Decision of the Constitutional
Court of the
U.br. 36/98 of 25.11.1998
Headnotes:
The right of the
inhabitants belong to nationality, residents of the
The official court activities
(deliverance of invitation and other writings) can not be pursued by using language
other than the official one.
Summary:
The applicant considers that besides the
Macedonian language, the Law on criminal procedure introduces nationalities'
language in official use within the criminal procedure, which is not in
compliance with Art.7.2. and Art.7.3. of the Constitution according to which the languages of the
nationalities can be officially used only in local self-government units (under
certain conditions) and not within state bodies, such the courts are.
Pursuant to disputed provisions,
inhabitants belonging to nationality, residents of the
One of the minimum right of the accused
in the proceedings is the right of free translator in case when he/she does not
understand or speak the language of the court (Art.6.3.g. from the ECHR). The
principle of fair trial is an essential and legitimate condition required for
human rights protection. The use of language in criminal
procedure need not to be observed only in relation with the question of its
official use, but within the framework of position in the proceedings, not only
of the accused, but also of the other parties. Therefore, bringing the
right of use of the own language and the right of free translator in connection
with the citizenship and nationality affiliation, and not with ignorance of the
language used by the court, constitutes standard of higher range in the
protection of human rights in the criminal procedure. This enables the
individual to use its language which naturally understands and speaks more
authentically.
The extension of this right to other
parties in the procedure (including foreigners), also contributes the principle
of fair trial and it is higher standard in the protection of position of all
parties in the procedure, not only of the accused.
Court obligation to deliver the
invitation and other writings also by using the language of the nationality
that the party belongs to (beside the Macedonian language), does not constitute
right of the individual towards its position in the criminal procedure aiming
to ensure fair trial, but it introduces duties for the court to use language
other than the official one, which is not in conformity with Art.7.1. of the Constitution according to which official language in
the