-public body for consultation, cooperation and coordination between MES,
NCEDI (National Council on Ethnic and Demographic Issues within the Council of
Ministers), other ministries and institutions and NGOs, working in the field of
education. The objective of the Council is to support the formation and
implementation of a national policy related to the integration of pupils from
ethnic communities in Bulgaria, as well as the development of strategies and
specific measures for educational policy in this regard. Difficulties arising
for children from minority groups are addressed by the Bulgarian National
Programme for Child Protection, designed by the Department for
"Intellectual Development and Cultural Integration".
The Ministry of Education and
Science is organizing training courses for academic personnel covering
information about Roma history and culture, problem solving and management of
the class.
The creation of dictionaries,
grammar books and training materials on the history and culture of minorities
in Bulgaria commenced with the active support of NGOs and lecturers in the
field of minorities' history and culture. The Inter-ethnic Initiative for Human
Rights Foundation has prepared materials for pupils, from first up to eleventh
grade, in the form of 11 addendums to the text books in language, literature,
history and music, with information about the Roma history and culture, as well
as 5 methodical instruction manuals for the teachers in the respective
subjects. The publications were endorsed by the Ministry of Education and
Science and have become regularly used training manuals. The Foundation has
trained teachers from 35 schools, to work with these manuals, and has
implemented a pilot project for their approbation in schools where Bulgarian
and Roma children study.
The Human Rights Foundation has also
initiated the creation of an educational programme for intercultural
understanding, entitled the "Development of Intercultural
Experience", intended for work with younger pupils. It is a training
programme to promote understanding through shared children's experience,
through intercultural dialogue in the class and through defense of mutual
rights. It is intended for work in classes and groups, regardless of their
ethnic composition and it is easy adaptable to different ethno-cultural environments.
The Balkan Foundation, Diversity,
publishes trainee manuals for studying the Roma language, as well as pedagogic
manuals to assist the teachers who work in the Bulgarian language, but who also
teach children from Roma and Turkish ethnic communities. Diversity
is also organizing annual international seminars on ethno-linguistics, directed
mainly to explore the linguistic problems of the Roma and Turkish children when
studying the Bulgarian language.
The Public Council on Cultural
Diversity, within the Ministry of Culture, has been operating since 2002.
International student exchanges are being organised in art schools, which are
under the management of the Ministry of Culture, e.g. since 1989, an exchange
programme has been organised between the students from the National School of
Fine Arts "Ilia Petrov", in Sofia, and the students of art and design
from the City College, in Bath, England. Participants on the programme have
meetings in Bulgaria and England, have become acquainted with the local
cultures and traditions and, in parallel, are working on common projects.
Results from their creative activities are being shown in exhibitions organised
in the town of Bath and at the British Council in Sofia.
Regional Councils on Ethnic and
Demographic issues are functioning under the regional administrations (28 in
number) and are working on programmes approved by these authorities. The
Councils involve experts from the regional administrations, mayors of
municipalities, representatives of the territorial units of the central
executives, and public minorities' organisations working in the respective
regions. Such experts are nominated in almost half of the 263 Bulgarian
municipalities.
Citizenship Education
The year 2005 was proclaimed
by the Council of Europe as The European Year of Citizenship through
Education. The Bulgarian government was one of the initiators and most
active participants of this programme. Representatives of key institutions and
NGOs were involved in the implementation of the National Programme for the
"Year", and the leader in the process was the Ministry of Education
and Science.
The European Year of Citizenship
through Education took place in the context of the 50th anniversary of the
European Cultural Convention. For more information see: http://www.citizenship-bg.org/en/index.html.
One of the main questions addressed was: How can education on democracy
contribute to solving societal problems and promote social cohesion?
Examples of actions undertaken
within the elaborated National Programme on the "Year of Citizenship"
are:
During the Year, a special Education
Pack was developed for training teachers and introducing the topics about
citizenship education throughout schools in Bulgaria.
Special training, workshops and
summer academies took place, in 2005, focusing on tolerance and intercultural
communication.
For more information, see our Intercultural Dialogue section.
Bulgaria/ 8.4 Amateur arts, cultural
associations and community centres
8.4.1 Amateur arts
Amateur arts are supported foremost
by municipalities and partly by the Ministry of Culture and by sponsors -
foundations and members of the public. The number of local cultural festivals
of amateur arts is increasing.
Amateur arts in Bulgaria have been
associated with the Chitalishte (culture clubs) ever since their
genesis. There has been a drastic slump in the number of amateur art companies,
performers and viewers (especially since 1990). The past three or four years
have seen the beginning of stabilisation within the system, which is evidenced by
the growing number of amateur art events: festivals, competitions, traditional
feasts. The majority of those events are devoted to folk arts and crafts and
authentic folklore.
Bulgaria/ 8.4 Amateur arts, cultural
associations and community centres
8.4.2 Cultural houses and community
cultural clubs
Chitalishte are important community culture clubs.
The UNDP Project BUL/00/002,
Community Development and Participation through the Chitalishte Network
2001-2004, is among the most important grant schemes to develop the Chitalishte-infrastructure
in Bulgaria. By building on the Chitalishte's existing network, the
project envisaged an expanded and sustainable role for the Chitalishte.
By building on its traditional strength, the potential exists for increasing grass-roots
participation and local development. Some of the strategies for improving the
capacity of the Bulgarian Chitalishte include ICT grants for "model
projects which demonstrate good practice" and public awareness
initiatives.
Bulgaria/ 9. Sources and Links
9.1 Key documents on cultural policy
Institute of Culturology: Bulgarian
Cultural Policy 1990-1995. Sofia, 1997.
Markov, Emil; Kassabov, Ivan: Statutory
Options of Financing Culture. Legal Report on the Culture Technological
Park Project under the Policies for Culture Programme (in Bulgarian).
Materials from a seminar on Decentralisation: Investing
in the Culture of Regions. held in Bistritsa from January 18 to 20, 2001
under the Policies for Culture Programme (in Bulgarian).
Ministry of Culture: Cultural
Policy 1996-1999. Sofia, 2000 (in Bulgarian).
National Statistical
Institute: Statistical Yearbook 2000; Statistical Yearbook 2001;
Statistical Yearbook 2002, Statistical Yearbook 2003, Statistical Yearbook
2004, Statistical Yearbook 2005. Sofia: National Statistical Institute,
2000 to 2006.
Tomova, Bilyana: Financing
of the Arts / Culture in Bulgaria: Between the State and the Market. Economic
Report on the Culture Technological Park Project under the Policies for Culture
Programme (in Bulgarian).
ECF / Boekman Stichting: Arts,
Politics and Change. Amsterdam, 2005 / Bulgarian. Translation Изкуство,
политика,
промяна, ed. Sema-RS, Sofia
2005
Ivan Tchalakov, Vladya Borisova,
Donka Keskinova, Georgy Damyanov, Rossitza Arkova, Tsveta Andreeva, Jordan
Kalchev, Todor Todorov: Economic Contribution of Copyright and related
rights-based Industries to the Bulgarian Economy. With the methodological
support of the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), Sofia 2007 (in
Bulgarian. English version will be published by WIPO by the end of 2007).
Arch. Uliana Maleeva, Arch. Hristina
Staneva: HEREIN - European Heritage Network NATIONAL HERITAGE POLICY
. BULGARIAN REPORT, UPDATED 2007, (in English and in Bulgarian), Sofia
2007. See also http://www.european-heritage.net/sdx/herein/
Bulgaria/ 9. Sources and Links
9.2 Key organisations and portals
Cultural policy making bodies
Ministry of Culture
http://www.mc.government.bg
National Council for Co-operation on
Ethnic and Demographic Issues
http://www.ncedi.government.bg
Professional associations
Union of Bulgarian Artists
http://www.sbhart.com
Union of Bulgarian Composers
http://www.ubc-bg.com
Union of Bulgarian Musicians and
Dancers
http://www.ubmd.org
Union of the Architects in Bulgaria
http://www.stroitelstvo.bg
Grant-giving bodies
Goethe Institute - Sofia
http://www.goethe.de/sofia
Art Production Fund
http://www.artproductionfund.org
"Values" Foundation
http://www.values.bg
Apollonia Art Foundation
http://www.apollonia.dir.bg
Concept for Theatre Foundation
http://www.magstudio.net/c4theatre/
Future for Bulgaria Foundation
http://www.fbf.bg
National Culture Fund
http://www.eubcc.bg
Open Society Foundation
http://www.osf.bg
Resource Centre Foundation
http://www.ngorc.net
Swiss Cultural Program in Bulgaria
http://www.pro-helvetia.bg
Next Page Foundation
http://www.npage.org/en
Krug Circle
http://www.krug-bg.org
New Culture Foundation
http://novakultura.org/
Art in Action
http://artinaction.cult.bg/
Cultural research and statistics
Bulgarian Gender Research
Foundation
http://www.bgrf.org
International Centre for Minority
Studies and Intercultural Relations
http://www.imir-bg.org
Centre for Advanced Study
http://www.cas.bg
Internet portal for Cultural Policy
Studies
http://www.culturalpolicy.dir.bg
Culture / arts portals
Cult BG
http://www.cult.bg/
Democratic Review. A journal
published by the Citizen Foundation
http://www.dem-pr.hit.bg
Euro-Bulgarian Cultural Centre
http://www.eubcc.bg
Family of NGO in Arts and Culture
http://familia.ngos.cult.bg
Kultura a weekly for arts, culture
and non-fiction published by the Kultura Space Foundation
http://www.online.bg/kultura/
National Civil Forum for
Culture
http://slovo.bg/ngfk/
Institute for Contemporary Art
http://www.ica.cult.bg/
The Red House - Centre for Culture
and Debate
http://www.redhouse-sofia.org
The
Council of Europe/ERICarts "Compendium of Cultural Policies and Trends in
Europe, 9th edition", 2008